0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views5 pages

Workplace Sexual Harassment Case Study

This case study details the experiences of a woman who faced sexual harassment at her workplace, Khan Construction Company, after struggling with a history of domestic violence and financial hardship. Despite enduring the harassment, which severely impacted her mental health, she chose to take legal action against the company instead of accepting a settlement that required her to deny wrongdoing. Ultimately, she achieved justice, leading to the arrest of the supervisor and a significant fine for the company.

Uploaded by

Sonu Malik
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views5 pages

Workplace Sexual Harassment Case Study

This case study details the experiences of a woman who faced sexual harassment at her workplace, Khan Construction Company, after struggling with a history of domestic violence and financial hardship. Despite enduring the harassment, which severely impacted her mental health, she chose to take legal action against the company instead of accepting a settlement that required her to deny wrongdoing. Ultimately, she achieved justice, leading to the arrest of the supervisor and a significant fine for the company.

Uploaded by

Sonu Malik
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Name: Bakhtawar Malik 25265

Meesha Tahir 22703


Hifsa Amjad 22459
Subject: Business Ethics in Islam
Submitted to: Mam Asma Gull
Case Study:
Sexual harassment includes unwelcome sexual advances or requests for sexual favors and
comments, jokes, acts, or other verbal or physical conduct that is of a sexual nature or directed at
employees based on their sex. Despite the significant changes brought about by the #Me-too
movement over the past two years, harassment in the workplace is still a common-- and ugly--
problem. From unwelcome and offensive comments to unwanted physical advances and requests
for sexual favors, the #1 most common form of workplace harassment is familiar to us all. Still,
despite the visibility and empowerment of the #Me-too movement, many employees are
unwilling to report sexual harassment in the workplace.

This case study is about one of my neighbor who was the victim of the sexual harassment at the
workplace. The woman had a history of experiencing domestic violence and had suffered
psychological harm as a result, she had the sole financial responsibility for her children, her
financial state was so poor, and she needed the job badly. After giving many interviews, she got
the call from khan Construction Company. She didn’t give its second thought and started
working in a KHAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. The company makes houses, buildings in
many societies of Pakistan. The salary was quite good for my neighbor so she immediately took
that opportunity.

The first week of her job went quite good, nothing unethical happened. After the second week,
she undertook the training program alongside male workers and male supervisor. She noticed the
impudent behavior from male supervisor. First she ignored but then he started doing this
impudent behavior on regular basis. She felt very uncomfortable but not only this, he started
doing calls and text messages to her. The messages repeatedly stated that he likes her and made
unwanted expressions of his feelings and made excessive and bad compliments about her
appearance. Moreover he started telling lewd jokes to her and also made sexual comments about
her in front of all the male workers.

My neighbor was diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder and Mixed Anxiety and Depressed
Moods, arising as a consequence of the workplace sexual harassment. She also had a history of
experiencing domestic violence and had suffered psychological harm as a result; she had the sole
financial responsibility for her children. Her children were also affected because of all this. The
only reason the woman tolerated the lewd and disgusting behavior was because of her financial
position. Every day she worked she knew she would be humiliated and demeaned sexually by the
man, and it resulted in a diagnosed disorder causing her to be unable to work.

My neighbor decided to take a legal action against the company. She sues the company, and
during settlement discussions she is offered an extremely large monetary settlement. In the
agreement, the woman is required to confirm that the executive did nothing wrong, and after the
agreement is signed the woman is prohibited from discussing anything about the incident
publicly. Before the date scheduled to sign the settlement agreement, the woman's lawyer
mentions that she has heard the executive has done this before, and the settlement amount is very
large because the company probably had a legal obligation to dismiss the supervisor previously.
The company however wants to keep the supervisor because he is a big money maker for the
company. But my neighbor denied the settlement and she started fighting for her right. After
many problems she finally got justice and the supervisor was arrested, also the company was
fined a large amount.

QUESTIONS:
Q: 1 How sexual harassment affected the mental health of Women?
My neighbor was diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder and Mixed Anxiety and Depressed
Moods, arising as a consequence of the workplace sexual harassment. She also had a history of
experiencing domestic violence and had suffered psychological harm as a result; she had the sole
financial responsibility for her children. Her children were also affected because of all this.
Every day she worked she knew she would be humiliated and demeaned sexually by the man,
and it resulted in a diagnosed disorder causing her to be unable to work.
Q: 2 how women handled the settlement offered by Khan Construction Company?
She sues the company, and during settlement discussions she is offered an extremely large
monetary settlement. In the agreement, the woman is required to confirm that the executive did
nothing wrong, and after the agreement is signed the woman is prohibited from discussing
anything about the incident publicly. But my neighbor denied the settlement and she started
fighting for her right.
Q: 3 what happens if there is no evidence to a claim of sexual harassment?
Even if there are no witnesses, the organization should conduct an investigation and talk to the
people involved. In some cases, a finding of harassment may be based solely on the credibility of
the complainant's allegation.
Q: 4 how can you prevent sexual harassment at workplace?
Peruse and comprehend your association's Sexual Harassment Policy.
Get what conduct comprises lewd behavior.
Direct continuous schooling for your workers concerning what is lewd behavior and ensures that
they comprehend the lewd behavior strategy and how to report lewd behavior.
Screen the lead and climate of the working environment.
Support remarks in regards to the workplace, including issues with respect to inappropriate
behavior.
Tell your representatives that you won't endure lewd behavior at the work environment and show
your responsibility "to zero-resistance" by making a quick move, when fitting.
Post the lewd behavior strategy in an unmistakable spot and circulate the approach to all
representatives and propose examining in a workforce gathering.
Be both impartial and objective during an examination of an occurrence.
During the examination of a grievance and conceivable resulting discipline of the harasser,
colleagues might feel irate or compromised by the complainant and their allies. Stop bits of
gossip and hostile activities by associates quickly assuming an occurrence happens. It is critical
to exhibit that this kind of action won't go on without serious consequences.
Assuming strain between colleagues is an issue, consider having a studio in group building or
Correspondence (not, be that as it may, about a specific occurrence!)

SUMMARY
This case study is about a woman who was the victim of sexual harassment at workplace. She
also had a history of domestic violence and responsibility of her children. Her financial status
was poor. She was finding difficulty in getting job. After many hardships, she got a job. She got
a job in a KHAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. The company makes houses in different
societies of Pakistan.

The problem started when she took training program along male supervisor and workers. The
supervisor started showing impudent behavior to her. He started stating sexual comments on her.
Her mental health and children got affected because of this. She was diagnosed with adjustment
disorder, depression and anxiety. She tolerated the impudent behavior of supervisor because of
her financial position.

When her tolerance reached the limit, she took legal action against the company and she sues the
company. In a response company offered her a large monetary settlement. But she denied it. She
started fighting for justice again and she got justice. As a result supervisor was arrested and the
company was fined a large amount.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Failure to address workplace sexual harassment may lead to legal actions, such as the lawsuit faced by Khan Construction Company. Moreover, it can result in financial penalties, as the company was fined significantly. Additionally, allowing harassment can cause psychological trauma to victims, impacting their work performance and personal lives .

The #MeToo movement has increased awareness and empowerment around reporting workplace sexual harassment. However, despite heightened visibility, many employees remain reluctant to report harassment due to fear of retaliation or disbelief, as illustrated by the hesitancy of the woman in the case study to report initially .

The ethical dilemma arises when a company must choose between retaining a high-performing employee accused of harassment and upholding ethical standards. In the case, Khan Construction Company chose to keep the supervisor for financial reasons despite his misconduct, reflecting a potential compromise of ethical values for profit .

Companies can prevent sexual harassment by ensuring employees understand what constitutes harassment and how to report it. Regular education and a strong, clearly communicated zero-tolerance policy, supported by immediate action against harassment, are crucial. Policies should be visible and discussed in workforce meetings to foster a culture where harassment is not tolerated .

The outcome demonstrates that justice can prevail over financial settlements, influencing future harassment cases by inspiring victims to pursue legal action. It also serves as a warning to companies about the financial and reputational risks of ignoring harassment, potentially encouraging systemic changes towards better handling of such complaints .

Previous experiences of domestic violence can make individuals more vulnerable to workplace harassment by affecting their mental resilience. In this case, the woman's history of violence contributed to her psychological distress when faced with workplace harassment, impacting her decision-making and ability to seek help initially .

The woman's decision to reject a large monetary settlement in favor of pursuing justice highlights her ethical stance. Accepting the settlement would have required her to confirm no wrongdoing by the executive, which she chose not to support, opting instead to fight for what she believed was right despite the financial incentive to remain silent .

The woman diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder and Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Moods due to workplace sexual harassment experienced significant negative psychological impacts. Her condition was exacerbated by her history of domestic violence and her financial stress as the sole provider for her children. The mental health effects were severe enough to impair her ability to work .

Financial hardship can significantly influence harassment victims in legal decisions, as seen in the case where the woman's poor financial state initially led her to tolerate harassment. Ultimately, she chose to pursue legal action despite the financial allure of a settlement, prioritizing justice over immediate financial relief .

Offering a large settlement can be perceived as an attempt to silence victims rather than address the issue, potentially damaging a company’s ethical reputation. This can lead to public suspicion that such settlements are more about protecting the company and its interests rather than taking responsibility for the misconduct .

You might also like