Fei-Ranis Model of Economic Development
Uploaded by
Ashib Uddin Emo- Fei-Ranis (FR) Model of Dual Economy
- Stages and Implementation of the Model
- Criticism
Common questions
Powered by AICritics of the Fei-Ranis model have noted several key issues. Firstly, the assumption of zero Marginal Productivity of Labor (MPL) in Phase I is disputed, as empirical data suggests MPL may not be zero, particularly during peak agricultural seasons like sowing and harvesting. Economists such as Jorgenson argue that MPL is an empirical issue rather than a theoretical constant. Additionally, the model's reliance on a closed economy framework ignores the role of foreign trade, which can alter terms of trade and agricultural competitiveness. Critics also point out that the model underestimates the role of capital and technological advancement, as seen in the Green Revolution, in agricultural productivity. Lastly, the model does not account for potential inflationary pressures that may arise from labor reallocation or limited land supply increases .
The Fei-Ranis model outlines three key stages of economic growth in a dual economy. Phase I involves a surplus labor situation in agriculture where the Marginal Productivity of Labor (MPL) is zero, allowing labor to be transferred to the industrial sector without affecting agricultural output. Phase II begins when MPL is greater than zero but less than institutional wages, indicating some disguised unemployment remains, and these workers can be shifted to industry. Phase III is marked by MPL exceeding institutional wages, signifying the end of disguised unemployment and the start of self-sustained growth, where the agricultural sector becomes commercialized and competes with the industrial sector for labor. This process illustrates the transition from a stagnant to a self-sustaining economy by ensuring labor utilization and balanced sectoral growth .
In the Fei-Ranis model, 'disguised unemployment' refers to a situation where more people are employed in the agricultural sector than necessary, with their marginal productivity effectively zero. This allows labor to be moved to the industrial sector without affecting overall agricultural output. The model suggests that transferring such surplus labor to industry can lead to increased productivity there, as the industrial sector tends to have higher marginal productivity. In Phase I, the labor surplus (disguised unemployment) is transferred to the industrial sector at fixed institutional wages. This transfer gradually reduces disguised unemployment as the agricultural sector becomes more efficient and enters a phase of self-sustained growth, effectively utilizing total labor capacity .
The Fei-Ranis model assumes a closed economy framework, which does not fit today's globalized economies where foreign trade plays a crucial role. It also posits a constant supply of land and ignores technological advances and capital formation in agriculture, overlooking phenomena like the Green Revolution that have transformed agricultural productivity. Furthermore, the model does not fully integrate the complexities of urban-rural migration such as transport costs and infrastructural investment required for labor transfer. These assumptions make the model less applicable to current developing economies where factors like open trade, technological progress, and infrastructural challenges significantly influence economic development dynamics .
The dual economy in the Fei-Ranis model is characterized by a stagnant agricultural sector and a dynamic industrial sector. This setup leads to a perfectly elastic labor supply curve initially, reflecting an unlimited supply of labor at constant wages from agriculture to industry. As labor moves from agriculture, industrial wages remain low and constant (institutional wages) due to excess labor from agriculture. With economic growth, particularly in Phase II, the elasticity of the labor supply reduces as agricultural productivity improves and labor supply diminishes, leading to an increase in real wages in the industrial sector. Thus, the dual nature influences wage equilibrium and labor allocation between sectors, driving the economy towards self-sustained growth by eventually equalizing MPL and institutional wages .
The transition of labor from agriculture to industry, as described in the Fei-Ranis model, can have several economic repercussions. Initially, agriculture is seen as having surplus labor, allowing for its transfer without reducing agricultural output. As this transition progresses, the industrial sector experiences an increase in productivity due to the reduced labor cost, initially benefiting from the constant institutional wage. Over time, as labor in agriculture becomes scarce, this can increase food prices, leading to inflationary pressures in the economy. As the industrial sector expands, it may face increased wage demands, reducing profitability. The model's focus on balanced growth aims to mitigate these issues by ensuring simultaneous sectoral development to maintain economic stability and growth .
The Fei-Ranis (FR) model improves upon the Lewis model by emphasizing the significance of agricultural sector growth alongside industrial growth. While Lewis's model focused primarily on labor transfer from agriculture to industry under the assumption of surplus labor, it did not adequately address the agricultural sector's role in supporting industrial expansion. The FR model presents a detailed process in which increased productivity in agriculture can stimulate industrial growth through three stages of economic development. This model shows how agriculture supplies labor to industry without reducing agricultural output, advocates for a balanced growth between agriculture and industry, and underscores the need for both sectors to grow concurrently for sustainable economic development .
The Fei-Ranis model suggests that the agricultural sector contributes to industrial growth primarily through labor transfer and capital generation. As agriculture improves in productivity through technological advances and better farming practices, it can sustain its output while releasing surplus labor to the industrial sector. Additionally, increased agricultural productivity generates surplus output, part of which can be redirected into industry as investment capital. As the industrial sector expands and absorbs agricultural labor, it stimulates further increases in agricultural productivity by creating a demand for agricultural inputs, driving a cycle of growth between the two sectors .
The Fei-Ranis model considers high population growth as a significant factor leading to mass unemployment and surplus labor in the agricultural sector. For the model to effectively transition towards industrialization and self-sustained growth, the rate of labor transfer from agriculture to industry must exceed the rate of population growth. This ensures that the increment in the industrial workforce is adequate to absorb the surplus agricultural labor and mitigate issues related to disguised unemployment. Thus, addressing population growth is crucial for maintaining the delicate balance between labor supply and demand, affecting the model's overall feasibility and success in achieving economic development .
The Fei-Ranis model emphasizes the interdependence between agriculture and industry by suggesting that increased agricultural productivity is crucial for industrial growth. The model advocates for a 'Balanced Growth' approach, meaning simultaneous investment in both sectors to ensure sustainable development. In this setup, surplus labor from agriculture is shifted to industry, which is expected to grow and absorb this labor profitably. The growth of industrial profits supports further investment in both sectors, enabling overall economic progress. Such a coordinated growth strategy prevents issues like inflationary pressures and ensures that agricultural growth can generate surplus capital, partly reinvested in agriculture for further productivity improvements .
