0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views9 pages

Gender-Fair Language and Its Impact

This document discusses gender-fair language and how language can discriminate against or promote equal treatment of women. It provides examples of violations of gender-fair language such as objectifying or trivializing women. It also explains how recognizing problems through language, such as workplace harassment, has helped address issues. The use of gender stereotypes in language can reinforce sexism in society by influencing how people see themselves and others. Moving toward gender-fair language in institutions is important for promoting gender equality.

Uploaded by

Ruby Casas
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views9 pages

Gender-Fair Language and Its Impact

This document discusses gender-fair language and how language can discriminate against or promote equal treatment of women. It provides examples of violations of gender-fair language such as objectifying or trivializing women. It also explains how recognizing problems through language, such as workplace harassment, has helped address issues. The use of gender stereotypes in language can reinforce sexism in society by influencing how people see themselves and others. Moving toward gender-fair language in institutions is important for promoting gender equality.

Uploaded by

Ruby Casas
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Gender-fair Language

aoe @ Learning Outcomes ————— =—


At the end of this chapter, the students Should
be able to:
1, identify the ways language discriminar,.
against women;

2. state forms of discrimination in language.

and

3. explain how gender-fair language can be

realized.

ee

— @ Pre-work for the Chapter ————————___

Observe yourself for a day and answer the


following questions:

1. How do you speak to your female friends


and how do you speak to your male

friends? Do you shift in tone or word


choice?

2. How do you use communication tO assert


yourself and your ideas? How do you think
people of the other gender would use
language to assert themselves? Would it be
the same or different? Why or why not?

3. How do you describe feminine speech?


What about masculine speech?

How differently do men from older


generations speak as compared to women
from their generations? How is this

different from how you and your friends


speak today?

Scanned with CamScanner


Language and Gender Relations

Language 's a potent tool for how humans understand and


participate in the world. It can shape how we see society. It is a part

of culture. In this regard, language is not a neutral force; it enforces


certain ideas about people including gender,

Many gendered assumptions are present when it comes to


language. Language defines men and women differently as seen in
common adjectives associated with these genders. Unequal relations
can stem from statements that trivialize one gender’s experience or
perpetuate one gender’s supremacy, It evaluates gender, insomuch
as language trivializes or devalues certain characteristics.*' Thelma
Kintanar and Angela Tongson, in their 2014 book Gender-fair
Language: A Primer, focused on three aspects of language that
inform how gender is shaped—language articulates consciousness,
reflects culture, and affects socialization. Like gender stereotyping,
language influences how one sees his or her gender and perceives
other people's gender.

Violations of Gender-fair Language


Sexist language is a tool that reinforces unequal gender

relations through sex-role stereotypes, microaggressions, and sexual


harassment. Language can be used to abuse, such as in the case of
sexual harassment, or to perpetuate stereotypes. It can form subtle
messages that reinforce unfair relations, such as how “men cannot
take care of children” or “women cannot be engineers” which may
impact how one views his or her capabilities. All in all, language is
a powerful force that plays a significant role in how one perceives
the world.** Kintanar and Tongson gave extensive examples of these
violations in her book. The following are condensed versions and real-

life examples of violations of gender-fair language.

*' Julia T. Wood, Gendered Lives: Communication, Gender, and Culture (Belmont,
California: Thomson/Wadsworth, 2003).

Scanned with CamScanner


a
e

8
S
a

s
oS
=
3
Zz
2

e
S
a
The Perception of wo
as “darling” or “baby”
them appear ch

men as immature. Women may be labeled


by those who do not know them,
ildlike or juvenile.

The objectification, o

making

ae : r likening to objects, of women. By


ein « » a ¥ “ ‘ 9
g called honey, Sweets,” or “chick,” women become

devalued, especially if they are in an environment that merits


formality such as the workplace,

Fostering unequal gender relations

Language that lacks parallelism fosters unequal gender rel

The use of “man and wife” assumes that men are still m
. * * *
womens identities are subsum

their husbands.

ations.

en and
ed and shifted into beings in relation to

Gender polarization of words in use of adjectives

The personal care brand Dove recently came out with an


advertisement that used parallel adjectives to show the difference in
perception regarding men and women. Both men and women did
the same activity, but were described differently. In the ad, men who
took the lead were considered the “boss,” while women who had the
same initiative were considered “bossy.” Men who worked overtime
were seen as “providers,” while women who did the same were seen as
“uncaring.” This polarization of adjectives shows how perception does
change how one sees certain acts, depending on who performs them,

Hidden assumptions

Hidden assumptions in sentences can also be forms of


microaggression if the underlying perceptions are sexist and
degrading. For example, the statement, “The father is babysitting
his children,” assumes that the father is not a caregiver, and that any
attempt he has at parenting is temporary as the mother is the main
caregiver. A typical example of a situation involving sexist language is
shown in the following sample case.

Scanned with CamScanner


meh) _ GENDER-FaIR LANGUAGE Al
Scanned with CamScanner
that could not be contended with. Because it was unnamed, it
was ignored by those in power as if it did not exist. Recognizing
harassment for what it is—by defining and describing the act—
helped women around the world put mechanisms that would address
workplace harassment. Similarly, women who experienced date rape
had no term to describe what occurred to them, but naming their
experience helped them come to terms with their issue.>°

Another example of “the problem that has no name” was given by


Betty Friedan in her book, The Feminine Mystique, in 1963. Friedan
described it as the discontent that middle-class housewives felt in the
United States during the 1950s to the 1960s. In naming the issue
that her fellow housewives felt, Friedan was able to highlight the
structural oppression experienced by housewives, that despite their
basic needs being met, they themselves were unable to take control of
their lives due to the limits the society enforces on their reproductive

roles.

Sexist Language and Culture

A previous chapter noted that gender socialization is the process


in which roles are learned. Language that admonishes certain acts
depending on one’s gender is a form of externalized social control.
Common themes of a sexist language are the commercialization and
the trivialization of women. These sexist portrayals of women extend
to the advertising industry, entertainment industry, and the arts. The
normalization of sexism makes violence against women and children
acceptable or tolerable. Using language for gender stereotyping can
contribute to sexism by reinforcing the idea that certain words and
traits should only be associated with specific genders.

How people related to each other on a day-to-day basis reinforces


behavior, both positive and negative. To call someone stupid everyday
could have an effect on his or her potential, In turn, language
through its repetition of roles, stereotypes, and adjectives affects

“ Wood, Gendered Lives, p. 105. .


Ibid.

Scanned with CamScanner

i
Saee

=~» how one person enacts his

er capabilities. Constantly mocking


{1 making them

or h
en/LGBT, sexualizing them, anc

or joking about wom


appear weak would in ze these ideas.
That being said, language is not inherently sexist.
depends on a specific culture. Similarly, the attitude of a culture
towards a certain gender may ‘nfluence the words used, creating sexis,
language. Language is both a symptom and a perpetrator of sexism,

and is the very telling of how a society sees a certain gender.

deed make them internali


Being sexis

Toward a Gender-fair Language

The use of gender-fair language in educational institutions and


the removal of sexist language as imperative to gender-responsiveness

is currently being advocated. GABRIELA (General Assembly Binding


Women for Reforms, Integrity, Equality, Leadership, and Reson)
Women’s Party national president and party-list representative Liz:
Maza called for a ban of sexist language in all official communicati i
and documents in the House of Representatives. The creation f,
pei gender-fair language policy and the evaluation ofthe
— ins ee sane pees in institutions are indicators for a
{ c
ensuring that institutions are 6 tant eT

Lan e :
Ones oa than just the arrangement of words.
also a process that repres i language and vice versa. Language is
must be changed Be ewe beliefs, arid experiences. !

ged to reflect the changes in the world as well as to be

free from bias sj

m bias since
others ar ’ words can affect how a perso If and
ound him or her person sees oneself an

Scanned with CamScanner

Common questions

Powered by AI

Language discriminates against women by perpetuating stereotypes and reinforcing unequal relationships through structures and word choices that trivialize or undermine women's experiences. For instance, women are often objectified by being referred to as "darling" or "baby," which diminishes their maturity and professionalism, especially in formal environments like the workplace . The use of phrases like "man and wife" suggests men have primary identities that subsume women's identities . These linguistic choices subtly support the idea that women are lesser compared to men, which reinforces gender inequality .

Sexist language reinforces societal norms that trivialize and commodify women's roles, contributing to a culture that normalizes gender-based discrimination and violence. It maintains power imbalances by perpetuating stereotypes that devalue women, such as associating them with trivial or domestic roles while elevating male-associated traits . Language serves as both a reflection and a tool of cultural sexism, influencing perceptions and potentially limiting women's real-life opportunities and undermining gender equality .

Naming experiences empowers women by providing a framework to articulate and address issues that were previously undefined and ignored. For example, by identifying and defining 'date rape,' women could recognize their experiences as violations and seek justice and societal change . Similarly, terms like 'the problem that has no name,' as coined by Betty Friedan, clarified the structural oppression felt by housewives, which facilitated awareness and action against the limitations imposed by societal gender roles .

Language both reflects and shapes cultural perceptions of gender by portraying gender roles and stereotypes that influence societal norms and expectations. It projects certain ideas about gender, such as associating 'provider' with men and 'bossy' with women, even when performing the same roles . This polarization affects how individuals see themselves and others in society, reinforcing traditional gender roles and limiting personal expression and opportunities for both genders .

Language reinforces gender stereotypes by embedding cultural norms and biases into everyday communication, which shapes societal expectations and behaviors. These stereotypes are perpetuated by repetitive language that associates certain roles and traits with specific genders . Strategies to counteract this include the promotion of gender-fair language policies and education to consciously alter ingrained linguistic patterns and foster equality in social institutions .

Whether language is perceived as sexist or neutral often depends on cultural attitudes towards gender roles. A culture's dominant norms and values can determine whether certain language choices are accepted or seen as reinforcing stereotypes. For example, describing women in diminutive terms might be acceptable in one culture but considered derogatory in another . Thus, language both reflects and influences cultural perceptions, potentially entrenching biases or fostering social change depending on the linguistic practices valued by a society .

Implementing gender-fair language policies in workplaces can significantly enhance gender equality by fostering an inclusive environment that challenges and restructures traditional role-associated language. By eliminating phrases and terms that trivialize or commodify any gender, such policies encourage language that respects and reflects all employees equally. This supports broader equality efforts by promoting diversity and limiting discrimination, leading to more balanced gender representation and opportunities within professional settings .

Gender-fair language in educational institutions is crucial as it promotes inclusivity and equality, challenging traditional gender stereotypes from an early age. By removing sexist language and adopting gender-neutral terms, educational environments encourage students to see themselves and others through a modern, equitable lens, contributing to broader societal gender responsiveness . This shift can lead to more balanced gender relations and opportunities for everyone, irrespective of gender .

Hidden assumptions in language can perpetuate microaggressions and reinforce gender stereotypes that uphold unequal power dynamics. For instance, the assumption that a father "babysits" his children implies that caregiving is not an inherent male role, reinforcing the notion that such responsibilities belong primarily to women . These subtle linguistic choices shape perceptions and expectations, sustaining discriminatory roles and limiting the potential for achieving gender equality .

Microaggressions, often embedded in everyday language, subtly undermine gender identities by perpetuating stereotypes and marginalizing experiences. Language that conveys condescension or stereotypes, such as calling women 'bossy' while men in the same role are 'leaders,' invalidates women's professional roles and capabilities . These linguistic microaggressions accumulate, shaping individuals' gender identities by reinforcing traditional roles and limiting self-expression and societal recognition of diverse gender contributions .

You might also like