EGR System Layout and Water Handling
EGR System Layout and Water Handling
3 Layout
3.3 Layout
The EGR cooler and water mist catcher are installed in the EGR unit. The
unit, shown in Fig. 9, Page 20, includes a cooler spray with a function to
increase the cooling efficiency and to keep the cooler clean. A pre-spray
used to pre- pare the EGR gas for cooling and cleaning is installed in the
gas pipe up- stream of the EGR unit.
The EGR unit used for a low sulphur EGR system (LS EGR) is designed for a
fuel sulphur limit of 0.5% S, covering not only the ECA sulphur limit of 0.1% S
but also the 2020 global limit of 0.5% S. The EGR unit used for high
sulphur system (HS EGR) is designed for a maximum of 3.5% S and will be
slightly changed compared to the LS EGR unit. The EGR unit is integrated
on the en- gine, similar to a scavenge air receiver. The layout of the EGR
engines is shown in Fig. 10, Page 21 and Fig. 11, Page 21.
The presence of sulphur in the EGR gas requires that different grades of stain-
less steel are used for the EGR unit and the EGR cooler. These steel grades
cannot be used in connection with seawater, as chlorides in the water will
lead to corrosion, and accordingly a central cooling system using freshwater
as cooling media is specified for the EGR cooler.
The supply of water to the pre-spray and EGR cooler spray, and the
removal of water from the EGR unit is part of the EGR water handling
3 EGR – Exhaust Gas Recirculation
system, which will control and recirculate the water. The system – which
also includes dis- charge of excess water generated in the combustion
process - is described and illustrated in Chapter Water Handling System
(WHS), Page 26. Part of the water handling system, i.e. the Receiving Tank
Unit (RTU) which includes a small tank and a circulation pump, is
integrated on the engine.
3.3 Layout
Figure 10: Integrated EGR layout for bypass matching – 5G70ME-C
Bypass matching
On an EGR system with bypass matching, the turbocharger is mounted
either on the exhaust side or aft. In both cases, the EGR unit is mounted
on the ex- haust side. The two configurations are shown in Fig. 12, Page
22 and Fig.
13, Page 22.
Figure 13: Aft-mounted turbocharger and side-mounted EGR unit (RTU is not
shown)
TC cut-out matching
The configurations of EGR systems with TC cut-out matching are shown in
3.4 Configuration
Fig. 14, Page 23 and Fig. 15, Page 23.
Figure 14: One basic T/C, one cut-out T/C, and one EGR unit
Figure 15: Two basic T/Cs, one cut-out T/C, and one EGR unit
3 EGR – Exhaust Gas Recirculation
3.5 Engine outline
3.5 Engine outline
Bypass matching
The outline of an EGR system with bypass matching is shown in Fig. 16, Page
24. The engine is shown with a side-mounted turbocharger but engines with
aft-mounted turbochargers will also be available.
Figure 17: Outline of a 7S90ME-C9 Tier III engine with one basic T/C, one cut-
out T/C and one EGR unit
3 EGR – Exhaust Gas Recirculation
3.6 Water Handling System (WHS)
To prevent sulphur and particles from damaging the engine, cleaning of the
recirculated exhaust gas is required. This is performed in a combined cooling
3.6 Water Handling System (WHS)
and cleaning process by a pre-spray and an EGR cooler spray in the EGR
string, using recirculated water.
In order to maintain the ability of the water to clean, cool and neutralize the
exhaust gas, a Water Handling System (WHS) is needed. The system must
ensure the removal of accumulated particles and neutralisation of sulphuric
acid in the water, and ensure the delivery of water at a sufficient pressure and
supply rate to the EGR unit. In addition, the WHS handles the bleed-off water,
which is the surplus of water accumulated in the system from the combustion
process.
Two WHS systems are available:
▪ WHS 2: operates with a combined internal and external circulation of EGR
water to control the water quality during operation. WHS 2 is used for
LS fuels as well as for HS fuels.
▪ WHS 3: operates with an internal circulation of EGR water, using a
direct supply of NaOH and FW to the engine to maintain the water quality
during operation. WHS 3 is used for LS fuels only (max 0.5% S)
The naming, WHS 2 and WHS 3, replaces the name of the original Water
Handling System, WHS, for high sulphur and low sulphur fuels.
met.
The WHS is designed according to the specified sulphur limits for the fuel oil
used, when the engine is running in EGR mode:
▪ LS-WHS 2 for EGR designed for low-sulphur fuels (max 0.5% S)
In case the EGR system is designed for fuels of max 0.5% sulphur, the
production of particles is ignorable and cleaning of the recirculation water
will not be required. However, neutralisation of the recirculated water will
still be required. For LS-WHS 2 the flow of water in the SU loop and the
amount of NaOH is relatively low.
▪ HS-WHS 2 for EGR designed for high-sulphur fuels (> 0.5% S)
In case the EGR system is designed for fuels not complying with the
SOX requirements, the production of particles is significant and the
recirculated water will need cleaning to prevent damage to the engine. A
Water Treat-
ment System (HS-WTS) is installed in the buffer tank loop to reduce par-
ticulate matter in the water. For HS-WHS 2 the flow of water in the SU
loop and the amount of NaOH is relatively high.
volume of water needed in the EGR system during start up. The buffer tank is
arranged with an overflow pipe for automatic discharge of bleed-off water,
which accumulates in the system due to condensation of exhaust gas.
Figure 22: Sludge reduction by water removal from sludge tank (A), or by WTS
working as concentrator (B)
meet the sulphur requirements in the area, the bleed-off water may be dis-
charged to the sea provided the oil content in the discharge does not
exceed 15 ppm. A Water Treatment System (LS-WTS), including an
arrangement for continuous monitoring and recording of oil content, is required
to ensure com- pliance before discharge.
Figure 24: Diagram for the discharge of bleed-off water for LS-EGR (max
0.5% S)
3 EGR – Exhaust Gas Recirculation
Figure 25: Diagram for the combined discharge of bleed-off water for LS-
EGR and OBW
Figure 26: Diagram (example) for discharge of EGR bleed-off water for HS
fuels
Special requirements apply for the power cabling between the frequency con-
verter and the blower to ensure compliance with EMC directives. The interface
between the EGR blower control and ERCS is hardwired.
3.8 Installation
3.8 Installation
2. The supply unit should be positioned at the level of the buffer tank or
lower.
3. The NaOH tank should be located at the level of the supply unit or higher.
4. The position of the drain tank should allow a natural flow from the buffer
tank.
5. The position of the LS-WTS or HS-WTS should be in accordance
with the supplier’s requirements
6. The position of sludge tank should allow a natural flow from the WTS.
as cooling media to prevent material damage to the EGR cooler and unit. In
certain cases, if special precautions are taken, a combined cooling system
can be used, using central cooling for the EGR cooler and seawater cooling
for the scavenge air cooler.
An optimised cooling system for EGR could be installed to reduce the pump
power consumption, when the EGR system is not operating. In this case
the vessel cooling water pumps must be prepared for variable flow regulation
in way of either variable frequency drives or a well-defined two-speed
operation. The ad-on functionality at the engine comprises of a valve
arrangement, which automatically shuts off the water supply to the EGR cooler
when the engine runs in Tier II mode.
NaOH tank
NaOH is a corrosive and harmful product with a tendency to crystallise at
low temperatures, and the NaOH tank installation must therefore be designed
with this in mind. The material could be stainless steel, specially coated steel,
poly- mer or other materials suitable for the product. If a 50% NaOH solution
is used, the liquid will start to crystallise at temperatures below 12 °C and the
tank and pipes should therefore keep a minimum temperature of 16 °C. Ac-
cordingly, the tank should be installed in a room with a controlled temperature
or be insulated and fitted with means for heating. Similar protection against
crystallisation will be required for the NaOH supply pipes between the tank
and the NaOH inlet point. However, if a 30% NaOH solution is chosen, the
crystallising temperature is 4 °C and the temperature demand does not call
for special requirements. However, the required volume of the tank will be lar-
3 EGR – Exhaust Gas Recirculation
ger due to the lower NaOH concentration. The installation of the tank should
include precautions to prevent any leakage from the tank and tank connec-
tions.
When estimating the required capacity of the NaOH tank, several parameters
must be considered: the Tier III sailing time and sailing pattern, the fuel sul-
phur content, the NaOH concentration and the planned bunker frequency. An
example of estimating the NaOH tank capacity is given in Section
Calculation of EGR data, Page 54.
Sludge tank
The sludge outlet from the WTS is an aqueous solution including the remains
accumulated from the treatment of bleed-off water. The pH value normally
varies between 6 and 9. The water content in the sludge is more than 90%,
which makes it easy to discharge by a pump. The sludge tank could be a
separate tank or part of another tank, which holds similar sludge to be dis-
charged to reception facilities. The capacity of the sludge tank depends on
3.8 Installation
the Tier III sailing time and sailing pattern, the fuel sulphur content and the
planned discharge period. An example of estimating the sludge tank capacity
is found in Section Calculation of EGR data, Page 54.
Drain tank
The drain tank holds the bleed-off water to be discharged to the sea when the
relevant discharge criteria are met. In case of LS-EGR systems the bleed-off
water is discharged through an LS-WTS. In case of HS-EGR systems the
bleed-off water is discharged through the EGCS, which will be required,
when engine runs on HS fuels. The tank should be designed with a sufficient
volume to hold the amount of bleed-off water generated in periods where
discharge is not possible.
The design of the drain tank could be based on an estimate of the
expected time and sailing distance in which a discharge could not take
place. This may include time for an overhaul of the WTS.
Figure 29: Example of HS EGR System on a 182,000 DWT Bulk carrier, arrangement by Odense Maritime
Technology (OMT). SOx scrubber arrangement is not shown.
3
MAN Energy Solutions 3
40 (110)
MAN Energy Solutions 3
3.10 Retrofit
3.10 Retrofit
If a ship is not intended during its lifetime to enter a NO X ECA, in which it
would be required to meet Tier III regulation, there would be no reason to in-
clude a comprehensive Tier III installation. However, any doubt on whether the
ship in the future would enter the area could lead to a decision to install the
equipment anyway or at least prepare the ship for a retrofit installation.
Two methods to prepare for EGR retrofit installation are available:
▪ EGR Tier III DS (Design Specification)
▪ EGR prepared Tier III DS (Design Specification)
41 (110)
MAN Energy Solutions 3
In Table 6, Page 42 and Fig. 31, Page 43 and 32, Page 44 a suggestion
of components and preparations for Tier III DS retrofit based on the 4 cat-
egories are given..
3.10 Retrofit
Table 6: Components and preparations for EGR Tier III DS retrofit installation
42 (110)
MAN Energy Solutions 3
3.10 Retrofit
Phase EGR TC by-pass EGR TC cut-out
Postponed EGR control system EGR control system
Receiving tank unit, RTU Receiving tank unit, RTU
Cabling Cabling
EGR blower EGR blower
EGR cooler -
EGR shut down valve EGR shut down valve
EGR closing valve EGR balance valve
Cylinder by-pass valve -
Water treatment system, WTS Water treatment system, WTS
Supply unit, SU Supply unit, SU
Independent tanks (i.e. NaOH tank) Independent tanks (i.e. NaOH tank)
Water pipes Water pipes
NaOH pipes NaOH pipes
Bunker pipes Bunker pipes
Venting pipes Venting pipes
Table 7: Components and preparations for EGR Tier III DS retrofit installation
43 (110)
MAN Energy Solutions 3
3.10 Retrofit
44 (110)
MAN Energy Solutions 3
3.10 Retrofit
EGR prepared Tier III DS is the solution for ships where the Tier III compliance
will not be needed during the planned lifetime of the ship. However, the uncer-
tainty of the future trade of the ship could be met by a minimum preparation
of a later EGR retrofit installation. This gives the opportunity to avoid the cost
of the EGR system and still keeping a door open for a later installation.
In case a retrofit is later decided, a major retrofit job would be required. In ad-
dition to the cost of the Tier III equipment and its installation, expenses for
modification of the engine and T/C components should be included. The
en- gine will need re-certification for both Tier II and Tier III modes, which
calls for a new sea trial, on-board survey and class approval.
The extent of EGR preparation is given as example in Table 8, Page 45 and
Fig. 33, Page 46 and 34, Page 46.
45 (110)
MAN Energy Solutions 3
3.10 Retrofit
46 (110)
MAN Energy Solutions 3
Figure 35: SFOC of EGR engines in Tier II and Tier III mode
47 (110)
MAN Energy Solutions 3
Figure 36: Comparison of SFOC between EGR and EcoEGR engines in Tier
II mode
3 EGR – Exhaust Gas Recirculation
Figure 37: Comparison of SFOC between EGR and EcoEGR engines in Tier
III mode
48 (110)
MAN Energy Solutions 3
Power consumption
The electrical power required for the EGR system is related to the WHS and
the EGR blower.
Figure 38: Estimated power consumption for WHS and EGR blower
49 (110)
MAN Energy Solutions 3
NaOH consumption
The NaOH consumption depends on the engine load, fuel sulphur content,
EGR ratio and NaOH concentration. The estimated consumption for different
3.11 Consumptions and capacities
NaOH tank
The NaOH is usually supplied in a 50% solution, but a 30% solution can be
selected to prevent potential heating requirements, as explained in chapter In-
stallation, Page 34. In case a 30% solution is chosen, the NaOH
consumption will increase in accordance with the dilution ratio.
The volume of the NaOH tank should be designed to hold an appropriate
volume for EGR operation. An example for designing the NaOH tank, based
on specific criteria, is given in chapter Calculation of EGR data, Page 54.
3 EGR – Exhaust Gas Recirculation
50 (110)
MAN Energy Solutions 3
Bleed-off water
The surplus of water generated by the EGR process is discharged as
bleed- off water to the EGR drain tank. The amount of water relates to the
Drain tank
The EGR drain tank should be designed to include the estimated bleed-off
water accumulated when discharge is not possible, either during an overhaul
of the WTS or during a period when discharge is not allowed, i.e. in port, har-
bours or similar restricted areas. An example to estimate a proper volume of
the EGR drain tank is given in chapter Calculation of EGR data, Page 54.
Sludge production
3 EGR – Exhaust Gas Recirculation
51 (110)
MAN Energy Solutions 3
3.11 Consumptions and capacities
Sludge tank
Freshwater consumption
When operating in certain conditions on non-compliant fuels, addition of
freshwater may be required to compensate for accumulation of sulphates in
the recirculated water. Although consumption of FW is considered small,
CEAS will provide data for FW when required in specific ambient
conditions. In addition to CEAS data freshwater may also be required for
proper function of the installed WTS equipment. This information should be
provided by the supplier of the WTS.
need for cooling of recirculated exhaust gas, which has a significantly higher
tem- perature than the scavenge air it is replacing. The amount of cooling
water for scavenge air cooling is increased by 45% in Tier III mode compared
to Tier II mode.
52 (110)
MAN Energy Solutions 3
53 (110)
MAN Energy Solutions 3
cific sailing pattern inside and outside the emission control areas (ECA). The
data of the scenario, which is based on an EcoEGR engine designed for low
sulphur fuels, are given in Table 9, Page 54, Table 10, Page 54 and Table
11, Page 55.
54 (110)
MAN Energy Solutions 3
55 (110)
MAN Energy Solutions 3
scenario, covering a one-year period, the data in Table 13, Page 56 are
found.
56 (110)
MAN Energy Solutions 3
Operational challenges with high-sulphur fuel in marine EGR systems include significant particulate matter production, which necessitates water treatment to avoid engine damage and ensure compliance with emission standards. These challenges can be mitigated by implementing a comprehensive Water Treatment System (HS-WTS) that incorporates technologies such as centrifuges and filters to manage and clean recirculated water. Additionally, systematic removal of accumulated particles in buffer tanks and ensuring that sludge and waste discharge comply with environmental regulations are critical steps in managing these operational challenges .
For low-sulphur fuel systems (LS buffer tanks), there is no need for water cleaning because particle production is minimal, but the overflow pipes are designed to prevent the accumulation of dense particles and foam. The low overflow pipe is at the bottom of the tank to remove heavy particles, while the high overflow prevents foam accumulation . In contrast, high-sulphur systems (HS buffer tanks) require the recirculated water to be cleaned due to significant particle production. The buffer tank in these systems incorporates a Water Treatment System (HS-WTS) to handle particulate matter. This design ensures that only cleaned water is returned to the buffer tank, preventing engine damage .
In high-sulphur fuel systems, sludge management can involve redirecting water that settles in the sludge tank back to the EGR drain tank, thereby reducing the volume of sludge. Alternatively, the WTS can function as a concentrator by including total bleed-off water in the discharge. These methods help minimize the amount of sludge that must be offloaded when the ship is berthed, thus potentially reducing operational costs and facilitating easier compliance with environmental discharge regulations .
NaOH is used in marine Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) systems to neutralize sulphuric acid formed during the condensation of exhaust gases. When using low-sulphur fuels (maximum 0.5% S), the recirculation water doesn't require particle cleaning because particle production is negligible. However, NaOH is still needed to neutralize the acidity of the water. In contrast, with high-sulphur fuels (greater than 0.5% S), NaOH usage and water flow need to be higher due to significant particle production, and an additional Water Treatment System (HS-WTS) is required to clean the recirculated water to prevent engine damage .
EcoEGR systems enhance fuel efficiency by optimizing the Specific Fuel Oil Consumption (SFOC) in both Tier II and Tier III modes. Compared to standard EGR engines, EcoEGR engines reduce SFOC by 2-4 g/kWh in Tier II mode and by 0-3 g/kWh in Tier III mode . This optimization implies that ships using EcoEGR systems can achieve better fuel economy, reducing operational costs and environmental impact. The improved efficiency also supports compliance with increasingly stringent emissions regulations, bolstering long-term viability for ship operations in restricted areas .
The location and operation of overflow pipes in buffer tanks are crucial for the efficient functioning of EGR systems. In low-sulphur fuel scenarios, the overflow pipes are designed to prevent the accumulation of heavy particles and foam by ensuring discharge from the bottom and top levels of the tank, respectively . In high-sulphur fuel systems, efficient removal of dense particulate matter through specifically located overflow pipes helps maintain the quality of recirculated water, thereby preventing engine clogging and wear. Correct overflow placement ensures that only cleaned water is returned to the EGR system, maintaining system efficiency and longevity .
EGR systems can be strategically modified for compliance by initially implementing core components necessary for EGR functionality while deferring non-essential or less critical components until compliance is required. This strategy includes the installation of components marked as 'required' while postponing optional components until necessary. By employing this phased approach, ship owners can ensure that their vessels remain adaptable to future regulatory changes without incurring unnecessary immediate costs, thus maintaining operational flexibility and minimizing risk associated with technological obsolescence .
The design of water handling systems in marine EGR systems must incorporate mechanisms to treat bleed-off water to meet environmental discharge guidelines. These systems must ensure that, particularly in low-sulphur fuel scenarios, oil content in discharge water does not exceed 15 ppm, using measures such as LS-WTS for continuous monitoring . The impact of these design considerations is significant, as they ensure compliance with international environmental regulations. Moreover, they influence operational flexibility, allowing ships to discharge cleaned water at sea where permitted, while retaining water when local discharge is not allowed, affecting port handling logistics .
The categories for EGR Tier III DS retrofit preparation—required, recommended, convenient, and postponed—help shipping companies manage compliance and operational costs. By categorizing components and preparations, companies can incrementally prepare their ships for Tier III compliance without committing to full system installation until necessary. This phased approach allows shipping companies to delay expenses related to EGR systems until compliance is mandated, while still working towards compliance readiness. This flexibility is critical given the uncertainty of shipping routes and sulfur regulations, enabling companies to adapt quickly to shifting regulatory demands while minimizing upfront investment .
Ship owners should consider the likelihood of needing EGR systems during the ship's operational life, the potential cost savings of delaying full system installation, and the regulatory environment, including sulfur limits in potential operating zones. Extent of preparation impacts future retrofitting by determining the immediacy and expense of transition to compliance. Minimal preparation may lower current costs but result in more intensive and costly retrofits later, including engine modifications and re-certification. Thorough preparation facilitates easier retrofitting, allowing quicker adaptation to compliance rules as they evolve .