100% found this document useful (1 vote)
232 views9 pages

HSE Risk Management Framework 2023

This document outlines HSE risk management requirements at Stork facilities and projects. It defines the minimum requirements, including adopting a "whole life" risk management approach. It details the 5 step risk management process of identifying hazards, risks, evaluating risks, recording findings, and review timescales. Risks must be managed to be As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) using the hierarchy of controls. Facilities and projects must conduct regular audits and inspections to monitor control measures over time.

Uploaded by

SamuelFarfan
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
232 views9 pages

HSE Risk Management Framework 2023

This document outlines HSE risk management requirements at Stork facilities and projects. It defines the minimum requirements, including adopting a "whole life" risk management approach. It details the 5 step risk management process of identifying hazards, risks, evaluating risks, recording findings, and review timescales. Risks must be managed to be As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) using the hierarchy of controls. Facilities and projects must conduct regular audits and inspections to monitor control measures over time.

Uploaded by

SamuelFarfan
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Purpose
  • Scope
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Compulsory Documentation
  • Definitions
  • Appendix 1 - Risk Assessment Matrix

HSE Risk

Management

Revision X.Y, Month Year Document no. ST00.653.1050


Revision 1.0, February 2019

Approved by Jim McQueenie Date:

Reviewed by Date:

Prepared by Morgan Adam Date:

Revision history

Rev Date

1.0 10 Jan 2019 Initial issue

1.1 16 Feb 2019 New Template

Revision control
HSE Risk Management

Major revisions of this document are to be approved by the approver of the document. These major
revisions are identified by using the next whole number for the revision number. Minor revisions are those
of a minor nature that include changes to references or minor wording and are approved by the author of
the document. Minor revisions are shown by using the next decimal number. In both cases a clear
description of the revision change is to be provided including section numbers where applicable.

Contents
1 Purpose 4

2 Scope 4

3 Minimum requirements 4
3.1 Basic Requirements 4
3.2 Risk Management Process 5
3.3 Determining As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) 6
3.4 Hierarchy of Controls 6
3.5 Specific Risk Management 6
3.6 Ongoing Inputs to the Risk Management Process 8

4 Compulsory documentation 8

5 Definitions 8

6 Appendix 1 – Risk Assessment Matrix 9

ST00.653.1050 Classification: Stork General

Revision 1.1 Uncontrolled when printed or downloaded Page 3 of 9


HSE Risk Management

1 Purpose

The purpose of this management standard is to define the minimum requirements for the management of
risk in Stork facilities and on projects managed by Stork and to establish the processes to systematically
identify, evaluate, control, and communicate known and potential workplace safety and health hazards to
employees before work activities begin.

2 Scope

This management standard is applicable to all Stork businesses globally and shall be referenced when
developing regional and site level procedures to ensure compliance with the standard.

It also applies to those companies/joint ventures where Stork has operational control, and to those
companies/joint ventures that work for Stork as (sub) contractor and where Stork has operational control.
In case of doubt please contact the Stork group HSE team who shall provide support and assistance in the
decision process if a (sub) contractor is in scope or not.

This standard does not address requirements to comply with local legislation / regulations as these shall
be addressed in Regional Management Systems.

3 Minimum requirements

3.1 Basic Requirements


Facilities and projects will adopt a “whole life” approach to HSE risk management from the establishment
of the facility or commencement of the project to facility closure or project completion. The management
of HSE risk is required at all levels of work execution and includes expected facility / project scope
activities, task analysis and prior to task commencement. It is a proactive process that allows Stork to
respond to change and facilitate continuous improvement in our business. It must be planned, systematic
and cover all reasonably foreseeable hazards and associated risks.
Once the hazards have been identified, it is necessary to assess what risk they pose to employees in the
workplace. The risk shall be quantified and prioritised regarding corrective actions. In all cases, risk is to
be managed to a level that is ‘As Low as Reasonably Practicable” (ALARP), utilising the hierarchy of controls
when determining control measures.
To verify that control measures implemented are not eroded over time they will be monitored on a regular
basis. The facility or project will conduct regular audits and inspections of workplaces and continue to
identify hazards, assess risks, and develop/implement appropriate control measures.

The Risk Management processes are to be applied at all levels of the organisation:
 Organisational
 Task execution
 Personal

Risk-reducing measures and residual/risks shall be communicated to all interested parties. Supervision will
inform affected employees of identified or potential hazards and prescribed safety measures.

ST00.653.1050 Classification: Stork General

Revision 1.1 Uncontrolled when printed or downloaded Page 4 of 9


HSE Risk Management

3.2 Risk Management Process


A systematic approach to risk management shall be taken, following the 5 key sequential steps to the
process as listed below:

(1) Identify Hazards


Identify Hazards Ensure all hazards have been identified and
(1) adequately controlled by breaking down the task /
process / project into manageable steps during the
assessment process.

(2) Identify who / what is at risk and how


Identify who / what
Identify who or what could be affected by the hazard
is at risk and how
and how they will be affected.
(2)

(3) Evaluate the risk and identify suitable control


measures
(a) Describe risks that might affect personnel, the
Evaluate the risks environment, assets / property, legal
and identify suitable compliance, reputation, operational
control measures performance, project or facility outcomes
(3) (b) Assess the initial risk level (Likelihood x
Consequence)
(c) Identify control measures that shall be
implemented to reduce the risk to as low as
reasonably practicable. List existing controls
Risk Assessment or
Record findings already in place i.e. procedures, training,
equivalent
(4) equipment safety features, types of PPE etc.
along with any additional controls required. Be
specific and avoid generic phrases such as “PPE
to be worn”
(d) Assess the residual risk level (Likelihood x
Identify suitable Consequence)
review timescales
(5)
(4) Record Findings
Complete Risk Assessment Form or equivalent

(5) Identify a suitable review timescale


This will be dependent on the level of risk identified
during the assessment but the review timescale shall
not exceed 12 months.
Risk assessments shall be reviewed following an
incident, change in process / procedure, change in
equipment or change in key personnel associated with
the task / process.

ST00.653.1050 Classification: Stork General

Revision 1.1 Uncontrolled when printed or downloaded Page 5 of 9


HSE Risk Management

3.3 Determining As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP)


All hazards must be controlled to a point where the residual risk is deemed to be ALARP.

ALARP is the point where the time, effort and cost associated with the implementation of further control
measures is grossly disproportionate to the level of risk being controlled.

Deciding what is ‘reasonably practicable’ requires taking into account and weighing up all relevant matters,
including:

 The likelihood of the hazard or risk concerned occurring

 The degree of harm that might result from the hazard or risk

 Knowledge about the hazard or risk, and ways of eliminating or minimising the risk

 The availability and suitability of ways to eliminate or minimise the risk

3.4 Hierarchy of Controls


The preferred hierarchy for developing solutions/controls is provided below.

 Elimination: Eliminating toxic substances, hazardous equipment, or processes that are not necessary
for a system of work

 Substitution: Where hazardous materials/chemicals have been identified as a hazard, the preferred
option is to replace the material with a less hazardous one

 Isolation: The isolation of personnel from a hazard, such as moving sources of noise to a different
area, the use of a glove box / containment enclosures when using hazardous substances, abrasive
blasting cabinets, remote controlled devices

 Engineering Controls: The removal of potential hazards by reengineering the job is a preferred
option. This includes design modification, guards, permanently fixed physical barriers, interlocked
physical barriers, physical barriers, presence-sensing systems, ventilation, automation

 Administrative Controls: The application of administrative controls to hazards may include such
actions as limiting the time of exposure, rotating employees, and training/re-training of employees

 PPE: The provision of PPE does not eliminate the hazard, but only shields the individual from it.
Such action may have to be coupled with training in the correct use of the equipment

3.5 Specific Risk Management


Organisational Risk Management Process
Organisational risk management processes are applied at facility or site level and used to manage the
expected risks associated with the work activities required to execute the scope of work. Hazards
associated with the activities are analysed, mitigation processes and actions determined and entered into
the Aspects, Impacts and Hazard Register. This register is to be maintained for each facility and project.

Risk for each activity / hazard scenario identified is to be determined by combination of likelihood and
potential consequence with the outputs for each assessment being both unmitigated (initial) and mitigated
(residual) risk. Risk evaluation matrix is found in Appendix 1 of this standard.

ST00.653.1050 Classification: Stork General

Revision 1.1 Uncontrolled when printed or downloaded Page 6 of 9


HSE Risk Management

Task Execution Risk Management Process


Work execution is to be managed by assessing and mitigating the risks associated with all tasks and steps
required to execute the work.

Variations of this process include Task Based Risk Assessment, Job Safety Analysis (JSA), Job Hazard analysis
(JHA) and Task Safety Analysis (TSA) dependent on the regional or client nomenclature. This management
standard uses the term JSA.

Application of this process helps integrate accepted safety and health principles and practices into a
particular task or job operation. In this process, each basic step of the job is to broken down to identify
potential hazards and to recommend the safest way to do the job. The required controls to mitigate the
hazards associated with each step are identified.

JSAs are prepared and address specific work activities and hazards associated with the specific work, and
controls to mitigate the hazards. JSAs shall include the following information as prescribed on the JSA
form:

 Job scope and description of activities


 Listing of each activity or phase
 Identification of the hazards associated with the activities being performed, including the use or
presence of hazardous chemicals
 Determine risk level prior to implementing precautionary measures
 Specific, effective safety measures (engineering, administrative, or PPE) to eliminate or control the
hazards
 Determine level of residual risk

Risk evaluation matrix is found in Appendix 1 of this standard.

No field activities on the worksite may be performed until a JSA has been completed, reviewed and
approved based on the residual risk level.

Each employee is to review the document for the specific task performed before performing the work
activity. This review may be in the form of a pre-task briefing, a one on one discussion with the supervisor,
or reading the document. The review is documented by employee signature on the document or an
equivalent client requirement. Should specific tasks change while performing work activities, or additional
hazards are recognized, the document review process shall be revisited and completed before continuing
work.

JSA’s will be renewed, amended, or revised when the safety requirements change, hazards change, new
hazards are identified, the work scope changes, or 6 months has elapsed since the last review. The date
on the document(s) will be changed to reflect the renewal/ modification.

The supervisor/designee will conduct a pre-task meeting before any work activity begins and discuss the
completed JSA with all employees directly involved in the activity. Any employee who is not in attendance
at the pre-task meeting will not be allowed to work until he/she attends a similar briefing.

Personal Risk Management Process


Stork project personnel will utilise a personal risk management process when executing work activities.
This process is a mental hazard assessment of a task conducted by the worker on arrival at the work front
and prior to task commencement and is intended to focus a worker’s attention on the task to be performed
and environmental that it is to be executed in. It is intended to help identify any unsafe behaviours and
hazardous conditions that may have been missed in preparation for the work or which may have developed
during the job.

ST00.653.1050 Classification: Stork General

Revision 1.1 Uncontrolled when printed or downloaded Page 7 of 9


HSE Risk Management

The process is widely used and goes by many names such as Take 5, LMRA, START Card etc. Any of the
variations may be used by Stork project personnel dependent on the processes currently in use by the
client.

3.6 Ongoing Inputs to the Risk Management Process


The risk management process will be ongoing during the facility / project life cycle.
Inputs to this ongoing process include:
 Data collected from hazard observation cards
 Findings from site assessments, inspections and audits
 Findings from incident investigations
 Data communicated from HSE Alerts and bulletins
 Changes in regional or local legislative requirements

4 Compulsory documentation
N/A

5 Definitions
 Control: An action or measure that attempts to prevent a recognized hazard from causing injury or
damage.
 Hazard: A source of energy or condition that may cause injury to personnel, or damage to equipment,
property, or the environment.
 Job Safety Analysis (JSA): A system that identifies hazards associated with each step of a job and
develops solutions for each hazard that will either eliminate or control the hazard.
 The process of identifying and communicating to each employee the steps, hazards, and risks
associated with a task, and the safe work practices that are to be applied to complete the task safely.
 Risk: The combination of the probability (likelihood) of a specific unwanted event and the potential
consequences if it should occur.
 Risk Assessment: A detailed, systematic examination of any activity, location, or operational system
to identify risks, understand the consequences, and review controls.
 Risk Management: Activities that enable risks to be identified, understood, and minimized to a
reasonably achievable, tolerable risk.
 Unsafe Condition, Situation or Act: A hazardous condition or situation where, unless preventive
action is taken, there is the likelihood of an accident/incident. Any act that deviates from a generally
safe way or specified method of doing a job that increases the potential for an accident.
 Work Related: Activities for which management controls are, or should have been, in place. Incidents
occurring during such activities are reportable and shall be included in the statistics.

ST00.653.1050 Classification: Stork General

Revision 1.1 Uncontrolled when printed or downloaded Page 8 of 9


HSE Risk Management

6 Appendix 1 – Risk Assessment Matrix

ST00.653.1050 Classification: Stork General

Revision 1.1 Uncontrolled when printed or downloaded Page 9 of 9

Common questions

Powered by AI

The integration of Organisational, Task Execution, and Personal Risk Management Processes ensures safety at multiple levels by creating a comprehensive safety culture. Organisational processes manage risks at the facility or site level, Task Execution processes address specific job tasks using methods like JSA, and Personal Risk Management encourages individual accountability and risk assessment. This multi-layered approach ensures that safety measures are implemented consistently and comprehensively, addressing risks from strategic, operational, and individual perspectives .

The definitions of 'Risk' as the combination of likelihood and potential consequences and 'Risk Assessment' as a systematic examination inform the practical application by providing a clear framework for evaluating and prioritizing risks. These definitions guide the development of strategies tailored to minimize risks based on their severity and probability, ensuring systematic and effective mitigation measures are in place to protect personnel, assets, and the environment .

Regular reviews and updates of risk assessments are necessary to ensure that safety measures remain relevant and effective in a dynamic work environment. Triggers for such reviews include incidents, changes in processes, procedures, equipment, key personnel, or exceeding pre-determined review timescales. These reviews help in identifying overlooked hazards and adapting existing controls to meet new challenges, thereby enhancing safety and compliance over time .

Stork ensures continual improvement and adaptation of risk management processes by conducting regular audits, inspections, and collecting data from various sources like hazard observation cards and HSE Alerts. These activities allow for the identification of new risks and the evaluation of current controls' effectiveness. Changes in work conditions, employee feedback, and legislative updates also prompt reviews and adaptations, fostering a dynamic and responsive safety management framework that evolves with workplace changes .

Supervision plays a crucial role in the risk management process by ensuring effective communication about hazards and safety measures to employees. Supervisors are responsible for informing employees about known or potential hazards, reviewing JSAs, and facilitating pre-task meetings to discuss risks and safety protocols. This involvement improves risk awareness and empowers employees to actively participate in safety practices, fostering a proactive and inclusive safety culture .

Ongoing data collection from hazard observation cards, audits, and HSE Alerts plays a vital role in the risk management process by providing the necessary feedback for evaluating and refining safety measures. These inputs help in identifying new hazards, verifying the effectiveness of existing controls, and ensuring compliance with updated regulations. Continuous improvement is facilitated by this data-driven approach, contributing to a proactive safety culture and informed decision-making, thereby improving safety outcomes over time .

Job Safety Analysis (JSA) involves breaking down a job into steps, identifying hazards, and implementing controls for each step, ensuring safety principles are integrated into daily operations. It includes defining job scope, listing activities, assessing hazards, and determining risk levels before and after controls. Significance includes enhancing awareness, preparing for unforeseen hazards, and ensuring consistency in risk management while also allowing employee input and engagement in safety-related decisions .

The key steps in the systematic approach to risk management include: Identify Hazards, Identify Who/What is at Risk, Evaluate the Risks and Identify Suitable Control Measures, Record Findings, and Identify Suitable Review Timescales. Each step is crucial as it ensures that hazards are systematically recognized and mitigated. Identifying hazards allows for understanding potential risks; knowing who/what is at risk helps prioritize intervention; evaluating risks informs the selection of effective controls; recording findings ensures accountability and transparency; and regular reviews maintain the effectiveness of implemented measures by adapting to changes in the work environment .

The 'Hierarchy of Controls' is critical as it prioritizes control measures to effectively reduce risks, starting with the most effective methods such as elimination and proceeding down to less effective measures like PPE. This structured approach ensures that hazards are controlled in the most efficient manner, leading to improved safety outcomes by first attempting to remove hazards entirely or substitute them with less dangerous options, then isolating or engineering controls, and lastly, relying on administrative controls and personal protective equipment as last resorts .

The ALARP concept influences decision-making by balancing risk level against the effort, time, and cost of further mitigating actions. It requires examining the likelihood and consequences of risks and evaluating the practicality of further controls. Decisions are guided by whether additional measures are grossly disproportionate to the risk's potential impact. This framework ensures resources are allocated efficiently while maintaining safety standards .

HSE Risk 
Management 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Document no. ST00.653.1050 
Revision X.Y, Month
Revision 1.0, February 2019 
 
 
 
 
Approved by 
Jim McQueenie 
 
Date:  
Reviewed by 
 
 
Date:  
Prepared by
HSE Risk Management 
 
 
  
 
ST00.653.1050 
Classification: Stork General 
 
 
  
Revision 1.1 
Uncontrolled when printe
HSE Risk Management 
 
 
  
 
ST00.653.1050 
Classification: Stork General 
 
 
  
Revision 1.1 
Uncontrolled when printe
HSE Risk Management 
 
 
  
 
ST00.653.1050 
Classification: Stork General 
 
 
  
Revision 1.1 
Uncontrolled when printe
HSE Risk Management 
 
 
  
 
ST00.653.1050 
Classification: Stork General 
 
 
  
Revision 1.1 
Uncontrolled when printe
HSE Risk Management 
 
 
  
 
ST00.653.1050 
Classification: Stork General 
 
 
  
Revision 1.1 
Uncontrolled when printe
HSE Risk Management 
 
 
  
 
ST00.653.1050 
Classification: Stork General 
 
 
  
Revision 1.1 
Uncontrolled when printe
HSE Risk Management 
 
 
  
 
ST00.653.1050 
Classification: Stork General 
 
 
  
Revision 1.1 
Uncontrolled when printe

You might also like