First Quarter Exam Scores of Students under Three Sections
Grade 6 - Santan Population Mean Grade 6 - Champaka Grade 6 - Sampaguita
44 34 43 39
37 34 27 17
24 34 23 32
26 34 36 46
33 34 32 47
41 34 31 21
48 34 37 42
29 34 39 49
28 34 30 33
38 34 28 18
36 34 45 30
31 34 41 31
48 34 40 38
46 34 36 26
47 34 28 34
41 34 41
20 34 30
32 34
31 34
29 34
35.45 34.4 33.7647058823529
Problem 1: Can we say that the quarter exam scores of the students of Grade 6 - Santan is higher
Population Mean mean of 34 using 5% level of significance?
35 μ- Grade 6 Santan Quarterly exam score
35 Null Hypothesis (Ho): μ Grade 6-Santan Quarterly Exam score> 34
35 Alternative Hypothesis (Ha): μ Grade 6 Santan Quarterly Exam score<34
35
35 t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances
35
35 Grade 6 - Santan Population Mean
35 Mean 35.45 34
35 Variance 71.52368421 0
35 Observations 20 20
35 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
35 df 19
35 t Stat 0.766757551
35 P(T<=t) one-tail 0.226324161
35 t Critical one-tail 1.729132812
35 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.452648322
35 t Critical two-tail 2.093024054
Variables Mn SD t value
Grade 6 Santan 35.45 8.46
±0.7667576
Population Mean 34.00
Interpretation:
The table shows that the Quarter exam scores of students of Grade 6-Santan is 35.4
SD of 8.46 is higher than population mean of 34.
The researcher failed to reject the Ho since the t value 0.7667576 is higher than the criti
0.7291328.
Failed to reject Ho means that the Quarter Exam scores of the students of Grade 6
than population mean of 34 using 5% level of significance.
f Grade 6 - Santan is higher than population Problem 2: Reject the statement that the quarter exam scores of the students of G
ficance? than population mean of 35 using 5% level of significan
μ- Grade 6 Sampaguita Quarterly exam score
terly Exam score> 34 Not higher than Null Hypothesis (Ho): μ < 35
rterly Exam score<34 Higher than Alternative Hypothesis (Ha): μ > 35
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances
Grade 6 - Sampaguita Population Mean
Mean 33.7647059 35
Variance 94.6911765 0
Observations 17 17
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
0.766758 df 16
t Stat -0.52340766
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.30393217
1.72913281 t Critical one-tail 1.74588368
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.60786435
Failed to reject the Ho t Critical two-tail 2.1199053
t critical Decision
Failed to reject Ho Variables Mn SD
±1.7291328
Grade 6 Sampaguita 33.76 9.73
Population Mean 35.00
ts of Grade 6-Santan is 35.45 with computed Interpretation:
The table shows that the Quarter exam scores of students of Gra
7576 is higher than the critical value of computed SD of 9.73 is lower than population mean of 35.
The researcher failed to reject the Ho since the t value -0.5
s of the students of Grade 6-Santan is higher value of 1.745884.
Failed to reject Ho means that the Quarter Exam scores
Sampaguita are lower than population mean of 35 using 5% level of signifi
scores of the students of Grade 6 - Sampaguita is lower Problem 3: Is there a significant difference betw
sing 5% level of significance? Champaka and Grade 6 - Sampag
μ- Grade 6 Champaka Quarterly exam score
μ < 35 not lower than
μ > 35 lower than
Population Mean
-0.523408
1.7458837
Failed to reject the Ho
t value t critical Decision
-0.5234077 1.7458837
Failed to reject Ho
scores of students of Grade 6-Sampaguita is 33.76 with
mean of 35.
e Ho since the t value -0.52341 is higher than the critical
the Quarter Exam scores of the students of Grade 6-
35 using 5% level of significance.
Problem 3: Is there a significant difference between thequarter exam scores of the students of Grade 6 -
Champaka and Grade 6 - Sampaguita employing 5% level of significance?
μ- Grade 6 Champaka Quarterly exam score μ- Grade 6 Sampaguita Quarterly exam score
Null Hypothesis (Ho): μ Grade 6- Champaka QE scores = μ Grade 6- Sampaguita QE scores ≠
Alternative Hypothesis (Ha): μ Grade 6- Champaka QE scores ≠ μ Grade 6- Sampaguita QE scores
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances
Grade 6 - Champaka
Grade 6 - Sampaguita
Mean 34.4 33.76471
Variance 42.68571 94.69118
Observations 15 17
Pooled Variance 70.42196 -0.21371
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0 0.21371
df 30
t Stat 0.213706
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.416111
t Critical one-tail 1.697261
- 2.04227 2.04227
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.832222
t Critical two-tail 2.042272 Reject Ho
Variables Mn SD t value t critical Decision
Grade 6 Champaka 34.40 6.53 1.6972609
±0.213706 Failed to reject Ho
Grade 6 Sampaguita 33.76 9.73 2.0422725
Interpretation:
The table shows that the Quarter exam scores of students of Grade 6-Champaka is 34.40
with computed SD of 6.53 while the Quarter exam scores of students of Grade 6-Sampaguita is 33.76
with computed SD of 9.73. The
researcher failed to reject the null hypothesis since the t value is ±0.213706 is lower than the critical
value of 1.745884.
Failed to reject Ho means there is significant difference between Quarter Exam
scores of the students of Grade 6-Champaka and Grade 6-Sampaguita using 5% level of significance.
aguita QE scores ≠ There is no significant difference
paguita QE scores There is significant difference
0.21371
2.04227