0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views16 pages

Student Feedback System Project Report

This document summarizes a student project submission for a degree in electronics engineering. It was submitted by 4 students - Ganesh Gawde, Prajwal Kori, Reetik Kothari, and Shreeram Devarkar - under the guidance of Dr. Sangeeta Joshi at Vidyalankar Institute of Technology. The project is titled "Review System" and involves developing a system to collect student feedback on faculty.

Uploaded by

Reetik Kothari
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views16 pages

Student Feedback System Project Report

This document summarizes a student project submission for a degree in electronics engineering. It was submitted by 4 students - Ganesh Gawde, Prajwal Kori, Reetik Kothari, and Shreeram Devarkar - under the guidance of Dr. Sangeeta Joshi at Vidyalankar Institute of Technology. The project is titled "Review System" and involves developing a system to collect student feedback on faculty.

Uploaded by

Reetik Kothari
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

RIVIEW SYSTEM

Submitted in partial fulfillment


of the requirement for the degree
of
B.E. (Electronics Engineering)

Submitted by:

GANESH GAWDE 18103B0060

PRAJWAL KORI 18103B0032

REETIK KOTHARI 18103B0034

SHREERAM DEVARKAR 18103B0007

Under the Guidance of


Dr. SANGEETA JOSHI
Department of ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING

Vidyalankar Institute of
Technology Wadala(E), Mumbai
400 037

University of Mumbai

2021-22
DECLARATION

I declare that this written submission represents my ideas in my own words and where
others’ ideas or words have been included, I have adequately cited and referenced the
original source. I also declare that I have adhered to all principles of academic
honesty and integrity and have not misrepresented or fabricated or falsified any idea|
data|fact|source in my submission. I understand that any violation of the above will be
cause for disciplinary action by the Institute and can also evoke penal action from the
sources which have thus not been properly cited from whom proper permission has
not been taken when needed.

Name of student Roll No. Signature

GANESH GAWDE 18103B0060


PRAJWAL KORI 18103B0032
REETIK KOTHARI 18103B0034
SHREERAM DEVARKAR 18103B0007
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

This is to certify that

“REVIEW

SYSTEM”

is a bonofide work of

GANESH GAWDE 18103B0060


PRAJWAL KORI 18103B0032
REETIK KOTHARI 18103B0034
SHREERAM DEVARKAR 18103B0007

In partial fulfillment of degree course in


Electronics Engineering
As laid down by University of Mumbai during the academic year
2021-22

Under the guidance of

Dr. SANGEETA JOSHI

Signature of Guide Head of Department

Examiner Principal
PROJECT REPORT APPROVAL FOR B.E.

This project report entitled (INTELLI-HOME) by

GANESH GAWDE 18103B0060


PRAJWAL KORI 18103B0032
REETIK KOTHARI 18103B0034
SHREERAM DEVARKAR 18103B0007

is approved for the degree of Bachelor of Engineering in Electronics.

Examiners

1.

2.

Date:

Place:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

In successfully completing our project, I am indeed thankful to a large number of


people who have encouraged and helped me in variety of ways. It’s definitely a
privilege to express my gratitude to the people involved. My profound and sincere
thanks to Dr. SANGEETA JOSHI who consented to be our project guide. I have
scarceness of words to express my courtesy towards her for their keen interest,
valuable guidance, important judgement and constant encouragement during the entire
course of my study. Words in my lexicon fall short to express my feelings towards the
project guide for her timely and important help in completing this project report. Last
but not least, I sincerely thankful to the Vidyalankar Institute of Technology for
helping us to achieve completion of this project.

Project members:

GANESH GAWDE 18103B0060


PRAJWAL KORI 18103B0032
REETIK KOTHARI 18103B0034
SHREERAM DEVARKAR 18103B0007
Abstract
Student Feedback system is used to get the feedback from the students. It
generates the reports for the faculty on the basis of given feedback by the
students. The staff will be provided with separate usernames and password
in order to check the results. The total report is visible to the people like
chairman and principal. It contains the modules like student, faculty and
admin. Admin is the responsible for creating a class and assigning the
corresponding faculty to the class. Within short time we can get the
performance of the faculty from the student point of view. There are 15
questions to evaluate the status of faculty and each question contains 5
options like Excellent, very good, good, Average and Poor.

CHAPTER 1:
INTRODUCTION 1.1

1.2.1 Purpose:

The purpose of the project is to build an application program to reduce the


manual work for managing the Student, Feedback, College, Faculty. Generally
college takes feedback of students after in semester exam which is conducted
twice in one semester. So after long period of time teachers get able to know
what students requires from them. This project takes feedback of students after
every lecture of faculty. So that teachers will be able to understand what
students expecting from them and accordingly teachers will modify their
teaching pattern. This will make process of learning and teaching easier.
1.2.2 Scope:

The scope of this project would contain the project functionalities, constraints,
assumptions and future scope.

Functionalities:
1. Keeps track of all reviews given by students.
2. Monitoring whether students are able to understand the lecture or not
3. Student-Teacher relationship will grow stronger.

Constraints:
1. User must have a Smartphone device
2. Device should have access to Internet

Assumptions:
1. User has working internet connection on Smartphone device
2. Feedback

Future Scope:
This project Student Feedback System has been developed in such a
manner, that the future requirements of the user are met. The project is
flexible to adapt the changes efficiently without affecting the present
system. In future, there can be a provision to adjust the questions and to
import new student names and faculty through the portal. It is also planned
to implement the app on various other mobile platforms like Windows
and IOS. This is the future scope of this project

1.2.3 Advantages of Proposed System:

1. Reduces a lot of time and effort


2. Reduces paper work
3. Friendly user interface
4. Enhances security
1.2.4 Applicability:

Keeps track of all reviews given by students


HOD can monitor whether students are able to understand the lecture or not.
HOD can talk with the teachers about the reviews given by the students.
Will make it easier for the teachers to know whether students understood their
lecture.
Student-Teacher relationship will grow stronger.

1.3 ORGANIZATION OF REPORT

Survey of Technologies:

Survey of Technologies includes Comparing different Technologies that can be


used and choosing the best out of them which we are going to use for the
Development of our Platform.

Requirements Specification:

We will be defining the problem statement of our project. We will also to be


stating the requirement specification. Planning and Scheduling of the project
will be defined. Milestones of the project will also be defined.

Software Requirements:

We will define details of software needed for the development and


implementation of the project. In software requirement we will specify the
operating system, the compiler, testing tools, linker, and the libraries etc. which
will be necessary to compile, link and install the software.

Conceptual Models:

We will produce a model of the overall system which will describe operations
that can be performed on the system, and the sequences of those operations.
These models will be produced using different conceptual models like Block
Diagrams, Sequence Diagrams etc.
System Design:

Test Cases Design:

We will explain different conditions required to make the project work


correctly.
Data Integrity and Constraints:
We will define and explain all the validity checks and constraints provided to
maintain data integrity
System Design
5.1.1 Block Diagram:
IMPLEMENTATION AND TESTING

IMPLEMENTATION APPROACH:

Our Project is basically based on principle of reviews. It focuses on


whether a student has been able to understand a lecture or how much
the student was able to understand a lecture on the basis of the
feedback that is given by the student himself on a Likert’s Scale.
This Data will be saved on a cloud(database) which could be accessed
by the HOD of the department. Through which the HOD will be able
to monitor whether students were able to grasp what was taught in a
lecture or not.
This will create a easy learning environment between the students and
teachers. As students will be able to express themselves and the
teachers will also come to know how much the students are able to
grasp the topics that they were taught

Usefulness:

1. Keeps track of all reviews given by students.


2. HOD can monitor whether students are able to understand the
lecture or not.
3. HOD can talk with the teachers about the reviews given by the
students.
4. Will make it easier for the teachers to know whether students
understood their lecture.
5. Student-Teacher relationship will grow stronger.
CODING DETAILS:

We started with the coding of the Frontend part. For coding the
frontend we used ReactNative which is a user friendly platform for
coding. React Native is an open-source UI software
framework created by Facebook, Inc. Firstly we installed
ReactNative. We started by doing coding the homescreen page,
followed by the login page after he login page we did coding of the
timetable and the feedback page.
Then we started with the backend of our project using NodeJS. All the
coding was done by us on the Visual Studio Code application.

Results:
Firstly, there’s admin module which has admin login portal. The
username and password of admin is initially fixed. After login, Admin views the
students as well as faculty accounts and can modify their details. The whole
data is stored in the database. The admin also adds the students and faculty
details in the database. The admin also can delete the student’s as well as the
faculty data. The admin can view all the feedbacks results present in the
database. The identity of the student who gave the feedback is given by the
admin.
Then there’s student module which has student login portal. Each and every
valid student has their unique username and password which is given by admin.
The username and password when entered are checked with data present in the
database.
After login, the student can view the subject’s feedback which he/she wants to
submit. Then in the feedback form, the name of the faculty automatically comes
who teaches that particular subject. In the feedback form, there are multiple
fields for which student has to show his opinion. The fields are Vocabulary and
Body language, Audibility, Explanation, Subject Command etc., after the
submission of feedback the answers of all the questions are analyzed and the
result is stored in database. If the student has already given the feedback of that
particular teacher, then he/she can’t give the feedback again. Then at last there’s
faculty module which has teacher login portal. Each and every faculty has their
unique username and password which is given by the admin.
The username and password when entered are checked with data present
in the database. The faculty can view their overall performance according to the
student’s feedback. There will be a graphical representation of student's
feedback so that faculty can clearly understand his/her strengths. Next, the
polarity of the words in each sentences were calculated.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The Student Feedback System improves communication between students and teachers by allowing students to express their understanding and opinions on lectures after each session. This real-time feedback enables teachers to adjust their teaching methods promptly to better meet students' needs, thus making the teaching process more effective. By strengthening the student-teacher relationship, the system fosters an environment where students feel more comfortable sharing their thoughts, leading to a more personalized learning experience . As a result, the educational process becomes more dynamic and responsive, potentially increasing student engagement and performance by addressing issues as they arise rather than waiting until the end of the semester .

The Student Feedback System enhances performance monitoring for educators by providing a structured and continuous platform for students to evaluate their teachers after every lecture, rather than just after semester exams. This frequent feedback allows educators to understand students' perceptions and adapt their teaching strategies accordingly. The system’s ability to track historical feedback and present it visually, such as through graphs, aids educators in recognizing trends and areas for improvement . Additionally, the system allows department heads to easily monitor whether students comprehend the material, creating a feedback loop for continuous teacher development .

The development of the frontend of the Student Feedback System utilized React Native, while the backend was built using NodeJS. React Native is advantageous for frontend development because it is a widely-acknowledged open-source framework that allows for efficient design of cross-platform mobile applications with a user-friendly interface . NodeJS is beneficial for backend development due to its event-driven architecture and ability to handle multiple requests simultaneously, which is crucial for a responsive and efficient feedback system . Both tools enable rapid development and scalability, making them suitable for educational platforms that require frequent updates and handling of large data sets from student feedback.

The administration module in the Student Feedback System facilitates effective management of feedback data by providing the admin with access to all student and faculty accounts, enabling them to modify details and manage data efficiently. The system allows the admin to add or delete student and faculty information, view all feedback results, and ensure that data integrity is maintained . This centralized management enables quick updates and changes, ensuring that the system reflects the current status of student and teacher interactions and provides accurate and current insights for decision-making.

Future plans for expanding the functionality of the Student Feedback System include adapting the app for various mobile platforms like Windows and iOS, and offering flexibility to adjust feedback questions and import new student and faculty information through the portal. These expansions aim to address limitations such as platform dependency and rigid question formats . By increasing platform compatibility, the system becomes accessible to a broader user base, while the ability to modify questions allows for more tailored feedback mechanisms that can adapt to specific educational needs and methodologies over time.

The Student Feedback System notably reduces traditional paperwork by digitizing the feedback process, thus streamlining administrative tasks such as data collection, compilation, and reporting . This digital approach decreases manual entry errors, saves time, and minimizes physical storage needs. By automating these processes, educational institutions can reallocate resources towards more strategic tasks, potentially reducing administrative workload significantly. Furthermore, the system's real-time data processing capacities offer instant insights, providing educational administrators and faculty with immediate access to feedback data, consequently enhancing operational efficiency.

The project ensures academic honesty and integrity by requiring students to declare that their submissions represent their own ideas, properly citing sources when necessary, and understanding the consequences of misrepresentation . To further enhance these principles, additional measures could include implementing software to detect plagiarism in feedback, providing training on academic integrity for all users, and establishing a clear code of conduct with consequences for violations. These steps would reinforce the importance of honesty and integrity within the educational feedback process, ensuring more credible and trustworthy assessments.

A cloud-based database offers significant advantages for the Student Feedback System. It ensures centralized data storage, facilitating easy access and management of feedback data from anywhere by authorized users, such as administrators and department heads . This accessibility supports real-time monitoring and reporting, enhancing decision-making capabilities. Additionally, cloud solutions provide scalable storage, meaning the system can handle increasing amounts of data without physical infrastructure limitations. Enhanced security features typically associated with cloud services help protect sensitive information, ensuring data integrity and compliance with privacy standards.

The constraints associated with the implementation of the Student Feedback System include the need for users to have a smartphone device with internet access, potentially limiting accessibility for students without these resources . The underlying assumption is that all users have a reliable internet connection on their devices. These factors might affect the system's usability by restricting participation to those with the necessary technology, thereby excluding some students and potentially skewing feedback results due to a non-representative sample. To improve usability, alternative access methods or support for students lacking required technology may need to be considered.

The feedback mechanism in the Student Feedback System operates using a Likert Scale, where students evaluate various aspects of teaching quality with options such as Excellent, Very Good, Good, Average, and Poor . This system allows for quantifiable and standardized feedback, making it easier to analyze trends over time and across different faculty members. The use of a Likert Scale can lead to more objective data collection, as it minimizes variance in interpretations of qualitative feedback. However, its potential limitation lies in its oversimplification of complex feedback, possibly omitting nuanced insights into teaching effectiveness.

You might also like