Yes.

Said Executive Order can be considered as violative of the Constitution, specifically the right to life
of both the mother and the unborn and the duty of the the duty of the State to protect both the life of
the mother and the life of the unborn from conception. Said Executive Order also denies the general
public the right to health and access to medicines and access to contraceptives. Further, said Executive
Order also denies a person's right to due process of law as the aforementioned rights were deprived to
the inhabitants of Cagayan De Oro City without observing due process of law.

These rights are found in the Constitution which can be enjoyed by the general public for their
protection and benefit subject to certain limitations as provided under the law. Hence, the deprivation
of these Constitutionally enshrined rights are violative and constitutionally infirm.

o acquire, lease

web-based channels,

online and social media platforms

Online marketing is the practice of leveraging web-based channels to spread a message about a
company’s brand, products, or services to its potential customers.

A digital marketing strategy is a plan that outlines how your business will achieve its marketing goals via
online channels like search and social media

Digital marketing activities refer to the operations that enable marketers to bring together the right
product and the right consumers at the right time through the use of the Internet as a marketing tool or
channel.

What are the requirements

Notarized Retainers Contract between the concerned government agency and the

private lawyer

OSG or OGCC approval

Board Resolution of the concerned government agency

Certificate of availability of funds

Latest MCLE Certificate of said private lawyer

Comment and favorable recommendation of the Resident Auditor.

Respectfully forwarded, for consideration and proper disposition, thru Assistant Commissioner Roland A.
Rey, Local Government Sector (LGS), and Assistant Commissioner Fortunata M. Rubico, Legal Services
Sector (LSS) and Office of the General Counsel, to Acting Assistant Director Daryl H. Tonolete, OIC, LAO,
LSS, all of this Commission, in compliance with 2nd Indorsement dated June 2, 2021 on the above
captioned subject relative to the requirements for this Commission’s concurrence in the subject
Contract for Legal Retainer pursuant to the COA Key Services Procedural Flow. As such, the following
documents are attached herein:

Letter request dated February 9, 2021 of Ms. Julie Hope Timotea P. Evina, President, WPU;

Legal Retainer dated January 14, 2020 entered into by WPU and Atty. Zoilo C. Cruzat;

Written conformity and acquiescence of the Office of the Government Corporate Counsel (OGCC) dated
October 21, 2019;

Written conformity and acquiescence of the OGCC dated October 22, 2020;

Letters dated January 25 and January 26, 2021 of the WPU President relative to, among others, the
accomplishments of Atty. Cruzat for January to December 2021;

CAF;

mcle;

Previous Contract for Legal Retainer entered into on March 27, 2019 by and between WPU and Atty.
Cruzat; and
Letter with attachments dated June 26, 2020 of the WPU President on the accomplishments of Atty.
Cruzat for Fiscal Year (FY) 2019.