E-Jet Family Specifications Overview
i) Specifications, page 6
ii) Fleet analysis, page 9
iii) Fuel burn performance, page 11
iv) Maintenance analysis & budget, page 13
v) Technical support provider’s survey, page 24
v) Aftermarket & values, page 28
6 I AIRCRAFT OPERATOR’S & OWNER’S GUIDE
E-Jet family
The E-170/-175 were followed by the
longer E-190/-195 models, which have a
larger wing and higher-rated engines.
The E-190 entered service in
T
he E-170, E-175, E-190 and E- aircraft being certified as two main types conversion to AR variants in 2009.
195 are all members of the E-Jet and each with two variants. The smaller The maximum cruise speed for all
family. Designed from the outset E-170/-175 are powered by the CF34-8E models is 481kts or Mach 0.82 (see table,
for the regional jet (RJ) market, engine rated at 14,500lbs thrust, while page 7). The range varies from 1,700nm
the four family members provide 70 to the larger E-190/-195 are powered by the to 2,400nm, with the payload increasing
122 seats, with actual numbers depending CF34-10E rated at 18,500lbs thrust (see from 20,062lbs on the E-170 to
on cabin configuration. The family is table, page 7). The -10E has a one-inch 30,093lbs on the E-195. The E-170 and
intended to fill the gap between 50-seat wider intake fan than the -8E, and also a E-175 share the same fuel capacity, as do
RJs and the smallest jetliners, in order to three-stage low pressure compressor. the E-190/-195 models.
provide airlines with capacity on RJ Being certified as two main types Embraer comments that, although the
routes that needed more capacity, or means that the E-170/-175 and E-190/- fuel capacity is the same within each
smaller aircraft on jetliner routes at an 195 each have their own maintenance model, the range differs due to higher
economic level. The E-Jets family is the programmes. The two programmes have maximum take-off weight (MTOW). The
first of new generation large RJs or ‘right- a high degree of similarity, however. AR models also have a higher maximum
sized’ jets. zero fuel weight (MZFW) and slightly
The E-Jets have up to 95% higher operating empty weight (OEW).
commonality in parts and systems across Basic features The E-170/-175 have three payload
the four main types to reduce rotable The E-Jet family was launched in variants, while the E-190/-195 variants
inventories and maintenance costs. The 1999, with the E-170 entering service in have constant payload (see table, page 7).
flightdeck has 100% commonality for the the first quarter of 2004. The design The cargo capacity in two belly holds
four models, so they all have cross-crew- efficiencies promised 30% more payload also increases from 508.18 cubic feet to
qualification, thereby providing flexibility per pound of structural weight compared 906.17 cubic feet.
in fleet planning, since additions to the to similar-sized aircraft. Passenger comfort is aided by
fleet will incur relatively few costs. The E-175 first flew in 2003, with the Embraer’s double-bubble fuselage design
The E-Jet family is sub-divided into first delivery made in July 2005 to Air that promises an increased cabin width at
the E-170/-175 and E-190/-195, with the Canada. passengers’ elbows and shoulders, large
cabin windows, and a high cabin ceiling.
The aircraft is also configured in a four-
abreast seat arrangement, which is
popular with passengers. It also aids fast
passenger loading and unloading.
In terms of seat capacity, the E-170
carries 70 to 80 passengers, the E-175
carries 78 to 88, the E-190 carries 98 to
114 seats, and the E-195 carries 108 to
122.
Actual seat numbers depend on an
operator’s seat pitch and other cabin
configurations, such as number and size
of wardrobes, toilets and galleys.
Time on the ground for any aircraft is
wasted money for an operator, so the E-
Jets are equipped with integral airstairs at
the forward passenger door to aid fast
Aircraft Engine Take-off MTOW MLW Maximum Fuel Seats Range with Cargo
thrust -lbs -lbs payload capacity full payload volume
-lbs -lbs -lbs & LRC -nm -[Link].
E-170 STD CF34-8E 14,200 79,344 72,310 20,062 20,580 70-80 1,800 508.18
E-170 LR CF34-8E 14,200 82,011 72,310 20,062 20,580 70-80 2,000 508.18
E-170 AR CF34-8E 14,200 85,098 73,414 21,693 20,580 70-80 2,100 508.18
E-175 STD CF34-8E 14,200 82,673 74,957 22,223 20,580 78-88 1,700 604.59
E-175 LR CF34-8E 14,200 85,517 74,957 22,223 20,580 78-88 1,900 604.59
E-175 AR CF34-8E 14,200 89,000 75,178 22,840 20,580 78-88 2,000 604.59
E-190 STD CF34-10E 20,000 105,358 94,798 28,836 28,596 98-114 1,800 799.18
E-190 LR CF34-10E 20,000 110,892 94,798 28,836 28,596 98-114 2,300 799.18
E-190 AR CF34-10E 20,000 114,199 97,003 28,836 28,596 98-114 2,400 799.18
E-195 STD CF34-10E 20,000 107,563 99,208 30,093 28,596 108-122 1,500 906.17
E-195 LR CF34-10E 20,000 111,972 99,208 30,093 28,596 108-122 1,900 906.17
E-195 AR CF34-10E 20,000 115,279 100,971 30,093 28,596 108-122 2,200 906.17
turnaround times. This can potentially CF34-8E & -10E THRUST RATINGS
cut five minutes off turnaround time
compared to using an air jetty or ground Thrust -8E5 -8E5A1 -10E5 -10E5A1 -10E6 -10E6A1 -10E7
steps. ratings
The various efficiencies mean that Max take-off 14,510 - 18,820 - - - 20,360
turnaround is expected to take an average Normal take-off 13,420 14,050 17,390 18,820 17,390 18,820 18,820
of 20 minutes. The boarding process is
Max continuous 13,520 - 17,040 - - - -
further assisted by the larger overhead
lockers that give, on average, 1.75-2.0 Take-off flat rating deg C 30 - 30 - 35 - 30
cubic feet of stowage space per passenger.
This equates to an increase of up to 0.5 Max temperatures - deg C
cubic feet (or up to 28%) per seat, Max take-off 1,006 - 983 - - - -
compared to that available on each of the
Normal take-off 965 989 945 983 947 983 943
E-Jet’s equivalent-sized competitors. In
particular, the E-190 and E-195 models Max continuous 960 - 960 - - - -
have stowage space equal to, or better
than, older Boeing and Airbus aircraft
that are similar, or slightly larger, in size. The E-190/-195 will find competition executive seating for 19.
The cabin, seat and aisle width, and cabin in the spacious Bombardier C Series from The 12 main airline variants are
height are all some of the largest available 2013, and the Bombardier CRJ-1000 examined in this guide.
for this size of aircraft, if not the widest from late 2009. The smaller E-170/-175
of all narrowbodies in some cases. will shortly be competing with newer RJs
The E-170/-175 have no overwing and right-sized jets from Mitsubishi and E-170
exits, which allows more cabin Sukhoi, which promise more spacious The E-170 entered service with LOT
configuration options. Due to the size of cabins. The E-170/-175 also compete Polish Airlines in 2005. The STD variant
the E-190/-195, however, there is a need with the older CRJ-700 and -900 models. has an MTOW of 79,344lbs, the LR an
for two overwing exits. All variants have The E-Jets, however, are the only MTOW of 82,011lbs, and the AR an
two full-size passenger-entry doors family that offer a full range of four MTOW of 85,098lbs (see table, this
forward and aft on the port side, and two models covering 70-120 seats. They are page). While the STD and LR are
service doors forward and aft on the also the first of the new generation of RJs currently in operation, the AR is not due
starboard side. Doors forward and aft of to be in operation and, because they have to be delivered until late 2009/2010. An
the cabin can speed up turnaround time. many of the technological advances of additional variant, which has the same
The E-Jet family has many of the larger aircraft, they are already one of the specifications as other E-170s, but also an
advantages of modern mainline jets. This few aircraft certified to fly into difficult increased MTOW of 101,389lbs, will be
includes a cruising altitude of 41,000ft, airports such as London City Airport. designated SR as a short-runway variant.
full authority digital engine controls Environmentally, the E-Jet is fully This variant is due to be delivered to
(FADEC), and a fly-by-wire flight control compliant with all noise regulations, as British Airways CityFlyer in September
system. The flightdecks of all variants are well as CAEP/6 gaseous emissions. The 2009.
fully equipped with Honeywell Primus margins to CAEP/6 are particularly good The E-170 will have a maximum fuel
Epic digital avionics and a Dark & Quiet on the E-170/-175, ranging from 26.4- capacity of 20,580lbs, which produces a
cockpit environment to improve 97.6% for unburned hydrocarbons, range of 1,800nm on the STD, 2,000nm
awareness and reduce pilot workloads. carbon dioxide, nitrous oxides and smoke on the LR and 2,100nm on the AR. This
The E-Jets will also have an onboard emissions. is the case when the aircraft are flown at
central maintenance computer, which There is a business-jet version based long-range cruise speed (LRC) and with a
reduces line maintenance costs compared on the E-190, called the Embraer Lineage full payload.
to similar-sized aircraft. 1000, which has an extended range and The E-170, like all of the E-175
175.
The E-190 is powered by a more
powerful version of the engine on the E-
170. This is the CF34-10E with a take-off
thrust rating of 18,500lbs, and a bypass
ratio of 5.4:1.
In a single-class configuration, the E-
190 can accommodate 98 passengers
with a 32- to 33-inch seat pitch, 106 with
a 31- to 32-inch seat pitch, and 114 with
a 29- to 30-inch seat pitch. If a two-class
configuration is required, one option is
for eight premium seats with a 38-inch
pitch and 86 economy seats with a 31-
inch pitch, which totals 94. The E-190 is
again very similar to the standard layout
of the E-170, but with the addition of
variants, is equipped with the CF34-8E 175 has the same engine variant as the E- more fuselage length, and two overwing
rated at 14,500lbs of thrust and has a 170, which produces the same thrust but exits mid-cabin. A third cabin-crew
bypass ratio of 5:1. with higher MTOW, maximum landing member would need to be carried in most
In a single-class layout, the E-170 can weight (MLW) and maximum payload. layouts.
seat 70 passengers with a 32-inch pitch, In a single-class layout, the E-175 can
78 passengers with a 31-inch pitch, and carry 78 passengers with a 32-inch pitch,
80 with a 29-30-inch pitch. One dual- 86 passengers with a 31-inch pitch, and E-195
class configuration can accommodate six 88 with a 30-inch pitch. A possible dual- The E-195 was certified in June 2006
first- or business-class seats with a 36- class configuration could accommodate and launched by Flybe. Only the AR and
inch pitch and 64 economy seats with a six first- or business-class seats with a 38- LR variants are currently operated. The
32-inch pitch, making a total of 70 seats. inch pitch and 72 economy seats with a MTOW for the STD is 107,563lbs, and
Cabin configurations vary according 31-inch pitch, making a total of 78 seats. 111,972lbs for the LR. The AR’s MTOW
to operator. There is the option of having Apart from the length, and therefore the is 115,279lbs (see table, page 7). The
two galleys, with one at the front and one additional passenger capacity, the cabin maximum payload is 30,093lbs, with the
at the rear, or having one galley at the interior is exactly the same as for the E- fuel capacity the same as the E-190’s.
rear only. There are two toilets, one at the 170. This results in lower LRC ranges than the
front and one at the rear with the E-190, with the STD variant reaching just
optional addition of one wardrobe. This 1,500nm. The LR has a range of
would be an essential addition for E-190 1,900nm (same as the E-175LR), and the
operators that regularly transport JetBlue was the launch customer for AR can fly for 2,200nm. The engine is the
business travellers who require space to the E-190 in 2005 after it was certified in same as on the E-190 and with the same
hang their suit jackets, as a matter of August 2005. Only the LR and AR take-off thrust. The cargo capacity is
course. variants are currently operated, with the increased to just over 906 cubic feet,
AR being the launch customer for the E- which Embraer believes to be more per
190 generally. The MTOW for the STD passenger than available with the 737-
E-175 model is 105,358lbs, while the LR and 600 and A318.
The E-175 was certified in late 2004, AR have MTOWs of 110,892lbs and In a one-class layout the E-195 can
and Air Canada served as the launch 114,199lbs respectively. This equates to seat 108 passengers with a 32- to 33-inch
customer in 2005. The AR variant at least a third extra capability compared pitch, 118 with 31-inch pitch and 122
recently entered service with some to the E-170, which is also true for the seats in a high-density layout with 30- to
converted from LRs, and some directly take-off thrust, MLW, maximum payload 31-inch pitch. A possible two-class layout
from the factory. Although no STD and fuel capacity. This is required when it could involve eight premium seats with a
models are in current operation, the STD is considered that the E-190 carries at 38-inch pitch, and 98 economy seats with
has an MTOW of 82,673lbs while the LR least a third more extra passengers in all a 31-inch pitch, making a total of 106
has an MTOW of 85,517lbs and the AR configuration options. passengers. As expected, the E-195 cabin
an MTOW of 89,000lbs (see table, page The maximum fuel capacity is layout is the same as the E-190, but with
7). The maximum fuel capacity is again 28,596lbs, which equates to ranges of additional length. The additional length
20,580lbs with the operating range, 1,800nm, 2,300nm and 2,401nm for the accommodates a third cabin-crew
under the same conditions as for the E- STD, LR and AR (see table, page 7). The jumpseat, the option of a second
170, standing at 1,700nm for the STD, range again is calculated with LRC speed wardrobe and extra passenger seats.
1,900nm for the LR and 2,000nm for the and a full payload. This would mean that
To download 100s of articles
AR. This is a slightly shorter range the E-190 not only carries more like this, visit:
compared to the E-170, due to an passengers, but that the LR and AR can [Link]
increase in payload and MTOW. The E- also fly further than the smaller E-170/-
E-Jets fleet
a backlog of 7), the Air France Group for
KLM Cityhopper and Regional (15), Azul
Linhas Aereas (30), British Airways (BA)
for BA CityFlyer (11), Air Europa (7), J-
T
here are 540 E-Jets in airline (19) and LOT Polish Airlines (16), COPA currently up for discussion), followed by
operation. The business-jet Airlines (15), Saudi Arabian Airlines (15), Lufthansa (50), Kunpeng Airlines (45),
version, the E-190 Lineage Flybe (14), Aerorepublica (12), Regional Azul Linhas Aereas (20) and Brazil Rodo
1000, is not analysed here. (12), EgyptAir Express (11), Azul Linhas Aereo (20).
Due to the young age of the aircraft, Aereas (10) and Grand China Express Air Although the E-Jets will face future
most E-Jets are still flown by their (10). The remaining 29 operators all have competition from other new-generation
original operators, or their subsidiaries. fewer than 10 aircraft each. regional jets (RJs) they will remain the
Only two aircraft are parked: an E- Air Canada, Azul Linhas Aereas, only aircraft to offer four different
190LR with Aerorepublica; and an E- Cirrus, Finnair, LOT Polish Airlines, nas passenger sizes covering all areas of the
170LR with GECAS. air, Paramount Airways (India), Regional, regional market. They also benefit from
The E-Jets were all launched in June Republic Airlines, Royal Jordanian, flightdeck commonality and the fact that
1999. The first model, the E-170, was Shuttle America, TAME and Virgin Blue they are the only new-generation RJs
delivered to LOT Polish Airlines in Airlines all operate more than one type of already in operation and certified to
March 2005. The launch customer was to E-Jet. This allows them to swap aircraft operate at smaller airports with shorter
be Crossair in Switzerland but, due to re- within the schedule and route network, runways, such as London City Airport.
branding and its acquisition of the depending on passenger demand, and This is one of the main reasons why
collapsed Swiss national airline, this did avoid the cost of maintaining more than airlines such as BA (for its London City
not happen. The E-175 entered service one pilot pool. CityFlyer operation) have chosen the E-
later in 2005 with Air Canada, and two Jets over current RJs or are waiting for
months later the E-190 entered service other new-generation RJs to be delivered.
with jetBlue Airways. Both airlines Fleet forecast The fact that both backlog aircraft and
remain two of the largest E-Jet operators. In addition to the 540 aircraft in order options are spread across the world
The first E-195 was delivered to Flybe in operation, there is an order backlog for suggests that worldwide demand for these
December 2006. 345 aircraft and options for 313. The aircraft will continue into the future.
According to the Aircraft Fleet & majority of backlog aircraft will be
Analytical System (ACAS), the 540 delivered over the next three years, with
aircraft in commercial service comprise: 80 in 2009 and 110 in 2010. E-170
158 E-170s, 119 E-175s, 225 E-190s and Customers awaiting delivery of large There are currently 158 E-170s in
38 E-195s. The E-190 is the most popular numbers of aircraft are Aeromexico (with operation, which equates to 29% of the
model, accounting for 42% of the E-Jets
in operation. The E-170 and E-175
account for 29% and 22% respectively,
while the E-195 is just 7% of the fleet.
The breakdown of all the E-Jet
variants and their general global location
(see table, page 10) shows that they are
particularly popular in North America,
which has 54% of the fleet, since they can
be used as feeder aircraft to link all the
major carriers’ hubs. Many of the E-Jet
operators are regional feeder and
subsidiary airlines of US majors.
There are 46 operators, including:
Republic Airlines (71 aircraft), Shuttle
America (61), Air Canada (60), jetBlue
(38), Compass Airlines (36), US Airways
(25), Finnair (20), Virgin Blue Airlines
Aircraft variant Africa Asia Pacific Europe Middle East North America South America Variant Sub-Total Model Sub-Total
E-175 1 1 119
E-175 AR 36 36
E-175 LR 3 7 2 70 82
E-190 2 2 225
E-190 AR 1 24 109 27 161
E-190 LR 10 26 4 1 21 62
E-195 1 1 38
E-195 AR 7 5 12
E-195 LR 24 1 25
fleet with 20 operators. Although with 36, Shuttle America with 16, and 7FH per day.
Embraer markets three variants, there are Air Canada with 15. The remaining five There are two variants in commercial
only two in operation: the long-range operators have six or fewer aircraft. operation, the LR and AR, plus two
variant (LR) and the standard (STD). The FC time for the E-175 over the aircraft operated by Embraer in a non-
The only four E-170STDs in service past year has averaged from 85 minutes standard configuration.
are all with LOT Polish Airlines, which (with Compass Airlines) to 150 (with There are 62 LR variants operated by
was the first to operate the E-170. LOT Shuttle America). The daily utilisation has 13 airlines. The largest operator is
Polish Airlines has six more E170s, all of been as high as 15FH for some Shuttle Aerorepublica (12 aircraft), followed by
which are the LR variant. The average America and Compass Airlines aircraft, Finnair (10), Grand China Express Air
flight cycle (FC) over the past 12 months but is generally just under 7FH. (10), Regional (8) and Aeromexico
has been 32-160 minutes. Grand China There are two variants in operation: Connect (6). The remaining eight airlines
Express Air achieves as much as 4.5 36 E-175ARs, all with Compass Airlines operate four or fewer of this variant in
hours with one of its E-170s. The daily (which flies on behalf of Northwest their fleets. The LR is most popular in
utilisation has been as high as 15 flight Airlines and Delta), which was the first Europe, which has 26, followed by South
hours (FH) per day, but is usually 7-8 FH. airline to operate this variant and remains America and the Asia Pacific.
There are 152 E-170LRs currently in the only one; and the E-175LR, operated There are 161 AR variants of the E-
operation, with just over 50% in North by Republic Airlines (which has the 190, making it the most popular variant
America. Another 18% are in Europe, largest fleet), followed by Shuttle America of all E-Jets. The -190AR represents 30%
3% in South America, and 9% each in (16), Air Canada (15), LOT Polish of all E-Jets and over 70% of E-190s.
Africa, Asia Pacific and the Middle East. Airlines (6) and four other operators North America again takes the lion’s
The largest operator of E-170s is which each have three or fewer aircraft. share of 109 AR aircraft, or 68% of E-
Shuttle America (operating on behalf of 190s. South America and Asia Pacific
Delta and United) with 45 E-170LRs. take 15% each of the AR fleet. The
Republic Airlines is the second largest E-190 largest operators are Air Canada (45
operator with 31 E-170LRs, followed by The global fleet of E-195s consists of aircraft), jetBlue (38), US Airways (25),
Saudi Arabian Airlines (15), EgyptAir 225 aircraft with 24 operators, COPA Airlines (15) and Virgin Blue (13).
Express (11), Finnair (10) and LOT representing 42% of the total E-jet fleet,
Polish Airlines (10). The remaining and making it the most popular of all the
airlines operate six or fewer aircraft, and E-Jets. Again, it is popular with North E-195
many just have one or two. Shuttle American carriers, which operate 110 E- The E-195 is the newest of the E-Jets,
America was bought by Republic Airlines 190s, nearly half the global fleet. South with 38 in operation, accounting for just
in 2005, making the parent company a America has 22%, Asia Pacific 15%, 7% of the global E-Jet fleet. All are LR or
large operator, with more than double the Europe 12% and the Middle East 2%. AR variants, and most are in Europe. The
number of E-Jets than any other airline. Air Canada is the largest operator of average FC time over the past year has
Another variant, the short-runway the E-190 with 45, while jetBlue, the been 85 minutes, and the daily utilisation
version (SR), is planned for delivery to launch customer, has only 38. However, it nearly 7FH. Many of Royal Jordanian’s
British Airways CityFlyer in September has an additional backlog of over 60 E- E-195s are doing more than 7FH.
2009 for use at London City Airport. 190s, which would make it the largest There are just 12 LR variants, in the
operator of this model. Middle East and South America. Azul
The next largest operator is US Linhas Aereas and Royal Jordanian have
E-175 Airways (25 E-190s), followed by COPA five aircraft each, and nas air two. The
There are 119 E-175s in operation Airlines (15), Virgin Blue Airlines (13) AR variant has 25 aircraft, of which one
with 10 airlines, representing 22% of the and Aerorepublica (12). The other 18 is in the Middle East and the rest are in
global fleet. The E-175 is most popular in carriers have fleets of 10 or fewer. The Europe. The launch customer, Flybe, is
North America, where 106 aircraft are average FC over the past year has been the largest operator with 14 aircraft. Air
flown. This equates to nearly 90%. 85 minutes, with Air Canada even getting Dolimiti has five and Air Europa four.
The remaining 12 aircraft are 135 minutes from one of its E-190s. The
operated in Asia Pacific (3), Europe (7) daily utilisation has been as high as 15FH
To download 100s of articles
and the Middle East (2). The largest E- with some US Airways and Virgin Blue
like this, visit:
175 operator is Republic Airlines, with Airlines aircraft, and 10.5FH with
[Link]
38 aircraft, followed by Compass Airlines Regional. The fleet average is just under
A
nalysis of the fuel-burn distance flown. The resulting distance is assumed, on these short-haul flights, to be
performance of the four E-Jets referred to as the equivalent still air 200lbs per person, with no additional
family members reveals that, distance (ESAD) or nautical air miles cargo in the hold. The payload carried is
for a given distance, the fuel (NAM). therefore 16,000lbs for the E-170,
burn per seat-mile is influenced by several Average weather for the month of 17,600lbs for the E-175, 22,800lbs for
factors that include, but are not limited June has been used, with 85% reliability the E-190 and 24,400lbs on the E-195.
to: operating empty weight (OEW); winds and 50% reliability temperatures These are maximum seat capacities for
engine power; weather; and cruise speed. used for that month in the flight plans the four variants. Most airlines configure
produced by Jeppesen. The flight profiles their aircraft with fewer seats than this,
in each case are based on International but a smaller difference in passenger
Aircraft variants Flight Rules, which include standard numbers has only a small effect on
There are four basic variants of the E- assumptions on fuel reserves, diversion resulting fuel burn. The passenger
Jets family: the E-170, E-175, E-190 and fuel and contingency fuel. Having said numbers chosen still allow an illustrative
E-195. The E-170/-175 are certified as that, the fuel burn used for the analysis of comparison of fuel-burn performance to
one type, and the E-190/-195 are certified each sector just includes the fuel used for be made.
as another. Standard models have been the trip and taxiing. The optimum routes
used for each of the variants. and levels have been used for every flight,
All the aircraft variants are powered except where it has been necessary to Route analysis
by CF34 engine family. The E-170/-175 restrict the levels due to airspace or Three routes of varying lengths were
aircraft are powered by the CF34-8EA1, airway restrictions and to comply with analysed, with tracked distances of 207-
while the E-190/-195 are powered by the standard routes and Eurocontrol 645nm. All three routes are between the
CF34-10E. The increase in engine thrust restrictions. UK and France, and were picked to
for these two larger aircraft is reflected in A taxi time of 20 minutes has been examine the fuel burn per seat-mile with
their higher maximum take-off weights factored into the fuel burns and added to increasing mission lengths. All the routes
(MTOW). This goes from about the flight times to provide block times. are typical of operators of the E-Jets
79,000lbs for the E-170 to just over The flight plans have all been calculated family, which tend to have average flight
105,000lbs for the E-195. The OEW and using long-range cruise (LRC). Although cycle times of 1.45 flight hours (FH). All
maximum payload for each aircraft other speeds are more likely on shorter routes have been analysed in both
variant also increase with thrust, routes, LRC has been chosen so that all directions, in order to provide a better
although the range does not follow the
same pattern. The fuel capacity is the
same for E-170 and E-175 and the E-190
and E-195.
There will be many different thrust
and MTOW variants used by different
airlines. The basic specifications, as pre-
loaded in Jeppesen and as stated by the
manufacturer, have been used for these
calculations.
Flight profiles
Aircraft performance has been
analysed both inbound and outbound for
each route in order to illustrate the effects
of wind speed, and its direction, on the
City-pair Aircraft Engine MTOW TOW Fuel Block Seats Payload ESAD Fuel Fuel Wind
variant model lbs lbs burn time lbs nm per per speed
USG mins seat seat-mile kts
SOU-CDG E-170 CF34-8E5A1 79,178 66,273 523 58 80 16,000 207 6.543 0.032 -5
SOU-CDG E-175 CF34-8E5A1 82,500 69,471 565 57 88 17,600 207 6.425 0.031 -5
SOU-CDG E-190 CF34-10E5A1 105,138 89,366 633 57 114 22,800 207 5.551 0.027 -5
SOU-CDG E-195 CF34-10E5 107,338 92,862 624 57 122 24,400 207 5.116 0.025 -5
CDG-SOU E-170 CF34-8E5A1 79,178 66,545 539 60 80 16,000 223 6.741 0.032 -29
CDG-SOU E-175 CF34-8E5A1 82,500 69,762 584 60 88 17,600 223 6.632 0.032 -29
CDG-SOU E-190 CF34-10E5A1 105,138 89,700 653 59 114 22,800 223 5.724 0.028 -28
CDG-SOU E-195 CF34-10E5 107,338 93,087 646 59 122 24,400 224 5.297 0.025 -28
EXT-EGC E-170 CF34-8E5A1 79,178 68,267 749 86 80 16,000 415 9.368 0.023 -2
EXT-EGC E-175 CF34-8E5A1 82,500 71,581 805 84 88 17,600 415 9.152 0.022 -2
EXT-EGC E-190 CF34-10E5A1 105,138 91,959 920 83 114 22,800 415 8.071 0.019 -1
EXT-EGC E-195 CF34-10E5 107,338 95,395 910 84 122 24,400 415 7.461 0.018 -2
EGC-EXT E-170 CF34-8E5A1 79,178 68,429 794 94 80 16,000 437 9.929 0.024 -23
EGC-EXT E-175 CF34-8E5A1 82,500 71,710 847 93 88 17,600 438 9.622 0.024 -22
EGC-EXT E-190 CF34-10E5A1 105,138 92,114 971 90 114 22,800 437 8.514 0.021 -23
EGC-EXT E-195 CF34-10E5 107,338 95,591 962 91 122 24,400 438 7.886 0.019 -23
BHX-TLS E-170 CF34-8E5A1 79,178 70,103 967 112 80 16,000 606 12.091 0.020 -2
BHX-TLS E--175 CF34-8E5A1 82,500 73,490 1,033 111 88 17,600 605 11.737 0.019 -2
BHX-TLS E-190 CF34-10E5A1 105,138 94,274 1,196 111 114 22,800 607 10.491 0.017 -3
BHX-TLS E-195 CF34-10E5 107,338 97,717 1,186 111 122 24,400 607 9.722 0.016 -3
TLS-BHX E-170 CF34-8E5A1 79,178 70,498 1,059 125 80 16,000 676 13.235 0.021 -17
TLS-BHX E-175 CF34-8E5A1 82,500 73,949 1,136 125 88 17,600 675 12.907 0.020 -17
TLS-BHX E-190 CF34-10E5A1 105,138 94,778 1,313 121 114 22,800 672 11.513 0.018 -17
TLS-BHX E-195 CF34-10E5 107,338 98,320 1,315 121 122 24,400 673 10.776 0.017 -17
Source: Jeppesen
picture of each aircraft’s fuel burn, and 9-minute longer block time to 90-94 predictably be found on the shorter-
the effect of wind. minutes on the return leg. length route with the E-195 on the
The first route to be analysed, and the The third, and longest, route is outbound sector. The burn per seat on the
shortest, is Southampton, UK (SOU) to Birmingham, UK (BHX) to Toulouse, same route increases with decreasing
Charles De Gaulle, Paris, France (CDG). France (TLS). Again this route is typical aircraft size. So the E-170 has the highest
This route has a tracked distance of of the ones operated by Flybe. The burn per seat in all cases.
207nm on the outbound sector and outbound distance is 605nm, which, with The highest fuel burn per seat was,
208nm on the return sector, and is typical a slight headwind of 2-3 knots, allows the also predictably, on the longest route and
of the routes operated by Flybe. There ESAD to remain similar at 605-607nm. on the return sector for the E-170, in
were headwinds of 5 knots on the The return sector has a tracked distance particular (see table, this page).
outbound sector (which seems to have of 645nm, but, due to stronger The best indication of fuel-burn
had no effect on the ESAD, which headwinds of 17 knots, the ESAD performance is burn per passenger seat-
remains at 207nm), but stronger increases to 672-676nm. mile. For this, the best results overall
headwinds of 28-29 knots on the return were found on the longer sectors and the
sector (which meant that the ESAD worst on the shorter sectors.
distances increased to 223-224nm). The Fuel-burn performance For the first, and shortest, route the
winds have had a very small effect on the The fuel-burn performance of the four best performer was the E-195 with
resulting block times, with block times, E-Jet variants is shown for all three 0.025USG per seat-mile. This was
for all four variants, being close at 57-60 routes, both outbound and inbound. The followed by the E-190, then the E-175
minutes. data also include the associated fuel burn and finally the E-170 with 0.032USG per
The second route was Exeter, UK per passenger and fuel burn per seat-mile (see table, this page).
(EXT) to Bergerac, France (EGC), which passenger-mile for both sectors on each For the second route, the order
is again a route operated by Flybe. The route. The fuel burn increases on all remained the same with the E-170 getting
tracked distance is 415nm on the sectors as the power and size of aircraft 0.023-0.024USG per seat-mile, and the E-
outbound sector, and a shorter 408nm on increase, but this is not necessarily the 195 gaining 0.018-0.019USG per seat-
the return sector, the difference arising case for fuel burn per passenger or mile.
from a longer outbound flight routing passenger-mile. On the last and longest route, the
due to tracks. The outbound sector had On all six sectors, the fuel-burn performance order again remained
headwinds of 1-2 knots that left the performance is similar, with the E-170 unchanged. The E-170 used 0.02USG per
ESAD unchanged at 415nm. always burning the least fuel, followed by seat-mile and the E-195 used 0.016-
The return sector still had much the E-175. On all except the inbound 0.017USG per seat-mile (see table, this
stronger headwinds of 22-23 knots, sector of the last route (which has very page).
meaning that the ESAD increased to 437- close fuel-burn data for both the E-190
438nm, despite a shorter tracked and E-195), the E-195 comes third, To download 100s of articles
distance. Block times on the outbound followed by the E-190. like this, visit:
sector were 83-86 minutes, and with a 7- The lowest fuel burn per seat can [Link]
E-Jets maintenance
While there are 11 E-195 operators,
only two have sizeable fleets that have
been operating for two or more years.
These are Flybe and Royal Jordanian,
Maintenance programme
The E-Jets have a Maintenance
Steering Group 3 (MSG3) maintenance
T
he Embraer E-Jets are sub- Operators using the aircraft for programme. “The E-170/-175’s
divided between the E-170/-175 regional feeding services include maintenance planning document (MPD)
and larger E-190/-195. The Chautauqua Airlines, Republic Airlines is on its fifth revision, having been
smaller E-170 first entered and Compass Airlines. Major airlines released in November 2008,” explains
service in 2002, while the larger variants using the type include Alitalia, Egyptair, Mikko Koskentalo, manager marketing
started operations later in 2004. The two Finnair, LOT Polish Airlines, Saudia, and sales at Finnair Technical Services.
main type groups are certified as two South African, Air Canada and Royal “The E-190/-195’s MPD is on its third
different aircraft types, and have different Jordanian. Small operators are those such revision, which was released in
landing gears and engines, so they have as Baboo, Cirrus Airlines, Fuji Dream November 2008.” Embraer expects to
two separate, although similar, Airlines and Hong Kong Express release its next revisions in the third
maintenance programmes. Airlines which Airways. quarter of 2009.
operate both type groups therefore need Most E-170 and -175 fleets are “The maintenance programme
to have both maintenance programmes operated on short sectors with average includes about 1,400 tasks for the
approved. FC times of 0.9-1.4FH. Annual rates of E-170/-175 and 1,200 for the E-190/-195
There are 530 E-jets in operation with utilisation are 1,900-2,500FH. The E-175 in average configuration,” continues
airlines: 270 E-170s/-175s, and 260 E- is operated at longer FC times. Koskentalo. “The MPD has systems,
190s/-195s. There are about another 362 Annual utilisation rates are close at structural, zonal, high-intensity radiated
on firm order. The aircraft are powered 2,000-2,500FH for Alitalia Express, fields (HIRF)/lightning, and corrosion
exclusively by the CF34 engine, but the Egyptair Express, Finnair, LOT Polish prevention and control programme
E-170/-175 are equipped with the -8E5 Airlines, Saudia and Air Canada. US (CPCP) inspections.”
variant, and the E-190/-195 are equipped airline Republic Airlines, which provides There are various intervals for these
with the higher-rated -10E5. feeder services for Delta and United inspection tasks, which are based on
The E-Jets have a base maintenance Express, has longer average FC times of multiples of 24 hours, FHs, FCs, calendar
programme of four base checks, with a 1.35-1.50FH. Shuttle America, which hours, and calendar months. These tasks
basic interval of 6,000 flight hours (FH) also operates feeder services as Delta are not pre-packaged into defined
and 5,000 flight cycles (FC). The fourth Connection and United Express, has FC maintenance checks in the MPD.
check in the cycle therefore has an times of about 1.60FH, one of the longest Operators are free to package tasks
interval of 24,000FH and 20,000FC. An FC times of all E-Jet operations. Republic into line and base maintenance checks,
eighth check at the end of the second base Airlines and Shuttle America also have according to their rates of utilisation and
check cycle is heavier than the fourth higher annual utilisations of 2,600- FH:FC ratio. Tasks with calendar month
check. 3,000FH. intervals are more likely to be included in
Most aircraft are operated at annual The E-190/-195 have similarly been base checks.
utilisations of 2,000-2,500FH, so they acquired to operate in a variety of roles, There are several inspections with
will have a base check every 25-30 although a few operators are regional intervals close to 600FH and multiples of
months. On this basis, the earliest-built E- airlines, affiliated with larger carriers, 600FH, and these are grouped into
170s will have the first of their fourth using the aircraft for feeder services. The ‘intermediate’ or ‘A’ checks by most
base checks coming due in about three E-190/-195 have mainly been selected to airlines. Some, such as Flybe, have chosen
years. The fleet leader is an E-170LR operate thinner routes for major and to equalise the tasks with the lower
operated by Republic Airlines, which has medium-sized airlines. Examples include intervals into smaller line maintenance
accumulated about 12,800FH and Air Canada, COPA, Finnair, Hainan checks.
9,100FC. Airlines, jetBlue Airways, Lufthansa, There are many inspections with
TACA and USAirways. intervals close to 6,000FH, and airlines
The E-190 has similar rates of group these into ‘base’ or ‘C’ checks.
E-Jets in operation utilisation to the E-170/-175. Most E-190 There are many tasks that have intervals
The E-170 accounts for the majority operations achieve annual utilisations of lower than 6,000FH, and so they cannot
of the two smaller variants. The E-170 2,100-2,600FH and 1,350-1,900FC. be grouped into ‘base’ checks. “We have
and E-175 have been selected by airlines Average FC time is about 1.50. chosen to add a 3,000FH check package,
to operate in a variety of roles, including Exceptions to this are Air Canada and and group these tasks into a ‘B’ check.
regional feeder services for larger carriers, jetBlue, two of the E-190’s largest The downtime for this also allows us to
lower-density routes for major airlines, operators, which both accumulate complete cosmetic tasks and to catch up
and thinner markets served by small averages of about 3,000FH per year and with service bulletins (SBs) that cannot be
carriers. have average FH times of 1.80-2.00FH. completed during line checks. This
Rotable components
Considering the relatively small size
of the E-170/-190 fleet it, is surprising
that no fewer than three companies are
offering rotable overhaul programmes for
it. They are all fundamentally similar,
covering most of the rotable parts with
the exception of the larger items, the
landing gear and APU. Failed or hard-
time components are removed from the
aircraft by the operator and exchanged
for fresh components provided by the
service provider. The latter then arranges
for the repair, testing, and return of
serviceable parts to the inventory. As well
benefiting from having predictable costs,
the operator avoids the burden of
managing warranty administration, and
having arguments with a large number of
vendors.
Unsurprisingly, the most established
of these providers is Embraer itself. The
company’s Parts Pool Program, which
was developed for the earlier ERJ-145
family, has been extended to the E-170/-
190 and has been selected by a large
number of operators.
CF34-10E5 in operation
There are no fewer than five engine
variants available for the E-190 and E-
195: the CF34-10E5, E5A1, E6, E6A1
and the E7. They are physically identical,
and the difference between them is in the
take-off thrust rating, flat-rating
temperature and the maximum allowable
take-off temperature (see table, page 22).
All these engines are maintained on-
condition, but a typical interval for the
first shop visit of a CF34-10E5 is about
18,000EFH. Second and third shop-visit
intervals will be lower at about
12,000EFH and 10,000EFH respectively.
The first shop visit is estimated to cost in
the region of $850,000, but the second
and third will be more expensive at $1.4
million and $1.3 million respectively.
Over the three shop visits the cost per replacement will not be a factor until the engine maintenance costs than the E-
EFH will be $89/EFH. second shop visit. Assuming that the 170/-175.
On all the CF34-10E variants the second shop visit takes place at Despite the greater thrust and the
LLPs have a projected ultimate life of 27,500EFH/21,520EFC, then the stub life higher cost of overhaul of the CF34-10,
25,000EFC. The list price of the current left in the LLPs at replacement is going to its longer shop-visit intervals result in an
production-standard parts is be about 14%, and a more realistic LLP overhaul cost per EFH comparable with
approximately $1.4 million. Dividing reserve would therefore be $65/EFC. the CF34-8E5. Moreover, the list price
each individual part cost by its ultimate for the LLPs on the CF34-10 is actually
cycle life puts the LLP reserve at about less than the CF34-8 at $1.4 million
$56/EFC. Again, reserves for LLP CF34-10E7 compared to $1.65 million. As a result,
replacement depend on the stub life that The equivalent shop-visit intervals for the higher-rated CF34-8E5A1 suffers the
can be left at replacement. the higher-rated -10E7 will be about highest cost of all, because it has the
Based on the projected ultimate 13,000EFH, 7,000EFH and 6,000EFH. shorter shop-visit intervals, the most
component lives and assuming an annual The first shop visit is estimated to cost in expensive LLPs and the lowest LLP life.
utilisation of 2,300FH/1,800FC, LLP the region of $700,000, but the second The total maintenance cost for the
replacement will not be a factor until the and third will be more expensive at an two smaller members of the family is
second shop visit. Assuming that the estimated $1.0 million and $950,000 $783-837 per FH for the E-170/-175, and
second shop visit takes place at respectively. Over the three shop visits the $771-811 per FH for the E-175 (see
30,000EFH/23,480 cycles, then the stub cost per EFH will be $102/EFH. table, page 22). The difference is mainly
life left in the LLPs at replacement is Based on the projected ultimate due to the increased cost of maintaining
likely to be approximately 6%, and a component lives, and assuming an annual the higher-rated engines. The E-190/-195
more realistic LLP reserve would utilisation of 2,800FH/2,200FC, LLP have higher heavy-component-related
therefore be $60/EFC. replacement will not be a factor until the costs, which offset their lower engine
third shop visit. Assuming that the third maintenance costs.
shop visit takes place at The total costs are particularly low
CF34-10E6 26,000EFH/20,350 cycles, then the stub for the E-190/-95 considering their size.
The equivalent shop-visit intervals for life left in the LLPs at replacement is This is one major element that makes the
the higher-rated -10E6 will be about going to be approximately 18%, and a aircraft appealing compared to the
17,000EFH, 10,500EFH and 9,000EFH. more realistic LLP reserve would smallest jetliners, whose maintenance
The first shop visit is estimated to cost in therefore be $69/EFC. costs are about $300 per FH higher.
the region of $850,000, but the second Although the maintenance costs are
and third will be more expensive at $1.35 relatively high for the E-170/0175, the
million and $1.25 million respectively. Maintenance cost summary aircraft nevertheless remain economically
Over the three shop visits, the cost per Perhaps surprisingly, there is not a attractive.
EFH will be $95/EFH. great difference between the total
Based on the projected ultimate maintenance costs for the E-170/-175 and To download 100s of articles
component lives, and assuming an annual the larger E-190/-195. This is mainly like this, visit:
utilisation of 2,300FH/1,800FC, LLP because the E-190/-195 has slightly lower [Link]
E-Jet family
engine maintenance providers include GE
Engine Services and Aveos Fleet
Performance. Due to the financial,
personnel, time and tooling costs of
T
his survey summarises the major 7. Heavy Component Maintenance come due.
aftermarket and technical (see fourth table, page 27). The backlog of E-Jet deliveries
support providers for the amounts to nearly 350 aircraft that are
Embraer E-Jet family of aircraft. Some of the technical support destined for all areas of the world.
It is grouped into seven sections covering providers are listed in most, if not all, of Existing operators will already have
the categories of technical support offered the seven sections and could be termed as maintenance contracts in place with
by each provider. ‘one-stop-shop’ service providers for the third-party facilities or in house, but the
E-Jets. This means that they provide most maintenance of those aircraft going to
1. Engineering Management and of the technical support services that an new operators, however, will need to go
Technical Support (see table, page airline customer would require. The to tender. This will be where a lot of the
25); tables show the range of services that growth could be seen, as more third-party
2. Line maintenance and in-service these facilities are capable of offering. operators, both airline-connected and
operational support (see first table, As the tables show, the maintenance, independent, start to offer capabilities
page 26); repair and overhaul (MRO) and other around the world.
3. Base Maintenance Support (see technical support facilities are able to Many of the third-party facilities
second table, page 26); provide a complete range of line and base available around the world were once
4. Engine Maintenance (see first table, maintenance services, as well as engine part of, or are connected to, an airline.
page 27); and heavy component maintenance for The Executive Jet model (of which
5. Spare Engine Support (see second the E-Jet family. there is currently only one being
table, page 27); The major maintenance providers operated) within the E-Jet family has not
6. Rotables and Logistics (see third include: ExelTech Aerospace, Aveos Fleet been considered in the data below. The
table, page 27); Performance and Embraer. The major market shares, as produced by Aircraft
Fleet & Analytical System (ACAS) for the
month of June 2009, do not include this
model. The geographical breakdowns are
conducted according to ACAS’s view of
countries and their relevant world region.
Engine maintenance
The E-Jet family has just the one
engine option for each aircraft model: the
CF34-8E for the E-170 and E-175; and
the CF34-10E for the E-190 and E-195
models. Although the engine is part of a
family that is maintained by many
facilities, there is still a limited choice of
MRO facilities that cover these engine
variants.
As would be expected, General
Electric (GE) takes the majority of the The next individual company is Aveos ExelTech Aerospace is by far the most
engine overhaul market. Its engine shop Fleet Management, which accounts for prolific of the remaining third-party
in Strother, USA, alone has just over 48% 11% of the engine overhaul market. facilities. It has taken 27% of the market
of the share, which according to ACAS Lufthansa Technik takes the next biggest share for both checks, and comes close to
equates to over 500 engine shop visits to share of the market, when both its main being a one-stop-shop when it comes to
date. If those figures are combined with shop and that at Lufthansa A.E.R.O. E-Jet maintenance.
those completed at its headquarters and Alzey are combined. As well as maintaining engines, Aveos
Welsh engine shop, the result is that GE As previously mentioned, there are Fleet Performance also undertakes a large
holds nearly a 58% market share. and will continue to be a growing amount of airframe maintenance, assisted
As the aircraft fleet grows and more number of choices for operators as the E- by the number of E-Jets in the Air
engines require shop visits, and the Jets fleet grows. This is because many Canada fleet. For both checks, it has
number of facilities with capabilities engine shops are developing their CF34 gained 12.5% of the market. This means
grows, it will be interesting to see how capabilities to include the -8E and -10E that facilities in Canada have nearly 40%
this figure changes. Having said that, GE series. This is true of MRO companies (190 aircraft) of the base maintenance
has large facilities all over the world, so it such as MTU and Lufthansa Technik, as market share.
is likely to continue to take a large well as airline maintenance departments. Embraer itself has performed about
portion of the market. For the APU market, about half of 12% of base maintenance checks at its
StandardAero, which pushed GE into APUs are maintained by Sundstrand Nashville, USA facility. There are other
second place with engine overhauls for Power Systems in the US. The other half MRO facilities, as seen in the tables, that
the Embraer ERJ-145 family, is an expert are maintained in-house by airlines or are undertake maintenance on the E-Jets, but
on the Rolls Royce AE3007 (see ERJ-145 up for tender. they all contribute less than 4% each,
family technical support providers, with many doing less than 1% (about five
Aircraft Commerce, December 2008 / aircraft) each of base check maintenance.
January 2009, page 23). According to Base maintenance These figures will change over the
ACAS, Standard Aero has only had three The base maintenance market is next year or so as the global fleet
engine shop visits from E-Jets in recent divided into light and heavy checks. The increases and more facilities increase their
times, despite also being CF34 experts. figures differ between the two checks, but capabilities and capacity. This could well
This is quite possibly because it the order that the facilities fall into be true of companies such as Flybe,
predominantly deals with corporate jets. generally stays the same. which is increasing its E-195 fleet. At the
Also, while it does maintain the -1, -3 There are still a number of operators same time Flybe is reducing its 737 and
and -8 models of the CF34, it does not that undertake their base maintenance in BAE146 fleet, meaning that there will be
yet have capability for the -10, and GE house, with nearly a quarter of light an increase in E-Jet capacity at Flybe
(Strother) has cornered the US market. checks and 19% of heavy checks being Aviation Services.
StandardAero could well increase its completed this way (equating to 91 and
market share over the coming years. 117 aircraft respectively). There are 10%
The next largest market share is taken of light checks and 15% of heavy checks North and South America
by a group made up of contracts that are for aircraft with maintenance contracts North America is the largest operator
unknown or are for tender. This amounts up for tender, or completed by an of E-Jets with 293 aircraft (54%), while
to nearly 30% of recent market share. unknown facility. South America has only 12% of the
Facility Maint. Op. AOG Line A checks Engine QEC Engine Landing gear APU Thrust reverser
control support checks changes changes changes changes changes
Aveos Fleet Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Performance Inc.
Egyptair Maint. Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
& Engineering
Embraer Services Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
(Nashville)
Embraer Maint. Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Center (Brazil)
ExelTech Aerospace Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Finnair Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Flybe Aviation Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Services
Goodrich Y Y Y
Lufthansa Cityline Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
MTU Maintenance Y Y In co-operation with partner
OGMA Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
global fleet according to ACAS’s June companies include US Airways. The vast majority of European
2009 data. Again, many of the operators There are 63 aircraft currently being facilities are in fact developed from airline
have in-house maintenance facilities, but operated in South America, but again, maintenance departments and include
there are also a growing number of other like in the Asia Pacific area, the Alitalia, Finnair, Flybe, LOT Polish
MRO facilities offering E-Jet maintenance market is not large, even Airlines and Lufthansa. This is directly
maintenance. This is aided by the vast E- though the aircraft is a South American connected to the fleet that those airlines
Jet fleet that is already flown in the North product. The main facility is in fact have chosen to fly in recent years. OGMA
American area. Embraer’s Maintenance Center in Brazil. and SR Technics are two of the few
As mentioned previously, Aveos Fleet With this and many large MRO facilities independent facilities that offer E-Jet
Performance and ExelTech Aerospace are in North America, the South American maintenance.
facilities in North America that have a fleet is well catered for. Standalone engine maintenance is
large share of the market. Both are offered by GE in Wales and by MTU in
considered independent MROs, although Germany, the latter being an independent
Aveos Fleet Performance started as the Europe facility.
maintenance department for Air Canada. Although Europe has the second The growth of the E-Jet fleet within
Other independent MRO facilities in largest E-Jet fleet, it has just 16.5% of the Europe could well see capacity and
North America include AAR, Certified global fleet. There is a relatively good capability growing within those facilities
Aviation Services, Empire Aero Center, choice of facilities for both engine and that already offer the service, but also
First Wave MRO Inc., and Goodrich. airframe maintenance, although none of among more of the independent facilities
As well as maintaining their own them currently work on the large and new operators, such as British
fleets, many operators offer third-party numbers that are seen by Aveos, ExelTech Airways. Nearly 100 new aircraft will be
maintenance capabilities to others. These and GE in North America. delivered to Europe alone over the
coming years, which emphasises this
point.
E-JET FAMILY BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT
Facility C checks Heavy checks Composites Strip / paint Interior Asia Pacific
refurb.
The greater Asia Pacific region
accounts for just 9% (or 50 aircraft) of
Aveos Fleet Performance Inc. Y Y Y Specific areas only Y
the global E-Jet fleet. As such there are
Egyptair Maintenance Y Y Y Y Y
currently limited maintenance options for
& Engineering
E-Jets based in Asia Pacific. The facilities
Embraer Aircraft Maintenance Y Y Y Y Y
that do have capability will be on a small
Services (Nashville)
scale at the moment, or will just deal with
Embraer Maintenance Center Y Y Y Y Y
in-house maintenance. Operators may
(Brazil)
have in-house maintenance facilities, but
Embraer Service Center) Y Y
few also offer third-party capabilities to
(inc. Fort Lauderdale, France & Singapore)
others.
ExelTech Aerospace Y Y Y Y
Mandarin Airlines does a fair amount
Finnair Y Y Y Y Y
of its own maintenance in house, but it
flyBe Aviation Services Y Y Y Limited areas only Y
does not offer third-party maintenance.
jetBlue Airways
Instead, it has an agreement with China
Lufthansa Technik Y Y
Airlines to do some of its base
OGMA Y Y Y Y
maintenance checks. China Airlines’
capabilities, as well as others such as
the major airlines of the regions that E-JET FAMILY SPARE ENGINE SUPPORT
operate this aircraft.
The operators with maintenance Facility On-wing AOG services Short-term Medium/long- Engine
departments offering third-party support leases term leases pooling
capabilities include EgyptAir (EgyptAir
Egyptair Maintenance Y Y
Maintenance & Engineering) and Royal
& Engineering
Jordanian (JorAMCo), the former coming Embraer Services Y Y
relatively close to being a one-stop-shop. (Nashville)
New E-Jets in the regions will account Embraer Maintenance Center Y Y
for 17 aircraft in the Middle East and 14 (Brazil)
ExelTech Aerospace Y
aircraft in Africa. Only two of the Finnair Y Y If available If available If available
operators already have the type, so there Flybe Aviation Services Limited to line
are potentially four new maintenance & base EMM tasks
contracts to be awarded. One of those GE Engine Services Y Y Y
Lufthansa AERO Alzey Y Y Y Y Y
new operators will be South African
MTU Maintenance Y Y Y Y Y
Airlink in 2011, so maintenance is very
likely to be completed in house. This
could mean that South African Airlink E-JET FAMILY ROTABLES AND LOGISTICS
covers southern Africa, while EgyptAir
covers northern Africa and JorAMCo Facility Rotable Rotable Repair & AOG PBH
inventory inventory document support rotables
deals with the Middle East, although
leasing pooling management support
Goodrich has a small capability from its
offices in Dubai. Egyptair Maintenance Limited support Limited support Limited support Limited support Limited
If an aircraft encounters problems in support
areas that have no maintenance cover, & Engineering
Embraer Services Y Y Y Y Y
such as some regions of Asia, Africa and (Nashville)
the Middle East, many of the major Embraer Maintenance Center Y Y Y Y
global MROs would be able to assist the (Brazil)
operator by sending out the relevant Embraer Service Center Y Y Y Y
(Fort Lauderdale, France & Singapore)
personnel and parts. Airlines with their
ExelTech Aerospace Y
own maintenance department would also Finnair Y Y Y Y Y
be able to do this, if not already done, to Fokker Services / Stork On system On system Full cap. Full cap. On system
cover their network. level level level
Goodrich Y Y Y Y Y
Lufthansa Technik Y Y Y Y Y
Summary
Although the E-Jet fleet is set to reach E-JET FAMILY HEAVY COMPONENT MAINTENANCE
about 900 aircraft, the technical support
market looks likely to remain a specialist Facility Wheels, tyres APU test Thrust Landing Landing gear
& brakes & repair reversers gear exchanges
one served by a few providers. The fleet
will remain focused with a relatively Egyptair Maintenance Y Y
small number of airlines. The technical & Engineering
support market will mainly be divided Embraer Services Y Y Y Y
between Embraer, GE, some independent (Nashville)
Embraer Maintenance Center Y Y Y
airframe and engine shops, and the larger (Brazil)
airline maintenance and engineering Embraer Service Center Y Y Y Y
departments. (Fort Lauderdale, France & Singapore)
Finnair Y Under study Under study
Flybe Aviation Services W&T only
To download 100s of articles Fokker Services / Stork Dormant cap. Dormant cap Dormant cap
like this, visit: Goodrich Y
[Link] Lufthansa Technik Y Y Y









