Scribd
Upload
21 views2 pages

Evaluating Research Sources Effectively

The document provides guidance on evaluating and effectively using sources for research. It outlines four principles for working with sources: 1) Evaluate sources for quality and importance; 2) Take full notes including bibliographic information, quotes, and your own thoughts; 3) Ensure you understand the context and reasoning of the original source; 4) Get feedback from others on your work. It also provides a quick tip for speed reading sources, which involves understanding the source's structure and argument to find key points and themes efficiently.

Uploaded by

Houcine D'Azergui
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
21 views2 pages

Evaluating Research Sources Effectively

The document provides guidance on evaluating and effectively using sources for research. It outlines four principles for working with sources: 1) Evaluate sources for quality and importance; 2) Take full notes including bibliographic information, quotes, and your own thoughts; 3) Ensure you understand the context and reasoning of the original source; 4) Get feedback from others on your work. It also provides a quick tip for speed reading sources, which involves understanding the source's structure and argument to find key points and themes efficiently.

Uploaded by

Houcine D'Azergui
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

The Craft of Research: Chapter 6 and a Quick Tip

Once you gather your sources (yesterday's post), or are still in the process of doing so,
you should be evaluating them - which ones are valuable, which ones have weak
arguments, and how to cite them accurately and fairly, avoiding plagiarism and
yanking-out-of-context.

Two principles for sources, especially secondary (those based on a primary, or


eyewitness, source): (1) "One good source is worth more than a score of mediocre
ones"; (2) "One accurate summary of a good source is sometimes worth more than
the source itself" (emphasis orig.). Sadly, much research is not reported accurately,
even by other scholars themselves. Here's how to go about good reading and using
(not a sequence of steps, but rather a group):

1. Evaluate sources. (1) Skim books/articles (see Quick Tip at end). (2) When
skimming tells you that a source is important, read it slowly and with
awareness as to the total context of any statements you might use. If you see
"quoted in" after information, trace that back and see how (in)accurately
researchers have quoted the original material from its original context.
2. Take full notes. Make notecards with complete bibliographical information
(i.e. author/editor, title, volume, publisher, edition, place published, date, page
number, keywords, summary of source, direct quotation, your own thoughts
about connections, and library call numbers for books). Use a text document
or 5x8 cards - 3x5 are impractical unless you naturally write in a 6-point font.
After making notes, check the source again. Be careful not to rephrase too
closely to the original. If it's a direct quote, make LARGE quote marks around
the quoted text, word for word.
3. Get the context right. Look at the author's line of reasoning, relative
importance of points in the original source, the author's level of confidence
("seems to ___"), author's views vs. author's summary of someone else (this
can be tricky!), roots of disagreement in two different sources, etc. Triple-
check.
4. Get help from others! Form a study group, explain your thinking at a given
point to laymen, and ask for others' critical opinions.

Quick Tip: steps for speedy, accurate reading. Take notes during all of them! The fifth
is optional.

1. Know the source's geography - things to read include the abstract (articles),
headings, chapter titles, oft-cited sources, table of contents, sections of
chapters, etc.
2. Find the point of the argument - this should be in the introduction (particularly
the last part thereof) or the conclusion. Note types of evidence used.
3. Find important sub-points. Look for transition words (first...second...,
finally..., etc.) and read the first and last parts of each transitioned chunk.
4. Find key themes. Write these with the source's bibliographical information.
These aid in later sifting of sources.
5. Skim paragraphs - first sentence + last sentence. Do this if steps 1-4 give iffy
answers.
Also do these for your own writing. If it's difficult, the organization needs reworking.

You might also like