0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views2 pages

Globalization's Impact on Development

This document discusses different perspectives on globalization, history, and development. It notes that people have different views and opinions on these topics that can spark disagreements. While some see globalization as beneficial politically and economically, others view it through a religious lens, leading to different perspectives. The document argues that the best approach is for people to learn about politics and economics to better understand globalization and how it can contribute to a country's growth. Studying these topics can help adults gain knowledge and competencies to understand contemporary issues and challenges facing all societies.

Uploaded by

Melvin Pogi138
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views2 pages

Globalization's Impact on Development

This document discusses different perspectives on globalization, history, and development. It notes that people have different views and opinions on these topics that can spark disagreements. While some see globalization as beneficial politically and economically, others view it through a religious lens, leading to different perspectives. The document argues that the best approach is for people to learn about politics and economics to better understand globalization and how it can contribute to a country's growth. Studying these topics can help adults gain knowledge and competencies to understand contemporary issues and challenges facing all societies.

Uploaded by

Melvin Pogi138
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Asio,Kevin F.

September 21, 2021


BSAG-1101 Score______
Learning Task #2 (Position Paper)

“Globalization, history and development:


a tale of two centuries”

People always have their own perspectives, especially when it comes


to politics, areas, and other topics. These opinions will spark a discussion that
will turn into a disagreement, and for some reason. It will become an issue
due to misunderstandings. When it comes to Globalization, history and
development people will have there own sights, opinions and ideas.
Furthermore, the term globalization is used in two different ways, causing
some misunderstanding and it will become an issue.

Trade, investment, and financial flows are not the only forms of
economic openness. It also includes cross-national flows of services,
technology, information, and ideas. People's cross-border mobility, on the
other hand, is heavily regulated and restricted. Asymmetrical economic
interconnectedness exists. In the industrialized world, there is a significant
degree of interdependence among countries. The emerging world is heavily
reliant on the developed world. From 1870 until 1914, the era of laissez-faire
prevailed. Goods, capital, and labor were able to circulate almost freely
across national borders. The government's involvement in the economy was
modest. Of course, there were disparities between countries. In general,
however, these characteristics were more readily apparent in Third World
countries than in Atlantic economies. The openness of economies that
characterized this period was accompanied by a rapid development of cross-
border trade, investment, and finance. According to Jan Nederveen, the idea
of periodizing globalization raises a number of concerns. First, many
research, due to its presentist leanings, accepts globalization uncritically,
overlooking structural patterns, misreading contemporary developments, and
presenting as innovative what are older aspects. Second, a presentist
viewpoint suggests a Eurocentric viewpoint, reinforcing the widespread
stereotype that world history begins with the “rise of the West.” The traditional
globalization cutoff points of 1500 and 1800 mirror old-fashioned Eurocentric
history. Third, this perspective on globalization is not universal. It excludes or
minimizes non-Western contributions to globalization, which contradicts
historical evidence and makes little sense in an era of developing
multipolarity, when multicentric interpretations of world history have grown
more important. Fourth, it is out of step with other research on globalization.
Fifth, globalization periodization is not a given and is a point of contention in
globalization research. Deepak Nayyar expresses his point of view right at
the outset of the topic, emphasizing that he is more interested in political and
economic than religious ways in order to help people understand what
globalization is and what it can offer in terms of our country's growth. Others
are concerned in defining globalization, history, and development in religious
terms. As a result, there are different viewpoints on both sides, which has
turned it into a problem.
I agree with Deepak Nayyar because I've seen how globalization
benefits our country both politically and economically. In the digital economy
of the internet era, which has dissolved the national barrier of time and place,
allowing for the control and ease of integration of national markets, Philippine
technology will be faster and cheaper. When it comes to trade flows, the
Philippines' economy has benefited from the reduction of trade barriers,
which has allowed global commerce to grow at a faster rate over time. New
technologies have formed distribution channels as a result of the IT
revolution, which are difficult to restrict under protectionist trade rules. When
it comes to advertising, the Philippines' money flows have become
increasingly multinational in the internet age. Globalization and its driving
forces have provided various work prospects to all Filipinos in the Philippines.
I believe that the best course of action for this problem is for people to learn
and understand politics and economics because politics helps you to know
your rights, clarifies what you believe, helps you to understand our nation's
parties, and prepares you for adult life, while economists engage in current
events. Learning to utilize statistics and read critically is part of studying
economics. Economics majors are fascinating people because they can
explain why economic phenomena occur as well as how economic
performance may be improved. Adult learners will benefit from studying the
contemporary world since it will help them become interested in
contemporary world problems and concerns that all societies face, as well as
gain competences and knowledge. Adults learn about the nature of
relationships through studying these challenges and issues.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Contemporary analyses of globalization often reflect historical patterns by accepting globalization's progression uncritically, sometimes overlooking structural patterns and contemporary developments. These analyses are critiqued for being presentist and Eurocentric, offering a narrow view of globalization's history and minimizing non-Western contributions. Such analyses are criticized for being disconnected from current research trends and failing to capture globalization's complexities .

Adult learners benefit from studying contemporary global problems as it fosters interest in current international issues and societal challenges. This education enhances their competencies, broadens their understanding of relationships, and prepares them to contribute meaningfully to societal discourse. By cultivating informed citizens, this knowledge can drive advocacy and solutions to global challenges .

The periodization of globalization often contributes to a Eurocentric perspective by reinforcing the notion that world history begins with the 'rise of the West,' as seen in the traditional cutoff points of 1500 and 1800. It excludes non-Western contributions to globalization, contradicting historical evidence and neglecting the importance of developing multipolarity in world history. Critics argue that this Eurocentric view is not universal and is out of step with current globalization research .

Studying politics and economics is crucial for understanding globalization and its effects because it equips individuals with the knowledge of rights, clarifies beliefs, and provides insights into national and global economic phenomena. It prepares individuals for active engagement in economic optimization and helps them critically analyze global and local events, thus influencing informed decision-making .

Different perspectives on globalization, history, and development lead to varied interpretations and policies, often resulting in disagreements and misunderstandings. For example, some views focus on political and economic aspects, while others define globalization in religious terms. These differences can complicate consensus-building and result in differing priorities in policymaking, affecting how globalization's benefits are distributed and understood .

The concept of laissez-faire during the late 19th and early 20th centuries reduced government intervention in economies, allowing goods, capital, and labor to circulate almost freely across national borders. This openness fostered rapid development in cross-border trade, investment, and finance, facilitating significant economic growth and interdependence among countries, especially in the industrialized world .

During the period from 1870 to 1914, there was a significant degree of economic interconnectedness among industrialized countries, characterized by the free movement of goods, capital, and labor across national borders. However, this interconnectedness was asymmetrical, with the emerging world heavily reliant on the developed world. This period of laissez-faire featured modest government involvement in economies and disparities between countries, with Third World countries more impacted than Atlantic economies .

The IT revolution presents benefits such as the creation of new distribution channels that enhance trade flows and global commerce. It offers faster and cheaper technology integration in the Philippines, aiding economic growth. However, it also poses challenges such as potential restrictions under protectionist trade rules, which can stifle these benefits. The adaptation to this new digital landscape requires policies that balance openness and regulation .

Globalization has benefited the Philippine economy by reducing trade barriers, which has facilitated the growth of global commerce. The digital economy, characterized by the dissolution of national barriers of time and place, has allowed for easier integration of national markets. The IT revolution has enabled the formation of new distribution channels, further enhancing this integration. These changes have provided various work prospects and have made Philippine technology faster and cheaper .

Misunderstandings about 'globalization' arise because the term is used in different contexts, often leading to debates over its true meaning. This can cause confusion in discussions as interpretations might emphasize global interconnectedness in trade and finance over societal and cultural exchanges. Such fundamental misconceptions can spark disagreements and hinder the formulation of cohesive political and economic strategies .

You might also like