0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views19 pages

Microsoft Teams in Education Review 2020

This document summarizes a research paper titled "Assessing the effectiveness of Microsoft Teams during COVID-19 for online learning: A students’ perceptive". The paper was published on ResearchGate in October 2020 and has received over 2,000 reads. It was authored by Divyapriya Karthikeyan from VIT University. The paper examines students' perspectives on the effectiveness of Microsoft Teams for online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. It provides 35 citations to other relevant literature on topics like e-learning, online education, challenges of remote learning, and research methods. The full paper contents were not included in the document.

Uploaded by

sukarman
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views19 pages

Microsoft Teams in Education Review 2020

This document summarizes a research paper titled "Assessing the effectiveness of Microsoft Teams during COVID-19 for online learning: A students’ perceptive". The paper was published on ResearchGate in October 2020 and has received over 2,000 reads. It was authored by Divyapriya Karthikeyan from VIT University. The paper examines students' perspectives on the effectiveness of Microsoft Teams for online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. It provides 35 citations to other relevant literature on topics like e-learning, online education, challenges of remote learning, and research methods. The full paper contents were not included in the document.

Uploaded by

sukarman
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: [Link]

net/publication/345416702

Assessing the effectiveness of Microsoft Teams during COVID-19 for online


learning: A students’ perceptive

Chapter · October 2020

CITATIONS READS

0 2,055

1 author:

Divyapriya Karthikeyan
VIT University
4 PUBLICATIONS   16 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Assessing the effectiveness of Microsoft Teams during COVID-19 for online learning: A students’ perceptive View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Divyapriya Karthikeyan on 07 November 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Divyapriya, Research Scholar
School of Bio Sciences & Technology, VIT, Vellore-632014, India
During COVID-19. Malaysian Journal of Social
Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(8), pp.106-116.
[18] Ellis, R.A., Marcus, G. and Taylor, R., 2005. Learning
[1] Kwisnek, V.F., 2004. Assessing the effectiveness of e- through inquiry: student difficulties with online
learning. In Instructional Technologies: Cognitive course based Material. Journal of Computer Assisted
Aspects of Online Programs (pp. 192-220). IGI Global. Learning, 21(4), pp.239-252.
[2] Maeroff, G.I., 2004. A classroom of one: How online [19] Al-Faki, I.M. and Khamis, A.H.A., 2014. Difficulties
learning is changing our schools and colleges. facing teachers in using interactive whiteboards in
Macmillan. their classes. American International Journal of Social
[3] Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. and Archer, W., 1999. Science, 3(2), pp.136-158.
Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer [20] Benbunan-Fich, R. and Hiltz, S.R., 2003. Mediators of
conferencing in higher education. The internet and the effectiveness of online courses. IEEE Transactions
higher education, 2(2-3), pp.87-105. on Professional communication, 46(4), pp.298-312.
[4] Poston, J., Apostel, S. and Richardson, K., 2020. Using [21] Nguyen, T., 2015. The effectiveness of online
Microsoft Teams to Enhance Engagement and learning: Beyond no significant difference and future
and Easy. horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and
[5] Larreamendy-Joerns, J. and Leinhardt, G., 2006. Going Teaching, 11(2), pp.309-319.
the distance with online education. Review of [22] Alexander, M.W., Truell, A.D. and Zhao, J.J., 2012.
educational research, 76(4), pp.567-605. Expected advantages and disadvantages of online
[6] Kim, K.J. and Bonk, C.J., 2006. The future of online learning: Perceptions from college students who have
teaching and learning in higher education. Educause not taken online courses. Issues in Information
quarterly, 29(4), pp.22-30. Systems, 13(2), pp.193-200.
[7] Dhir, S.K., Verma, D., Batta, M. and Mishra, D., 2017. [23] Dumford, A.D. and Miller, A.L., 2018. Online learning
E-learning in medical education in India. Indian in higher education: exploring advantages and
pediatrics, 54(10), pp.871-877. disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing
[8] Tayade, M.C. and Kulkarni, N.B., 2011. The Interface in Higher Education, 30(3), pp.452-465.
of technology and medical education in india: current [24] Francesa-Alfaro, A., Leiva-Chinchilla, P. and Chacón-
trends and scope. Indian Journal of Basic & Applied Rivas, M., 2016, October. User-friendly instructional
Medical Research, 1(1), pp.8-12. design tool to facilitate course planning. In 2016 XI
[9] AVGERINOU, M.D. and MOROS, S.E., The 5-Phase Latin American Conference on Learning Objects and
Process as a Balancing Act during Times of Technology (LACLO) (pp. 1-9). IEEE.
Disruption: Transitioning to Virtual Teaching at an [25] Athanaselis, T., Bakamidis, S., Dologlou, I., Argyriou,
International JK-5 School. E.N. and Symvonis, A., 2014. Making assistive
[10] Basilaia, G. and Kvavadze, D., 2020. Transition to reading tools user friendly: a new platform for Greek
online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 dyslexic students empowered by automatic speech
coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in recognition. Multimedia tools and applications, 68(3),
Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), pp.1-9. pp.681-699.
[11] Wang, G., Zhang, Y., Zhao, J., Zhang, J. and Jiang, F., [26]
2020. Mitigate the effects of home confinement on engagement with communication tools. Journal of
children during the COVID-19 outbreak. The Educational Technology Development and Exchange
Lancet, 395(10228), pp.945-947. (JETDE), 4(1), p.8.
[12] [27] Mandernach, B.J., 2006. Thinking critically about
Covid-19. Postdigital Science and Education, pp.1-6. critical thinking: Integrating online tools to promote
[13] Singh, K., Srivastav, S., Bhardwaj, A., Dixit, A. and critical thinking. Insight: A collection of faculty
Misra, S., 2020. Medical education during the covid- scholarship, 1, pp.41-50.
19 pandemic: A single institution experience. Indian [28] Atmowardoyo, H., (2010). Research methods for
pediatrics, 57(7), pp.678-679. language and literature studies.
[14] Murphy, E. and Coleman, E., 2004. Graduate students' [29] Atmowardoyo, H., 2018. Research methods in TEFL
experiences of challenges in online asynchronous studies: Descriptive research, case study, error
discussions. Canadian Journal of Learning and analysis, and R & D. Journal of Language Teaching
and Research, 9(1), pp.197-204.
de la technologie, 30(2). [30] Draugalis, J.R. and Plaza, C.M., 2009. Best practices
[15] Chen, R.T.H., Bennett, S. and Maton, K., 2008. The for survey research reports revisited: implications of
adaptation of Chinese international students to online target population, probability sampling, and response
flexible learning: Two case studies. Distance rate. American journal of pharmaceutical
Education, 29(3), pp.307-323. education, 73(8).
[16] Thompson, R. and Lee, M.J., 2012. Talking with [31] Martínez-Mesa, J., González-Chica, D.A., Duquia,
students through screencasting: Experimentations with R.P., Bonamigo, R.R. and Bastos, J.L., 2016.
video feedback to improve student learning. The Sampling: how to select participants in my research
Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy, 1(1), study?. Anais brasileiros de dermatologia, 91(3),
pp.1-16. pp.326-330.
[17] Krishnan, I.A., De Mello, G., Kok, S.A., Sabapathy, [32] Lefever, S., Dal, M. and Matthiasdottir, A., 2007.
S.K., Munian, S., Ching, H.S., Kandasamy, P., Online data collection in academic research:
Ramalingam, S., Baskaran, S. and Kanan, V.N., 2020. advantages and limitations. British Journal of
Challenges Faced by Hearing Impairment Students Educational Technology, 38(4), pp.574-582.
[33] Hunter, L., 2012. Challenging the reported
disadvantages of e-questionnaires and addressing
methodological issues of online data collection. Nurse
researcher, 20(1).
[34] Albers, M.J., 2017. Quantitative data analysis In the
graduate curriculum. Journal of Technical Writing and
Communication, 47(2), pp.215-233.
[35] Samuels, P., 2020. A Really Simple Guide to
Quantitative Data Analysis.
View publication stats

Padmapriya Dhanasekaran, Research Scholar


School of Bio Sciences & Technology, VIT,Vellore-632014, India

Common questions

Powered by AI

The implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on the future of online learning in higher education include an accelerated integration of digital technology in curricula, increased investment in online infrastructure, and a shift towards hybrid models that combine face-to-face and virtual learning. This evolution may lead to more personalized and accessible education, although it also poses challenges related to digital equity and maintaining quality education standards .

The adaptation of teaching methods in online education, such as incorporating multimedia, interactive platforms, and asynchronous discussions, positively impacts student learning outcomes by accommodating different learning styles, promoting ongoing engagement, and allowing students to learn at their own pace .

The pandemic has accentuated the need for digital equity, revealing disparities in access to technology and the internet among students. To address this, recommended measures include providing devices and connectivity support to disadvantaged students, implementing universal design principles in digital content creation, and offering training for both students and educators to utilize online tools effectively .

The transition to online education during the COVID-19 pandemic has transformed the traditional learning environment by making education more accessible remotely, intensifying the use of digital tools, and shifting pedagogical strategies towards more self-directed learning. This shift, while beneficial in many respects, also challenges institutions to address issues of digital divide, student engagement, and instructional quality .

Online learning tools are crucial for promoting critical thinking by offering diverse and dynamic content delivery methods which challenge students to analyze, synthesize, and evaluate information. Moreover, interactive activities such as discussion forums and problem-based learning scenarios encourage students to engage deeply with the material, enhancing critical analysis and reasoning skills .

Students with hearing impairments face several challenges during online learning sessions, such as difficulty in following audio content, reliance on visual cues which might be limited in standard online platform setups, and the lack of adequate sign language support in most online educational tools .

Microsoft Teams enhances student engagement during online learning by providing an interactive platform that facilitates communication and collaboration among students and faculty. Features such as virtual meetings, chat functions, and file sharing enable seamless interaction, thus fostering closer connections and increased active participation .

Effective strategies for instructors to address student difficulties in online courses include regular feedback, creating engaging and interactive content, offering technical support, and fostering an inclusive environment through diverse teaching methods such as live Q&A sessions and breakout discussions to ensure better comprehension and engagement .

Students who have not taken online courses perceive the primary advantages of e-learning platforms as flexibility in time and location, while the main disadvantages include the lack of face-to-face interaction, potential technical issues, and concerns about the effectiveness of communication channels .

Online synchronous communication tools, such as video conferencing and live chats, positively influence student learning and participation by providing immediate interaction, fostering a sense of community, and enhancing real-time collaboration. These tools help replicate traditional classroom dynamics and support active learning .

You might also like