What are the elements of a System of Quality Control? Identify and explain each.

ISQC 1.16 mandates that a company design and maintain a quality control system that
includes rules and procedures for each of the criteria listed below:

Leadership responsibilities for quality within the firm

ISQC 1.18 mandates that the company adopt policies and processes to foster an
internal culture that recognizes the importance of quality in performing engagements. It
also necessitates the managing principal/senior principal/executive board of a company
accepting ultimate responsibility for the company's quality control system. A principal
must also embrace day-to-day responsibilities. This issue is addressed by the specimen
procedures mentioned in Specimen whole company procedures, which must be
customized to the firm's specific circumstances.

Relevant ethical requirements

Under ISQC 1.20 and 20D-1, a firm must create policies and procedures to offer
reasonable confidence that the firm and its employees comply with relevant ethical
obligations, as well as to document incidents that could jeopardize the audit's integrity.

Independence

ISQC 1.21 and 1.22 concentrate on several specific policy and practice elements linked
to independence, such as the need that:

• engagement partners supply the firm with appropriate information on client

engagements so that the overall impact on independence requirements can be
assessed;

• personnel rapidly tell the firm of circumstances and relationships that pose a threat to
independence so that appropriate action can be done;

• relevant information is gathered and communicated to appropriate personnel so that

the firm and its employees can quickly determine whether they meet independence
requirements, and the firm can keep track of and update independence records, as well
as take appropriate action when threats to independence are present.

Any breaches of independence must be reported to the firm as soon as possible, and
the appropriate engagement partner must be alerted (ISQC 1.23).

Acceptance and continuance of client relationships and specific engagements;

When considering the competence and resources of the firm, the ability to
comply with ethical requirements, any potential conflicts of interest, whether the firm
complies with audit fees and the prohibition of providing non-audit services (as per the
FRC Ethical Standard), and the integrity of clients, the ISQC (UK) 1 requires policies
and procedures to be put in place.

ISQC 1.28 mandates the firm to develop policies and processes for maintaining an
engagement and client relationship, including how to handle situations when the firm
discovers information that would have prompted it to decline an engagement if it had
been accessible earlier. Consideration of the continuation of the engagement and the
client connection should be included in such policies and procedures.

The firm's professional and legal obligations under the circumstances, including whether
it is required to report to the person or people who made the appointment or, in some
cases, to regulatory authorities; and

The option to leave the engagement, or both the engagement and the client
relationship, if desired.

If the circumstances necessitate notification to a regulator or other body, the audit

engagement partner must consider it (such as reporting to the National Crime
Agency).Unless such discussions might constitute ‘tipping off’ or prejudicing an
investigation under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, a partner would normally discuss
the concerns with the appropriate level of the client's management before making a final
decision.

It's critical that the thought processes that led to the decision to resign or stay on the job
are properly documented.

Human resources

ISQC 1.29 requires the company to adopt policies and procedures that give it
reasonable certainty that it has enough people with the skills, knowledge, and
commitment to ethical values to:

To enable the firm or engagement principals to issue reports that are appropriate in the
circumstances, and to undertake engagements in compliance with professional
standards, regulatory and legal requirements. This is accomplished in the following
manner.

(1)Proper recruitment procedures.

(2)Adequate training of principals, staff, subcontractors and consultants.

(3)Adequate supervision of staff, subcontractors and consultants.

(4)Effective evaluation of each individual’s capabilities and potential.

(5)Appropriate, relevant work experience.

(6)Appropriate monitoring of the firm’s human resources and workflow to ensure that
there are sufficient resources to meet the workload adequately.

Engagement performance

A firm must establish policies and procedures that give it reasonable assurance
that engagements are carried out in accordance with professional standards and
applicable regulatory and legal requirements, and that the firm or engagement partner
issues reports that are appropriate for the circumstances. The following policies and
procedures must be included in these policies and procedures::

• Matters relevant to promoting consistency in the quality of engagement performance;

• Supervision responsibilities; and

• Review responsibilities.

Monitoring

The firm shall create policies and procedures that give it reasonable assurance
that the policies and procedures relating to the quality control system are relevant,
adequate, effective, and followed in practice. These rules and processes should include
a regular review and evaluation of the firm's quality control system, as well as a periodic
examination of a sample of completed engagements.

Why is each element of a System of Quality Control significant to achievement of

such effective system? Explain per element.

Any quality control system has inherent flaws that can restrict its efficacy. The
degree of compliance with a firm's prescribed quality control policies and procedures,
and hence the efficacy of the system, is affected by variation in an individual's
performance and comprehension of (a) professional requirements or (b) the firm's
quality control policies and processes.

When applicable, the firm's quality control system shall give reasonable confidence that
segments of its engagements done by its international offices, domestic or foreign
affiliates, or correspondents are performed in conformity with professional standards in
the United States.

Leadership responsibilities for quality within the firm

A quality culture is always evident. From meetings and training sessions to

corporate literature and purpose statements, it can be evident in everything a company
does. Partners that want to build a culture of quality should lead by example, displaying
their commitment.
Firms should designate one individual with overall leadership responsibility for quality
control and prove that this has been done in order to provide effective quality control.
Throughout this guide, this person is referred to as the "quality control leader." The
quality control leader is in charge of implementing, monitoring, and adjusting the firm's
quality control system as needed. Most companies allocate quality control to the same
person who is in charge of the company's risk management structure.

Acceptance and Continuance of Clients and Engagements

Policies and procedures should provide for acquiring an understanding with the
client regarding the nature, extent, and limitations of the services to be delivered to
reduce the possibility of misunderstandings. Professional standards may help determine
whether the understanding should be expressed orally or in writing.

Engagement Performance

Policies and processes should be implemented to offer reasonable assurance

that personnel review authoritative literature or other sources and consult with others
inside or outside the firm on a timely basis, if needed (for example, when dealing with
complex, unusual, or unfamiliar issues). Individuals consulted should possess the
necessary degrees of expertise, judgment, and authority. The nature of the consultation
arrangements is determined by a number of criteria, including the size of the firm and
the expertise, skill, and judgment of the people doing the task.

Why do we need a system of quality control for the firm?

A company must ensure that its employees follow the professional standards that
apply to its accounting and auditing practice. A quality control system is described as a
process that provides the firm with reasonable assurance that its employees are
adhering to appropriate professional standards as well as the firm's quality standards.
The rules and procedures created to execute the system in one part of a firm's practice
may be the same as, different from, or interrelated with those designed for another
segment, but the system's aim is the same for all segments.

The quality control system of a company is made up of the company's

organizational structure as well as the policies and processes put in place to ensure that
the company complies with professional standards. The nature, scope, and formality of
a firm's quality control policies and procedures should be appropriately comprehensive
and suitably designed in relation to the firm's size, number of offices, degree of authority
granted to its personnel and offices, personnel knowledge and experience, the nature
and complexity of the firm's practice, and appropriate cost-benefit considerations.
 References

Croner-I Navigate. Elements within a system of quality control

[Link]

Chartered accountants. Leadership responsibilities

[Link]
[Link]

PCAOB. System of Quality Control

[Link]

[Link]. Quality Control Policies and Procedures

[Link]