Socioeconomic Status and Student Performance
Uploaded by
shaSocioeconomic Status and Student Performance
Uploaded by
shaCommon questions
Powered by AIHuman capital theory, as applied in the context of socioeconomic factors and education, emphasizes the role of investments in human capabilities enhancing educational outcomes. As demonstrated by Villanueva et al. (2020), socioeconomically advantaged families can invest more in education through financial resources and parental involvement, which improve children's academic performance. This theoretical framework suggests that enhancing human capital investment through parental engagement and provision of educational resources can mitigate disadvantageous socioeconomic conditions, promoting greater educational equity .
During the lockdown period in the Philippines, socioeconomic factors indirectly affected students' electronic learning. Parental support and access to resources, which are elements of socioeconomic status, influenced the learning experience. The study by Villanueva et al. (2020) employs Gary Becker's human capital theory to demonstrate investment in a child's education through parental involvement and financial support impacts their academic performance. Limited access to resources and lower parental support in lower SES families can hinder effective e-learning .
According to Villanueva et al. (2020), socioeconomic factors indirectly influence academic performance through parental support and resource accessibility during electronic learning. A family's socioeconomic status can affect the level of investment in a child's education, such as enabling effective e-learning. This relationship is explained via human capital theory, highlighting two investment routes: direct parent involvement and provision of financial resources, both contributing to improved academic outcomes .
Jabar et al. (2020) found that socioeconomic factors affect parental involvement variably because of factors like family income and subjective living condition assessments. Higher income families generally show more involvement, but interestingly, parents who consider themselves worse off economically actually have higher involvement. This might be due to a greater perceived need to help their children succeed, countering economic disadvantages. This complexity showcases the multifaceted impact of socioeconomic status on educational engagement .
Yes, the educational attainment of parents can be a predictor of their high school children's academic success. Agullana et al. (2017) found a significant correlation between parents' educational levels and students’ performance in senior high school. Educated parents tend to value education more highly, encouraging their children’s academic achievement. The study underlines the importance of parents being aware of their children’s educational needs to provide necessary support and resources .
Agullana et al. (2017) recommend that regardless of socioeconomic status, parents should be properly oriented on the value of education, ensuring they support their children's schooling. Parents should also be aware of their children's academic needs to provide necessary resources. Meanwhile, schools should adopt educational approaches that support students’ performance irrespective of socioeconomic backgrounds, fostering an inclusive academic environment .
Socioeconomic status (SES) influences parental involvement in children's education, as studies show higher income families tend to be more involved. This increased involvement supports better academic performance among students. In Mendoza et al. (2016) and Villamor's research, it is shown that financial constraints impact education, and parental involvement is influenced by annual family income, which is a predictor of academic performance. Jabar et al. (2020) found that CCT program participants had higher parental involvement, indicating socioeconomic programs can promote engagement. Additionally, Agullana et al. (2017) highlight that while family income and educational attainment impact students significantly, parents' occupations do not if they provide sufficient income for educational needs .
The Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) program, known as the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) in the Philippines, significantly increases parental involvement in education. Jabar et al. (2020) concluded that families participating in the CCT program showed higher parental involvement compared to non-participants. This suggests that financial assistance programs can alleviate pressures on low-income families, enabling more engagement with their children’s schooling and potentially improving academic outcomes .
Mendoza et al. (2016) challenge the notion that poverty is a barrier to academic performance by indicating that poverty alone does not determine academic success. Instead, resources and parental involvement, which can be influenced by socioeconomic status, play a crucial role. Villamor's findings support this, asserting that poverty’s presence or absence has no direct bearing if adequate parental involvement compensates the lack of wealth .
Agullana et al. (2017) identify home residence and ethnic tribe as significant factors affecting academic performance. The implications are such that students coming from certain geographic areas or cultural backgrounds may experience different levels of educational support or face unique challenges. Such demographic factors often dictate access to resources, quality of schooling, and cultural support for education, impacting overall student performance. The study suggests educational strategies should consider these cultural and geographical implications for tailored support .