Historical Overview of Fingerprinting
Historical Overview of Fingerprinting
BICOL COLLEGE
College of Criminology
SUBJECT – CRIMINALISTICS
PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION
In Babylonia, the first use of fingerprints for personal identification originated when
Babylonian gistrates ordered their officers in making arrests and property confiscation to
secure the defendants’ fingerprints.
Kom Ombo Plain, on the east bank of river Nile, Egypt, lump of hundred much found in
Sebekian deposit which shows a portion of an adult palm during 12,000 B.C.
In China, fingerprint i called “Hua Chi”. The value of fingerprints for purposes of
identification was found on a Chinese clay seal made not later than the 3d century B.C.
During the Tang Dynasty, fingerprints were used in connection with the preparation of
legal documents. Kia Yung-yen, an author during this time stated that, “Wooden tablets were
engraved with the full terms of the contract, and notches were cut in the sides where they were
identical so that the tablets could later be matched or tallied, thus proving them genuine.”
The code of domestic relations as described in the Chinese Law Book of Yang Hwui states:
“To divorce a wife, the husband must write a bill of divorcement and state the reasons or
grounds that are due for action, and then impress his palmprint thereon.” For contracts,
SPO2 BRINGINO, RC BICOL COLLEGE
ñngerprints were also used as signatures of those who were illiterates, who could neither read
nor write. This was under the subject of “Land Tenure.”
Early in the 12th Century, in the novel, “The Story of the River Bank,” fingerprinting
found self already in the criminal procedure of China; and In the 16th century, a custom
prevailed in connection with the sale of children.
In Japan, deeds, dotes, and certificates to be used as proofs were sealed by the mark of
the hand (Palm-print) called “Tegata.” In the treatment of criminals, the imprint of the thumb
(bo-in or boan) was taken. The criminal signed only by thumb-print with regard to his sentence
and it was considered as an inferior sort .of signature.
In Constantinople, in a treaty of ratification, the sultan soaked his hand in a sheep’s
blood and impressed it on the document as his seal.
In England, Thomas Bewick, an English engraver, author, and naturalist engraved the
patterns D his own fingers on every wood-work he had finished to serve as his mark so as to
establish its genuineness.
1889-Sir Richard Henry at Dove, England read a paper detailing his system before the
British association for Advancement of Science.
1891-Juan Vucetich, an Argentinean police official, installed fingerprints files as an
official means of criminal identification; based his system of the pattern typed by Sir Francis
Galton; and he also claimed the first official criminal identification by means of fingerprints left
at the scene of crime.
In 1892, at La Piata, Argentina, a woman named Rojas who had murdered her two Sons
and had cut her own throat, though not fatal, blamed the attack on a neighbor. Bloody
fingerprints on a door post were identified by Vucetich as those of the woman herself which led
to her confession.
1892-Sir Francis Galton, an English Biologist, wrote his first textbook. He devised a
practical system of classification and filing.
1894-Sir Francis Galton’s report on fingerprint as a method of identification, along with
his system, was read at Asquith Committee of London, England. His system was officially
adopted on February 12, 1894.
1900-Alphonse Bertillon’s system of body measurement had by this time spread
throughout the world.
1901-Sir Edward Richard Henry was appointed assistant commissioner at Scotland
Yard.
His system was so applicable that Henry emerged as the “Father of Fingerprints,” at least as
the first man to successfully apply fingerprints for identification.
1901- marked the official introduction of fingerprinting for criminal identification in
England and Wales.
The system employed was developed from Galton’s observation arid devised by Edward
Richard Henry, the Inspector-General of Police in Bengal, India. He later became commissioner
of London’s Metropolitan Police.
1914-Fingerprints were officially adopted in France, replacing Bertillonage
E. Evolution of Fingerprint
1903-Fingerprints identification was adopted in the following penitentiaries:
A. Singing Sing
B. Napanoch
C. Auborn
D. Clinton
1904-John Kenneth Ferrer (Perrier) of the Fingerprint Branch of the New Scotland Yard,
attended the St. Louis Missouri Worlds Fair. He had been assigned to guard the British Crown
Jewels. American police officials became interested in fingerprint through him and he became
their instructor.
1904-The City of St. Louis Missouri, became the first city to adopt fingerprint. The police
department officials adopted the system on October 29, 1904.
1905-Fingerpritning was officially adopted by the U.S. Army. It was known as the first
military use of fingerprint.
1907-Fingerprinting was officially adopted by the U.S. Navy (January 11, 1907).
1908-Fingerprinting was officially adopted by the U.S. Marine Corps.
1910-Frederick A. Braytey published what appears to be the first American book in
fingerprints.
1911-The State of Illinois, made the first criminal conviction based solely upon fingerprint
evidence. It was known as the first judicial ruling on such evidence, (People vs Jennings, 252
Illinois 543-96 NE 1007, 43 LRA (NS) 1206 for 1991).
1915-The International Association for Criminal Identification was founded. The word
“criminal” was later dropped from the Association’s name. It is the first organized body of
professional identification experts.
1916-The Institution of Applied Science established at Chicago, Illinois was the first
school to teach fingerprint identification (June 16, 1916).
1916-Frederick Kuhne published a book entitled “The Fingerprint Instructor,” which
probably the first authoritative book in fingerprint to be circulated in the U.S. Munn and Co.,
served as the publisher.
1919-Marked the publication of “Fingerprint and Identification Magazine” (Chicago).
The first monthly journal devoted exclusively to fingerprint science, (July 1919).
1920-The Exceptional Arch, a new pattern, was adapted to Henry’s system by American
experts. The pattern was added after the study made by the assembly members at annual
convention of the International Association for Identification in 1920.
1922-Haken Jersengen, the sub-director of police in Copenhagen, Denmark introduced first
a long distance identification to U.S. at a police conference here. The method was adopted and
published in a magazine entitled “Publications” of the International Police Conference, (New
York City Police Department, 1932).
1924-The book entitled “Single Fingerprint System” by T.K. Larson, was first published
in U.S., (Berkley, Police Monograph Series) D. Application and Co., New York City.
1924-The First National Bureau of Identification was created by the act of Congress. The
bureau was established within the U.S. DOJ (Washington DC).
1925-Harry J. Myers II installed the first official fact fingerprint system for infants in
Jewish Maternity Hospital in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
1925-The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania used compulsory foot and fingerprinting of
new born infants and mothers which was enacted into law by Act of General Assembly as
approved on April 20, 1925.
1932-The International Exchange of Fingerprint date was initiated with a number of
other nations on February 15, 1932.
1933-The Bureau of Identification, U.S. Department of Justice, adopted the single
fingerprint identification system. The first national use of single print for identification
purposes for certain crimes only, (Feb. 1933).
1933-Latent fingerprints section, for making technical examination of latent prints or have
inked prints on an individual basis was instituted on November 10, 1933. The Civil
Identification on Section was established
SPO2 BRINGINO, RC BICOL COLLEGE
1937-The Institute of Applied Science installed Photographic and Firearms Identification
(Forensic Ballistics) laboratories. The institute was the first private school in U.S. which
installed laboratories for instructional purposes only.
1946-the 100TH millionth fingerprint card was received in the identification division of
the FBL The total grew to 152 million in May 11, 1959.
1979-AIS-2 replaced AIS-1. This phase involved the automated searching by name and
other descriptor information of incoming fingerprint cards against the database.
1979 (Oct. 17, 1979)-A latent fingerprint was developed and lifted from the hand of a
victim in Miami, florida murder resulting in identifying the suspect. This was the first known
case where a fingerprint from a human skin was used in the identification, prosecution and
conviction of a perpetrator of a crime.
1982-Missing Children Act was signed into law which requires the Attorney General to
acquire, collect, classify, and preserve any information which would assist In the location of
any missing person (including an unemancipated person as defined by the laws of the place of
residence of such person) or assist in the identification of any deceased individual who have
not been identified.
1983- Completion of the conversion of the FBI criminal fingerprint searching from
manual to automated searching. Also, AIS records became available by mail upon request of
the National Crime Information Center’s (NCIC’s) interstate identification index (III) — an
interstate record exchange.
1984-AIS records became available “ON-LINE’ through the NCIC program. Records from
the NCIC and AIS, and participating state and local telecommunication networks became
available w/in seconds to authorized criminal justice agencies.
1985 (Jan. 2) — a contract was awarded for building the final phase of the Identification
Division Automated System (IDAS).
1900-Mr. Jones was the first to teach fingerprints in the Philippines in the Phil.
Constabulary.
1918-The Bureau of Prisons records show that carpetas (commitment and conviction
records) already bear fingerprints.
SPO2 BRINGINO, RC BICOL COLLEGE
Under the management of Lt. Asa N. Darby during the American occupation in the
Philippines, a modern and complete fingerprint file has been established for the Philippine
commonwealth.
1933-The first conviction based on fingerprints was handed by the Supreme Court of
the Phil. in the case People vs. Medina and this case is considered the leading judicial
decision in the Philippine jurisprudence concerning fingerprinting (December 23).
The science of fingerprinting was first offered as a subject in the Philippines through the
effort of the Plaridel Educational Institution.
A. Purpose of the Study of Fingerprint - To give basic knowledge of fingerprint, its use and
application.
D. Uses of Fingerprints:
Some of the uses of fingerprinting include:
1. Identification of criminals whose fingerprints are found at the scene of the crime;
2. Identification of fugitive through a comparison of fingerprints;
3. Assistance to prosecutors in presenting their cases in the light of defendants’ previous
records;
4. Imposition of more equitable sentence by the courts;
5. Furnishing identification data to probation and parole officers and to parole boards for their
enlightenment in decision making;
6. Exchanging of criminal-identifying information with identification bureaus of foreign
countries in cases of mutual interest;
7. Means of personal identification;
8. Recognition by the government of honored dead;
9. Identification of unknown deceased;
10. Prevention of hospital mistakes in the Identification of infants;
11. Identification of persons suffering from amnesia where fingerprints are on file;
12. Identification of missing person;
13. Personal identification of victims of disaster works;
14. Identification of unconscious persons; and
SPO2 BRINGINO, RC BICOL COLLEGE
15. Licensing procedures for automobile, firearms, aircraft and other equipment.
In the Philippines, several decided cases could be cited where fingerprint evidence was
admitted, considered and appreciated by the appellate courts with even lesser number of ridge
similarities. In the BILANGAWA Vs. AMADOR case, (Court of Appeals No. 37320-b), a
fingerprint expert and constabulary sergeant testified and successfully defended fingerprint
evidence based on eight identical ride points.
People v. Medina (59 Phil. 330) - N.B. The first leading judicial decision in the Philippine
jurisprudence on the science of fingerprinting.
D. Weight of Fingerprint
The weight to be given to evidence of correspondence of fingerprint when offered to prove
identity of the accused as the person committing a crime is for the determination of the court
in the light of all the surrounding facts and circumstances.
To warrant a conviction the fingerprints corresponding to those of the accused must
have been found in the place where the crime was committed under such circumstances that
they could only have been impressed at the time when the crime was committed.
DENTAL IDENTIFICATION
The role of the teeth in human identification is important for the following reasons:
I. The possibility of two persons to have the same dentition is quite remote. An adult has 32
teeth and each tooth has five surfaces. Some of the teeth may be missing, carious, with filling
materials, and with abnormality in shape and other peculiarities. This will lead to several
combinations with almost infinite in number of dental characteristics.
2. The enamel of the teeth is the hardest substance of the human body. It may outlast all other
tissues during putrefaction or physical destruction.
3. After death, the greater the degree of tissue destruction, the greater is the importance of
dental characteristics as a means of identification.
4. The more recent the ante-mortem records of the person to be identified, the more reliable is
the comparative or exclusionary mode of identification that can be done.
In order to make an accurate dental record available for purposes 3f comparison with that of
the person to be identified, Presidential Decree No. 1575 was promulgated, requiring
practitioners of dentistry to keep records of their patients. It provides the following:
1. The dentist, in the course of diagnosis and treatment of the patient, may only concern
himself with the affected teeth and may not care to have a detailed examination of the other
teeth.
2. There may be no uniformity in nomenclature of the location and condition in the charting of
the teeth.
3. Although there may be a law obliging dentists to have a record of their patient, the law does
not mention the agency which will enforce it.
4. The dentist may have a record but may no longer be reliable on account of the lapse of time.
There may be changes in the teeth which are not seen by the dentist.
For purpose of uniformity, the following are the description of location for dental
identification:
1. Teeth position:
a. Anterior — From cuspid to cuspid inclusive (it includes cuspid, lateral and central incissor).
b. Posterior — All bicuspid and molar teeth.
SPO2 BRINGINO, RC BICOL COLLEGE
2. Surface:
Occiosal — 0 — Surface which is in contact with the opposing teeth when jaws are in
occlusion (closed).
Mesial — M — Surface in direct contact with the adjacent tooth towards the midline.
Distal — D — Surface in direct contact with the adjacent teeth away from the midline.
Buccal — B —‘Surface facing the lip or cheek.
Lingual — L — Inward directed surface of the teeth.
[Link]:
Amalgam (silver filling), gold inlay, gold foil, silicate, acrylic, temporary cement, crown.
[Link]:
a. Fixed prosthesis — bridge
b. Removable prosthesis:
(1) Complete denture
(2) Partial denture
5. Root canal treatment (endodentia).
Dental Features Which May Be Included in the Description for Identification;
1. Malposition, overlapping, crowding and spacing teeth.
2. Number and location of deciduous or permanent teeth.
3. Missing (unerupted or extracted) or supernumerary teeth.
4. Peculiar shape, size, direction Of growth of individual teeth. Missing piece or fragment
due to decay or trauma.
5. Restoration, prosthesis (surface, morphology, configuration and material).
6. Root canal therapy on x-ray examination.
7. Bone pattern on x-ray examination.
8. Complete denture (type, shade and material).
9. Relationship of bite.
10. Oral pathology (tore, gingival hyperplasia, etc.).
1. Age
9 yrs……………………….12 permanent teeth (8 incisors and 4 molars).
11 yrs …………………….20 permanent teeth (8 incisors, 8 premolar and 4 molar).
13 yrs…………………….28 permanent teeth and no deciduous teeth.
8 to 10 yrs………………..Calcification begin at the 3rd molar.
25 yrs…………………….Root-ends of 3rd molar completely calcified.
Beyond 25 yrs…………..Ends of the root of the 3rd molar have been completely calcified.
After 30 yrs ……………..Carries frequently develop at the cementum.
There may be gingival recession, decay attack of the root
surface.
2. Sex
SPO2 BRINGINO, RC BICOL COLLEGE
Examination for the presence of Barr bodies from palatal scrapings.
Dactylos — a finger
Skopien — to examine
B. Pattern Interpretation
1. Arches—5%
2 Loops — 60%
3. Whorls — 35%
N.B. - According to studies, the appearance of arches is less followed by whorls and the loops.
G. Rules in Delta Location when there is a Choice Between Two or More Delta
1. The delta may be located at a bifurcation which does open towards the core.
2. When there is a choice between a bifurcation and another type of delta, equally close to the
point of divergence, the bifurcation is selected.
3. When there iS a series of bifurcation opening towards the core at the point of divergence of
two type lines, the bifurcation nearest to the core Is chosen as the delta.
4. The delta may not be located in the middle of the ridge running between the type lines
toward the cores but at the nearer end only. The location of the delta depends entirely upon the
point of origin of the ridge between the type lines toward the core.
5. If the ridge enters the pattern area from the point below the divergent type lines. The delta
must be located at the end nearer (inner terminus) to the core.
2. Ridge tracing — Is the process of tracing the ridges that emanate from the lower side of the
left delta towards the righ delta to see where it flows in relation to the right delta.
3. Divisions of Fingerprint Patterns
I-Loops
1. ulnar
2. radial
SPO2 BRINGINO, RC BICOL COLLEGE
II- Arches
1. Tented
2. Plain —
Ill-Whorl
1. Plain whorl
2. Central pocket loop whorl
3. Double loop whorl
4. Accidental whorl
Rules to be Memorized
1. Radial loop (R) derived its name from the radius bone of the forearm; it is one type of
fingerprint patterns in which the ridges run its direction to the radius bone or to the thumb.
2. Ulnar loop is one type of fingerprint pattern in which the ridges flow toward the ulnar bone
or little finger. Ulnar loop, therefore derived its name from the ulna bone of the forearm, or little
finger. Its symbol is letter “U” in classification purposes.
N.B. - A pattern to be a loop must have the following four (4) essential requisites:
Symbolized by letter W in the classification. It Is a fingerprint pattern which there are two (2)
deltas and in which at least one (1) ridge makes e turn through one complete circuit, an
imaginary line drawn between the two (2) deltas must touch or cross at least one (1) of the
circuiting whorl ridges within the pattern area.
Symbolized by letter C in the classification. It is a fingerprint pattern which for the most part of
a loop, but which has a small whorl inside the loop ridges, sometimes called a composite
pattern, which means that It is made up of two (2) patterns in one, a whorl inside a loop.
It has two (2) deltas, one of which appears as the edge of the pattern area, as in plain loop. And
one shows inside the pattern area just below the counterpart ridges.
Symbolized by letter D in the classification. A double loop whorl is a pattern consisting of two
(2) separate and distinct loop formations. One of the loops surrounds or overlaps the other,
also called COMPOSITE PATTERN, like the central pocket loop whorl. It arises from the fact
that these patterns are a composite or combination of two 92) patterns in one, with two cores
and two deltas.
Symbolized by letter A In the classification. It Is a fingerprint pattern in which the ridges enter
on one side of the pattern and flow towards the other side with a rise at the center with not
more than one of the four (4) essentIal requisites for loop pattern and with no recurving ridge,
no angular formation and no upward thrust.
Symbolized by letter T in the classification. It is a variety of arch family, but their ridge
formations are not so simple as those of the plain arch, also considered TRANSITIONAL
PATTERN between a plain arch and a loop.
Generally speaking, TENTED ARCHES are formed in any of these three (3) way formations, to
wit:
Real Impressions - Impressions of the finger bulbs with the use of the printing ink on the
surface of the paper. Any other coloring materials may be used but less visible and indelible.
1. Plain Method.
2. RoIled Method
Step 1- Ink the roller. Apply a small amount (about 1/4 inch long stream) of fingerprint ink on
the right side of the slab, toward the back. Roll out a two to three inch wide layer of ink on the
back portion of the slab-lifting the roller off the slab after each stroke and return to the starting
point (do not use a back-and-forth motion with the roller). Repeat several times until a thin film
of ink forms on the roller
Step 2 - Next, using the same roller motion (without rolling back and forth), spread the layer
toward the front edge of the slab, until a smooth, uniform coating of ink forms. The front edge
is where the fingerprints are rolled. When the ink on the front edge becomes too thin, replenish
the ink roller on the back edge of the slab and repeat step two.
Porelon Pad Method - No advance preparation is needed to use the Porelon pad. However, the
pad surface should be cleaned occasionally to remove oil and dirt deposits by wiping the
surface lightly with a soft, dry, lint-free cloth.
Print Matic Method - like the slab and roller method, the Print matic method requires that the
ink is embedded within the Print Matic roller, and coating the slab requires only a few passes
of the roller in the same direction to apply a thin, even layer of ink.
1. INKING PLATE -A 12 inches plate is long enough for most set of 0 fingers. The width of the
plate should not be less than 8 inches, ten (10) is a better width. A 10 inch plate is also wide
enough to ink a complete palm in one operation whenever it becomes necessary.
2. CARD HOLDER — The simplest is a U-shaped spring clamp. Made of spring steel, stainless
steel or brass of gauge sufficient to hold its shape in heavy usage.
3. ROLLER — 6 inches long, and 2 inches In diameter. The handle should have supporting
posts or legs to suspend the rubber roller from developing flat sides and to keep unused
portions of the plate and table top from being smeared with ink.
4. INK - black printers ink is the most commonly used for taking fingerprint impression. It is a
consistency suitable for rolling into a thin film and it is quick drying when transferred to a card
SPO2 BRINGINO, RC BICOL COLLEGE
as an inked impression. Yet it does not dry too fast. Usable for several hours after a film has
been rolled.
FOUNTAIN PEN INK, COLORED INK AND STAMP PAD INK ARE OBJECTIONABLE FOR
SEVERAL REASONS, TO WIT:
5. FINGERPRINT STAND — 32 Inches high, the inking surface of a fingerprint stand should be
approximately 12 inches above the top of an ordinary desk making the printing surface
approximately 44 inches from the floor for the average person.
1. Cleanliness of equipment
2. The right kind and correct amount of ink.
3. Proper distribution of ink on the glass slab or inking plate.
4. The distance of the subject from the inking on the fingerprint card.
5. The advice of the operator to the subject to relax and never to aid in the operation.
6. The pressure exerted must be slight and even the roiling be continuous movement including
lifting.
7. The nail of the fingers should be at rights angle to the slab or to the card before starting the
rolling and always roll the fingers until the other side of the nail is reached (180 degrees).
8. The inking and printing must always reach below the first of the fingers.
9. The thumbs should be rolled towards the subject’s body and all other fingers away from the
subject’s body.
1. The first and most important step is clear the plate thoroughly.
2. A daub of printer’s ink is deposited near the edge of the plate away from the operator.
3. The subject’s hand and fingers must be relaxed.
STANCE FOR TAKING PRINTS - Most operators stand on the left side of the person whose
prints are being taken for the simple reason that more people are right handed and then
normally work more efficiently and do better advantage toward the right. Therefore, most
fingerprint stands are made so that the printing is done on the left front corner.
1. Temporary Disabilities
2. Permanent Disabilities
2. Fingers with stiff joints - Impressing shall be made after shaking a subject’s hand grasped
by the wrist up and down several times to smoothen the joint movement. In this case, if the
impressing plate and the glass plate are placed somewhat higher while having the subject
stand somewhat away from the table, handling would be easier.
3. Fingers with stiff surface skin, coarse fingers and fingers suffering from
dermatophytosis
- Wrap fingers in a steamed towel for several minutes, then impress. In this case, somewhat
denser ink and somewhat weaker impressing will be better.
1. Fingers soon after death - Wipe out fingers with a piece of gauze containing alcohol if they
are stained. In case where satisfactory roll impressions are not obtainable by the ordinary
impressing technique, the impression paper shall be cut to a proper size, and impressing shall
be made onto it using such aids as a fingerprint taking pallet from a dead body.
2. Stiff fingers of a clenched fist - Impressing shall be made using an aid such as a spatula
for taking fingerprints from a dead body.
A. Finger without percolate - Wipe them with a piece of alcohol — containing gauze, soften
them thoroughly with your finger tips, stretch wrinkles, and then impress.
B. Fingers with percolate - Take their mold with silicon after drying with lycopodium powder.
In order to obtain fingerprint impressions from silicon molds, strippable paint or cortex shall be
used this technique is as follows:
FINGERS WITH PEELED-OFF SURFACE SKIN. Wind that surface skin around the operator’s
finger. Apply ink to it and impress. When the true skin is exposed, take photo after applying
ink to the true skin or drying it with an aqueous marker in water or alcohol.
FINGER OF CHARRED BODY. In case where it is feared that they will disintegrate by even the
slightest, their photo shall be taken as they are.
MUMMIFIED OR ADIPOCERED FINGERS. Take their mould with silicon, make films with
strippable paint or cortex, and impress.
These are fingerprints which are imprinted by mere chance or without any intention to produce
the print. Chance print may be:
B. Visible prints — impressions made by chance and visible without chemical treatment.
C. Latent prints — Impressions which are visible grossly but made visible by the addition of
some substances. These are fingerprints found at the scene of a crime.
Thus, even when glove impressions or other traces of actions have been found as result of a
fingerprint search, it is necessary not to give up but to make a thorough search all over the
scene of the crime.
The methods of collecting fingerprints are roughly classified into eight, i.e., solid method
(powder method), liquid method, gas method, lifting method, flame method, molding method,
photographing method and development with lasers.
This solid method is also called the powder method since powder is used, and is the most basic
method.
POWDERING METHODS - Powdering methods include the brushing method, rolling method,
spraying method and light hitting method.
>The brushing method is a method where, after affixing powder to an object to be examined
with a brush (developing brush) to whose tip a small quantity of powder has been affixed a
fingerprint is developed by lightly sweeping it with another, powder less brush (finishing brush)
to remove excessive powder.
>The rolling method is method where, after placing a proper quantity of powder on an object to
be examined, lightly moving it by bending and tilting, spreading out powder all over the object
to have powder adhere to the fingerprint, the fingerprint is developed by flipping the back side
of the object to remove excess powder.
>Also, there is another method called the sprinkling or tapping method where, after having
powder adhere to a fingerprint by lightly tapping the object to be examined, the fingerprint is
developed by lightly tapping a part of the object with One’s fist, etc. to remove excess powder.
LIFTING METHOD - Collecting method by lifting fingerprint developed with powder include
methods employing cellophane tape, vinyl tape or other adhesive tape, and methods employing
silicon rubber.
1. Stretch the above thinly and evenly onto a proper-sized piece of paper or cloth.
2. Add 5-10% by volume of hardener to silicon base.
3. Mix them thoroughly.
4. Stretch the above thinly and evenly onto a proper-sized piece of paper or cloth.
5. Apply above to a fingerprint to be lifted.
6. Press lightly and evenly with a palm, etc. to prevent bubbles from being trapped.
7. Pull off after silicon has hardened.
Method of Restoration - When the fingerprint collection by solid method is over, the object
should be restored to its original state by removing powder which has been affixed to it. This is
called “restoration.” The method of restoration is as follows:
SPO2 BRINGINO, RC BICOL COLLEGE
Wipe the object lightly with a piece of cloth or a brush which contains 0.5-1% synthetic
cleanser liquid or 2-5% soap liquid.
1. Affix some chemicals to latent or visible fingerprint to cause a chemical change in the
excreta elements.
2. Develop or clarify it.
3. Record the print by photographing it.
This method is effective for developing a latent print from an object such as paper, wood or
metal and to collect a visible fingerprint-such as a blood fingerprint. This is a chemical
collecting method whose principle is that the element of the chemical liquid reacts to the
element in excreta or blood by changing color.
1. Reagent (chemical liquid) - Reagents commonly used are ninhydrin, silver nitrate, etc.
2. Method to affix reagent - Method to affix reagent include the painting method, soaking
method and spraying method.
>The painting method Is a method where an object is painted evenly with a brush 9flat brush
for liquid) with ample reagent to affix the reagent to the fingerprints. This method is suitable for
a large or solid object to be examined.
>The soaking method is a method to affix reagent to fingerprints by soaking an object to be
examined into regent in a tiny or other vessel. This method is suitable for cases where a small
object is to be examined for development.
GAS METHOD - This is a method where a latent fingerprint is developed by means of coloring
by affixing gasified reagent or by causing chemical change in elements of excreta, and then
collected by photographing or by lifting onto lifting material. This method is suitable for
developing fingerprints from papers, unpainted wood and textiles.
Iodine Is exclusively used as a reagent. The developed pattern disappears with in a few
minutes. Therefore, reduction is unnecessary.
>The methods of affixing the reagent include a method where gas is blown on to an object to be
examined using an iodine gas generator or a method where gas is filled up into a box in which
an object has been placed. Also, there is another method where gas is blown into a vinyl bag in
which an object has been placed.
>Since the fingerprint developed disappears within a few minutes, it i collected by being
photographed.
> One of the recently developed method is to develop a fingerprint in white by affixing gas
generated from cyan acrylic instant adhesive. It proves effective for developing fingerprints from
a blackish object, especially the adhesive ice of adhesive tape.
LIFTING METHOD - This method includes a method where a visible fingerprint is directly lifted
to lifting material, a method where a fingerprint which has been directly lifted is processed with
powder, chemical quid, etc., and a method where a fingerprint is lifted using lifting material
processed in advance with chemical liquid, etc., and then preserved as it is or photographed.
These are effective for collecting dust fingerprints, oil/grease fingerprints, and blood
fingerprints.
b. Blood fingerprint - In cases where a blood fingerprint has just been impressed on an
unabsorptive object, it shall be directly lifted on gelatin paper. In cases whir lifting Is difficult
as it has become slightly dryer, it is better to apply gelatin paper to and lightly press the blood
fingerprint following the technique of lifting, to peel off the paper after moistening the blood, to
stick aluminum powder or gray to the blood fingerprint by brushing, and to lift it onto other
gelatin paper.
c. Oil/grease fingerprint - When the surface is dry, t shall be collected by lifting it onto Binio
roll lifter as it is. If not dry, it shall be lifted after drying in the shade. Meanwhile, in cases of
fluid oil/grease, a fingerprint cannot be collected by this method.
The molding materials include silicon rubber, plaster, “Aljix”, strippable paint, paraffin was,
and plastic liquid. Collection shall be made by taking a photograph or just preserving the mold.
PROTOGRAPHING METHOD - Space age technology is being used to enhance latent prints
that heretofore were of insufficient quality to be used. While image processing has been used
for some time, the high cost of computers precluded the use of such technology in most crime
laboratories. Major advances in the “microchip” industry and the resulting proliferation of
relatively inexpensive microcomputers have placed this technology within the budgets of many
laboratories.
On porous items of evidence (e.g., paper, cardboard, and the like), evidence Is treated in the
usual way with ninhydrin. If prints are visible but have insufficient ridge detail, laser
illumination can be used. A zinc chloride solution is used to change the Ruhemann’s purple
coloration, caused by the reaction of ninhydrin with the amino acids present in the prints, to a
yellow-orange color. The color change is luminescent in laser light, and visible prints may be
photographed.
The Kromekote card is used to lift the print from the skin surface by placing the card over the
skin in the suspected area and applying pressure for about 3 seconds. The card is carefully
removed and then dusted with black fingerprint powder to develop the print transferred onto
the card. The fingerprint obtained is the mirror image of a normal print, which can be reversed
through photography.
After the Kromekote technique is used, fingerprint powder can be applied directly to the skin to
develop prints. The literature reports that the Magna-Brush gives results superior to a
fiberglass filament brush. If a print is developed by this method, it must be photographed and
then may be lifted using cellophane lifting tape.
Fingerprints on skin surfaces appear to last about 1-1/2 hours on living victims. Deceased
victims should be examined for latent prints on the skin as soon as possible. The technique is
still somewhat experimental, but the simplicity and ease of use of the methods will result in
greater use through experience on the part of investigators,
1. Whenever scene fingerprints have been found, confirmation by a witness shall be made prior
to collection.
2. Whenever scene fingerprints have been found, they shall be developed and photographed
prior to collection in order to clarify the position of an object and positions of fingerprint
impressions. Picture taking shall if,e made by providing the fingerprinted object with a label
containing the name of incident, date and hour taken, place, witnesses, signatures, collector’s
affiliation and name, etc.
3. Whenever fingerprints are collected by lifting (printingO then the grain of wood, pattern, or
other characteristics original to the object near the fingerprints shall be lifted at the same time
with lifting tape, etc. to clarify the place where the fingerprints are impressed. In addition, the
name of incident, date and hour collected, object of collection, p/ace of collection, signature of
witness, and collector’s afflilation and name shall also be entered on the back of the lifting
paper.
PRESERVATION WITH FINGERPINT LIFTING TAPE - The most common method of collecting
latent Fingerprint evidence today is by special transparent cellophane tape. The material Is
supplied in rolls and s usually 1 or 2 inches wide. After the surface is dusted with fingerprint
powder, the tape is placed over the print. Care must be taken to prevent any air pockets. The
tape is smoothed down over the print with the aid of a signer and then drawn off. Particles of
SPO2 BRINGINO, RC BICOL COLLEGE
fingerprint powder adhere to the sticky surface of the tape and thereby transfer the fingerprint
pattern. The tape is finally placed onto a card of suitable color, contrasting with the powder
used.
HOW LONG DOES A FINGERPRINT REMAIN ON AN OBJECT? - Plastic prints remain for any
length f time provided that the object on which they are left or the substance in which they are
formed is itself stable. In investigations, it sometimes happens that police officers find
fingerprints that give the impression of having been made in dust, but on closer examination
are found to be dust-filled plastic prints in oil paint made years earlier.
When objects on which there may be fingerprints are found outdoors in ice or snow,
they must be thawed slowly and placed so that the thawed water does not run over and destroy
the prints. A suitable method of treating is to scrape away as much snow and Ice as possible,
with the greatest care, before the object is brought to a warm place. Only when the object is dry
should the print be developed.
When plastic fingerprints are present in oil or grease, the thawing must be allowed to
proceed slowly and under close scrutiny since the print may easily be destroyed by heat. Such
prints should be photographed when they appear.
Since latent fingerprints are often partial and unclear, their identification often
encounters difficulties. Therefore, those who are engaged in Identification should make a
correct identification. This also applies to the identification of palm prints, middle phalange
prints, basic phalange prints and footprints.
1. Conditions of collection (method of collection, situation of both the object impressed and the
fingerprint left on the scene, time elapsed, etc.).
2. Kind of pattern, position impressed.
3. Kind of finger.
4. Situation of impression (whether slipped, twisted, duplicated or not; either surface or true
skin; and reversal fingerprint).
The live-scan method of fingerprinting, stores and transmits fingerprints digitally. The
new method allows police to place a suspect’s finger on a glass plate, which is then read by a
special device to produce a digital image of the prints. The image can then be transmitted over
telephone lines to computerized criminal records centers.
Laser fingerprinting eliminates the mess of inked fingerprints and also many of the
problems associated with them.
CLASSIFICATION OF FINGERPRINTS
STEPS IN CLASSIFICATION
A. STEPS
1. Recording — simply means the taking of fingerprint impressions, either rolled or plain
impression.
2. Interpretation — simply means the naming or interpreting of a fingerprint pattern. Loop
(either radial or ulnar), Arch (plain or tented) or whorl (plain, central pocket loop) whorl, double
loop whorl or accidental whorl).
3. Blocking — this applies only to loop pattern either as ulnar or radial loop. It means
designating by symbol the type of patterns which each finger and thumb bears and recording
for each respective finger and thumb.
4. Classification — this refers to the classification proper this time you need a complete set of
ten (10) fingerprint patterns to obtain the necessary classification.
CLASSIFICATION IN GENERAL — It refers to the sorting things into division or group so that
they can at later time be quickly located.
D. SYMBOLS IN BLOCKING
FINGERPRINT PATTERN INDEX FINGER OTHER FINGERS
Arches (Plain) A a
Arches (tented) T t
Radial loops R or / r or /
Ulnar loops U or \ u or \
Plain Whorls W w
Central Pocket Loop Whorl C c
Double Loop Whorl D d
Accidental Whorl X x
PRIMARY CLASSIFICATION
A. Procedure to be followed in obtaining primary classification
SPO2 BRINGINO, RC BICOL COLLEGE
Numbering in natural sequence. The first step in classifying fingerprints is the numbering of
the finger and thumbs. The natural sequence, starting with the right thumb as one and ending
at the left little finger as ten is followed:
Right hand 1 2 3 4 5
Left-hand 6 7 8 9 10
ODD FINGERS: The odd fingers are 1 (right thumb) 3 (right middle finger) 5 (right little finger)
7 (left index finger) 9 (left ring finger).
EVEN FINGERS: The even fingers are 2 (right index finger) 4 (right ring finger) 6 (left thumb) 8
(left middle finger) 10 (left little finger).
TOTAL WHORL FOR PRIMARY - In a set of prints, the numerical value is represented by two
(2) distinct totals. First: all whorls appearing on the odd fingers; and second, all whorls
appearing on the even fingers. The two totals obtained constitute the primary classification.
ODD and EVEN finger must never total together. The ODD numbered fingers shall constitute
as the denominator and the EVEN numbered fingers as the numerator.
ARBITRARY COUNT OF ONE (1) ADDED - To each total, an arbitrary count of one is added.
PURPOSE OF ARBITRARY COUNT OF ONE (1) - The purpose of the arbitrary count of one is
to avoid a classification of zero over zero in a set of print in which no whorls appear; this might
be mistaken for the letter “0” which has another specific meaning In the classification.
NUMBER OF POSIBLE COMBINATIONS IN THE PRIMARY - There are one thousand and
twenty four (1,024) possible combinations of primaries, beginning with “one over one” and
ending with “thirty-two over thirty-two”
AFTER GETTING THE PRIMARY CLASSIFICATION YOU MUST FILE THE FINGERPRINT IN
THE
FOLLOWING MANNER 1/1 - Lowest Classification
32/32 - Highest Classification
NOTE: The numerical value of the (AMP) FMB) must not be changed.
2. If both fingers are amputated or missing at birth they are treated as whorl with the
respective numerical value and with meeting (M) tracing.
SECONDARY CLASSIFICTION
RANK — The secondary classification follows the primary classification.
POSITION OF SECONDARY — The secondary classification appears just to the right of the
fraction which represents the primary.
MEANING OF SECONDARY — The numerator (WRITTEN ABOVE) indicates the type of pattern
appearing on the index finger of the right hand.
DENOMINATOR MEANING — The denominator (WSR1TTEN BELOW) Indicate the type pattern
appearing on the index finger of the left hand.
RECORDING RIDGE COUNT — The ridge count of the loops are recorded as “I” (inner) and “0”
(outer).
LOOPS AND WHORLS IN SUB-SECONDARY - In a set of prints having loops and whorl only
the sub- secondary classification may include two (2), but not more than three (3) fingers of
each hand.
“M SYMBOL” - The symbol (M) meeting appearing in a sub-secondary classification, indicates
a whorl in the figures being considered, since only a whorl can have a meeting tracing.
“I” and “0” SYMBOL - The symbols “I” and “0” in a sub-secondary classification may relate to
a set of prints having loops and whorls or all loops or whorls. Whether the prints are loops,
whorls or loops and whorls may be ascertained from the primary classification since “one” over
“one” indicates no whorls, thirty-two indicates all whets and other primaries indicates both
loops and whorls.
FILING: The filing of prints within the sub-secondary classification is done according to the
following sequences:
First — I (inner) in loops
Second — 0 (outer) in loops
First: I (Inner) in whorls
Second: M (meeting) in whorls
Third: 0 (outer) in whorls
SPO2 BRINGINO, RC BICOL COLLEGE
For loops (Ridge Counting)
Index Finger
1-9 ridge count……………………………. I (Inner)
10 or more………………………………… 0 (outer)
Middle Finger
1-10 ridge count …………………………….I (Inner)
11 or more …………………………………..0 (outer)
Ring Finger
1-13 ridge count ……………………………1(Inner)
14 or more ridge count ……………………………..0 (outer)
3. For Arches
FINAL CLASSIFICATION DEFINED: The final classification is the ridge count on the loop
(ulnar and radial) appearing in the right little finger.
Position - The final classification is indicated at the extreme right of the numerator.
NO LOOP IN THE RIGHT LITTLE FINGER - If a loop does not appear in the right little finger,
a loop in the left little finger may be used. The little finger position in the formula remains
unchanged, except that the ridge count is noted as a denominator rather than as a numerator.
ARCH OR TENTED ARCH - If an arch or tented arch appears in the little finger, it is indicated
in the classification formula by a small dash (-). If such a formation appears in both little
fingers, final classification is not obtainable.
BOTH LITTLE FINGERS ARE USED - Both little fingers are considered by some bureaus and
the ridge counts of both are recorded. However, the count of the right little finger governs the
sequence for filing within the final classification.
WHORL - If no loops appear in the little fingers but a whorl appears instead. A final
classification may be obtained by a ridge count of the whorl. Making a ridge count of whorls (in
either or both little fingers) is required in connection with a large collection or group of prints,
such as prints having a primary classification of thirty two over thirty two.
SEARCH - When a search is made within a group of cards, and when the final is designated,
only prints having the same final count or count are examined. Some bureaus allow a count of
three on either side of the final classification.
LITTLE FINGERS USED ONLY FOR FINAL CLASSIFICATION - The ridge of tne little finger is
used exclusively for the final classifications
LITTLE FINGERS NOT USED FOR KEY CLASSIFICATION - At no time can the ridge count of
either of the little fingers be used for the key classification.
IMPORTANCE OF FINAL - The final and the key classifications may be considered the
CONTROL FINGERS for filing and searching. They limit the number of the prints to be
examined each group.
SPO2 BRINGINO, RC BICOL COLLEGE
FINAL NOT POSSIBLE - If the type pattern of either little finger is an arch, as a tented arch, no
final classification is obtained. This is indicated by a small dash (-)
Major Classification, Defined - The major classification represents only the thumb of each
hand. It is the ridge count of the loop and/or the tracing of the whorl appearing in the thumb
of each hand (if such whorls appear).
POSITION - The major classification is placed immediately to the left of the primary in the
classification formula,
RIGHT AND LEFT THUMBS: NUMERATOR AND DENOMINATOR - The thumb of the right
hand appears in the classification formula as the numerator, and the thumb of the left hand as
the denominator.
SYMBOL FOR MAJOR CLASSIFICATION - The major classification is written with specific
symbols, which indicates the respective patterns of the thumb as being either whorls or loops.
RIDGE TRACING OR RIDGE COUNTING - These symbols are governed by the ridge tracing for
whorls or the ridge counts for the loops.
SYMBOLS FOR LOOPS: S (small) in loops (ridge count); M (medium) in loops (ridge count); L
(large) in loops (ridge count).
LOOPS PATTERN IN BOTH THUMBS - In a set of prints having loop patterns in both hands,
the ridge count of the left thumb governs the symbol for the right thumb.
SEQUENCE FOR WHORLS - For the whorls in the thumbs indicated as Inner (I), meeting (M),
and outer (0), the sequence is as follows:
LOOP AND WHORL IN MAJOR - When the whorl appears in one thumb and a loop in the
other, a specific sequence is used.
SPO2 BRINGINO, RC BICOL COLLEGE
REFERENCE: ONE THUMB MISSING - Although a classification was obtained for one missing
thumb, (as described above), it is necessary to continue the search in all possible references.
The original pattern of the missing thumb might be different from the thumb of the opposite
hand.
BOTH THUMBS MISSING - If both thumbs are missing, they arbitrarily acquire the
classification of meeting whorls, and no other reference searches are necessary. No major
dassification is obtainable if one thumb pattern is plain arch or tented arch. Such print will
pertain to the small letter group (referring to the secondary classification).
RADIAL LOOP ON EITHER OR BOTH THUMBS - The major classification is obtained if a
radial loop is present on either or both thumbs because a ridge count is possible. However, the
print will be flied with the small letter group.
Key Classification, Defined - The key classification represents the ridge count of the right
first loop appearing in a set of prints, beginning with the thumb of the right hand but excluding
the little finger.
Little Fingers Disregarded - The little fingers are totally disregarded in obtaining a key
classification, for they are exclusively used in the final classification.
POSITION OF KEY - The key, no matter where it is found is always written at the extreme left
of the numerator.
IMPORTANCE OF THE KEY AND FINAL - The key and final maybe considered the control
figures for filing and searching. To limit the number of print, it Is necessary to examine within
a group.
K. WRITE THE KEY AT THE LEFT OF THE ENTIRE FORMULA, PRECEDING ALL OTHER
COMPONENTS OF THE CLASSIFICATION FORMULA
LITTLE FINGERS NOT USED - If not used, the little fingers (regardless of their type patterns
or ridge count) as shown by the key for which they represent, are reserved for the final.
KEY NO LOOPS - Make ridge count of whorl appearing in the thumb of the right at the
extreme left delta. This may b used as a key.
KEY NOT POSSIBLE - If the entire set of prints is composed of plain arches and tented arches,
the key cannot be obtained.
M32W MMM.
M32WMMM
If both hands are amputated or missing at birth, the footprints should be taken as they, too,
bear friction ridges with definite patterns
D.N.A fingerprinting.
1 DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID
2 Fundamental building block of an individual’s entire genetic makeup.
3 It codes for things like eye color, hair color, stature, predisposition to some diseases and
many other human traits
4 DNA in Criminal Investigations
5 The same DNA is found in all cells of the body.
6 For example, the DNA in a man’s blood is the same as the DNA in his skin cells, semen,
and saliva. Hence, DNA is a powerful tool because each person’s DNA is different from
every other individual’s, except for identical twins.
7 Your DNA does not change through your life.
8 Any cellular material left at a crime scene may be a useful source of DNA.
9 DNA APPLICATIONS/CAPABILITIES
10 Provides forensic DNA fingerprinting/analysis to match the suspect of the crime of the
cases of:
a. Allege rape and other sexual crimes wherein biological sample(s) are recovered.
b. Alleged murder/homicide to establish identity of perpetrator
c. Found dead body where standard manner of identification could not establish identity.
2. Identifies victims of mass disasters such as plane crash, ship wreckage, fire disasters and
other disaster wherein accurate identification of the cadavers is needed.
3. Establishes paternity/maternity in child custody conflict and inheritance lawsuits to
link consanguinity.
4. Provides proper training and lectures to PNP personnel in obtaining and handling
evidence at the crime scene and the correct procedures in the chain custody.
5. Creates criminal database for convicted persons.
6. Assists Crime Laboratory technical divisions and other investigate agencies in the
establishment of identification of a person(s).
7. Conducts forensic studies and researches.
Damage to the epidermis, the outer layer of the skin, does not lead to permanent destruction of fingerprint ridges, allowing fingerprints to potentially restore over time, as evidenced in attempts by John Dellinger to efface his fingerprints with acid. The dermis, containing the dermal papillae which shape these ridges, when damaged, can result in permanent alteration or destruction of the fingerprint pattern. Consequently, for lasting identification, preservation of the dermis is crucial .
Fingerprint classification involves multiple layers: primary, secondary, sub-secondary, and final classifications. The primary classification is based on fingerprint patterns like whorls and loops. Secondary classification involves the index fingers, while sub-secondary classification considers certain finger specific ridge counts or whorl tracings. This hierarchical classification, including ridge count and patterns, narrows down searches efficiently in large databases, significantly enhancing the process of matching an unidentified fingerprint to existing records .
Symbols such as 'I' (Inner), 'M' (Meeting), and '0' (Outer) are used in sub-secondary fingerprint classifications to denote ridge counts and tracing positions. This systematizes the fingerprint matching process by grouping similar prints, thereby facilitating efficient and focused searches within databases. These symbols allow forensic scientists to swiftly categorize fingerprints, aiding resolution in large datasets by limiting comparisons to relevant subsets, enhancing not only speed but accuracy in forensic inquiries .
Beyond criminal justice, fingerprints ensure secure identification in fields such as healthcare to prevent hospital mistakes, recognition of unidentified deceased persons, aiding missing person investigations, and enabling licensing procedures for objects like firearms and vehicles. Widely accepted due to their uniqueness and reliability, fingerprints facilitate various administrative and security protocols, ensuring accurate personal identification across different domains .
The key philosophical principle supporting the claim that fingerprints are infallible for personal identification is the Principle of Infallibility. This principle asserts that fingerprints are a reliable means of personal identification and are universally accepted by courts as such. Fingerprints remain unchanged from around 3 to 4 months of intra-uterine life until after death, providing unique and immutable patterns that ensure their reliability as a practical tool in forensic identification .
Methods for comparing and identifying latent fingerprints include analyzing friction ridge characteristics, examining sweat pores, and observing ridge edges' shapes. In forensic science, these methods are significant because they help objectively verify identities by pointing out unique fingerprint features that can be noted and compared with reference prints. Such precision in methodology aids in distinguishing individuals with a high degree of accuracy, thereby strengthening forensic integrity .
Several variables affect latent fingerprint preservation, including the nature of the surface (e.g., porous, non-porous), environmental factors like temperature and humidity, and the method used for developing the prints. For example, cold objects should be warmed slowly to prevent water run-off that destroys prints, and objects with plastic print impressions in oil need careful thawing. These conditions dictate the choice of method for optimal preservation and visibility of the fingerprints, which directly impacts the success in forensic analyses .
For fingerprints to warrant a conviction, they must be found at the crime scene under circumstances indicating they could only have been impressed during the crime's commission, directly linking the accused to the criminal act. The court weighs the evidence of correspondence, interpreting it alongside other surrounding facts and situations to ensure that the evidence holds significance beyond reasonable doubt .
The restoration of fingerprint patterns after injuries, such as burning with acid or exposure to harsh elements, emphasizes the permanence and embedment of fingerprints within human physiology. Attempts to obliterate or alter fingerprint features, although may temporarily disrupt epidermal patterns, do not affect their core structure established by the dermal layer. Thus, this phenomenon reinforces the principle of permanence, solidifying fingerprints as a most dependable identification method, an essential aspect for reliable forensic education and application .
The legal framework for the admissibility of fingerprint evidence in courts primarily stems from the precedent set by the case People v. Jennings in 1911, where an Illinois court recognized the reliability of fingerprint evidence in determining identity. It was concluded that such evidence, when properly authenticated and analyzed, could be decisive in leveraging truth in judicial proceedings, forming a basis for its widespread acceptance across judicial systems .









