aR Flight The pure acrobatic ability of binds far exceeds that achieved by the most sophisticated aiseraf [ial 1994, p. 301] light is the central avian fly. They are masters of the fluid that is air, just as fishes are masters of the fluid that is water. Birds can hover in one place. dive at breathtaking speeds, fly upside down and backward, and soar for days on end. Birds are one of nature’s finest locomotor experiments (Dia 1994). Our best aircraft are inferior by a large margin, Basic bird flight has many components—taking off, maneuvering, sta~ bilizing positions, and landing—each of which is complex in its own right, Flight requires rapid and constant adjustments of the wings and tail. The sensory system sends information from thous. Japeation. Yet birds do not merely ids of individual feathers a bird’s plumage (see page 87) to the flight-control center in the bra and neural receptors throughout the body: (Dial 1994; see page 200), Flight is expensive in regard to short-term energy output but makes up for that investment in regard t0 cost per unit distance covered. Flight is the most economical form of locomotion: it costs less energy t0 fly 1 kilometer than co walk, run, or swim the same distance. A-10-gram bird in flight, for example, expends less than | percent of the total en- ergy required by a 10-gram mouse to run the same distance. The high short-term costs of flight, however, favor efficient designs of a bird’s wings as well as its skeleton This chapter first considers the elementary aerodynamic principles of flight, including the role of wings as airfoils, the phenomenon of lift, and the countering forces of thrust and drag. Different modes of flight—the gliding flight of soaring birds and the hovering of hummingbirds—help to illustrate these principles. The fund, including the role of leading-edge vortices in generating lift. Then we re~ view the anatomy of avian flight, particularly the skeleton and the highly developed breast muscles that power flight. Flightless birds also highlight the adaptations and tradeoffs required for flight. Some diving birds (such nenals of flapping flight follow,116 (CHAPTER FIVE FIGURE 5-1 Aerodynamic forces on two cross sections of the wing of a gull. The upward force of lift counteracts gravity. The forward force of thrust counteracts the slowing force of drag created by friction and by air turbulence, The airfoil of the inner wing (A) generates mostly lift, The different orientation (angle of attack) of the outer wing. (8) generates both thrust and lift. [After Burton 1990] as penguins) have traded aerial flight for underwater flight with the use of highly modified flipperlike wings Elementary Aerodynamics To stay alofi, birds must overcome the forces of gravity and drag by gen- crating equal and opposite forees—lift and thrust, Lift is the upward air pressure force that counters the downward force of gravity, expressed as, a bird's weight, Thrust isa forward force that counteracts the slowing i fluence of the forces of turbulence and friction, collectively called drag. When these four forces—weight, lift, drag, and dhrust—are in dynamic balance. a bird maintains level flight at a constant speed. Unlike airplanes, which generate life with wings and chrust with engines, birds use their wings to do both (Figure 5-1) Lift Resultant force ) Inner wing Drag Airflow Resultant force (8) Outer wing. Gravity@ @) Resultant force Angle of aMaEk —arogede FIGURE 5-2 Functional anatomy of the airfoil (A) Dimensions and their terminology. (8) The streamlined, asymmetrical shape of an airfoil produces lift by reducing pressure on the upper curved surface relative to that on the lower suface. Faster and more complicated airflow patterns on the upper surface reduce pressure thete and contribute to the production af lft. Downward deflections of the airstream produce an opposite, upward-directed physical force. (After Burton 1990; Long 1999} The wings of birds produce lift by the passage of the airstream across their surfaces, usually by forward movement into the airstream, Even a stationary wing, however, generates lift ina wind: for example, an alls tross with outstretched wings will rise gently into a strong wind. In the simplest sense, the wingy function as airfoils with properties like those of the wings of airplanes. The upper surfices of an airfoil are curved more strongly than the lower surfaces, producing a curved structure that tapers posteriorly. The orientation, or angle of attack. of the airfoil with respect to the passing airstream, called “relative wind,” produces the net upward force called lift. The angle of attack is defined as the angle between the direction of the airstream and the straight chord line connecting the lead- ing and trailing edges of the airfoil (Figure 5-2A). The amount of lite generated must balance a bird’s weight to sustain level flight, Airfoils produce lift by altering the circulation of air around them, de- ecting some of it downward. and by increasing the speed of airflow at the upper surface relative 0 its speed at the lower surfice of the airfoil (Anderson and Eberhardt 2001; Kunzig 2001; see Figure 5-2B). Several components of the alteration of air circulation by the airfoil contribute to the production of lift. Differential airspeeds across the airfoil produce lilt, in part, as an ex pression of the Bernoulli principle. In brief, fast-moving air imparts less pressure against an adjacent surface than does slower-moving air, causing a net force upward in regard to the paired surfaces of an airfoil. The air deflected upward by the leading edge of the airfoil and then by its own inertia straight backward produces a space of lower pressure above the upper surface. Air rushes, or accelerates. from the high-pressure area ahead of the airfoil, and below it, into the low-pressure space being swept out uz FLIGHTug CHAPTER FIVE above and behind the airfoil. The direction of this movement is toward the trailing edge of the airfoil. As a result, air flows faster over the top of the airfoil than below it, creating a net upward force. If you were to blow gently over the upper surface of a piece of tissue paper, the tissue would tise or straighten out because of the net upward pressure on the lower side. ‘The unequal pressures that develop as air flows over the surfaces ofa bird's wing have the same effect. This effect is the classic explanation of lift, But the Bemoulli effect is just a small part of the circulation pattem gener- ated by the airfoil and of the creation of the net upward force called lift. New analyses of the aerodynamics of avian flight suggest chat che pri- mary function of the wing as an airfoil is to move air downward (Long 1999: Videler 2005). First. the leading edge of the airfoil and its tiked undersurface push into the air ahead of them, creating high pressure ahead of the wing and below it. The asymmetrically curved shape of the airfoil directs the airstream as a whole downward. Elementary physies (Newton's third law) cells us that, for every action, there is an equal but opposite re- action, The downward delleetion of air by th fore, produces opposite upward forces of lft. In addition, che curved upper surface of the airfoil deflects some air particles upward at frst, chen backward, and finally rard in a slowing spiral motion toward the trailing edge of the wing. Their final downward trajectory adds more upward lift. The amount of lift increases with airspeed and with the volume of air deflected. which in wm is a fimetion of wing area, When a large bird, such as a gull or albatross. stands on the edge of a cliff ficing into the wind, the flow of air across its outstretched wings generates lift. The amount of life increases by the square of the velocity of the airstream. If the wind is strong enough, the bird rises effortlessly into the air, In still air, the seabird must jump off the cliff with wings outstretched. As the bird drops. airspeed increases, producing lift and. with it, flight. Birds that do not launch themselves trom cliffs or trees may generate the initial for- ward thrust by running as they take off. Loons and some ducks run over the water until they be irbore. The orientation, or angle of attack, of a wing in a current of air alfects the generation of life (Figure 5-3). More lift is generated as the pitch of the wing rotates clockwise. increasing the angle of attack and conse quently the downward deflection of air, If the angle of atack is too great, however, the aitstream no longer follows the streamlined surfaces of the airfoil, Instead, the air separates from the surface, then swirls upward and forward from the rear edge of the wing. The negative force called drag increases with the disruption of the airflow. Increased drag blocks the backward flow of air over the upper surface and causes a loss of lift, or a stall, When landing, a pilot purposely stalls an airplane by increasing the angle of attack of the wings just before the wheels touch the runway Birds, too, adjust the angle of their wings to stall just before landing. Slots between adjacent fight feathers aid in the fine control of the air moving over the wing surfice and thereby aid in the extraction of itt producing energy, Slots are cracks or holes through which air squeezes Air forced from beneath the wing through a slot expands on the upper foil, thei19 (A) Angle of attack 0° FUGHT uit Resultant (8) Angle of attack 5” Uf esuttant z WAL (C) Angle of attack 15” Lite Resultant Angle of attack, UU angie of aack 15 Wing stall FIGURE 5-3 The angle of attack affects the balance of aerodynamic forces on the ‘wing, Tie angles of attack illustrated are (A) 0, (B) 5, and (C) 15 degrees. increasing the angle of attack by 5 degrees from a horizontal position increases lift, But increasing. the angle by only 15 degrees causes the airstream to separate from the upper surface of the airfoil, which increases turbulent airflow, or drag. and severely reduces lift. Higher angles of attack will cause a loss of lift and the bird or airplane to stall. [after Burton 1990) side, reducing the pressure there and ine sing lift. The wing tips of many soaring birds include slots between the ends of the primary feathers (Fig- ure 5-4). In effect, the slots permit the primaries to act as individu: “winglets,” reducing drag at the wing tip by redistributing the air turb lence horizontally and vertically. Some slots also control the flow of air over the airfoil to maintain some lift at slow speeds or at high angles of attack when a bird is stalling. The extended alula, or bastard wing, cre= ates a slot ut the leading edge of the wing that keeps airflow bound to the wing (Figure 5-5). This adjustment helps especially during landing and takeoff, when forward thrust is minimal and extra lift is essential co prevent stalls, Modern aircraft 1 of the wing, which you can sometimes see opening o ve these same sorts of slots in the front landing.120 CHAPTER FIVE FIGURE 5-4 Siots reduce induced drag at the wing tip, ald fine control of airflow over the wing surface, and prevent stalling at slow airspeeds. Soaring birds such as che ‘Turkey Vulture shown here have well-developed slots between the tips of the primary wing feathers. Slight adjustment of the primaries and their associated slots control a vulture’s speed, lft, and aerial position as it searches the terrain for carcasses. [A. Morris/ VIREO] Any slight air turbulence or friction between the air and a bird's body and wing surfaces reduces lift through the opposing force of drag. The thin leading edges of the wings minimize friction, or profile drag. Simi- larly. the thin leading edge of a Frisbee makes it is easier to throw than a soccer ball. Friction, and therefore profile drag. increases with airspeed. ‘Thus, it is harder to throw a Frisbee or a soccer ball or to fly into a strong wind with high airspeeds than itis to throw or fly into a light wind. Con- versely, turbulence, or induced drag, decreases at faster airspeeds as air flows more smoothly over the wings. Forward thrust provides the power to overcome the slowing effects of drag on airspeed. Propellers and jet engines provide thrust for airplanes. The downbeat of the wing stroke provides thrust for most birds. In keep- ing with Newton’s second law of motion, thrust force equals mass (amount of air moved) times velocity (rapidity of the wingbeat). Similarly, a canoe paddle generates forward thrust by pushing water, instead of air, back- warcl, The total chrust required co overcome the effects of drag is the sum of the thrusts required to overcome profile drag and induced drag. These two Components of thrust are therefore called profile power and induced power, respectively. Total flight-power requirements vary in a parabolic relation to flight speed, because induced power decreases as profile power increases (Fig- ure 5-6). The energy cost of flying is least at intermediate speeds and21 “ ® Steep angle of attack fucnT Angle of — attack Steep angle of attack Litt Laminar flow over top of wing restored by alula — Turbulence (lows steep angle of attack, generating greater lift, without, much reduction of lift due to turbulence) ‘Angle of attack Gravity FIGURE 5-5 The slot created by the extended alula keeps the airflow close to the wing during takeoff and landing. [after Able 2008] FIGURE 8-6 Total flight- power requirements are the sum of profile power (which increases with speed) and induced power (which decreases with speed). This sum bears a parabolic, or U- shaped, relation to airspeed. The total is least at minimum power speed, or the bottom of the parabola, ‘The power required to fly a unit distance is least at the ‘maximum range speed, Which is defined by the lowest-value intersection of the (broken) line drawn from the origin (zero speed, Airspeed —e zer0 power). [After Alexander 1992) Minimum Maximum power range speed speed. Profile power Flight power ——= Induced powerHB b0x 5-1 PEREGRINE FALCONS: SPEED STOOPING The Peregrine Falcon (see Fig- ure 21-9) achieves breath- taking speeds when diving, called stooping, on its aerial prey. Stoops are ex- ecuted at angles ranging from 30 to 60 degrees. sometimes starting at more than 1500 meters from the prey and dropping from 450 to 1080 meters in altitude (White et al. 2002). Calcula- tions of their airspeed by stationary observers range from 160 to 440 kilometers per hour (96-264 miles/hour). Arguably, the most direct measurements are those by a free-falling para~ chutist who accompanied his trained falcons in dives from 3670 meters, or 12,000 feet (Franklin 1999), At 240 kilometers per hour (144 miles/ hour), the stooping falcon tucked in its wings and extended its shoulders to assume a diamond shape. At higher speeds (320 kilometers/hour, or 200 miles/hour), the falcon elongated and streamlined its shape to the maximum by pulling its wings in close to its body and extending its head. Keeping an eye fixed on the target prey while diving at such speeds is challenging, in part because the falcon’s acute vision is to the side, not straight ahead, Turning the head would in- crease drag and slow the bird down. So the fal- con instead adopts a spiral path that keeps its head straight and the prey in sight slightly to the side, Better aerodynamics of the body orientation more than compensate for the longer stoop path (Tucker et al. 2000), 122 greatest at low and high speeds. Hovering in one place with no airspeed getically expensive mode of flight; flying very fast also is expen- sive. Birds tend to fly at their minimum power speeds (30-60) kilomesers per hour), which minimize the rate of fuel use and nioximize the time airborne (Rayner 1985a). Birds do not always strictly adhere to flight speeds that minimize power costs (McLaughlin and Montgomerie 1990; Bruderer and Bolde 2001), Hummingbirds, for example, hover expensively in front of flowers to ex- act nectar, and they fly fist to beat competitors to nectarflled flowers Gill 1985). Peregrine Falcons dive on prey at breath-taking speeds (Box 5-1). Additionally, « bird should fly faster than its minimum power speed to achieve the maximum flight range with a given amount of fuel be- cause the added momentum carries it farther for the same total power in- vestment, Flight at this maximum range velocity is most characteristic of long-distance migrants, stich as geese (Box 5-2). Migrating Common Swifts travel at about 40 kilometers per hour, close to their predicted maximum range velocity. In contrast, while feeding, Common Swifts cruise slowly at only 23 kilometers per hour, close to their predicted min imum power speed. isan en Kinds of Flight Beyond the basics, birds have exploited an extraordinary range of special ized modes of flight. Simple aerodynamic models and comparisons with airplanes do not always accurately apply to the dynamics of actual flight. Small birds, particularly, use varied forms of flapping flight that reduceHE box 5-2 Flying in formation helps to FLYING IN FORMATION save energy, especially in large : or heavy birds, such as geese with small wings relative to their mass (Badgerow 1988; Alexander 1992). By flying just off the wing tip of the preceding bird, each goose cancels some of the air turbulence at its own wing tips, which reduces induced drag and saves energy. In the fa- miliar "Vee" formations of migrating geese, each individual bird flies off and behind the wing tip of the bird in front of it (see illustration). "Vee" formation of migrating geese. Proper positioning relative to the air currents from the wing tips of the BBE receding bird saves energy. [After Alender 1992] The energetic advantage of formation flight could be as high as 50 percent. Direct measures of the energy output of pelicans trained to fly in formation proved that they use from 10 to 14 percent less energy in flight formation, partly be- cause the group's airstream allows those in back. to glide more than the leaders can (Weimerskirch et al, 2001). 123124 CHAPTER FIVE FIGURE 5-7 Use of thermals by a gliding vulture to counteract sinking [After Pennycuick 1973] profile drag and that level power costs in relation to airspeed, In this sec tion, we start with simple forms of Hlight—soaring and gliding—and pro- ceed to features of complex flapping flight. Soaring, or Gliding, Flight The soaring flight of vultures and many other birds illustrates how the forces of weight, lift. and drag work in this simplest form of flight. With- out flapping their wings to apply forward thrust, soaring vultures gradu- ally lose altitude in still air—that is, they “sink”—because of drag, Glider airplanes also sink at predictable rates that take into account their airspeed and wing dimensions, Sink rates are lowest when drag is lowest, at inter~ mediate light speeds. Soaring birds and gliders both counter their in- evitable descent by aking advantage of rising air. The two principal ways of doing so are called thermal soaring and slope soaring. Thermal soaring exploits columns of warm air that rise when the ground is heated by the sun (Figure 5-7). The soaring bird circles up- ward within the column of rising air and then glides to the base of an adjacent thermal. The bird continues to fall relative to the air. buc air rises in thermals at the rate of approximately 4 meters per second. which eas- ily offsets a sink rate of 1 to 2 meters per second, Colin Pennycuick (1972) pioneered the study of the gliding flight of birds by following vultures that commuted from their roosts to feeding grounds out on the Serengeti Plain of East Africa. He did so from his own plane, a motorized glider that could simulate the flight of the vultures but that could also generate thrust when necessary. The vultures could travel 75 kilometers by using only six thermals that rose to heights of 1500 meters. Migrating hawks, such as the Broad-winged Hawk in eastern North America, also use ther- mals, a practice that allows them to cover long distances wich maximum economy. Flocks of Broad-winged Hawks, called “kettles.” rising in airthermals as well as wind deflected upward by the ridge, are a special attraction at fimous hawk-watching locations, such as Hawk Mountain in eastern Pennsylvania, Slope soaring exploits a different kind of rising air—namely, the air that is detlected upward when it hits a terrestrial ridge or ocean wave. Migrating hawks soar along ridges and gulls hang effortlessly behind boats or above the ocean beach by riding the deflected air currents. Seabirds, such as the long-winged albatrosses, can cruise expertly along to the wind- ward sides of la If the line of the wave crest is not in the intended direction of travel, the albatross can fly into a head wind by al- ternately rising off the crest of a wave and gliding at an ge wave cres ingle to an adjacent wave. This so-called dynamic soaring takes advantage of the layers of different wind speeds above the ocean. The albatross accelerates down- ward from the fast-moving, upper air layers into the slower-moving, lower air layers: then, they swing upwind. As they lose speed and lift, chey bank again into the fast-moving, upper air layers. Flapping Flight G ative effects of drag. Flapping flight, on the other hand, adds thrust to the controlling forces. Each primary flight feather functions as an airfoil, as can the wing itself, When these airfoils change their orientations down- ward from the horizontal, a part of che upward lift that they generate changes into forward thrust, This principle is illustrated by the perform- ance of the rotating blades of a helicopter. Each blade is an airfoil posi- tioned at the best angle of attack relative co the sweep of the rotor. When the blades rotate in a horizontal plane, air is deflected directly downward o generate lift thac offsets the weight of a hovering helicopter, By tilting the rotor forward, the blades drive air backward as well as downward, thereby imparting forward thrust and causing the helicopter to move for ward (Figure 5-4 ding flight minimizes the use of powered thrust to overcome the neg- Lift on rotor Lift on rotor Drag on fuselage ‘Weight ‘Weight FIGURE 5-8 Hovering (loft) and forward (right) flight of a helicopter. When the blades of the rotor rotate in 2 position that is horizontal to the ground, the lift that they generate balances the downward pull of gravitation, called weight. Tilting the rotor directs some of the lift in @ forward direction, called thrust, and generates negative forces, called drag, 125 FUGHT126 CHAPTER FIVE ‘The wings of birds also act like large propellers. with some accessory propellers in the wing tip and with some distinction between the contti- bution of the inner wing and that of the outer wing (see Figure 5-1). In the outer half of the wing, each primary functions as a smaller, separate airfoil; together they can produce forward thrust, as does the propeller of an airplane. To produce forward thrust. the airfoils of propellers and of primaries move vertically rather than horizontally chrough the air. As the leading edge of the primary slices the air colunn during the downstroke. the net pressure on the back surface pushes the feather forward, Control of the angle of attack of each primary by tendons and muscles, as well as by the natural responses of the flexible vanes to air pressute, results in a continuously integrated system of feather positions through the wing stroke. The forward forces of thrust produced by the propeller-like pri- maries are transferred to the inner wing. the horizontal movement of which generates lift, The result is forward flight. The same principles apply to the wing action of hummingbirds, which among vertebrates sustain the highest known levels of oxygen consump- tion and muscle-power output while hovering (Chai and Dudley 1995). In his pioneering analyses of bird flight, Crawford Greenewale (1960a) took high-speed movies of hummingbird flight and then scudied them at slow speeds to discover how hummingbirds achieve their remarkable con- rol. He conchided that hummingbird flight resembles that of a helicop- ter or, more precisely, a novel combination of airplane and helicopter in which the propellers rotate about a horizontal axis to produce various combinations of lift and forward thrust. Greenewale describes the action thus: In hovering flight che wings move backward and forward in a horizontal plane. On the down (or forward) stroke the wing moves with the long leading edge forward, the feathers trailing upward to produce 2 small, positive angle of attack. On the back stroke the leading edge rotates nearly a hundred and eighty degrees and moves backward, the underside of the feathers now uppermost and trailing the leading edge in such a way that the angle of attack varies from wing tip to shoulder, producing substantial twist in the profile of the wing, [Greenewalt 1960a, 3] A hummingbird can move forward or backward from stationary hov- cing, just by changing the direction of the wingbeat, because every an gle produces a different combination of lift and thrust. Forward veloci- ties increase as the wings beat in an increasingly vertical plane. This rotation of the wing is made possible by the unusual structure of the humerus and its articulation with the pectoral girdle. The secondaries of a hummingbird’s inner wing are short, and the outer primaries are clon- gated to form a single, specialized propeller. The complete stroke of the Wing tip describes a figure-eight pattern, which includes a powered up-Forward 26 miles per hour Forward 8.6 miles per hour (top speed) Hovering Backward fl FIGURE 5-9 Hummingbird wing motions. in forward flight, the wings beat vertically to generate forward thrust. In hovering flight, the wings beat horizontally in the pattern of a flattened figure eight. To fly backward, the hummingbird tits the angle of wing action to create rear-directed thrust, [After Greenewalt 1960a) stroke as well as downstroke (Figure 5-9). The upstroke generates only ‘one-third of the power generated by the downstroke, not the same amount, as was believed for many years (Warrick et al, 2005). Like the wings of insects, the wings of birds and their controlling mus- culature oscillate mechanically with intrinsic elasticity Greenewalt 1960b). The wings of a Ruby-throated Hummingbird, for example, beat at an es- sentially constant rate of 53 strokes per second, The durations of the up- stroke and downstroke are equal. The wingbeat rates of various species of hummingbirds and most other birds decrease predictably with inereas- ing wing length, as oscillation theory predicts. These obse important implications for the neuromuscular basis of avian fight. After the wingbeat rate has reached its natural oscillating frequency, the nerves and muscle fibers responsible for sustaining the rhythm necd to fire per- haps only once every four beats, like a child on a swing with only occasional push by the parent. Birds in slight control lift and thrust in complex, rapid, and continu- fous patterns (Warrick et al. 1998), No aircraft approaches the average ations have 127 FUGHT[NAGLE 5-1 Birds compared with airplanes 2 Travel speed (body lengths/second) 32 (supersonic SR-1) Rooll rate (degrees/second) G forces allowed Plane (type) __Bird (species) (Common Pigeon) 120 (Common Starling) 140 (switis) 720 (A~4 Skyhawk) 5000 (Barn Swallow) 4-5 (general aircraft) 10-14 (many species) 8-10 (elect miliary airerafi) Note: Hundreds of times per day From Dial 194. bird’s acrobatic maneuverability (Table 5-1). of birds during takeoff, aerial maneuvers, chases, and landings reveal the precise changes in wing position that control body orientation and air- speed (Figure 5-10). Birds rarely crash. Even more important than the integration of life and thrust is the independent control of each wing. Asymmetrical wing actions enable a bird co steer, tum, and twist. By flap- ping with one wing oriented forward and the other wing oriented back~ ward, the bird can execute an abrupt turn. Setting the wings in a partly folded position reduces the amount of lift, controlling the loss of altitude gradually while gliding, By setting one wing back farther than the other. the bird adds curvature to its glide path. About 50 different muscles control the wing movements, Some mus- cles fold the wing; others unfold it. Some pull the wing upward. others low-motion photographs Downstroke 128 Upstroke FIGURE 5-10 Complete wing stroke of the duck. Black arrow sections trace the movement of the wing tip through the wing stroke. [After Burton 1990}129 FLIGHT a8, yore “ ing vortex aif ® FIGURE 5-11 Wingbeats leaving trailing currents of swirling air. (A) The powered downstroke of slow-fiying pigeons produces doughnut-shaped patterns of air currents called vortex rings. (8) The pattern of vortices trailing behind a fast-flying kestrel with continuously integrated powered downstrokes and recovery upstrokes. [After Alexander 1992] pull it down, and still others adjust its orientation, In most small birds, only the downstroke is the power stroke. Little lift is achieved on the re- covery stroke, during which the primaries are separated to minimize air resistance. Powered downstrokes followed by simple recovery strokes pro~ duce doughnut-shaped rings of turbulent, swirling, Hed vortex rings. in the wake of the flying bird (Rayner 1988; Figure 5-11). The forces of life and thrust on the wing are continuously integrated during the normal wingbe: The conversion of the tailing vortices from doughnut-shaped rings into continuous streams in fast flight is due to the integration of forces from the wings’ downstrokes and upstrokes. These trailing vortices, however, must be left behind in a controlled fashion: Hlapping too slowly causes the turbulence to backlash; flapping too fast causes interference of the turbulence with the next upstroke. Asa rule, birds increase their air- speed, not by beating their wings faster, but, insteacl, by inereasing the amplitude and oricntation of their wingbeats to achieve gre (Tobalske and Dial 1996), One number, the Strouhal number, defines optimuns rates of wing (or tail) motions to effect Hlight efficieney (Taylor et al. 2003; Whitfield 2003). er thrust130 (CHAPTER FIVE FIGURE 5-12 Conical leading-edge vortices create lift on the tapered wings of swifts by deflecting the ‘oncoming airstream downward. The expanded area indicates the downwash that generates lift. Leading- ledge vortices first appear off the wrist and continue to be generated along most of the length of the narrow wings but move inside and upward ‘and then behind the wing tip itself. [After Videler et al, 2008} Simply multiply wing-stroke speed times body size. and divide by for~ ward speed. Birds, as well as bumblebees. bats. and locusts, all operate most efficiently at the predicted Strouhal numbers from 0.2 to 0.4. So do swimming animals from fish to whales. ‘Adding to the acrobatic abilities of aerial birds such as swifts and hum mingbirds are recently discovered sources of lift on the outer wings, called leading-edge vortices (Videler et al. 2004; Muller and Lentink 2004; War- rick et al. 2005), Already known as a fundamental of insect flight, leading- edge vortices may also play a major aerodynamic role in bird flight. The sharp leading edges of the wings of swifis, for example, spawn a swirl of air that can aid flight if ic is stabilized and channeled to best effect. By sweeping their wings backward in gliding flight, birds can convert the leading-edge vortex into a tiny tomado at the wing tip (Figure 5~12) Low pressures in the core of the vortex comado suck the wing tip up- ward or forward, depending on its orientation. The small, swept-back wings of supersonic fighter jets exploit the same aerodynamic effects. The leading-edge vortices add lift in variable wind speeds and even at low an- gles of attack. Changing wing positions changes their immediate effect, which enables swifts co turn quickly to catch insects. Landing on elevated or arboreal perches, particularly, requires excep- tional control of flight trajectory. Birds are unique among flying verte- brates in the way that they land (Caple et al. 1983, 1984). Aerial species such as bats, flying squirrels, and certain lizards make contact with their forelimbs and then rotate their bodies downward until the hind feet touch the landing surface (Figure 5-13). Variations exist, but only birds rotate their centers of mass upward to stall directly over the landing site. FIGURE 5-13 Varied Thrush landing on a tree stub. Note the forward extension of the feet as the thrush controls the final touchdown. [After Able 2004]Supplementing che wings are the tail’s contributions to flight, which may be minimal in species with small tails but substantial in other species. Tails help co control flight position and stability as well as aid steering and braking. Tails also add lift by improving airflow over the wings, especially at slow speeds. and by reducing turbulence as air passes over the body. This contribution may be more important in young birds that are learn= ing to fly than in skilled adults. Immature rapcors, in particular, tend to have longer tails than those of adults. The size difference (as much as 15 percent) is most pronounced in shortailed e. East Africa, as well as in the familiar Red-tailed Hawk of North America. Corresponding to the increased lift, immature raptors have a more buoy- ant flight than do adults, Extra lite apparently reduces the chance of in= jury when they strike prey and ficilicates their mastery of early flight and bunting skills (Amadon 1980) agles such as the Bateleur of Intermittent Flight Many birds alternate regular bouts of lapping flight with short periods of nonflapping flight, Cooper's Hawks and Black Vultures, for example, flap several times and then glide, appropriately called flap gliding, Finches and woodpeckers rise and fall as they alternate flapping and nonflapping sequences in their characteristic flap-bounding flight, These ovo main cat- egories of so-called intermittent flight both reduce a bird's power costs They are distinguished by wing positions—wings extended in gliding versus wings folded, or flexed, in bounding—and by their advantages at difterent flight speeds. Flap gliding reduces predicted costs at slower air- speeds, especially those below minimum power speed (Rayner 1985b). Conversely, fap bounding reduces predicted costs at fase speeds, especially at or above maximum range velocity. Experiments in wind tunnels sup= port these predictions. Mid-sized species such as the Common Starling shitt from flap gliding ac slow airspeeds t0 Hap bounding at high airspeeds (Tobalske 1995). The two modes of intermittent flight also scale differ- ently with respect co body size. Flap gliding is favored in large birds, whereas Hap bounding works best in sinall and miid-sized birds. The European Green Woodpecker is the largest species (176 grams) known to employ flap bounding (Tobalske 1996). Wing Sizes and Shapes Flight speed, gliding ability [Link] energy consumption all de= pend on the size and shape of a bird’s wings Figure 5-14). The costs of flight are determined by the relation beoween a birds total wing area andl its body mass—that is, how much mass, in grams, must be carried by each unit area of wing surface. The relation between wing area and body mass, called wing loading, is given in grams per square centimeter of wing- surface area, Some birds have small wings relative to their body mass, and thus high wing loadings. Other birds have proportionately large wing, 131 FUGHT132 CHAPTER FIVE [saan NAW “ © o FIGURE 5-14 Flight abilities vary with the shape of bird wings. (A) Long, narrow wings, such as those of an albatross, are best for high-speed gliding in high winds. (8) Short, rounded wings, such as those of a grouse, permit fast takeoffs and rapid maneuvers. (C) The slim, unslotted wings of falcons permit fast, efficient flight in open habitat. (D) Slots in wings of intermediate dimensions increase the lift and gliding ability of buteos. areas, and thus low wing loadings. The Thick-billed Murre, a species of auk that spends much of its time swimming and diving, has small wings and high wing loadings (2.6 grams/square centimeter). The murre and other diving birds—loons, grebes, and diving ducks—with high wing Joadings must run over the water, flapping their wings to gain enough lift for flight. In contrast, the large-area wings of similar-sized raptors, such as the Red-tailed Hawk, translate into low wing loadings that allow pro- longed soaring. Songbirds tend to have large wings for their body mass low wing loadings of about 0.1 (0 0.2 gram per square rile flight at and, consequent! - allowing frequent launches and active maneuvi relatively low cost. Wing dimensions also affect lift and drag forces and, as a consequence, mode of flight. The long, narrow, pointed wings of albatross, filcons. and swallows have a high lift-to-drag, or so-called aspect, ratio. They are adapted to efficient soaring and open-country flying at fist speeds, The long, narrow wings of albatrosses, for example, produce more lift than do shorter, broad wings of equal total area because the leading edge of a wing produces the most lift; the rear half of a wing produces the least. Thus, long, high-lift wings enable Turkey Vultures to begin soaring early in the day. In contrast, their short, rounded wings force Black Vultures to for the assistance of rising warm-air currents until they can soar without expensive flapping. In addition, induced drag, or turbulence, declines as wing length increases. Long. narrow wings separate the wing tips where turbulence is greatest. Although long, narrow wings are best for gliding and fist open-country flying, they sacrifice maneuverability. Thus aerial cen mete birds typically have long, pointed wings, whereas species living in dense vegetation have short, rounded wings. A falcon’s pointed wings serve it133 well in high-speed chases in open country, whereas a Sharp-shinned FIGHT Hawk's short. rounded wings enable it to chase small binds through dense vegetation, Short, rounded wings have a low aspect ratio. The maneuvering flight and explosive takeoffs that require Wrens have short, rounded wings. Their rapid wingbeats enable them to naneuver amid seemingly impenetrable networks of branches and vines. The short, rounded wings of quail and pheasants permit short bursts of rapid acceleration, enhancing their chances of escaping predators are best for The Skeleton The skeleton of a bird is uniquely structured for flight (Figure 5-15; see also Figure 1-3), Fusions and reinforcements of lightweight bones make the avian skeleton both powerfull and delicate. Unusual joints not only make flight motions possible but also brace the body against the acten- dane stresses. The skeleton strategically supports the large muscles that pro- vide the power for flight. In cross section, many bird bones are light, air-filled structures unlike the dense, solid bones of many terrestrial animals. The hollow, long bones Carpometacarpus, ulna: = Cervical spine Scapula——— ~ ccoi Pelvis Clavicle or furcula Free” caudal =o ~ ibs vertebrae sesnn Pygostyle Uncinate process Tibiocarsus NN ~ Tarsometatarsus Digits FIGURE 5-15 Major features of a hummingbird skeleton. [After Tyrrell and Tyrrell 1985)134 CHAPTER FIVE of the wings may be strengthened further by internal strus, Instead of _ bony jane filled with dense teeth, birds have « lightweight, toothless bill. The huge bills of toucans, being hollow, are not the burden they seem. Despite these adaptations for reduced mass, the bird skeleton with- stands the strains imposed by flight. The thorax is more rigid and better that of a reptile. The hinged, bony ribs trame a strong bridge between the backbone and the breastbone but allow expansion for hing. Horizontal bony flaps, called uneinate processes. extend posteri~ orly fiom the vertical upper ribs to overlap the adjacent ribs and reinforce the rib cage. The sternum, or breasthone. typically has a large keel, or carina, that anchors the major flight muscles. A bird's flying ability increases With the size of ity keel: some flightless birds lack the keel completely. The flight muscles act in concert with the bones of the pectoral gir- dle, which include, on each side, the coracoid, scapula, and furcula (Fig- ure 5-16). On top of the rib cage are the long, saberlike seapulae, each of which joins to the coracoid and furcula (Box 5-3). This triangular sys- created by the wing strokes during flight. An acute angle beeween the scapula and the coracoid in creases the potential exertion force of the dorsal elevator muscles, which help to pull the humerus, or upper wing bone, upward. This angle is The avian wing is a modified forelimb, The humerus, ulna, and radius rtebrates, Large surfaces allow the resting wing to fold neatly against the body. These elaborate joints also permit the wing to change flight, and landing. When outstretched, these joints are strong enough to withstand the wrenching forces created The fused hand and finger bones help to provide strength and rigid ity in the outer wing skeleton, Most of the wrist bones—the earpals and metacarpals—are fused into a single skeletal element called che carpo- hei reinforced tha br tem of struts resists the chest-crushing pressures oblique in flightless bire. are homologous to the limb bones of other v the joints between the limb bones positions and angles during takeo during wing strokes, BOX 5-3 THE FURCULA IS A FLEXIBLE, ELASTIC SPRING In most birds, the furcula, o ea wishbone of the holiday dinner turkey, isa fused pair of clavi- cles, or “collar bones.” and serves as a strut, or spacer, between a bird's shoulders. X-ray movies of flying Common Starlings reveal that, in flight, the furcula can act as an elastic spring (Jenkins et al. 1988; Pool 1988). With each beat of the wing, the upper ends of the furcula spread widely, becoming as much as 50 percent wider than the normal resting width, and then contract. The fur- cula repeats this cycle of wide elastic expansion and contraction from 14 to 16 times a second in synchrony with the starlings wingbeats. Exactly how the spring action of the furcula aids flight is unclear, but it may enhance respiratory perform: ance by pumping air through the air sacs (see Chapter 6). Because it functions as 2 rapidly vibrating spring, the wishbone “may be one of the most dynamic skeletal units in the vertebrate world” (K. Dial, in Poo! 1988).135 FLIGHT Supracoracoideus tendon Tn elemet ‘Triosseal canal a Furcula snes ow Downstroke Scapula Supracoracoideus /Foramen tendon /'teiosseum Humerus sternum, ‘Supracoracoideus muscle Pectoralis muscle sternal keel Upstroke Supracoracoideus 7 Supracoracoideus tendon Pectoralis ‘Supracoracoideus muscle muscle FIGURE 5-16 Right front view of the pectoral girdle and sternum of a pigeon. The ventrally located supracoracoideus muscle raises the wing by means of a pulleylike tendon that passes to the dorsal surface of the humerus through the triosseal canal between the furcula and the coracoid bones, plus the scapula (illustrated in Closer Look). The curved arrow indicates the action of this tendon. The pectoralis muscle, which has been removed in this drawing but is shown in the Closer Look, inserts onto the lower side of the humerus and pulls the humerus downward, as indicated. {From George and Berger 1966; *Closer Look” after Able 2004] metacarpus. There are only 2 free carpals in the avian wrist, far fewer than the 10 or more in most vertebrate wrists. The hand itself includes three digits, rather than the five found in most tetrapods, The alula, or bastard wing, originates from the first digit, the thumb, and moves independently136 (CHAPTER FIVE of the rest of the wing tip. Within the wing itself are powerful tendons and compact packages of tiny muscles that control the subtle details of wing position. Flight Muscles The two great flight muscles—pectorilis and supracoracoideus—originate on the keeled sternum and insert onto the expanded base of the humerus. Their ventral positions help to lower a bird's center of gravity in flight. The pectoralis muscle complex accounts for as much as 35 percent of a bird’s total body weight. Contraction of this muscle pulls the wing down in che power stroke. Different sections of this architecturally complex muscle enable takeoff, level flight, and landing. The pectoralis muscle at taches to the furcula and to the strong membrane between the coracoids and the furcula, Tt also attaches to the peripheral parts of the sternum, including the outer part of the keel, In tree-trunk-climbing birds with shallow keels, such as woodereepers, the pectoralis muscle spreads thinly over the rib cage for attachment. The supracoracoideus muscles lift the wings on the recovery stroke (see Figure 5-16). The supracoracoideus muscles are typically smaller than the pectoralis muscles. From each of these muscles positioned ventrally in the sternum, a strong tendon passes upward and forward through the triosseal canal (formed by the junction of the coracoid. seapula, and fur- cula) and inserts onto the dorsal side of the base of the humerus. The dor- sal insertion of this tendon enables the ventrally located supracoracoideus muscles to raise the wing, as if by a pulley. The supracoracoideus mus- cles power the rapid initial wingbeats chat are essential for clearing the ground quickly upon takeoff and achieving a minimal airspeed. A pigeon is unable to take off from the ground if its supracoracoideus tendons are cut experimentally (Sy 1936). Once launched and airborne. however, pigeons can fly without functional supracoracoideus muscles because the smaller dorsal elevator muscles can handle the less demanding recovery strokes of the wings during sustained flight. Hummingbirds use the upstroke of the wing as a propelling power oke. Logically, the supracoracoideus of = times as large relative to body size as that of most stroke rather than asa recovery, hummingbirds is other birds. It is half the size of the pectoralis muscle and constitutes 11.5. percent of total body mass, more than in any other bird. The supracora- coideus muscle is also unusually large in penguins, whose flippers propel them forward with a powered upstroke as well as downstroke. Muscle-Fiber Metabolism The power for flight derives from the metabolic activity in the cellular fibers of flight muscles, some of which have an extraordinary eapaciey For acrobic metabolism, ‘ertain muscle fibers are suited to specific modes offight. Red and white fibers are the extremes of the variation, but inter- mediate fiber types exist, Sustained flight power derives trom a high concent cle fibers in the flight muscles. The sustained contraction power of red muscle fibers results from the oxidative metabolism of fac and sugar, which is termed aerobic respiration. These narrow fibers have high su volume ratios and short diffusion distances, which aid the uptake of the oxygen required for aerobic metabolism. They also contain abundance myoglobin, mitochondria, fat, and enzymes that catalyze the chain of metabolic reactions known as the Krebs cycle. Experimental studies of extracts from pigeon breast muscle, which is rich in red fibers and the associated enzymes, have contributed to our present knowle bic metabolism. The aerobic capacity of the flight muscles of small song- birds and small bats is at the highest level known for vertebrates Few birds have muscle that consists entirely of red fibers. Rather, blends of different fibers that combine long-term endurance in flight with short-term power are typical of most birds. White muscle fibers provide this short-term power through anaerobic metabolism, which does not require oxygen, Unlike red fibers, th oglobin, few mi- tochondria, and a different set of enzymes. The white fibers are capable of a few rapid and powerfull contractions, but they fatigue quickly tic acid—a product of anaerobic metabolism—accumulates. The light meat of the breast muscles of domestic fowl and grouse consists prima- rily of narrow, white muscle fibers, the source of power for explosive takeoff. The short-term power of white muscle fibers is useful as well for fast turns and evasive actions in flight, but the birds tire easily and cannot fly long or far. ition of red mus- to- of aero contain little my as lac Flightless Birds Not all birds fly, Besides the ratites (eu are flightless grebes, pigeons. parrots, penguins, waterfowl, cormorants, auks, and rail. The original faunas of remote predator-free islands, sueh as the Hawaiian Islands in the Pacitic Ocean and the Mascarene Islands in the Indian Ocean, included a host of flightless birds: geese. ibises, rails. parrots, and the extinet Dodo (ee Box 21-1). If fight and mobility are so clearly advantageous to the majority of birds, why are some birds flight- less? The answer lies largely in the costly development and mainter of th ostriches and cassowaries), there nee anatomical apparatus required for Hight. An enlarged, keeled, cal- citied sternum and large pectoralis muscles, for example, are expensive to produce. Their maintenance also requires much energy. In the absence vantageous uses, such as the need to fly from predators, natural se= ion favors reduced investment in the material and energy for flight (McNab 1994). Rails often evolve flightless forms on islands where pred- ators are absent (Olson 1973). Rails also typically delay until they nearly fall grown the addition of calcium to the (cartilaginous) sternum, 137 FLIGHT138 CHAPTER FIVE Scapula Scapula Coracoid FIGURE 5-17 Skeletons of the King Rail, a flying rail, at (A) 17 days and (8) 47 days after hatching (size reduced so that femur lengths in the two drawings are equal). Stippled areas represent cartilage. Note the obtuse angle formed by the articulation of the scapula and coracoid in the younger form and the acute angle in the older form. [From Olson 1973], strengthening it into a bony structure that supports flight (Figure 5-17). Simple postponement of this conversion would lead to Hlightlessness. In the fossil record, evolutionary reduction of the sternal keel and the mass of flight muscles is, in fact, a first sign of reduced flying ability. The angle between the scapula and the coracoid also becomes more obtuse, and ul timately the wing bones become smaller. The flightless kiwis of New Zealand, for example, have only vestigial wings. Other routes co the evolution of flightlessness are seen in specialized diving birds, Foot-propelled divers, such as loons, grebes, and cormorants, have evolved powerful legs and feet that function as paddles. If evolution favors hindlimbs for locomotion, wings and associated pectoral develop- ment may regress and render a diving bird nearly or completely flight- less, Extreme cases are those of the flightless Titicaca Grebe of Lake Titicaca, Peru, and the Flightless Cormorant of the Galipagos Islands (Fig- ure 5-18). Reduced-sized wings trap less air, thereby reducing buoyancy that interferes with diving. Penguins, which are wing-propelled divers, represent another route to flightlessness in specialized diving birds. Their wings propel them through water rather than through the airy their feet act as rudders rather than as paddles, The evolution of such forms has occurred not only in penguins but also among the auks in the Northern Hemisphere. The evolution of wing-propelled divers from flying birds proceeds through an intermediate state in which wings are used for both under- water propulsion and serial flight. Diving petrels represent the inter=FIGURE 5-18 Flightless Cormorant drying its little wings after swimming. This species retains an ancestral behavior that is typical of other, flighted species of cormorants, which must dry their water-soaked flight feathers after a swim in order to fly (see page 81). [Michael Gore/Frank Lane Picture Agency/CORBIS} mediate stage in the evolution from flying petrels co flightless penguins. Auks, such as the Razorbill, with dual-purpose wings, represent the i termediate stage in the evolution of specialized divers from flying ances- tors to the flightless Great Auk of the North Adantic, The progressive specialization of wing skeletal structure is evident in the changes from the slim wing bones of a gull through shorter and heavier bone structures to the broad. flat wing skeleton of a penguin’s flipper (Figure 3-19). Summary Structural adaptations for flight dominate avian anatomy. Fusions and reinforcements of lightweight bones are among the adaptations of the avian skeleton for flight. Of particular importance are the keeled sternum, which supports the powerful pectoralis and supricoracoideus flight mus- cles, and the strutlike arrangement of the pectoral girdle. The tendons of the ventrally located supracoracoideus muscles pass through the triosseal canal to dorsal insertions on the humerus. The red fibers of avian flight muscles have an extraordinary capacity for aerobic metabolism. and sus- tained work. The form of the wing and of the individual fight feathers is that of an airfoil, which generates a force called lift as air passes over and is 139 FLIGHT FIGURE 5-19 Modifications of the wing skeleton in wing: propelled diving birds: (bottom to top) an aerial gull, an auk, the flghtiess Great Auk, an eatinet penguinike auk, and a penguin, [From Storer 1960140 CHAPTER FIVE deflected downward by the asymmetrical surfaces, Control of flight is achieved through changes in wing and wing feather positions and through the use of slots between feathers, Gliding birds exploit rising air currents, oth heated thermals and slope-deflected air, to gain altitude without the exertion of flapping, Hummingbirds achieve extraordinary maneuyerabil- ity in flight by beating their wings ac different angles in a figure-eight pat- tem that includes a powered upstroke as well as a powered downstroke. Flight power requirements are least at intermediate flight speeds. but birds often fly faster or slower than this speed to. maximize distances traveled or to feed. Particular wing shapes adapt birds to specific modes of flight because they influence the penalties of induced and profile drag relative to the wing's ability to generate life and thrust. Long. narrow wings sac- fifice maneuverability for high-speed flight with low drag. Birds are the only vertebrates that can land with precision on elevated or arboreal perches. Some birds have become flightless, particularly on remote islands that lack mammalian predators. Delayed ossification of the sternum in rails predisposes them to the evolution of flightlessness. Specialized diving birds rely either on hindlimb locomotion or wing-propelled underwater loco~ motion, Extremes of both kinds of diving birds have lost the power of fight. Penguins, for example, have Hlipper-like wings.