0% found this document useful (0 votes)
79 views2 pages

Understanding Influence Tactics

Influence can be defined as the capacity to produce effects on or compel the actions of others. There are nine commonly used influence tactics: rational persuasion, inspirational appeals, consultation, ingratiation, personal appeal, exchange, coalition tactics, pressure, and legitimating tactics. Rational persuasion uses logical arguments and facts to convince others, while inspirational appeals tap into emotions and values. The type of influence tactic used depends on whether the target is an upward report, downward report, or peer.

Uploaded by

Christian Galvez
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
79 views2 pages

Understanding Influence Tactics

Influence can be defined as the capacity to produce effects on or compel the actions of others. There are nine commonly used influence tactics: rational persuasion, inspirational appeals, consultation, ingratiation, personal appeal, exchange, coalition tactics, pressure, and legitimating tactics. Rational persuasion uses logical arguments and facts to convince others, while inspirational appeals tap into emotions and values. The type of influence tactic used depends on whether the target is an upward report, downward report, or peer.

Uploaded by

Christian Galvez
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Influence in general:

Defined as the capacity or power of persons or things to be a compelling force on or produce effects on
the actions, behavior, opinions, etc., of others.
Influence is such a powerful skill when it comes to achieving your intent. In an organization various of
influence tactics can be used depending on the context or situation and the more tactics you have at your
disposal, the more likely it is that you will achieve your influence goals. According to research there are nine
commonly used influence tactics, and these are:
1. Rational persuasion
2. Inspirational appeals
3. Consultation
4. Ingratiation
5. Personal appeal
6. Exchange
7. Coalition tactics
8. Pressure
9. Legitimating tactics
Rational Persuasion:
includes using facts, data, and logical arguments to try to convince others that your point of view is the
best alternative. This is the most commonly applied influence tactic. One experiment illustrates the power of
reason. People were lined up at a copy machine and another person, after joining the line asked, “May I go to the
head of the line?” Amazingly, 63% of the people in the line agreed to let the requester jump ahead. When the line
jumper makes a slight change in the request by asking, “May I go to the head of the line because I have copies
to make?” the number of people who agreed jumped to over 90%. The word because was the only difference.
Effective rational persuasion includes the presentation of factual information that is clear and specific, relevant,
and timely.
Inspirational appeals:
seek to tap into our values, emotions, and beliefs to gain support for a request or course of action.
When President John F. Kennedy said, “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your
country,” he appealed to the higher selves of an entire nation. Effective inspirational appeals are authentic,
personal, big-thinking, and enthusiastic.
Consultation:
refers to the influence agent’s asking others for help in directly influencing or planning to influence
another person or group. Consultation is most effective in organizations and cultures that value democratic
decision making.
Ingratiation:
refers to different forms of making others feel good about themselves. Ingratiation includes any form of
flattery done either before or during the influence attempt.
Personal appeal:
refers to helping another person because you like them and they asked for your help. We enjoy saying
yes to people we know and like. Personal appeals are most effective with people who know and like you.
Exchange:
refers to give-and-take in which someone does something for you, and you do something for them in
return. The rule of reciprocation says that “we should try to repay, in kind, what another person has provided us”
(Cialdini, 2000).
Coalition tactics:
refer to a group of individuals working together toward a common goal to influence others. Common
examples of coalitions within organizations are unions that may threaten to strike if their demands are not met.
Coalitions also take advantage of peer pressure. The influencer tries to build a case by bringing in the unseen as
allies to convince someone to think, feel, or do something.
Pressure:
refers to exerting undue influence on someone to do what you want or else something undesirable will
occur. This often includes threats and frequent interactions until the target agrees.
Legitimating tactics:
occur when the appeal is based on legitimate or position power. “By the power vested in me…”: This
tactic relies upon compliance with rules, laws, and regulations. It is not intended to motivate people but to align
them behind a direction. Obedience to authority is filled with both positive and negative images. Position, title,
knowledge, experience, and demeanor grant authority, and it is easy to see how it can be abused.
Direction of Influence:
The type of influence tactic used tends to vary based on the target. For example, you would probably
use different influence tactics with your boss than you would with a peer or with employees working under you.
These directions are:
1. Upward Influence
2. Downward Influence
3. Peer Influence
Upward Influence:
as its name implies, is the ability to influence your boss and others in positions higher than yours.
Upward influence may include appealing to a higher authority or citing the firm’s goals as an overarching reason
for others to follow your cause. Upward influence can also take the form of an alliance with a higher status
person
Downward Influence:
is the ability to influence employees lower than you. This is best achieved through an inspiring vision. By
articulating a clear vision, you help people see the end goal and move toward it. You often don’t need to specify
exactly what needs to be done to get there—people will be able to figure it out on their own. An inspiring vision
builds buy-in and gets people moving in the same direction.
Peer Influence:
Peer influence occurs all the time. But, to be effective within organizations, peers need to be willing to
influence each other without being destructively competitive (Cohen & Bradford, 2002). There are times to
support each other and times to challenge—the end goal is to create better decisions and results for the
organization and to hold each other accountable. Executives spend a great deal of their time working to influence
other executives to support their initiatives.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Exchange tactics may be more effective than coalition tactics in contexts where individual incentives or reciprocity is more valued over group action. This is particularly true in environments that reward personal achievements or where individuals seek tangible benefits for their efforts. Exchange tactics foster personal alliances and ensure that both parties gain directly, which can be faster and more flexible than building a coalition, especially in fast-paced or competitive environments .

For upward influence, rational persuasion and inspirational appeals are considered effective. Rational persuasion involves presenting clear, logical arguments and evidence, which can appeal to leaders by aligning with the organizational goals and priorities. Inspirational appeals tap into higher values or the organization's vision, mobilizing action and alignment among those in leadership positions .

Rational persuasion relies on logical arguments and factual evidence to convince others, making it effective when decisions require critical thinking or when dealing with analytical individuals. In contrast, legitimating tactics depend on authority, rules, or regulations, enforcing compliance rather than persuasion. While rational persuasion is more collaborative and encourages buy-in through reasoning, legitimating tactics enforce adherence through hierarchical power, which may limit actual engagement or commitment to the task .

Consultation tactics align with democratic values by encouraging participation and input from others in decision-making processes, fostering a sense of ownership and collaboration. This aligns with democratic principles by valuing different perspectives and seeking consensus or agreement, thereby enhancing the quality of decisions and strengthening organizational commitment through inclusive practices .

Legitimacy and authority in legitimating tactics intersect by utilizing positional power to enforce compliance, based on the perceived right of leaders to demand it. This interplay can ensure standard adherence and order but may also stifle initiative or innovation if overrelied upon. The impact on organizational influence can be dual: it secures immediate conformity but risks disengagement or resistance if not balanced with motivational strategies .

Personal appeal leverages the existing relationships and rapport between peers, making it effective for gaining support through personal connections. This tactic is particularly useful in peer influence, where mutual respect and liking can facilitate agreement and cooperation without overt competition, contributing to better decision-making and accountability within the organization .

Inspirational appeals in downward influence inspire and motivate by connecting tasks to broader values and visions, creating a shared sense of purpose. This approach promotes buy-in, energizes employees to act toward the common goal, and often elicits intrinsic motivation, reducing the need for micromanagement as employees align themselves with the envisioned outcomes .

Coalition tactics leverage peer dynamics by uniting a group toward a common goal, enhancing the credibility and power of the influencing party. This approach uses the collective strength of a group to exert peer pressure, making it easier to influence the target's thoughts or actions by demonstrating widespread support and shared interests within the organization .

Pressure tactics involve the use of threats or persistent demand to elicit compliance, relying on the negative consequences of not complying. They can generate compliance through fear or urgency. In contrast, exchange tactics involve a reciprocating approach where compliance is achieved through mutual benefit or trade-off, fostering a more positive and cooperative relationship by appealing to the principle of reciprocation .

Ingratiation can be advantageous as it makes the target feel valued and appreciated, creating a more favorable reception to requests. By playing to the human desire for appreciation, it can build goodwill and cooperation. However, it may also backfire if perceived as insincere or manipulative, damaging trust and credibility if overused or recognized as a tactic rather than authentic appreciation .

You might also like