Understanding Usufruct in Civil Law
Understanding Usufruct in Civil Law
A usufructuary can make improvements on a property but cannot demand reimbursement for these improvements from the owner at the end of the usufruct period . According to Article 579, the usufructuary may remove the improvements provided no damage is caused to the property, such as by replacing any modified features with the originals .
Articles 565, 573, and 574 outline the responsibilities of a usufructuary, emphasizing the preservation of the property's form and substance. Article 565 requires the usufructuary to maintain ordinary repairs, while Articles 573 and 574 provide exceptions where the usufructuary may not bear some costs if explicitly stipulated otherwise. These articles collectively ensure the usufructuary's duty to care for and manage the property, protecting the owner's interest .
If an object is lost after a contract's perfection and before its delivery, the rule res perit domino might apply, where the owner bears the loss . However, Article 1189 also grants the buyer a personal right to demand what was agreed upon in the contract. If loss results from an accident or unforeseeable event, Article 1174 applies, exempting any party from liability .
Usufruct creates a real right for the usufructuary because it grants them the ability to use and enjoy another's property, deriving benefits from it without owning it . This right can affect third-party relations once registered. In contrast, a lease typically establishes a personal right unless the lease term exceeds one year, in which case it can affect third parties .
While a usufructuary of both movable and immovable property must maintain the property's form and substance, they are particularly liable for ordinary repairs on immovable property, as it is part of their obligation to preserve the property . For movable property, any modifications or improvements are removable by the usufructuary, as long as no damage is caused, unlike with immovable property where they may also undertake sets-off for damages done .
The usufructuary has the right to use and enjoy the benefits of the property without owning it, being limited to the rights granted by the usufruct, such as leasing the property to others . In contrast, the naked owner retains ownership rights, including the ability to sell or mortgage the property, and must respect the usufructuary's rights until the usufruct terminates .
Contracts under a usufruct terminate with the expiration of the usufruct because the usufructuary holds rights to use the property only temporarily . Exceptions exist, such as leases of agricultural lands where the usufruct ends but the lease may continue until the harvest . This exception is intended to respect the cyclical nature of agricultural production.
Under Article 572, a usufructuary may lease the right of usufruct to another or alienate it completely. However, they cannot sell or mortgage the property itself, only the rights they hold . This distinction ensures that the usufructuary retains only temporary rights subject to the expiration or termination of the usufruct, while the property's ultimate ownership remains with the naked owner .
Article 1189 becomes relevant in situations where a contract has been perfected, but the delivery and transfer of ownership have not yet occurred . In such cases, the purchaser has a personal right against the seller to demand delivery, as the juridical tie has been established through perfection of the contract. If the object is lost due to the seller's fault before the delivery, the seller may be held liable, unless the loss results from an accident or a fortuitous event, which falls under Article 1174 .
Historically, parents had usufructuary rights over their children's property, enabling them to use and derive income from it. However, modern legal frameworks have largely moved away from these doctrines, focusing on the child's welfare instead. Current laws rarely expressly grant such rights, emphasizing parental duties to support rather than derive benefit .


