0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views3 pages

Engineering 4.0: CAE Software Efficiency Study

The E4TC research report examines the efficiency potential of CAE software in electrical design for engineering machines and plant systems, based on an eight-month study of German companies. It introduces an Engineering Workflow Model and an Efficiency Level Matrix that quantifies engineering workflows, revealing that partial automation can significantly enhance efficiency. The study concludes that companies can improve their overall processes by approximately 20% as they advance through defined efficiency levels.

Uploaded by

Hussein Algomaa
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views3 pages

Engineering 4.0: CAE Software Efficiency Study

The E4TC research report examines the efficiency potential of CAE software in electrical design for engineering machines and plant systems, based on an eight-month study of German companies. It introduces an Engineering Workflow Model and an Efficiency Level Matrix that quantifies engineering workflows, revealing that partial automation can significantly enhance efficiency. The study concludes that companies can improve their overall processes by approximately 20% as they advance through defined efficiency levels.

Uploaded by

Hussein Algomaa
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

ABSTRACT

Engineering 4.0 – A study of the efficiency potential and the use of CAE
software in electrical design for engineering machines and plant systems

E4TC research report exclusively available from EPLAN

New Engineering 4.0 Study


The European 4.0 Transformation Center (E4TC) at the RWTH Aachen Campus studied the stra-
tegic digitisation of design and control engineering for machines and plant systems. The 36-page
research report, “Engineering 4.0 – A study of the efficiency potential and the use of CAE software
in electrical design for engineering machines and plant systems” is based on an eight-month field
study of German machine engineering companies that manufacture mass-produced machines
and special machines, engineering offices/hardware planners and device manufacturers. The
methodology developed, which quantifies potentials and procedures in engineering, makes possi-
ble for the first time a well-founded evaluation of current engineering workflows in mass machine
manufacturing and special machine manufacturing. The central finding: the partial automation of
engineering results in the best ratio between effort and benefit from a business standpoint.

Engineering Workflow Model – The researchers focused on the work fields of


Efficiency Level Matrix engineering, design, bills of materials, reports,
control cabinet layout and devices and tem-
The E4TC researchers in Aachen first introduced a refer- plates. The reasons for this are clear: “The
ence model for the engineering workflow and created an dependencies on customers or partners in
evaluation matrix with five levels of efficiency. The Efficien- these process steps range from relatively low
cy Level Matrix, with detailed statements about Metho- to non-existent,” says E4TC Managing Director
dology Workflow, is accompanied by a Use Level Matrix. Dr Thomas Gartzen. “Companies literally have
This describes and evaluates the use of CAE software complete control in these areas to tap into
as the basic prerequisite for Engineering 4.0. The study potential time and cost savings through stan-
indicates the object of research right at the start: a total of dardisation or automation projects.” The path to
ten process steps that are characteristic for engineering in higher efficiencies in the value chain is mapped
machine construction (mass produced/special machines). out using traditional methods, from standardi-
The generated Engineering Workflow Model comprises sation up to automation. To be able to evaluate
the typical work steps for processing an order. the efficiency of each work step, the study

1/3
scaled the workflow methodology into five stages – each eLevel. Device-oriented work methods bring
corresponding to an efficiency level (eLevel) of engineer- 25 percent time savings in the creation of
ing. schematics. Using a circuit library for product
functions resulted in 50 percent time savings.
Findings Another 25 percent reduction can be achieved
by introducing partial automation. And stand-
Using the collected data, the researchers determined that ardisation completely eliminates the time neces-
companies can become around 20 percent more efficient sary for creating reports.
in their overall processes as they move from eLevel to

Engineering Workflow Model “Design & Construction” (Work Steps 1–8)

Clarify the Design Create


Clarify Create Check Create Bill Design
Basic Functions Manufacturing
Specifications Schematics Schematics of Materials Control Cabinet
Conditions and Infrastructure Documentation

Standardisation (Work Steps 9, 10)

Create Create
Device Macros and
Standards Templates

Figure 1: Engineering Workflow Model

eLevel Work Method Characteristics per Work Step


1 “traditional” Graphically oriented work method, symbols, manually created schematics, typical
design of new circuits (ETO share)

2 “partially Graphically oriented work method, use of product macros, creation of device data-
standardised” bases, device selection

3 “standardised” Graphical and device-oriented work methods, use of a circuit library for production
functions, central macro projects, modularisation, consistent reuse, fully automatic
report creation, introduction of division of labour in engineering into order proces-
sing and data creation for standardisation

4 “partially Use of a comprehensive circuit library and of design methods including options,
automated” variants, importing data, offline ERP/PDM integration

5 “automated” Use of generation and configuration functions, integration into the entire process
(ERP/PDM), sales configurations (a degree of automation up to 100 percent)

Figure 2: “Methodology Workflow” Efficiency Level (eLevel) Definition

2/3
Work Steps 4–7: Work Steps 9, 10: Resulting
Savings in direct Efforts for Total Potential,
eLevel
work in the system standardisation, Work Steps 1–10
(schematics creation) pro rata basis per order

1. “traditional” – – –

2. “partially standardised” 25 % 5% 20 %

3. “standardised” 50 % 10 % 40 %

4. “partially automated” 75 % 15 % 60 %

5. “automated” 100 % 20 % 80 %

Figure 3: Efficiency Table


Design Time per Project (%)

Efforts for
Standardisation

Traditional Partially Standardised Partially Automated


(1) Standardised (3) Automated (5)
(2) (4)

Engineering Efficiency (eLevel)

Figure 4: Engineering Efficiency Curve

EPLAN Software & Service GmbH & Co. KG


An der alten Ziegelei 2 · 40789 Monheim am Rhein · Germany
Phone: +49 2173 3964-0 · Fax: +49 2173 3964-25
info@[Link] · [Link]

3/3

Common questions

Powered by AI

ERP/PDM integration enhances engineering efficiency by seamlessly linking design processes with enterprise resource planning and product data management systems. This alignment supports data flow and communication across different process stages, contributing to a higher degree of automation and reducing manual intervention requirements .

Standardization plays a crucial role in efficiency by eliminating variable processes and enabling full automation, such as the automatic creation of reports and the use of central macro projects. The study finds that standardization can completely negate the time required for order-specific report creation, thereby significantly boosting efficiency .

The Efficiency Level Matrix facilitates evaluation by providing a structured framework to quantify the efficiency potential at each work step in engineering workflows. It outlines five distinct levels of efficiency (eLevels), each with specific work method characteristics, enabling companies to measure and improve their processes from standardization to full automation .

The E4TC study suggests that engineering companies can achieve 20% overall efficiency improvements by transitioning through eLevels, with significant gains realized through methods like device-oriented work methods, use of circuit libraries, partial automation, and thorough standardization of report creation processes .

Creating a well-integrated engineering workflow involves clarifying specifications, design functions, infrastructure, creating and checking schematics, developing materials bills, and manufacturing documentation, which leads to creating device standards and templates. Unlike traditional methods that rely on manual, graphically oriented designs, integrated workflows use circuit libraries, macros, and leverage ERP/PDM systems for higher degrees of automation and efficiency .

Engineering automation in mass and special machine manufacturing offers benefits such as increased process efficiency by up to 20%, a 25% time saving through device-oriented work methods, 50% savings using circuit libraries, and complete elimination of report creation time through standardization .

The introduction of a circuit library allows for consistent reuse of production functions and modularization. This results in up to a 50% time saving in schematic creation and supports the division of labor in engineering into order processing and data creation for standardization .

CAE software acts as a foundational tool for advancing to Engineering 4.0 by facilitating the standardization and automation of engineering processes. This technology supports various stages of workflow enhancement, from graphical representation and device data insertion to fully automated report generation, thus setting the stage for the transition to higher efficiency levels .

The traditional eLevel (1) is characterized by graphically oriented work methods, manually created schematics, and new circuit designs. In contrast, the automated eLevel (5) utilizes generation and configuration functions, integrates the entire process including ERP/PDM, and achieves a maximum degree of automation up to 100 percent .

Partial automation improves efficiency by introducing a comprehensive circuit library and design methods including options and variants, as well as importing data and offline ERP/PDM integration. This approach can bring up to a 75% time saving in work steps like schematics creation, resulting in an overall 60% efficiency gain from work steps 1-10 .

You might also like