0% found this document useful (0 votes)
781 views12 pages

Soil Classification Methods and Examples

This document discusses soil classification systems. It provides examples of classifying soils using the USDA and AASHTO systems based on particle size distribution and plasticity characteristics. The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) is also explained, which categorizes soils as coarse-grained or fine-grained based on the percent passing the No. 200 sieve. USCS further classifies soils using group symbols and names based on gradation properties and liquid limit/plasticity index. Sample problems are provided at the end to classify soils using the USCS.

Uploaded by

Tyn Maturan
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
781 views12 pages

Soil Classification Methods and Examples

This document discusses soil classification systems. It provides examples of classifying soils using the USDA and AASHTO systems based on particle size distribution and plasticity characteristics. The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) is also explained, which categorizes soils as coarse-grained or fine-grained based on the percent passing the No. 200 sieve. USCS further classifies soils using group symbols and names based on gradation properties and liquid limit/plasticity index. Sample problems are provided at the end to classify soils using the USCS.

Uploaded by

Tyn Maturan
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Soil Classification
  • Classification by Engineering Behavior
  • Sample Problems

Soil Classification

Thursday, 9 September 2021 8:30 am

Example 1:

Classification of Soil Page 1


Example 2:

Soil B has a particle size distribution of 20% gravel, 10% sand, 30% silt, and 40%
clay, determine its USDA textural classification.

Classification of Soil Page 2


Classification of Soil Page 3
Classification of Soil Page 4
In general, the quality of performance of a soil as a subgrade material is inversely
proportional to the group index.

Example 1

Ninety-five percent of a soil passes through the No. 200 sieve and has a liquid
limit of 60 and plasticity index of 40. Classify the soil by the AASHTO system.

Classification of Soil Page 5


Example 2 (Plates)
Classify the following soil by the AASHTO Classification System:
• Percentage passing No. 10 sieve = 90
• Percentage passing No. 40 sieve = 76
• Percentage passing No. 200 sieve = 34
• Liquid limit = 37
• Plasticity index = 12

Classification of Soil Page 6


2. Classification by Engineering Behavior
(cont.)
Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)

This system classifies soils into two broad categories:

• Coarse-grained soils that are gravelly and sandy in nature with less than 50%
passing through the No. 200 sieve.

• Fine-grained soils are with 50% or more passing through the No. 200 sieve.

• Other symbols used for the classification are:

• W—well graded

• P—poorly graded

• L—low plasticity (liquid limit less than 50)

• H—high plasticity (liquid limit more than 50)

Classification of Soil Page 7


For proper classification according to this system, some or all of the following
information must be known:
1. Percent passing of gravel
2. Percent passing of sand
3. Percent passing of silt and clay
4. Uniformity coefficient (Cu) and the coefficient of gradation (Cc)
5. Liquid limit and plasticity index of the portion of soil passing the No. 40 sieve.

More recently, ASTM designation D-2487 created an elaborate system to assign


group names to soils. These names are summarized in Figures 5.4, 5.5, and 5.6.

In using these figures, one needs to remember that, in a given soil,

• Fine fraction = percent passing No. 200 sieve

• Coarse fraction = percent retained on No. 200 sieve

Classification of Soil Page 8


• Gravel fraction = percent retained on No. 4 sieve

• Sand fraction = (%retained on No. 200 sieve) - (%retained on No. 4 sieve)

TAKEN FROM ASTM D2487-11

Classification of Soil Page 9


Classification of Soil Page 10
SAMPLE PROBLEMS

Classify the soils using the Unified Soil Classification System. Give the group symbols
and the group names.

Classification of Soil Page 11


Classification of Soil Page 12

Common questions

Powered by AI

In the USCS, soils with more than 50% passing the No. 200 sieve are classified as fine-grained. However, in this example, only 34% is passing, meaning it is a coarse-grained soil. The soil has a liquid limit of less than 50 and a plasticity index of 12, which does not indicate significant plasticity. Therefore, it would likely be classified as SM (Silty Sand) due to the combination of sand and a minor amount of fines (silt).

The AASHTO soil classification system classifies soils based on grain size distribution and Atterberg limits (liquid limit and plasticity index). A soil in which 95% passes the No. 200 sieve is predominantly a fine-grained soil. With a high liquid limit of 60 and a plasticity index of 40, this soil would classify as an A-7-6 soil group. This classification indicates a clayey soil with high plasticity, suggesting it is less desirable as a subgrade material for pavement .

According to ASTM D-2487, sand and gravel fractions are pivotal in distinguishing soil types within the coarse-grained category. Sand fraction (particles passing through the No. 4 sieve and retained on the No. 200 sieve) affects texture and compaction efficiency, while gravel fraction (particles retained on the No. 4 sieve) primarily influences load-bearing capacity and drainage. The balance between these fractions dictates the soil's practical applications, influencing stability, erosion control, and permeability in engineering projects .

The liquid limit and plasticity index are critical in USCS for classifying fine-grained soils. If the liquid limit is below 50, the soil is classified as having low plasticity ('L'); if above 50, as high plasticity ('H'). The plasticity index further corroborates this classification, expressing the range of moisture content where the soil remains plastic. These parameters help differentiate between clayey soils (C) and silty soils (M) by indicating the soil's cohesive properties and potential for shrink-swell behavior .

In the USCS, well-graded soils (indicated by 'W') have a variety of particle sizes that result in good packing and reduced void space, which enhances stability and strength. Poorly graded soils ('P'), on the other hand, have uniform particle sizes, leading to more void spaces and potential for compressibility under load. Well-graded soils are preferred for engineering applications due to their stability, while poorly graded soils may require stabilization or compaction efforts for significant load-bearing applications .

The uniformity coefficient (Cu) and the coefficient of gradation (Cc) are essential in assessing soil or aggregate gradation, influencing compactness and stability. Cu, defined as D60/D10, illustrates particle size distribution; a high Cu indicates a well-graded soil with a wide range of particle sizes, leading to better packing and increased strength. Cc indicates the curve's shape on a gradation chart, signaling how well particles conform to a particular gradation (optimum values typically range from 1 to 3). These coefficients collectively assess soil's suitability for engineering projects, where optimal gradation improves load support and reduces settlement .

In the USCS, when more than 50% passes the No. 200 sieve, soils are categorized as fine-grained. This classification relies on particle behavior characteristics, as fine-grained soils (silts and clays) exhibit distinct plasticity and moisture-related properties influencing soil mechanics differently than coarse-grained soils. Fine-grained soils require different treatment due to higher plasticity, lower permeability, and unique engineering challenges such as swell potential and compressibility, significantly impacting construction and infrastructure projects .

In the AASHTO soil classification system, a high group index indicates poor performance as a subgrade material. The group index is inversely related to the quality of performance, implying that as the group index increases, the soil's suitability for use as a subgrade decreases. This reflects poorer load-bearing capacity and higher plasticity .

The USDA textural classification system uses a soil texture triangle to determine the classification based on the relative percentages of sand, silt, and clay. Soil B, which has 10% sand, 30% silt, and 40% clay, would fall into the 'Clay' category according to the USDA system. The presence of 20% gravel does not typically affect the USDA classification directly, as the system mainly focuses on the sand, silt, and clay fractions .

ASTM D-2487 is a standardized classification pivotal for soil engineering, providing consistency and detail in categorizing soils. It distinctly separates fine and coarse-grained soils, enhancing the granularity of evaluation. Fine fractions (particles passing the No. 200 sieve) focus on plasticity and liquidity properties, crucial for assessing cohesion and shrink-swell potentials. Coarse fractions consider gradation for load-bearing assessment. This classification supports infrastructure design, offering precise criteria vital for predicting behavior under varying environmental and mechanical forces .

You might also like