Leadership and Governance Rubrics
Leadership and Governance Rubrics
Department of Education
REGION III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF TARLAC PROVINCE
INDICATOR LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 MOVs per Indicator STANDARD MOVs as per RM
133
1. In place is a Not evident The Development The Development The Development ESIP – only the Annex 5 – 1. APPROVED School
Development Plan Plan guided by the Plan is involved Plan is enhanced Planning Worksheet and Improvement Plan (SIP)
([Link]) developed school’s vision, through the shared with 81-100% Annex 10 Annual - Reviewed/Adjusted/Enhanced
collaboratively by mission and goal leadership and the community Implementation Plan SIP
the stakeholders of (VMG) is developed school and the participation in School Learning Continuity Attachments: School
the school and through the participation of 51- performing the Plan (LCP) Memorandum, Letter of
community leadership of the 80% community leadership roles School Memo Invitation, Activity Completion
school and the stakeholders with the school Letter of Invitation Report
participation of the providing technical ACR
50% of the support __________________________________ 2. APPROVED Annual
community Implementation Plan
stakeholders * LGU – 1 Attachments: School
Barangay –2 Memorandum, Letter of
Alumni 1 Invitation, Activity Completion
SGC – 6 Report
School Planning Team - 5
TOTAL - 15 people 3. APPROVED Office
________________________________ Performance Commitment &
Level 0 Review Form
No evidence Attachments: School
Memorandum, Minutes of
Level 1 the Meeting, ACR, School
SIP/AIP/LCP with the signature Organizational Structure,
of the SGC and approved by the Process flow
SDS
4. Programs, Project,
Level 3
5. Modes of Dissemination
SIP/AIP/LCP with the signature Attachments: School Website,
of the SGC and approved by the Facebook
SDS Account Page,
Leaflets/Brochures/Newsletters,
School Memorandum Transparency/Bulletin Board,
School Paper, Communication
ACR Plan, Flow and System.
Level 2
SMEA conducted on the
programs and projects in the SIP
or the Monitoring & Evaluation
Tool on the SIP with 10 to 11
Level 3
SMEA conducted on the
programs and projects in the SIP
or the Monitoring & Evaluation
Tool on the SIP with 11 to 14
people involved as manifested in
the attendance sheet
3. The school is Not evident The school defines The school and 51 The school and 81 Additional MOVs (not
organized by a clear the organizational – 80% of the – 100% of the compulsory)
structure and work structure, and the community community Different school organizations
arrangements that roles and collaboratively collaboratively with the ff:
promote shared responsibilities of define the define the Term of Reference
leadership and the stakeholders organizational organizational Constitution and by laws
governance and structure, and the structure, and the Minutes of the meeting
define the roles and roles and roles and
responsibilities of responsibilities of responsibilities of SGC - 6 people
the stakeholders the stakeholders the stakeholders
Level 0 - No Evidence
Level 1
SGC members
Term of Reference
Constitution and by laws
Level 2
SGC members
Term of Reference
Constitution and by laws
Minutes of the meeting on the
establishment of the SGC and
succeeding School meetings
Level 3
SGC members
Term of Reference
Constitution and by laws
Minutes of the meeting on the
establishment of the SGC and
succeeding meetings every
quarter or as indicated in the
constitution and bylaws with 6 or
all members present
4. A leadership Not Evident A network has The network The network allows MOVs for Mode of Dissemination
network facilitates been actively provides easy exchange and School Website
communication collaboratively stakeholders access to Facebook Account Page
between and among established and is information for information Brochures/leaflets/newslette
school and continuously making decisions sources beyond the r
community leaders improved by the and solving school community Transparency/bulletin boards
for informed school community learning and every quarter School Paper
decision-making yearly administrative Communication, system, and flow
and solving of problems twice a
school-community year
Level 0 – No evidence
wide – learning
problems.
Level 1
SGC and its committees
Curriculum Committee
Ways and Means
Committee
Beautification/School
Ground Committee
Program Monitoring and
Level 2
Any of the ff.:
SMEPA showing the
adjustment done twice a year
ACR on the resolution of the
issues and concerns done
twice a year
Resolution made to resolve issues
and concerns about learning and
administration done twice a year
Level 3
Any of the ff.:
SMEPA showing the
adjustment every quarter.
ACR on the resolution of the
issues and concerns done
every quarter
Resolution made to resolve issues
and concerns about learning and
administration every quarter
5. Long term Not Evident Developing Leaders undertake Leaders assume Standard MOVs
program is in Structures are in training modes for responsibility for OPCRF/IPCRF
Level 2
OPCRF/IPCRF focusing on
the Individual Development
Plan (IDP)
School Memo on the conduct
of 2 Phases of the IPCRF
evaluation
Minutes of the Meeting
ACR/Performance Monitoring
and Coaching Form.
School Organizational
Structure
2 Trainings conducted for the
Learning and Development
Level 3
INDICATOR LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 MOVs per Indicator STANDARD MOVs as per RM 133
[Link] curriculum No All types of Programs are These List of Curricular Offerings 1. Teacher’s Portfolio
Teachers’ Portfolio
- Summary of RPMS/
IPCRF portfolio
(proportion of
teachers meeting
PPST career stage 3
in all domains
(Highly Proficient)
- Monthly Supervisory
Plan
- Virtual Observation
INDICATOR LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 MOVs per Indicator STANDARD MOVs as per RM 133
1. Roles and No There is an There is 51-80% Shared and 1. School Monitoring, Evaluation & 1. School Monitoring, Evaluation &
responsibilities evidence active party stakeholders participatory Adjustment (SMEA) Adjustment (SMEA)
of accountable that initiates engagement in processes with 81- Attachments: Attachments:
clarification of clarifying and 100%
person/s and SMEA Committee SMEA Committee
the roles and defining their stakeholders
collective responsibilities specific roles and engagement in SMEA Meetings with School SMEA Meetings with School
body/ies are in education responsibilities. determining roles, Memorandum Memorandum
clearly defined delivery with responsibilities and Minutes of the Meeting Minutes of the Meeting
and agreed 50% of accountabilities of SMEA Plan with SMEA Plan with
upon by stakeholders stakeholders in Quarterly Schedule of Reporting to Quarterly Schedule of Reporting to
community participation. managing and stakeholders stakeholders
stakeholders. supporting Dissemination Report relative to Dissemination Report relative to
education.
SMEA Results SMEA Results
- Quarterly/Semestral SMEA Results - Quarterly/Semestral SMEA Results
2. Achievement No Performance A community-level A community-
- Report on Midyear Assessment and - Report on Midyear Assessment and
of goals is evidence accountability accountability accepted
MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES
INDICATOR LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 MOVs per Indicator STANDARD MOVs as
per RM 133
1. Regular resource Not Evident 50% of Stakeholders Resource inventory is Resource inventories are 1. APPROVED Work and 1. APPROVED Work and
inventory is are aware that a regular characterized by systematically developed Financial Plan Financial Plan
collaboratively resource inventory is regularity, with 51-80% and with 81-100% Attachments: Attachments:
undertaken by learning available and is used as of participation of stakeholders
School School
managers, learning the basis for resource stakeholders, and engagement in a
facilitators, and allocation and communicated to the collaborative process to Memorandum Memorandum
community mobilization. community as the basis make decisions on Minutes of the Minutes of the
stakeholders as basis for resource allocation resource allocation and Meeting Meeting
for resource allocation and mobilization. mobilization. Attendance Attendance
and mobilization. Pictures Pictures
2. A regular dialogue Not Evident 50% Stakeholders 51-80% Stakeholders 81-100% Stakeholders 2. APPROVED School 2. APPROVED School
for planning and participation in the are regularly engaged collaborate to ensure Operating Budget Operating Budget
resource programming, development of an in the planning and timely and need-based Attachments: Attachments:
that is accessible and educational plan in resource programming planning and resource