Maximum Container Capacity for Petrol
Maximum Container Capacity for Petrol
To show that 847 and 2160 are coprimes using Euclid's algorithm, apply the division process repeatedly to find the common factors. If at the end of applying Euclid's process the last non-zero remainder is 1, then the numbers are coprime, meaning they have no common factors besides 1. This method is effective because it systematically breaks down the numbers into smaller, related factors, revealing commonality through rigorous calculation .
The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic states each positive integer has a unique prime factorization, aiding in finding the LCM and HCF of numbers. For 120 (2³x3x5) and 144 (2⁴x3²), the HCF is found by taking the lowest power of common primes: HCF = 2³x3. The LCM, requiring the highest power of each prime present in any factorization, is LCM = 2⁴x3²x5, thus efficiently computing these core arithmetic quantities .
The number 9 cannot end with the digit 0 for any natural power n because 0 as a last digit implies divisibility by 10, which requires the presence of the prime factors 2 and 5. However, the prime factorization of 9 is composed solely of the prime number 3 (9 = 3²), which lacks both the 2 and 5 required to form a factor of 10. Thus, no power of 9 can ever end with 0 .
Euclid's division algorithm helps determine the HCF by repeatedly applying the process of division until the remainder is zero. For 4052 and 420, the algorithm involves dividing 4052 by 420 to get a quotient and a remainder, then dividing the divisor (420) by this remainder, repeating the process with each new divisor and remainder pair, until the remainder is zero. The divisor at this last non-zero remainder step is the HCF. This method efficiently reduces the problem size through successive reductions .
Express 0.3178 as a rational number by interpreting the decimal places as consecutive powers of 10, forming the fraction 3178/10000. This method is useful because it converts finite decimal expansions into a/b form, fitting the definition of rational numbers, thus allowing operations like addition, comparison, and simplification within a rational number framework .
The significance lies in emphasizing the non-linear nature of number factorization. The HCF represents shared minimal factors while the LCM covers all factor incidences among numbers. For 378, 180, and 420, the product of HCF and LCM differs from their multiplication: HCF captures least commonality and LCM maximal spread, neither of which matches straightforward summation of all individual distributions, reflecting intricate and deep number properties beyond basic arithmetic expectations .
A rational number such as 13/64 has a terminating decimal expansion if the denominator in its lowest terms (64 in this case) is composed only of the prime factors 2 and/or 5. The number of decimal places is determined by taking the power to which each prime factor appears in the denominator's prime factorization. Here, 64 = 2^6, hence the decimal expansion terminates after 6 decimal places .
To determine whether 3x5x13x46 + 23 is prime or composite, compute the full value of the expression, which yields a numerical result. A prime number has no divisors other than 1 and itself. If any integer less than its square root divides it without a remainder, it is composite. The expression suggests arithmetic evaluation rather than simple, inherent properties, illustrating that testing numeric evidence is crucial .
To verify that 2√2 is irrational, assume first that it is rational, expressed as a fraction of two integers a/b in lowest terms. Squaring both sides gives (2√2)² = (a/b)², leading to 8 = a²/b² ⇒ a² = 8b², meaning a² is divisible by 8. Thus, a must be divisible by √8, contradicting the reduced fraction assumption. The importance lies in understanding the properties of numbers and their classifications, which are foundational in mathematics, especially in calculus and algebra where irrational numbers play critical conceptual roles .
The significance lies in showing a fundamental property of integers, which has applications in combinatorial arguments and number theory. The proof is structured by considering two cases: when the first integer 'n' is even and when it is odd. If 'n' is even, both 'n' and 'n+2' are divisible by 2, leading to divisibility by 2. Additionally, the product of any three consecutive integers is necessarily divisible by 3, as at least one of them must be a multiple of 3. Hence, the product 'n(n+1)(n+2)' is divisible by both 2 and 3, thus by 6. If 'n' is odd, 'n+1' is even, contributing the factor of 2, while the logic for divisibility by 3 remains the same, proving divisibility by 6 in all cases .