See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: [Link]
net/publication/319128325
Data Collection
Chapter · July 2017
CITATIONS READS
0 68,210
2 authors:
Huma Parveen Nayeem Showkat
Aligarh Muslim University Aligarh Muslim University
19 PUBLICATIONS 21 CITATIONS 25 PUBLICATIONS 47 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Review View project
Mass Communication Theory View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Nayeem Showkat on 15 August 2017.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
Quadrant-I (e-Text)
Module name/ title: Data Collection
Paper: Communications Research
Component I: Personal Details
Role Name Affiliation
Principal Investigator Prof. Biswajit Das Centre for Culture, Media
& Governance,
JamiaMilliaIslamia, Delhi
Co-Principal Investigator Dr. Durgesh Tripathi University School of Mass
Communication, Guru
Gobind Singh
Indraprastha University,
Delhi
Paper Coordinator (if Dr. Sunitha Chitrapu Social Communications
any) Media Department
(SCMSophia), Sophia-
Smt. Manorama Devi
Somani College, Mumbai
400 026
Content Writer/ Dr. Huma Parveen Dept. of Mass-
Author(s) Communication, Aligarh
Muslim University
NayeemShowkat Department of Mass
Communication, Aligarh
Muslim University, Aligarh
Content Reviewer Prof. Biswajit Das Centre for Culture, Media
& Governance, Jamia
Millia Islamia, Delhi
Language Editor Mr. P K Satapathy Department of English,
School of Open Learning,
University of Delhi
Component II: Description of the Module
Items Description of Module
Subject Name Communication Studies
Paper Name Communications Research
Module Name/Title Data Collection
Module ID P2M18
Pre-requisites
Objectives
Keywords Primary data, secondary data, data
collection
Media & M18 - Data Collection 1
Communication
Studies
P2 - Communications Research
Quadrant-I (e-Text)
Module 19: Data Collection
1. Learning Outcome
The module aims to introduce different methods used by researchers for collection of
data. The purpose of research is to make description, explanation and/or predictions
about various phenomena. The efficacy of any research depends on the accuracy of
the data collected. The chapter outlines different methods available for data
collection in social science research.
2. Introduction
Research is a highly specialised activity that is more than just collecting information
or writing a description. It involves collection of information in a targeted fashion,
which is further analysed thoroughly to lead to answers of research questions and
evaluate results. The collection of data is the heart of any research design,
irrespective of the field of study. Any research begins with certain questions, which
need to be answered. Data collection is the process of gathering the desirable
information carefully, with least possible distortion, so that the analysis may provide
answers that are credible and stand to logic (Sapsford &Jupp, 2006).
3. Types of Data
There are two types of data:
Primary Data
Secondary Data
3.1 Primary Data:
The data gathered by researcher first-hand is primary data. The researcher collects
such data on purpose, because no previous records of the data exist to be accessed
by public. Primary data can be collected using a range of methods like surveys,
interviews, focus groups, etc. Such data is considered to be highly reliable.
3.2 Secondary Data:
The data that have been collected and compiled by someone, and are accessible to
the public, are known as secondary data. It is the data used by the investigator from
previous studies and other sources. The primary data collected for one research
study, becomes secondary data when it is further used for another research.
Generally, secondary data includes government reports, census data, departmental
records, etc. Using such data is less expensive and faster in comparison to primary
data.
4. Quantitative and Qualitative Data
The data collection methods can also be classified on the basis of the methods used.
There are two categories of data collection methods:
Media & M18 - Data Collection 2
Communication
Studies
P2 - Communications Research
Quadrant-I (e-Text)
Quantitative Data
Quantitative Data
4.1 Quantitative Data
The data that can be quantified and expressed as a number is quantitative data. For
example, height of students of a class, marks obtained in a test, number of news
stories published on a topic, number of times a particular word has been used in
publications, etc. It is feasible to represent such datathrough ordinaland ratio scales,
and are capable of being statistically evaluated.
4.2 Qualitative Data
The data that cannot be expressed in the form of a number is qualitative [Link]
data can only be expressed through nominal scales, for example, religion, gender,
etc. It can also be “descriptions of situations, events, people, interactions and
observed behaviours; direct quotations from people ... and excerpts or entire
passages from documents, correspondence, records and case studies” (Patton,
1988). Qualitative data can be best conveyed in the form of words.
5. Data Collection Techniques
The data can be collected using various techniques. The decision about which tool to
use for data collection is guided by the research question. Some methods of data
collection are:
Interview
Focus Groups
Field Observation
Case Study
Ethnography
Oral History
Projective Techniques
Some instruments of data collection are:
Questionnaire
Interview Schedule
5.1 Interview
An interview is meant to record and analyse people’s opinions, experiences, beliefs
and ideas on relevant topics. The respondents are required to present more detailed
information. This gives a deeper insight into the social phenomena, as compared to
the quantitative methods such as surveys and questionnaires. Interviews are also
Media & M18 - Data Collection 3
Communication
Studies
P2 - Communications Research
Quadrant-I (e-Text)
convenient to gather data when the research deals with more sensitive topics, about
which the participants may not feel very comfortable to talk openly in a group
environment (Gill, Stewart, Treasure, & Chadwick, 2008).
Research interviews can be classified into three categories: structured, semi-
structured and unstructured.
Structured interviews follow a strict procedure of asking a list of predetermined
questions to the participants, and recording the answers using standardised
techniques. The data is administered verbally, leaving little or no scope for follow-up
questions to responses that warrant further elaboration. A structured approach
means each interviewer is required to answer the same questions in the same
sequence. The answers thus recorded can be analysed and evaluated reliably. They
are less appropriate for situations where deeper probe is required.
A semi-structured interview is more open as compared to a structured interview,
allowing the investigator or the respondent to divert, if an idea is to be pursued in
more detail. In a semi-structured interview, the researcher proceeds with ageneral
outline of themes, which can be further expanded when needed. The questions can
be asked to different participants in different ways, keeping in view the desired
context. For example,
Unstructured Interviews do not follow a designated set of questions. These are more
informal, free flowing and spontaneous, in comparison to a structured interview. The
questions are developed as the interview proceeds, based on the responses of the
interviewee. Unstructured interviews tend to be more time-consuming and difficult to
manage. The respondents may feel confused owing to inadequate guidance,
because there is a lack of pre-determined questions. These unstructured interviews
are most helpful when seeking a ‘deep’ probe into something. It may pertain to an
area about which little knowledge exists, or a different perspective is sought (Bailey,
2008).
5.2 Focus Groups
A focus group refers to a group of people who have been purposefully assembled at
a place to take part in a discussion on a topic of relevance. It is a method of
collecting information by studying people’s collective views, opinions, experiences
and reactions, and also to understand the meanings implied by them (Morgan, 1998).
The participants of a focus group are chosen keeping in view certain common
characteristics that relate them to the topic of discussion. The environment in a focus
group is open and interactive, so that the participants feel free to express their ideas
and opinions. Focus groups provide a lighter and open arena for discussion, as
compared to a personal interview. They are more similar to a semi-structured
interview, but the objective is more than just collection of data from many
respondents simultaneously.
Media & M18 - Data Collection 4
Communication
Studies
P2 - Communications Research
Quadrant-I (e-Text)
The data thus collected is analysed carefully and systematically to arrive at
conclusions regarding the collective opinion of people. This method was originally
used for market research, but in due course it was also used in public sector
marketing, political analysis, and health education campaigns, among others (Bloor,
Frankland, Thomas, & Robson, 2001).
5.3 Questionnaire and Schedule
Questionnaires and schedules are devices used to collect data through a series of
questions and other similar prompts from a group of respondents.
In case of a questionnaire, the respondents comprise heterogeneous and widely
scattered groups of people. Therefore, the questions are prepared keeping in mind
the fact that the participants will have to fill the answers to questions themselves.
Therefore, it is feasible to even mail or email the questionnaire to the target group, or
it can be given to them by hand and be collected after some time.
The schedule, on the other hand, is a structure of a set of questions on a given
topic,which the researcherasks the respondent personally. The sequence and
language of questions remains unchanged. A schedule is administered usually in
cases where the questions may create some confusion in the mind of the
respondent, and therefore may require further explanation.
Questionnaires and schedulesboth include open-ended questions and close-ended
questions. In open-ended questions, the respondent has greater freedom in giving
his response. In close-ended questions there is a limit of responses for a respondent
to choose from.
A schedule consumes more time as compared to a questionnaire and therefore a
questionnaire is likely to be less expensive.
5.4 Observation
Observation is defined as “the systematic description of events, behaviours, and
artefacts in the social setting chosen for study” (Marshall &Rossman, 1989). Through
the mode of observation, the researcher gets to describe situations as they exist, by
making use of five senses, thus presenting a sketch of a situation under study
(Erlandson, Harris, Skipper, & Allen, 1993).
The researcher observesthe behaviour of participants and records the results of
these observations. Observation method is roped in by the researcher to develop an
overall understanding of the phenomena being investigated, in the most objective
and accurate way possible (De Walt and De Walt, 2002).
For example, in an interview method, the participants may become conscious of their
responses being monitored. They may give responses that may deviate from what
they may do in real life, as they want to portray themselves in a favourable light. On
the contrary, observation technique allows for noting people’s behaviour when they
are not aware of it (Cargan, 2007)
Media & M18 - Data Collection 5
Communication
Studies
P2 - Communications Research
Quadrant-I (e-Text)
Observation method lets the researcher to look for nonverbal cues about feelings,
check the pattern of interaction (who talks to whom), observe how participants
interact, and also record the time they spend in different activities (Schmuck, 1997).
Some characteristics of observation are:
Observations are guided by the research questions. Therefore the
observations are conscious and planned. They differ from casual everyday
observations of behaviour which are often casual, selective, and inaccurate.
Observations are systematically recorded, often using an observation check
list.
Data are analyzed using both quantitative and qualitative data analysis
methods.
5.5 Case Study
A case study is an in-depth investigation about a person, group, situation or
occurrence. It involves collection of data from various sources employing a mix of
different methods, whichever appropriate. Case studies are used in researches
where a deep probe and understanding of the issue is required.
This method is used widely in many social science studies, especially in conducting
research on issues relating to “education,sociology, and communitybasedproblems
such as poverty, unemployment, drug addiction, illiteracy”, among others (Zainal,
2007).
Advantages of using case studies are (McLeod, 2008):
They give detailed information.
They provide cues for further research.
They allow probing of situations which are difficult to investigate.
Disadvantages of using case studies are (McLeod, 2008):
The results cannot be generalised to a bigger population.
There are chances of researcher's own inclinations to creep in.
The study cannot be replicated.
The process is more time-consuming.
5.6 Ethnography
Ethnography is the study of societies and cultures in a systematic way. It observes,
records and analyses people belonging to a society in their natural ‘environment’
settings or‘fields’. The data is gathered by methods aimed to capture their regular
activities and social meanings related to them. The researcher may not get involved
in the activities, butparticipates directly in the setting, for the purpose of collecting
Media & M18 - Data Collection 6
Communication
Studies
P2 - Communications Research
Quadrant-I (e-Text)
data. The information is recorded, being careful to not impose the meaning on the
participants externally (Brewer, 2000).
Ethnography is one of the chief methods used for collection of qualitative data in
social sciences. They provide specific and in-depth accounts of the customs,
traditions, habits, and mutual differences of different societies and cultures.
The basic objective of employing ethnography method is to obtainthorough and
holistic understanding of people’s actions and opinions, along with the kind of
location they live in, by way of observing and interviewing in detail. According to
Hammersley, “The task (of ethnographers) is to document the culture,
theperspectives and practices, of the people in thesesettings. The aim is to ‘get
inside’ the way each group of people sees the world” (Reeves, Kuper, & Hodges,
2008).
Ethnography has the following characteristics (Hammersley, 1983):
It observes people’s behaviour in ‘ordinary’ or ‘everyday’ settings, instead of
any artificial settings created by the researcher.
The principal method of gathering data is participant-observation. Some other
methods are also used.
Any external influence on people is avoided and their natural activities are
focussed on. The mode of data collection is unstructured to make it flexible.
A small scale group is studied at a time in one setting.
The data is aimed to describe and analyse the meanings associated with
everyday human actions.
5.7 Oral History
Oral history is the method of recording, preserving and interpreting historical
information obtained from first-hand from people, from their past experiences and
memories. People are interviewed and their accounts are documented, which are
then preserved as an aural record for future. The researcher can make use of audio
and video tapes, and transcriptions from interviews.
The interview is carried out by the researcher by spending extended time with the
participant, listening to the accounts through storytelling and narration.
Oral history, though seems to be similar to in-depth interviews, but the two are
different from each other. Interviews, be structured, semi-structured or unstructured,
focus a specified topic and follow an interview guide. The questions asked to the
respondents are similar or different depending upon the requirement. However, oral
history does focus on a particular topic, yet it is far less organised than the interview
method.
Media & M18 - Data Collection 7
Communication
Studies
P2 - Communications Research
Quadrant-I (e-Text)
For instance, if one aims to study the body image issues in women at workplace, it
may be apt to conduct interviews to obtain their opinions about the issue. In this
method, they may also be able to explain qualitatively, how and what they feel about
it and related issues. In case the researcher wants to study body image issues
among working women, as a part of their life altogether, based on their experiences
from childhood till present, oral history may be the suitable method. This may allow
the respondent to recount personal experiences and stories.
5.8 Projective Techniques
Projective techniques are methods of eliciting someone’s internal ideas, values,
attitudes, needs and opinions by responding to stimuli using external objects. When
a person is asked a particular question, the answers received tend to be more
socially favourable and consciously framed. On the contrary, when a person is
subjected to ambiguous stimuli, the responses are likely to be closer to reality.
Projective technique is based on the principle that the degree of ambiguity of a
stimulus, is directly proportional to the respondent expressing his emotions, attitudes
and beliefs more accurately. In an unambiguous technique, like a survey
questionnaire, the answers are often presented to portray oneself in a positive light.
For example, a rich doctor is asked the reason for his purchasing an expensive car.
He may tell that he bought it because of its comfortable ride, excellent mileage and
other benefits. But, on being asked why his brother, who is equally rich, had
purchased a costly car, he would say that he is a status-seeker. Thus, a person
tends to speak the truth, when he is given a mask (Ahuja, 2015).
There are different types of projective measures used by researchers. They are
(Ahuja, 2015):
a. Pictorial techniques
Rorschach inkblot test: In this method, ten standard cards, each having
an inkblot representing different diagnostic categories, are given to
subjects. They are then asked to describe what they see. The responses
are recorded for further analysis. The analysis reveals the subject’s
personality traits.
Thematic appreciation test: This method uses showing a series of pictures
relating to the topic of research, to the respondents. They are asked to
describe the pictures, and responses are noted. The answers are
analysed afterwards to reflect the personality characteristics of the
respondents.
Pictures
b. Verbal techniques
Story or sentence completion: The subjects are given some incomplete
sentences or stories, and are asked to complete them in their own way.
The answers are interpreted later.
Media & M18 - Data Collection 8
Communication
Studies
P2 - Communications Research
Quadrant-I (e-Text)
Word association test: A list of words is given to the respondents, one
word at a time. They are asked to link each word with the word that
immediately came to their mind. The responses are recorded and
interpreted to reveal the inner feelings of the subjects.
c. Play techniques
Doll play: These methods are used to study children’s behaviour.
Situations are created using dolls, and the child is asked for his or her
opinion regarding it.
d. Psycho-drama or socio-drama technique
Role playing: This technique involves the subject playing certain roles,
that is, they act out someone else’s behaviour in a specific setting. For
example, mock parliament sessions in colleges, where different students
assume the roles of different leaders. These methods are also used in
studying inter-personal relationships.
6. Summary
The module presents a holistic view of the various tools and techniques employed by
researchers for collection of data. Beginning with a description of primary and
secondary data, qualitative and quantitative data; each method of data collection has
been described elaborately. The different methods that have been explained include
interview, focus groups, questionnaire and schedule, observation, case study,
ethnographies, oral history and projective techniques.
References
1. Ahuja, R. (2015). Research methods. New Delhi: Rawat Publications.
2. Bailey, K. D. (2008). Methods of Social Research (4. ed.). Free Press. p. 194.
3. Bloor, M.,Frankland, J., Thomas, M., &Robson, K. (2001).Focus groups in
social research. London: Sage Publications.
4. Brewer, J. D. (2000). Ethnography. Buckingham, MK: Open University Press.
5. Cargan, L. (2007). Doing Social Research. Plymouth, UK: Rowman and
Littlefield Publishers.
6. DeWalt, K. M., &DeWalt, B. R. (2002). Participant observation: a guide for
fieldworkers. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
7. Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing
naturalistic inquiry: a guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data
collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. British Dental
Journal, 204, 291-295.
9. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983).Ethnography: Principles in Practice.
London, UK: Tavistock.
10. Marshall, C., &Rossman, G. B. (1989). Designing qualitative research.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. McLeod, S. A. (2008). Case Study Method. Retrieved from
[Link]/[Link]
Media & M18 - Data Collection 9
Communication
Studies
P2 - Communications Research
Quadrant-I (e-Text)
12. Morgan, D. L. (1998).The focus group guide book. London: Sage
Publications.
13. Reeves, S., Kuper, A., & Hodges, B. D. (2008). Qualitative research
methodologies: ethnography. BMJ, 337, 512-514.
14. Sapsford, R., &Jupp, V. (2006). Data Collection and Analysis. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Schmuck, R. (1997). Practical action research for change. Arlington Heights,
IL: IRI/Skylight Training and Publishing.
16. Zainal, Z. (2007). Case Study as a research method. JurnalKemanusiaanbil,
9, 1-6.
Media & M18 - Data Collection 10
Communication
Studies
P2 - Communications Research
View publication stats