Organization and Management in Feasibility Study
Organization and Management in Feasibility Study
Organizational policies and regulations contribute to structural integrity and performance by establishing clear guidelines and expectations for behavior, performance, and operational procedures. These policies, such as hiring, performance evaluation, and attendance, ensure consistency, fairness, and compliance with legal standards. They also facilitate efficient resource utilization, employee performance tracking, and conflict resolution, maintaining the organization’s integrity and optimizing its performance .
An organization's business profile and mission statement play a crucial role in its strategic alignment and operations by providing a unified direction and purpose. The business profile outlines the organization's structure, incorporators, and management style, which are fundamental to strategic decision-making. Meanwhile, the mission statement communicates the organization’s core purpose and values, serving as a guide for operational priorities and a benchmark for ensuring that all activities align with the long-term objectives .
The organization and management aspect of a feasibility study includes the form of ownership, management style, study of officers and key personnel, organizational chart, and project schedule. It covers elements like the different management styles, such as autocratic, paternalistic, democratic, laissez-faire, and management by walking around (MBWA).
An organizational chart functions as a visual representation of an organization's structure, illustrating roles, responsibilities, and relationships between different positions. It shows the hierarchy and relative rank of parts and positions/jobs within the organization, aiding in understanding the flow of authority and communication, and helping to clarify roles and responsibilities to avoid overlap and inefficiencies .
Including a detailed management contribution in a feasibility study is crucial as it outlines the roles, responsibilities, and qualifications of key personnel, ensuring that the management team is capable of executing the business plan. This enhances investor confidence, demonstrates organizational preparedness, and helps in the identification of potential management gaps or needs, ultimately affecting the feasibility and success of the business venture .
The paternalistic management style can be highly effective in fostering a positive workplace culture as it emphasizes employee welfare and involvement in decision-making, which can lead to increased motivation, loyalty, and morale. By considering employee feedback and prioritizing their well-being, this style creates a supportive and collaborative environment. However, it may also lead to dependency on leadership for decision-making and limit autonomy if not balanced with individual empowerment .
The laissez-faire management style can lead to high innovation and motivation among self-driven employees because it allows them freedom to manage their work autonomously. However, this style can also result in a lack of coordination, poor team cohesion, and insufficient guidance for employees who require more direction, potentially leading to decreased productivity and organizational performance issues if not carefully managed .
Management by walking around (MBWA) improves communication and problem-solving by creating informal opportunities for managers to engage with employees. This approach breaks down communication barriers, fosters open dialogue, and allows managers to identify issues before they escalate. By being accessible and listening to employees' concerns and suggestions, managers can more effectively mentor and guide their teams, leading to improved problem resolution and stronger team cohesiveness .
Different management styles have varying impacts on employee motivation and organizational loyalty. For instance, the paternalistic style can increase employee motivation and attachment to the organization because it considers employees' feedback and works in their interest. Similarly, the democratic style fosters open communication and inclusivity, enhancing motivation and loyalty. In contrast, the laissez-faire style can lead to high autonomy for motivated individuals but might cause disengagement in employees who need guidance. Lastly, MBWA encourages team collaboration and employee mentorship, boosting morale and commitment .
Line authority directly impacts the profit generation as it empowers managers to command subordinates and make decisions quickly. This can lead to efficient operations and clear command lines. In contrast, staff authority supports profit generation indirectly by providing advice and counsel without direct command power, which can enhance decision-making quality and strategic alignment. However, excessive reliance on staff authority may lead to slowed decision processes and potential conflicts if line managers perceive advisors as overstepping .


