Example 5 - Unrestrained beam with end moments - Class 3 section Sheet 2 of 9 Rev

5.2 Design values of bending moments and shear

forces
The design effects due to the combined actions shown in Figure 5.2 were
calculated as follows:
Design bending moment at A MA,Ed = 330 kNm
Design bending moment at B MB,Ed = 320 kNm
Design bending moment at C MC,Ed = 250 kNm
Design bending moment at D MD,Ed = 280 kNm
Design shear force at A VA,Ed = 225 kN
Design shear force at D VD,Ed = 185 kN

3000 3000 3000

240 kN 120 kN
5.6 kN/m
Design loads
A B C D
9000

225 208

Shear force kN
32 48

168 185

330
280

Bending moment kNm

250
320

Figure 5.2

5.3 Buckling length (Lcr)

Since the beam is unrestrained between the supports, there is only one segment
to consider in this example, with a length equal to the beam length.
BS EN 1993-1-1 does not give guidance for determining buckling lengths. For
beams, the buckling length should be taken as being equal to the span length
unless the designer considers the beam to be restrained.
Lcr = 9.0 m

05-Unrestrained beam with end moments using Class 3 UC section_meb.doc 42

 Example 5 - Unrestrained beam with end moments - Class 3 section Sheet 3 of 9 Rev

5.4 Section properties

305  305  97 UKC in S355 steel
From section property tables:
Depth h = 307.9 mm P363
Width b = 305.3 mm
Web thickness tw = 9.9 mm
Flange thickness tf = 15.4 mm
Root radius r = 15.2 mm
Depth between fillets d = 246.7 mm
Elastic modulus, y-y axis Wel,y = 1 450 cm3
Area A = 123 cm2
Modulus of elasticity E = 210 000 N/mm2 3.2.6(1)

For buildings that will be built in the UK, the nominal values of the yield NA.2.4
strength (fy) and the ultimate strength (fu) for structural steel should be those
obtained from the product standard. Where a range is given, the lowest
nominal value should be used.

For S355 steel and t  16 mm BS EN 10025-2

Yield strength fy = ReH = 355 N/mm2 Table 7

5.4.1 Cross section classification

235 235 Table 5.2
 =   0.81
fy 355

Outstand of compression flange

b  tw  2r 305.3  9.9   2  15.2 
c =   132.5 mm
2 2
c 132.5
=  8.6
tf 15.4
c
The limiting value for Class 2 is  10   10  0.81 = 8.1
tf
c
The limiting value for Class 3 is  14   14  0.81 =11.3
tf
8.1< 8.6 < 11.3
Therefore, the flange in compression is Class 3

Web subject to bending

c = d = 246.7 mm
c 246.7
= 24.92
tw 9.9
c
The limiting value for Class 1 is  72  72  0.81  58.32
tf

05-Unrestrained beam with end moments using Class 3 UC section_meb.doc 43

 Example 5 - Unrestrained beam with end moments - Class 3 section Sheet 4 of 9 Rev

24.92 < 58.32

Therefore, the web is Class 1 under bending.
Therefore the section is Class 3 under bending.

5.5 Partial factors for resistance

 M0 = 1.0 NA.2.15
 M1 = 1.0

5.6 Cross-sectional resistance

5.6.1 Shear buckling
The shear buckling resistance for webs should be verified according to 6.2.6(6)
Section 5 of BS EN 1993-1-5 if:
hw 
 72 Eq (6.23)
tw 
 = 1.0 BS EN 1993-1-5
NA.2.4
hw = h  2 t f  307.9   2  15.4   277.1 mm
hw 277.1
=  27.99
tw 9.9

 0.81
72 = 72   58.32
 1.0
27.99 < 58.32
Therefore the shear buckling resistance of the web does not need to be
verified.

5.6.2 Shear resistance

Verify that: 6.2.6(1)
V Ed Eq (6.17)
 1.0
V c,Rd

Vc,Rd is equal to the design plastic shear resistance (Vpl,Rd).

Av ( f y / 3 )
V pl,Rd 
 M0
Av is the shear area and is determined as follows for rolled I and H sections
with the load applied parallel to the web.
A v  A  2 bt f  t f t w  2 r  but not less than hw tw
 123  10 2   2  305.3  15.4   15.4   9.9  ( 2  15.2 )   3517.38 mm2

05-Unrestrained beam with end moments using Class 3 UC section_meb.doc 44

 Example 5 - Unrestrained beam with end moments - Class 3 section Sheet 5 of 9 Rev

h w t w  1.0  276.8  9.9  2740.32 mm2

2740.31 mm2 < 3517.38 mm2
Therefore, Av = 3517.38 mm2
The plastic design shear resistance is:

V c,Rd  V pl, Rd 
Av ( f y / 3 )


3517 .38  355 / 3 
 10  3  721 kN
6.2.6(2)
Eq (6.18)
 M0 1.0

Maximum design shear occurs at A, therefore the design shear Sheet 2

VEd = VA,Ed = 225 kN
V Ed 225
  0.31 < 1.0
V c,Rd 721
Therefore the shear resistance of the section is adequate.

5.6.3 Resistance to bending

Verify that: 6.2.5(1)
Eq (6.12)
M A,Ed
 1.0
M c,Rd
At the point of maximum bending moment (A) check if the shear force will
reduce the bending moment resistance of the section.
V c,Rd 721
  360.5 kN
2 2
Shear force at maximum bending moment V A,Ed, = 225 kN
225 kN < 360.5 kN
Therefore no reduction in bending resistance due to shear is required. 6.2.8(2)

The design resistance for bending for Class 3 cross-sections is: 6.2.5(2)
W el,y f y 1450  10 3  355
M c,Rd  M el,Rd    10  6  515 kNm Eq (6.14)
 M0 1.0
M A,Ed 330
  0.64 < 1.0 Eq (6.12)
M c,Rd 515
Therefore the bending resistance of the cross section is adequate.

5.7 Buckling resistance of member in bending

If the lateral torsional buckling slenderness (  LT ) is less than or equal to  LT,0 [Link](4)
the effects of lateral torsional buckling may be neglected, and only
cross-sectional resistances apply.
The value of  LT,0 for rolled sections is given as  LT,0 = 0.4 NA.2.17

05-Unrestrained beam with end moments using Class 3 UC section_meb.doc 45

 Example 5 - Unrestrained beam with end moments - Class 3 section Sheet 6 of 9 Rev

Wy f y
 LT  [Link](1)
M cr

Wy  Wel,y For class 3 cross sections.

BS EN 1993-1-1 does not give a method for determining the elastic critical
moment for lateral-torsional buckling (Mcr). Here the ‘LTBeam’ software
(which can be downloaded from the CTICM website) has been used to
determine Mcr.
When determining Mcr the following end restraint conditions have been applied
to the beam.
LTBeam symbol Definition Restraint applied (fixed/free)
v Lateral restraint Fixed
 Torsional restraint Fixed
v’ Flexural restraint Free
’ Warping restraint Free
The value for the elastic critical moment obtained from ‘LTBeam’ is:
Mcr = 607.7 kNm
Therefore,

1450  10 3  355
 LT   0.92
607.7  10 6
0.92 > 0.4
Therefore the resistance to lateral-torsional buckling must be verified. [Link](4)
Verify that:
[Link](1)
M Ed
 1.0 Eq (6.54)
M b,Rd

The design buckling resistance moment (Mb,Rd) of a laterally unrestrained beam [Link](3)
is determined from: Eq (6.55)
fy
M b,Rd   LT W y
 M1
where:
Wy  Wel,y for class 3 cross sections.

 LT is the reduction factor for lateral-torsional buckling

For UKC sections the method given in [Link] for determining  LT for rolled
sections may be used. Therefore,
1 1 [Link](1)
 LT  but  1.0 and  Eq (6.57)
2
 LT   LT 2    LT 2  LT

05-Unrestrained beam with end moments using Class 3 UC section_meb.doc 46

 Example 5 - Unrestrained beam with end moments - Class 3 section Sheet 7 of 9 Rev

where:

 
 LT  0.5  1   LT  LT   LT,0    LT 2  
From the UK National Annex  LT,0  0.4 and   0.75 NA.2.17

The appropriate buckling curve depends on h/b:

h 307.9
  1.01
b 305.3
1.01 < 2, therefore use buckling curve ‘b’ NA.2.17
For buckling curve ‘b’, LT = 0.34 NA.2.16 &
Table 6.5


 LT  0.5  1  0.34   0.92  0.4   0.75  0.92 2    0.91 [Link](1)

1
 LT   0.74
0.91  0.91 2  0.75  0.92 2  
1 1
2
  1.18
 LT 0.92 2
0.74 < 1.0 < 1.18
Therefore,
 LT  0.74 
To account for the shape of the bending moment distribution, LT may be [Link](2)
modified by the use of a factor ‘f’’.
 LT
 LT,mod  but  LT,mod  1.0 Eq (6.58)
f
where:

f  1  0.5 1  k   1  2  LT   but f  1.0 [Link](2)

2
 0.8
c
 

1 NA.2.18
kc 
C1

C1 may be obtained from either tabulated data given in NCCI, such as Access
Steel document SN003, or determined from:
M cr (actual bending moment diagram)
C1 
M cr ( uniform be nding moment diagram)
As a value for C1 for the bending moment diagram given in Figure 5.2 is not
given in the Access Steel document SN003 the value for C1 will be calculated.
Applying a uniform bending moment to the beam, the value of Mcr determined
from the ‘LTBeam’ software is:
M cr  460.5 kNm

05-Unrestrained beam with end moments using Class 3 UC section_meb.doc 47

 Example 5 - Unrestrained beam with end moments - Class 3 section Sheet 8 of 9 Rev

607.7
C1   1.32
460.5
1
kc   0.87
1.32


f  1  0.5  1  0.87   1  2   0.92  0.8  2   0.94
[Link](2)

0.74 Eq (6.58)
 LT,mod   0.79
0.94
The design buckling resistance moment (Mb,Rd) of a laterally unrestrained beam
is determined from:
fy
M b,Rd   LTWy
 M1 Eq (6.55)
where:
 LT   LT,mod
355
For this beam M b,Rd  0.79  1450  10 3   10  6  407 kNm
1.0
M A,Ed 330 Sheet 2
  0.81 < 1.0 [Link](1)
M b,Rd 407 Eq (6.54)
Therefore the design buckling resistance of the member is adequate.

5.8 Web subject to transverse forces

The verification for web subject to transverse forces should be carried out at
the supports and at the points of load application. However, as the reactions
are transferred through end plates and the loads are applied through the bottom
flange, there is no need to verify the resistance of the web to transverse forces
in this example.

Page references
5.9 Blue Book Approach given in Section
The design resistances may be obtained from SCI publication P363. 5.9 are to P363
unless otherwise
Consider the 305  305  97 UKC in S355 stated.

5.9.1 Design bending moments and shear forces

The design bending moments and shear forces are shown in Figure 5.2
Design bending moment at A MA,Ed = 330 kNm
Design bending moment at B MB,Ed = 320 kNm
Maximum design shear force (at A) VA,Ed = 225 kN

5.9.2 Cross-section classification

Under bending the section is Class 3. Page D-76

05-Unrestrained beam with end moments using Class 3 UC section_meb.doc 48