100% found this document useful (1 vote)
617 views4 pages

Understanding Ethical Frameworks in GE 8

This document provides an overview of an ethics course module. It discusses the difference between reason and will, and how they can be seen as standing in an antithetical relationship. It also examines five main ethical frameworks: virtue ethics, natural law ethics, deontological ethics, utilitarian ethics, and a love and justice framework. For each framework, it provides a brief explanation of its principles and how it guides moral decision-making. The document aims to help students distinguish between reason and will, understand the concept of ethical frameworks, and differentiate among the five frameworks.

Uploaded by

Chen Maglunsod
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
617 views4 pages

Understanding Ethical Frameworks in GE 8

This document provides an overview of an ethics course module. It discusses the difference between reason and will, and how they can be seen as standing in an antithetical relationship. It also examines five main ethical frameworks: virtue ethics, natural law ethics, deontological ethics, utilitarian ethics, and a love and justice framework. For each framework, it provides a brief explanation of its principles and how it guides moral decision-making. The document aims to help students distinguish between reason and will, understand the concept of ethical frameworks, and differentiate among the five frameworks.

Uploaded by

Chen Maglunsod
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Course Introduction
  • Natural Law Or Commandment Ethics
  • The Difference Between Reason And Will
  • Resources and Additional Resources

COURSE MODULE MODULE NO.

Don Carlos Polytechnic College


Purok2, North Poblacion, Don Carlos, Bukidnon
Email: geovannebartolaba1982@[Link]

DON CARLOS POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE


GE 8: ETHICS
Semester of A.Y. 2020-2021

Introduction

Reason and will can generally be considered as standing in an antithetical relationship. This fact originates
from the different historical developments of the natural law and legal positivist theories. Originally, natural
law was an idea that explained the nature of morality and not the nature of law. Man could (by using reason)
understand the revelation of the Gods. By this, he could understand how he should behave in respect of other
human beings around him.
An ethical framework is a set of codes that an individual uses to guide his or her behavior. Ethics are what
people use to distinguish right from wrong in the way they interact with the world. Good moral values allow
a person to make the right decisions and improve their interactions with other people.

Rationale

This module will focus on the difference between reason and will and why the concept of reason and will can
be seen as standing in an antithetical relationship. And also, the frameworks behind moral dispositions.

Intended Learning Outcomes

A. Distinguish between reason and will


B. Explain the meaning of ethical framework
C. Distinguish among five ethical framework
Activity
Match the items in Column 1 with Column 2. You may repeat an answer.

Column 1 Column 2
Ethical Statements Ethical Frameworks
___1. The ethical person develops good character A. Virtue on Character Ethics of
Aristotle
___2. An act is ethical if one gives the other what he/she is due. B. Natural Law or Commandment
Ethics of St. Thomas
___3. An act is ethical if it is an obligation expected of every man C. Deontology and Duty Framework
or woman. of Emmanuel Kant
___4. That which is right to follows the rule “do good and avoid D. Utilitarian, Teleological and
evil”. Consequentialist
___5. That which is ethical is that which has good consequences. E. Love and Justice Framework
___6. An act is ethical if one gives the other more than what he is
due.
___7. To act ethically, one must in a way that he wishes others to
act in the same way.
___8. An act is ethical if it brings about the greatest good for the
greatest number of those affected by the act.
___9. What is good is written in a person’s very being.
1
Crafted by Mr. Arvin Narvaza
COURSE MODULE Discussion
MODULE NO. 9

The Difference Between Reason And Will

The moral person is endowed with an intellect and will. The “will” is what “disposes” what the “intellect
proposes”. Reason conducts the study, research, investigation, fact-finding. It uses logic, the principle of
consistency, avoids fallacious to come up with a truthful and accurate proposition. In a research study, the
product or work of reason is the body of facts gathered, organized, synthesized and evaluated. The job of the
will is to make a decisive conclusion.

The will is the faculty of the mind that is associated with decision making. It’s the one that says yes or no.
Decision making which is an activity of the will can be developed.

Jean Paul Sarte, the French Philosopher, and the most popular existentialist was saying that an individual is
nothing until he/she starts making decisions.

Apparently, the mark of the maturation of culture is manifested through the development of a culture of
moral strength or virtue, or will power, its free will. “Free Will” is the capacity of rational agents to choose a
course of action from among various alternatives

Framework And Principles Behind Moral Frameworks

An ethical framework is a set of codes that an individual uses to guide his or her behaviour. It is just another
term for “moral standards” as introduced in the early part of the modules given. It is what people use to
distinguish right from wrong in the way they interact with the world. It is used to determine the moral object
of an action. An ethical framework guides an individual in answering these questions: “What do I ought to
do?” and “Why do I ought to do so”? So ethical framework serve as guideposts in moral life.

The various dominant mental frames may be classified as follows: 1.) virtue or character ethics of Aristotle,
2.) natural law or commandment ethics of St. Thomas, 3.) deontological and duty frameworks of Emmanuel
Kant, 4.) utilitarianist, teleological and consequentialist approach and, 5.) Love and justice framework.

1. Virtue Or Character Ethics Of Aristotle


Virtue ethics is a philosophy developed by Aristotle and other ancient Greeks. It is the quest to understand
and live a life of moral character.

This character-based approach to morality assumes that we acquire virtue through practice. By practicing
being honest, brave, just, generous, and so on, a person develops an honorable and moral character.
According to Aristotle, by honing virtuous habits, people will likely make the right choice when faced with
ethical challenges.

To illustrate the difference among three key moral philosophies, ethicists Mark White and Robert Arp refer to
the film The Dark Knight where Batman has the opportunity to kill the Joker. Utilitarians, White and Arp
suggest, would endorse killing the Joker. By taking this one life, Batman could save multitudes.
Deontologists, on the other hand, would reject killing the Joker simply because it’s wrong to kill. But a virtue
ethicist “would highlight the character of the person who kills the Joker. Does Batman want to be the kind of
person who takes his enemies’ lives?” No, in fact, he doesn’t.

So, virtue ethics helps us understand what it means to be a virtuous human being. And, it gives us a guide for
living life without giving us specific rules for resolving ethical dilemmas.

2. Natural Law Or Commandment Ethics Of St. Thomas


2
Crafted by Mr. Arvin Narvaza
COURSE MODULE MODULE NO. 9
Thomas Aquinas, much like Aristotle, wrote that nature is organized for good purposes. Unlike Aristotle,
however, Aquinas went on to say that God created nature and rules the world by "divine reason."
Aquinas wrote most extensively about natural law. He stated, "the light of reason is placed by nature [and
thus by God] in every man to guide him in his acts." Therefore, human beings, alone among God’s creatures,
use reason to lead their lives. This is natural law.

3. Deontological And Duty Frameworks Of Emmanuel Kant


Deontology is an ethical theory that uses rules to distinguish right from wrong. Deontology is often
associated with philosopher Immanuel Kant. Kant believed that ethical actions follow universal moral laws,
such as “Don’t lie. Don’t steal. Don’t cheat.”

Deontology is simple to apply. It just requires that people follow the rules and do their duty. This approach
tends to fit well with our natural intuition about what is or isn’t ethical.

4. Utilitarianist, Teleological And Consequentialist Approach

 The Utilitarian Approach assesses an action in terms of its consequences or outcomes; i.e., the net
benefits and costs to all stakeholders on an individual level. It strives to achieve the greatest good for
the greatest number while creating the least amount of harm or preventing the greatest amount of
suffering.

 Teleological ethics, (teleological from Greek telos, “end”; logos, “science”), theory of morality that
derives duty or moral obligation from what is good or desirable as an end to be achieved. Also
known as consequentialist ethics, it is opposed to deontological ethics (from the Greek deon, “duty”),
which holds that the basic standards for an action’s being morally right are independent of the good
or evil generated.
Teleological theories differ on the nature of the end that actions ought to promote.

 Consequentialism is a theory that suggests an action is good or bad depending on its outcome. An
action that brings about more benefit than harm is good, while an action that causes more harm than
benefit is not. The most famous version of this theory is Utilitarianism.

5. Love And Justice Framework


What is ethical is that which is just and that which is loving. Justice giving what is due to others (justice)
while giving even more than what is due to others.

Assessment

1. What is the difference between reason and will.


2. Do animals have free will?
3. What is your ethical framework in making decisions?
4. How does your ethical framework for decision making help you?

Resources and Additional Resources

• Internet
• ETHICS: Ruben A. Corpuz(AB English-Philo,LIB,PhD), Brenda B.
Corpuz(BSE,MAED,PhD

3
Crafted by Mr. Arvin Narvaza
COURSE MODULE MODULE NO. 9

4
Crafted by Mr. Arvin Narvaza

Common questions

Powered by AI

Ethical frameworks serve as guides for determining right and wrong, informed by philosophical traditions. They help people answer what they 'ought' to do and why by providing structured principles. For example, virtue ethics focuses on character and virtuous habits, natural law emphasizes divine reason, deontology is based on adherence to duty and rules, utilitarianism assesses outcomes by the greatest good, and the love and justice framework focuses on fairness and compassion .

Justice is addressed across ethical frameworks in distinct ways: natural law emphasizes divine justice and order; virtue ethics focuses on personal development of fairness as a character trait; deontology requires adherence to fair and universal principles; utilitarianism seeks the greatest good, often prioritizing majority benefit over individual justice; and the love and justice framework directly centers justice by advocating for fairness tempered with compassion, encouraging beyond what is due .

The love and justice framework redefines ethical actions by combining fairness with compassion, suggesting that ethical actions are those that balance justice for what is due with love, which may involve giving more than required . Unlike duty-based frameworks like Kant's, which emphasize rule adherence, or consequence-based ones like utilitarianism, which focus on outcomes, this framework emphasizes relational ethics and moral motivations .

Immanuel Kant's deontological ethics define the rightness of an action based on adherence to universal moral laws. Kant believed that actions are ethical if they follow principles that could be consistently applied as universal laws, such as duties not to lie or steal. The morality of an action is not determined by its consequences but by whether it can be justified as a universal duty .

Virtue ethics differs by focusing on the moral character of the individual rather than solely on actions or consequences. It emphasizes the development of virtuous habits that inform ethical choices. Compared to utilitarianism, which prioritizes outcomes and overall happiness, or deontology, which emphasizes rule adherence regardless of consequences, virtue ethics considers the intent and character of the actor, encouraging personal moral development .

Intellect and will interact in ethical decision-making by first using reason to gather and evaluate factual information (the role of intellect) and then employing will to make decisions based on those findings. The intellect proposes options based on logical analysis, while the will decisively concludes by choosing a course of action. This suggests a dynamic where intellect informs will, ensuring decisions are grounded in rational deliberation .

Natural law theory posits that morality is rooted in universal principles derived from nature or God's will, which humans can understand through reason. It assumes an inherent understanding of right and wrong based on these principles . Legal positivism, on the other hand, argues that laws are rules created by human institutions and not necessarily linked to moral standards. These laws are valid due to their procedural enactment rather than any inherent morality .

Jean-Paul Sartre's existentialist philosophy suggests that free will can be developed through active decision-making. Sartre argued that individuals create their essence through choices and actions, asserting that people are defined by their decisions rather than preset characteristics or essences. An individual becomes what they choose to be through conscious decision-making, emphasizing personal responsibility and freedom in shaping one's destiny .

Aristotle viewed nature as organized towards achieving good purposes aimed at human flourishing through the development of virtues . Aquinas built on Aristotle but integrated divine reason into natural law, arguing that God created nature with rules that humans can understand and follow using reason. For Aquinas, ethical living aligns with divine intentions and natural order as expressions of God's will .

Utilitarian ethics can be challenging due to the need to predict outcomes and weigh benefits against harms for all affected. Quantifying happiness or benefit poses a significant challenge, and the focus on outcomes can disregard individual rights and justice. It also involves complex calculations of net benefit, making it difficult to account for long-term and indirect consequences .

COURSE MODULE
MODULE NO. 9
DON CARLOS POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
GE 8: ETHICS 
Semester of A.Y. 2020-2021
Introduction
Reason and wi
COURSE MODULE
MODULE NO. 9
Discussion
The Difference Between Reason And Will
The moral person is endowed with an intellect an
COURSE MODULE
MODULE NO. 9
Thomas Aquinas, much like Aristotle, wrote that nature is organized for good purposes. Unlike Aris
COURSE MODULE
MODULE NO. 9
4
Crafted by Mr. Arvin Narvaza

You might also like