Understanding Ethical Frameworks in GE 8
Understanding Ethical Frameworks in GE 8
Ethical frameworks serve as guides for determining right and wrong, informed by philosophical traditions. They help people answer what they 'ought' to do and why by providing structured principles. For example, virtue ethics focuses on character and virtuous habits, natural law emphasizes divine reason, deontology is based on adherence to duty and rules, utilitarianism assesses outcomes by the greatest good, and the love and justice framework focuses on fairness and compassion .
Justice is addressed across ethical frameworks in distinct ways: natural law emphasizes divine justice and order; virtue ethics focuses on personal development of fairness as a character trait; deontology requires adherence to fair and universal principles; utilitarianism seeks the greatest good, often prioritizing majority benefit over individual justice; and the love and justice framework directly centers justice by advocating for fairness tempered with compassion, encouraging beyond what is due .
The love and justice framework redefines ethical actions by combining fairness with compassion, suggesting that ethical actions are those that balance justice for what is due with love, which may involve giving more than required . Unlike duty-based frameworks like Kant's, which emphasize rule adherence, or consequence-based ones like utilitarianism, which focus on outcomes, this framework emphasizes relational ethics and moral motivations .
Immanuel Kant's deontological ethics define the rightness of an action based on adherence to universal moral laws. Kant believed that actions are ethical if they follow principles that could be consistently applied as universal laws, such as duties not to lie or steal. The morality of an action is not determined by its consequences but by whether it can be justified as a universal duty .
Virtue ethics differs by focusing on the moral character of the individual rather than solely on actions or consequences. It emphasizes the development of virtuous habits that inform ethical choices. Compared to utilitarianism, which prioritizes outcomes and overall happiness, or deontology, which emphasizes rule adherence regardless of consequences, virtue ethics considers the intent and character of the actor, encouraging personal moral development .
Intellect and will interact in ethical decision-making by first using reason to gather and evaluate factual information (the role of intellect) and then employing will to make decisions based on those findings. The intellect proposes options based on logical analysis, while the will decisively concludes by choosing a course of action. This suggests a dynamic where intellect informs will, ensuring decisions are grounded in rational deliberation .
Natural law theory posits that morality is rooted in universal principles derived from nature or God's will, which humans can understand through reason. It assumes an inherent understanding of right and wrong based on these principles . Legal positivism, on the other hand, argues that laws are rules created by human institutions and not necessarily linked to moral standards. These laws are valid due to their procedural enactment rather than any inherent morality .
Jean-Paul Sartre's existentialist philosophy suggests that free will can be developed through active decision-making. Sartre argued that individuals create their essence through choices and actions, asserting that people are defined by their decisions rather than preset characteristics or essences. An individual becomes what they choose to be through conscious decision-making, emphasizing personal responsibility and freedom in shaping one's destiny .
Aristotle viewed nature as organized towards achieving good purposes aimed at human flourishing through the development of virtues . Aquinas built on Aristotle but integrated divine reason into natural law, arguing that God created nature with rules that humans can understand and follow using reason. For Aquinas, ethical living aligns with divine intentions and natural order as expressions of God's will .
Utilitarian ethics can be challenging due to the need to predict outcomes and weigh benefits against harms for all affected. Quantifying happiness or benefit poses a significant challenge, and the focus on outcomes can disregard individual rights and justice. It also involves complex calculations of net benefit, making it difficult to account for long-term and indirect consequences .



