0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views3 pages

Peter Rabbit: Story vs. 2018 Film

The document compares the storybook and 2018 movie adaptations of The Tale of Peter Rabbit. It discusses differences in characters, plotlines, and themes between the two versions. While the storybook focuses only on Peter and his family, the movie introduces other animals and human characters. The document also analyzes visual aspects and tone between the adaptations.

Uploaded by

Nora Wingtyas
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views3 pages

Peter Rabbit: Story vs. 2018 Film

The document compares the storybook and 2018 movie adaptations of The Tale of Peter Rabbit. It discusses differences in characters, plotlines, and themes between the two versions. While the storybook focuses only on Peter and his family, the movie introduces other animals and human characters. The document also analyzes visual aspects and tone between the adaptations.

Uploaded by

Nora Wingtyas
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Peter Rabbit: A Comparison of The Storybook vs Movie Adaptation

Name : Novita Rahmadhani Wingtyas


Course : Literature and Film
Lecturer : Donny Eros, S.S., M.A.

As we already knew, The Tale of Peter Rabbit is a children’s literature written and
illustrated by an English author, Beatrix Potter. It tells the story of a rabbit family.
The main protagonist is a young and full of curiosity male rabbit, Peter. He lives
under a fir tree with his mother, and younger sisters: Flopsy, Mopsy, and Cottontail.
They are allowed to roam everywhere–except for a nearby garden, which belongs to
an old grumpy man, who serves as the antagonist, Mr. McGregor. As you’d expect, he
disobeys his mother’s words. Things tend to become chaotic once Peter break inside
Mr. McGregor’s garden. In short, Peter managed to slip underneath the gate even
though it costs him his jacket and shoes. The storybook ends with Peter’s sisters
having a supper while Peter, completely exhausted, unwittingly flopped down the
floor and shut his eyes.

On the other hand, the second movie adaptation of Peter Rabbit (2018), tries to relive
the story of a curious rabbit called Peter. The movie adaptation didn’t start with the
introduction of Peter and his family. The opening sequence started with 3
hummingbirds, sang a song. At first, I doubted whether it’s a musical or not. Turns
out that its not. After the opening sequence of birds singing, we get to encountered a
rabbit family. Of course we already guessed away the characters: Peter, his sisters,
and mother.

Slightly different, this version introduced us to a character that perhaps only


mentioned in the storybook version that I read. Benjamin Bunny. The storybook did
mention Benjamin as Peter’s cousin, who told him things about cats. The mother (and
Peter’s father) are absent. They’re present in a form of wall painting. His father died
while entering Mr. McGregor’s garden. The movie didn’t mention the reason of his
mother’s death, and perhaps it will be explain in the sequel (I haven’t watch it).
Peter’s sisters characters are explored in the movie adaptation. We can see that
they’re triplets. Cottontail became sort of empowered female rabbit, or badass for
short, while Flopsy and Mopsy love to argue and stated that one of them is the oldest
and vice versa. Benjamin is more like a sidekick for Peter because he–most of the
time–sticks whatever, whenever, wherever Peter up to.

We also encountered the human character other than Mr. McGregor. There are Bea
(or Beatrix Potter), an aspiring painter whom Peter and his family see as a mother
figure, and Thomas McGregor, Mr. McGregor estranged great nephew. The riot starts
when Thomas, an ambitious employee who worked for Harrods, inherited Mr.
McGregor’s house in English countryside. At first he decided to pay a visit to the
house and sell it so that he can open his own store. Then a meeting with the animals
led to his behavior to Peter and his family, whom he addressed as ‘rodents’.

In short, the storybook version is preferred amongst children than the movie
adaptation. The storybook really deserved as a kid-friendly while the movie,
addressed for a mature audience. The jokes that James Corden, the voice cast of Peter
Rabbit tried to make, aren’t generally funny but more like dark comedic. The movie
sounds pretty boring for children because there are lots of long conversation and the
curious male rabbit from the storybook became a portray of naughty-dark-comedic
rabbit. Less appropriate for audiences under the age of 13.

The moral of the storybook, ties in with children’s behavior: to listen and obey their
parents also not to cross the borders. While in the movie, it is unclear when it
involved the ‘parent’ thing. In a scene where Peter realized his mistakes, Mopsy
narrated that ‘its not that kind (wise parent and moralistic) of movie’ All that we
learned is that family sometimes have to sacrifice and torn all the hatred. Its okay to
disagree sometimes, but it’s a must thing to realize that we live amongst differences
and shall be tolerant about it. It also teaches us not to be scared to admit our mistakes
and make amends (or might be shape us to develop a forgiving trait).

The aspect that I love about the 2018 movie adaptation is the visual. It applies a
lighter tone compared to another lifelike or live action animal movies, such as
Paddington and Garfield. For animal-related movies I love to see a lighter tone or cool
color gradings because its more convincing and oftentimes really put me in a state of
mind that those animals can really talk in human language. Or simply ‘how fun and
entertaining a talking animal can be’. Moreover, warm tone usually used to emphasize
our visual. Its commonly found in fantasy or romance movies, and its aesthetically
pleasing our eyes.

I also enjoyed the fact that they kept Peter’s jacket original color. The triplets in the
storybook all wear pink dresses while in the movie, we can see the color differences.
Its good to make amends with the triplets which one is which from the olden
storybook version. Cottontail wore a colored dress, Mopsy and Flopsy respectively
wore a mustard and red dress.

In other version of Peter Rabbit storybook, they updated the color coordinated clothes
of the rabbits (including Benjamin who sticks with his brown sweater). However, I
made a comparison between the storybook verison sent by Pak Eros and the 2018
movie adaptation.

Also, the storybook only focused with Peter and his family while the movie
adaptation also involved other animals such as the pig, wolf, and others. The
characters are diverse and broaden in the movie but lacking a plot while the storybook
version’s plot is more solid.

Both of it has its own pros and cons and if I had to pick one, as a grown up, I’d rather
watch the movie adaptation rather than reading the kid-friendly storybook. But of
course I had to read the storybook to identify the details and miss.

Short length films can’t elaborate all details, aspects, and point of views as much as
literature because it depends on running time while literature is infinite when it comes
to running time. You can read as long as you want while other reader might finish it
quicker.

Common questions

Powered by AI

In the storybook, Peter Rabbit is primarily characterized as a mischievous yet curious figure whose disobedience leads to learning a moral lesson . The movie adaptation, however, presents Peter as a darker, more comedic character with a rebellious streak, emphasizing humor over morality, which appeals to a more mature audience . The movie expands his role to include leadership and interaction with a broader set of characters beyond his immediate family .

In the storybook, the family roles are traditional with Peter's mother as a guiding figure and Peter as the disobedient child learning a lesson . In contrast, the movie adds layers by introducing Beatrix Potter as a maternal figure and provides the siblings with distinctive personalities, such as Cottontail being portrayed as empowered . The movie presents a more complex family dynamic by including Thomas McGregor, Mr. McGregor's estranged great-nephew, who directly interacts with and opposes the rabbit family .

The visual elements in the movie, such as cool color grading and CGI enhancement, create an engaging aesthetic that can enhance the overall viewing experience by making the talking animals believable . However, this focus might detract from the narrative flow, as the complexities introduced by visual spectacle can overshadow the simplicity and coherent arc found in the storybook's narrative, which primarily relies on plot and character development .

The movie expands the plot by introducing Thomas McGregor and Beatrix Potter, adding depth and additional story arcs, such as Thomas's plans to sell the house and his confrontations with the animals . These new dynamics create plot complexity and conflict. In contrast, the storybook maintains a straightforward narrative focused on Peter's adventure and subsequent escape from Mr. McGregor's garden, emphasizing a moral lesson without additional subplot distractions .

The movie maintains certain elements of Beatrix Potter's original work, such as the characters' designs (e.g., Peter's blue jacket). However, it diverges significantly by adding modern humor, darker comedic elements, and intricate character dynamics, shifting from a simple moral tale to a complex narrative. This modification, geared towards adult humor and themes, diminishes the original's straightforward morality and charm .

The inclusion of diverse characters in the movie, like additional animals and human figures, broadens the narrative scope and introduces secondary plots, making it more complex and engaging for adult viewers . This complexity can detract from the central moral that is straightforward in the storybook. It allows for multiple viewpoints and interactions, making the storyline more dynamic while potentially diminishing the storybook's focused moral on obedience .

The movie integrates darker and more mature humor, which contrasts sharply with the storybook's innocent and straightforward tone . While the storybook is well-received by children for its simplicity and moral focus, the movie's humor may not appeal to a younger audience due to its complexity, targeting a more mature demographic and potentially losing the charm that endears the storybook to kids .

The storybook emphasizes themes of obedience and the consequences of defying authority, reflected in Peter's disobedience leading to negative consequences . It reinforces the moral of obeying parental guidance. In contrast, the movie introduces a theme of questioning authority and embracing individual agency, as seen in Peter's continued mischief and the resolution that involves understanding and accepting differences rather than strict adherence to rules .

The storybook serves a young audience with its clear moral on listening to parental authority and understanding boundaries, illustrated through Peter's adventure and consequences for disobedience . Conversely, the movie targets a mature audience by addressing themes of family sacrifice, tolerance, and forgiveness, lacking emphasis on traditional parental wisdom, and instead promoting complex social interactions and humor .

The movie adaptation employs a lighter tone and cool color grading, enhancing the illusion that animals can speak, making it entertaining and visually appealing . This contrasts with the storybook's simple illustrations, which rely on imagination through reading. The movie's visuals attract a mature audience with its aesthetic appeal and complexity, whereas the storybook is designed to be kid-friendly with straightforward storytelling .

You might also like