PA Forensic Audit & Election Integrity Insights
PA Forensic Audit & Election Integrity Insights
The political landscape described by Dr. Robert B. Sklaroff shows intra-party politics within the Republican Party in Pennsylvania as competitive and sharply divided on election integrity issues. He highlights the dynamic of two 'white-male' senatorial candidates attacking each other, while a 'black-female' candidate, Kathy Barnette, tactically capitalizes on this discord . Barnette is distinguished by her consistent advocacy and unique background, suggesting a nuanced race where traditional profiles are challenged .
Election integrity is a critical theme in the advocacy strategies of candidates like Kathy Barnette and Doug Mastriano. Dr. Sklaroff describes them as the only statewide candidates courageously prioritizing this issue, which they argue is essential to counteract what they perceive as the Democratic Party's strategy to lead the country towards bankruptcy . They advocate for forensic audits and challenge the legitimacy of the 2020 election results, framing these actions as necessary to restore confidence in the electoral process .
Dr. Robert B. Sklaroff portrays Kathy Barnette's candidacy as distinct through her strong articulation of her policies, consistent advocacy on election integrity, and a deeply personal narrative rooted in her military background and challenging upbringing. He emphasizes her credibility built through years of activism and her ability to raise funds effectively, distinguishing her from other candidates by her resilience to attacks and her moral conviction .
Dr. Robert B. Sklaroff supports Doug Mastriano's gubernatorial candidacy primarily because Mastriano is seen as a lone, maximal force pushing for election integrity, which is Sklaroff's major concern. Sklaroff appreciates Mastriano's forthright efforts, despite aggressive opposition, and acknowledges his unique impressiveness at various campaign events and the PA Leadership Conference .
Dr. Sklaroff anticipates criticisms of election integrity advocacy to focus on perceived partisan motivations and the validity of claims regarding fraud. He suggests candidates should address these by conveying the systemic importance of election integrity, supporting their arguments with documented aberrations, and highlighting the procedural steps they recommend for state-specific audits, as opposed to simply making generalized allegations .
Beyond partisan beliefs, Dr. Sklaroff's advocacy for election audits is driven by a conviction in the importance of transparency and systemic integrity within the electoral process. He underscores the necessity of responding to documented 'aberrations' and confessions by key players, advocating for audits as a means to address these discrepancies and restore public confidence in elections .
Dr. Sklaroff references the Cloward-Piven Strategy to express his concern that the Democratic Party's policies aim to deliberately overwhelm the social welfare system, leading to a crisis that could result in economic instability or bankruptcy. He implies that this strategy could be employed by the Biden administration as a political maneuver, furthering a need for immediate action on election integrity to prevent potential economic fallout .
Dr. Sklaroff uses the Arizona case as a reference point, illustrating detailed documented aberrations in the electoral process and suggesting similar issues might exist in Pennsylvania. He advocates for a comparable audit study in Pennsylvania, using Arizona's findings as evidence of the potential necessity and urgency for such an examination to ensure electoral integrity in his state .
Dr. Sklaroff finds Kathy Barnette's narrative compelling due to her personal story of overcoming adversity, her military service, and her stance as a black conservative. Her narrative includes being the product of rape but not aborted, highlighting her resilience and moral fiber. This personal history, combined with her active role in advocating for election integrity, reinforces her authenticity and appeal within the political sphere .
Dr. Sklaroff identifies procedural pathways that include thorough forensic audits and systemic investigations. He places emphasis on the legal and procedural groundwork, which involves annotating transcripts from the House State Government Committee. He advocates for the examination of 'aberrations' admitted by key players and contrasts these with similar initiatives in other states as part of a comprehensive approach to addressing electoral anomalies from the 2020 POTUS election .