0% found this document useful (0 votes)
112 views11 pages

Political Science and the State Concept

The document discusses several key topics: 1. It traces the origins of modern concepts of state and nation, noting that the state evolved from the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648 while the concept of nation emerged during the French Revolution. 2. It explains different theories of nationalism, including cultural nationalism based on unity in uniformity that originated in Europe, versus political nationalism and the idea of unity in diversity that was embraced by the Indian National Congress. 3. It notes that many post-colonial states face challenges of nation-building as modern states were often formed through colonialism and imperialism without regard for ethnic and cultural identities.

Uploaded by

Vaibhav Ratra
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
112 views11 pages

Political Science and the State Concept

The document discusses several key topics: 1. It traces the origins of modern concepts of state and nation, noting that the state evolved from the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648 while the concept of nation emerged during the French Revolution. 2. It explains different theories of nationalism, including cultural nationalism based on unity in uniformity that originated in Europe, versus political nationalism and the idea of unity in diversity that was embraced by the Indian National Congress. 3. It notes that many post-colonial states face challenges of nation-building as modern states were often formed through colonialism and imperialism without regard for ethnic and cultural identities.

Uploaded by

Vaibhav Ratra
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

“Political science begins and ends with state itself”

 Modern concept of state has evolved from treaty of Westphalia, 1648


 The term nation comes from the Latin word NASCI which means race
 The concept of nation came in French revolution, so it’s a concept of
modern Times
 In a particular geography a particular way of life or culture evolves.
The strongest medium to express culture is language. Thus ethnicity,
language, culture, religion becomes the basis of recognition of oneness
or nation.
 The above idea of nation is European in origin. It is based on the idea
of unity in uniformity. This theory of nationalism is the theory of
cultural nationalism.
 In the Indian context, the idea of nation propounded by Jinnah and
Savarkar were based on western or European idea. In modern times
nation was made the unit of state, ie, if people can establish
themselves as a nation they become eligible for the recognition as a
state. The leaders of Indian National Congress were not of cultural
nationalism but rather it was the idea of political nationalism, ie, the
idea of unity in diversity. This idea is based on Indian civilization values
of pluralism and tolerance
 In non-Western world, most of the states are facing the crisis of
nation building as modern states are product of colonialism and
imperialism
 Supranationalism means existence of authority that is higher than that
of nation states and capable of imposing the will on member states.
Supranationalism thus transfers sovereignty and decision-making
authority from constituent body to an international or regional
organization.

Global poltics =International politics +global governance

 International politics is interstate politics- States interacting with


each other independently
 Global governance is a dynamic and complex process of interactive
decision making that involves formal and informal mechanism. Though
States or government remains the primary institution but the global
governance also involve supranational bodies, example UN
Left wing and right wing politics

LEFT WING RIGHT WING


Left-wing politics is more Right-wing politics are more conservative.
liberal in its approach and
outlook
Left-wing economics policies Its economic policies involve low taxes, less
involve reducing income regulation on businesses by the
equality, increasing tax rates government
for the wealthy, and
government spending on
social programs and
infrastructure
Those belonging to the left- Right-wing ideologies believe that the best
spectrum of politics believe outcome for society is delivered when
that society will benefit individual rights and civil liberties are
from an expanded role for paramount with limited involvement of
the government the government
Left-wing politics is Right-wing politics is characterized by
characterized by an emphasis ideas of authority, hierarchy, tradition,
on equality, fraternity, and nationalism
progress, and reform
Left-wing nationalism is Right-wing nationalism is influenced by
based on social equality, Romantic Nationalism where the state
popular sovereignty, and derives its legitimacy from the culture it
national-determination. It governs, including, language, race, and
associates itself closely with custom “born” within this culture
national liberation
movements
Left-wing politics is Right-wing politics have always found
traditionally against religious supporters who believe that religion should
institutions and believe that play an expanded role in society.
state and religion must be
separate from each other
(Secularism)

What are the main reasons for weak national identities in India?

 Historical and geographical isolation

 Lop-sided development

 Continuous neglect of a region

 Insider-outsider complex that nurturers nativism and son-of-the-soil


ideology

 Internal colonialism, i.e., despite being rich in natural resources some


regions remain economically underdeveloped.

 The reasons being either ill-conceived top-down approach or survival


of one region at the cost of the other region. Chhota Nagpur plateau
is an example of this type of underdevelopment.

 Political vested interests can accentuate and exploit regional


loyalties.

 Reaction to an imposed ideology that can make its appearance as a


reaction against the perceived imposition of a particular ideology,
language or cultural pattern on all people and groups.

 Linguistic aspirations that have remained a formidable basis of


regionalism.

 Expression of ethnicity.
Difference between state and nations

STATE NATION
The State has four elements— Common territory, common race,
population, territory, common religion, common language,
government, and sovereignty. In common history, common culture
the absence of even and common political aspirations are the
one element, a State cannot elements which help the formation of a
be really a State. nation, and yet none of
these is an absolutely essential element
The State is a political Nation is a united unit of population
organization which fulfills the which is full of emotional, spiritual and
security and welfare needs of psychological bonds.
its people
It is essential for each State But for a nation territory is not an
to possess a fixed territory essential requirement
Sovereignty is an essential It is not essential for a nation to possess
element of the State sovereignty
The State is limited to a fixed Obviously its boundaries can easily extend
territory beyond the boundaries of the State
The State uses police power Nation is bound by
(force) for preserving its unity strong cultural and historical links
and integrity
State is less stable than nation Nation is more stable than State

 Palestine is in observer status acquired it in 2012


 India supported the resolution in United Nations.
 India supports the statehood of Palestine

Types of states in global system

 A territory having all the determinants of a state that is population,


sovereignty, territory, government, international recognition is known
as legal juridical state.
 Even after being a legal juridicial State, if state do not have a strong
political institution where non state actors are more violent and more
powerful than the state or where state itself threatens its people are
known as Quasi States, example -Afghanistan, where Taliban is more
powerful than the state, Pakistan-military supremacy over civilian
prevails
 Legal juridical States having strong political institution, no major
secessionist movement, smooth transfer of power, regular election or
where rule of law prevails and constitution is supreme is called a called
strong States, example India
 Note- the probability of solving the Kashmir issue will increase if
Pakistan become strong empirical State, a vibrant responsible
democracy. At present Pakistan is a Quasi state, where there is a
multiple centers of power

Origin or emergence of state

1. Divine theory
[Link] theory (Aristotle, Plato)\
[Link] contract theory -according to this theory State is outcome of
contract between humans. The main scholars who supported this
theory are Hobbs, John Locke and Roussea

Evolution of modern Europe

Ancient times

 In ancient Greek, there were City States - Athens and Sparta


 Greece was not a nation; it was a geographical entity with many cities
States.
 People were the citizens of Athens or Sparta; they were not Greek
citizens. Greece was a agrarian society in which there was a system of
slavery
RELATED INFORMATION

Land -Capability found in natural resources of the state is known as land

Labour-Physical capability found in human resources is labour

Capital-Capability found in man-made resources is known as capital

There are three types of capitals- physical, financial and intellectual


capital

 Machines are physical capital of a country.


 Money is financial capital.
 Capability found in ideas is intellectual capital

Three types of ideas- business, scientific and literary ideas.

 Ownership right of a business idea is trademark.


 Ownership right of scientific ideas is patent.
 Ownership right of literary is called is copyright.
 Together these three are known as intellectual property rights

Entrepreneurship -Ability to generate new idea is known as entrepreneur


who will optimally utilize that other three factors of production land,
labour and capital

 Socialism suppress entrepreneurship in capitalism promotes


entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship is the most dynamic factor of
production in economics sector
 It led to the failure of socialism and success of capitalism
 It was a patriarchal society.
 They believe that inequality is natural. God has created two types of
people -master and slaves.
 They were ethnocentric people as Greek used to call others barbarians.
 In ancient Greece there was no Central authority, it was extremely
decentralized as the city was state itself.
 Greek scholars made no difference between politics and ethics and their
world view was not compartmentalized, as the issue of best political
life was not separated from issue of best life in general. Difference
between ethics and politics was started by Machiavelli in modern Times.
 Ancient Greek scholars were rationalist scholars and their belief was in
the philosophy of humanism -in humanism man is the major of all
things, man is the center of the universe
 During mediaeval Times city-states came to an end and Europe became
a confederation known as Roman empire.
 Since the Roman empire was too big, hierarchy of rulers or lords
emerged.
 There were also struggle between churches and the rulers. Over the
time, the authority of the Empire become nominal and the churches
started dominating all age of life. Hence medieval age is also known as
age of religion or dark ages. The philosophy was overshadowed by
religion.
 The economic system was feudalism.
 Feudalism is a system based on birth. The term feudal lord represents
the owner of the land. In feudalism, there used to be two classes
-lords and serves. Whether a person is lord or serve depends on his
birth, rather than worth. The situation of serve is like a bonded
labour. They had to work in the field of particular feudal lord
Difference between totalitarian and authoritarian regimes
Difference between left and right ideology

Comparison between feudalism and capitalism

 In feudalism, there is no freedom but in capitalism, there is a concept


of freedom
 Feudalism is based on barter system, whereas capitalism is based on
money economy.
 Feudalism means bonded labour, capitalism means waged labour
 Feudalism is based on birth whereas capitalism is based on achievement

Modern Time

 Started from the age of renaissance which led to the rebirth of


humanism and rationalism.
 Industrial revolution started in Europe
 For industrialization, work force was required to work in industries and
people were working as serves in the field
 So capitalist started talking about liberty and freedom
 They said that serve should revolt against the feudal lords as they can
work anywhere
 Machiavelli was the scholar of emerging capitalist class
 Capitalist felt the need of supreme authority and capitalist started to
join hands with the monarchy that led to centralization of authority.
 Since capitalism is not based on birth, in capitalism the relationship
between capitalist and the worker has to be based on contract and
there was in need of some authority, whose law can be considered as
supreme and which can be given power to enforce the contract as
during mediaeval times there was multiple centers of authority
 Hence capitalist who had the economic power supported the king who
had the political power. Together they laid the foundation of modern
state
 Modern state has been constituted on the line of nation. People
belonging to one nation were treated as one political unit for
administrative convenience
 Since the rise of capitalism, the history of the east and the west
interlinked.
 For many Marxist scholars, globalization is a kind of neo imperialism.
The colonial masters divided the territories not on the basis of nation
or ethnicity but on the basis of administrative convenience. Hence
difference ethnic communities are either combined in one state or some
ethnic communities are divided in different states. Hence secessionist,
ethnic or sub national movements are regular feature in these state
Positives and negatives of globalization
Globalization is a process of interaction and integration among the
people, companies, and governments of different nations, a process
driven by international trade and investment and aided by
information technology
Change in Political role
Globalization has changed the role of the state politically because of
strengthened interstate relationships and dependence on one another.
States were created to be sovereign but now, due to globalization,
often give their sovereignty away to ‘pooling’ in conventions,
contracting, coercion and imposition. This has led to increasingly
similar jurisdictions across states and to power being seen as an
economic rather than political progress because states now make
political progression and regression together, causing states to
become more developmental.
Change in Economic role
 Globalized economic changes have a substantial effect on the state’s
role. The global economy has been created by online banking, stock
markets and, largely, global franchises. The state no longer controls
currency because of intangible assets and importation as well as
online and electronic banking and a shared currency between many
states, like in much of Europe.
 International organizations like WTO have a dominant role in
influencing countries to adopt certain market initiatives.
Social dimension
 Social globalization has created greater social awareness of human
rights violations, child labour abuses and corruption. These challenges,
in turn, affect public administration and the role of government.
The major change in the configuration of the public-private spheres
in favor of globalizing the corporate sector has changed the leading
role of government
 in the allocation of resources, the distribution of wealth, the
stabilization of the economy and economic growth.
Advantages
 By economic integration, it helps the government of developing
countries to deal with major problems by increasing their economic
growth, solving the poverty problems etc.
 The model of state and its functioning also evolves as a result of
the free flow of political ideas.
 The government takes policy initiatives in the field of health,
education and technology which are the direct result of globalization.
 Recent verdicts on the rights of the LGBTQ community in India are
the perfect example of the changing role of the state in providing
rights to its citizens.
Disadvantages
 Matters related to India's subsidy regime at WTO shows too much
interference by the dominant powers at the world stage.
 Globalization facilitates the spread of new diseases in developing
nations by travelers between countries, and states in developing
countries have to rely on developed countries due to lack of
capabilities of tackling these problems.
 Decrease in skilled labor in the developing countries because of easy
mobility of skilled manpower to other countries having higher
opportunities.
 Globalization has led to economic inequality in developing countries.
Nature of Political Science

What is a political theory?

Theory means explanation of a phenomenon. And political theory means


explanation of political phenomenon, example –BREXIT, rise of ultra-
nationalism

 Theories are of two types- philosophical or normative theories and


empirical or scientific theories
 Scientific theories are limited in number. The feature of scientific
theories are - observation of fact, collection of data, experimentation,
use of mathematical analysis. Scientific theory focus on what is rather
than what ought to be. The. scientific theories are value free approach
 The philosophical or normative theory focuses on what ought to be. In
philosophical theories we study the idea. Philosophy is the study of
Idea
Happiness = hope – present condition
 Philosophical methods are most suitable for the subject of political
science as in this subject we are dealing with more normative aspects

Nature of political science

 Political science is one of the oldest discipline. Over the years there has
been revision, expansion or at times its boundaries have also been
narrowed down
 We trace the origin of political science in ancient Greece.
 It started as a part of political philosophy (study of political ideas)
 The purpose was how to give the best possible life to the people.
During Greek time, the issue of best political life was not separated
from the best life itself
 During medieval ages religion came to acquire the dominant space in all
spheres of human life and even the study of politics was subordinated
to the [Link] the political works were produced by religious
scholars
 During modern times, especially with the works of Machiavelli, political
science as a discipline got its autonomy from religion. The sphere of
politics was separated from that of ethics and religion
 Political science becomes the history of the state. Scholars like Garner
defined political science is the study of state and the government.
Garner said political science begins and ends with state itself

Scholars in political philosophy can be categorized into two schools of


thought – idealist and materialist.

Idealist- idea is real for them, what we see is not real

Materialist- those who believe that matter is real

 For materialist, the world in which we live is a real world, material


pleasure are real pleasure. Marx, Hobbs, Machiavelli are materialist
 For idealist, the world is filled with illusion; the real world is the
world of thought. Real happiness lies in thought. Real happiness is
not accumulated through material but real happiness lies to the
satisfaction of the soul
 Materialist are seen as realist
 In terms of power-

Idealist Realist
Means are more important than Goals are more important than
goals means
Means and ends should be Only concerned with the ends
compatible
Ex - Gandhi Ex – Subash Chandra Bose
Ethics are not separated from Politics is only pursue of power
politics

Socrates
 He was considered as the wisest man as he accepted that ‘he knew
nothing’ .He is considered as the father of ethics. Ethics is the branch
of philosophy that talks about the art of living, that is how we ought
to live
 The myth does prevails that Socrates was not a real person. He was
just an imagination of Plato. Plato was just giving his own ideas by
creating an imaginary person
 Before Socrates, there were scholars who were trying to understand
the physical properties of the universe and composition of life
 Socrates believed that it is not enough to know what constitutes a
life. It is more important to know the purpose of life on what
constitutes a good life or virtuous life
 According to Socrates, the purpose of life is happiness. it is a source
of satisfaction. To gain happiness one needs excellence. Thus he defined
excellence as virtue. It means the purpose of life is to have virtuous
life. In order to live a virtuous life, we should have the knowledge of
that
 According to Socrates, the source of knowledge lives within ourselves.
Our soul is the ultimate guider. The soul can resolve the dilemmas and
to listen to the voice of the soul, he has proposed the method of the
DIALECTICS.
 Socrates is known as the father of dialectics. Dialectics can be called
as logical reasoning. The term dialectics denotes dialogue, means
debates. Dialectics is a process through which our belief gets
transferred into true knowledge.
 Socrates has categorized knowledge into two types of -opinion or
believes and knowledge
 Type 1 -opinion or beliefs
According to Socrates, it give the illusion of knowledge. This
knowledge is shakable. In the words of Socrates, we should
not use the term knowledge for this type of knowledge,
rather it is just belief
 Type 2 -true knowledge/ conceptual knowledge
This knowledge is unshakable. It is a product of dialectics.
Hence dialectics is a process through which our opinion get
filtered and we are able to get true knowledge. So it is
uniform and universal
 The biggest contribution of Socrates is his theory of knowledge in
which he established that knowledge of idea superior to the knowledge
of matter
 And according to him it is not enough to know what is life rather it
is more important to know what good life is. That is why he is
considered father of philosophy

“Knowledge is virtue”
 This is statement is from Socrates theory of knowledge. He is known
as the father of philosophy and Plato considered him the wisest man.
This statement comes in the context of Socrates explanation of good
life. According to Socrates, it is not enough to live a life, it is more
important to live a good life. Good life means a happy and satisfied life
 In order to live a good and satisfied Life, one should have knowledge of
good life and he believed that knowledge is virtue. Knowledge is a
source of excellence and excellence is a source of happiness
 He gives the example of shoemaker who gains happiness when he makes
good shoe. Just like making a good shoe, we should gain excellence in
the art of making shoe. Similarly, we should know art of living, hence
he believed that knowledge is virtue and unexamined life is not worth
living
 There was a huge influence of Socrates on Plato
 Plato’s theory of idea is based on Socrates theory of knowledge.
Plato’s justification of the rule of philosopher king is also based on
Socrates view that knowledge is virtue.
 If Athens had to become a virtuous state, it has to be ruled by
knowledge. Plato strongly believed that until philosophers are the rulers
or rulers learned philosophy, there is no end to the predicament of
human life.
Note - This idea is relevant in the Indian context where many
outdated and inhuman custom and traditions are still prevalent
among certain sections of the society. When we critically examine
such institution, only then we will be able to reject illogical and
inhuman practices and able to move towards social progress.
“Unexamined life is not worth living”
 This statement is also from Socrates theory of knowledge
 Scholars before Socrates were trying to understand what constitutes
life. But Socrates held that it is more important to understand what
constitutes good life
 According to Socrates, precondition for good life is the knowledge
about good life. Person should look for true knowledge, which is
different from opinion and beliefs. He proposed dialectics or logical
reasoning as a method to gain knowledge of good life. Hence he
suggested that unexamined life is not worth living
 Not only Socrates but many Indian philosophers like Swami
Vivekananda, Gandhi, Aurobindo Ghosh also emphasized for the need of
mental revolution. Hence Socrates truly deserved to be known as the
father of philosophy because he was the first person to emphasize on
the need for good life
Who were Sophists?
 The terms of Sophism come from the words SOPHIA denoting
knowledge
 Sophists were also teachers considered as first teachers on politics,
considered as the first political educationist
 They were teaching how to acquire power
 They believed that matter has primacy over ideas
 They believed that the source of good life is money and power
 Sophist believed that the coming to politics one must gain master over
rhetoric.
 Sophists believed that individual has priority over society, that is part
is more important than the whole

Belief of Socrates tradition

 Socrates believed that sophists are misleading the youth


 Socrates held that when we consider our self-interests have a primacy
over the interests of the society, it is because of our ignorance
 Socrates was ordered to drink hemlock, that is poison, against the
charges that he was misleading the youth and his teaching was
dangerous for the state.
 As per tradition, he had an opportunity to escape. However, he
preferred to drink poison rather than escaping
 It denotes that he wants to show that life carries no meaning, if you
cannot live according to the ideas we subscribe to.
 He wanted to give the message that it is the duty of all citizens to
obey the orders of the states even when it appears against our
interest
 From Socrates point of view, it appears against our interest because
we are ignorant
 Socrates believed that money and power is not the source of good life
rather honesty and knowledge is the source of good life
 Socrates criticized rhetoric and proposed dialectics
 He believes man is social by nature- which is more important than
part. so society is natural. He believed in organic theory.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The European concept of nationhood is based on the idea of unity in uniformity, which emphasizes cultural nationalism characterized by common ethnicity, language, and culture. This concept evolved from the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648 and was significant in the French Revolution, making it a modern concept. In contrast, the Indian idea of nationhood, as proposed by leaders of the Indian National Congress, is based on political nationalism, which emphasizes unity in diversity, informed by Indian civilization values of pluralism and tolerance. This concept moves away from the uniformity of cultural nationalism to embrace a more inclusive and diverse political unity .

Supranational organizations in global politics function as entities that possess authority higher than individual nation-states. These organizations, such as the United Nations, can impose regulations and promote coordinated policy-making among member states. This transfer of sovereignty and decision-making authority from states to regional or international organizations means that states often have to abide by collective decisions even if these decisions are contrary to national interests. While this framework aims to foster international cooperation and global governance, it can also reduce individual nation-states' ability to make independent policy decisions .

A 'quasi-state' is characterized by weak political institutions where non-state actors wield significant power over official state mechanisms, often surpassing the state’s ability to govern effectively. Factors contributing to this status include internal conflict, lack of effective governance, and dominance of military or militant groups over civilian government, resulting in fragmented political authority. Examples include Afghanistan, where the Taliban exerts considerable influence, and Pakistan, where military authority often overrides civilian rule. These conditions prevent the quasi-state from exercising full governance over its territory, undermining its legitimacy and sovereign control .

The factors of production mentioned in the document include land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship. Land refers to natural resources, labor represents human resources, and capital is categorized into physical, financial, and intellectual capital. Physical capital includes machinery, financial capital is represented by money, and intellectual capital involves ideas such as business, scientific, and literary concepts. Entrepreneurship is the capacity to generate and utilize new ideas, serving as the dynamic element in utilizing the other three factors. While socialism tends to suppress entrepreneurship, capitalism promotes it as a key driver of economic growth and innovation .

A state is defined by four elements: population, territory, government, and sovereignty. It is a political organization that ensures security and welfare for its people. In contrast, a nation is signified by emotional, spiritual, and psychological bonds among a united population. While a state cannot exist without a fixed territory and sovereignty, a nation can exist beyond these constraints, relying on common cultural and historical links. Consequently, a state is less stable than a nation, which has deeper emotional cohesion .

Socrates believed that true knowledge, acquired through dialectics or logical reasoning, was superior to mere opinion or belief. This pursuit of knowledge was essential for living a good and virtuous life. He distinguished between materialistic pursuits advocated by the Sophists and the quest for truth and virtue. Socrates' emphasis on knowledge and ethics influenced his political views, where he rejected the Sophist emphasis on rhetoric and power and instead advocated for governance based on virtue and understanding. His concept that 'knowledge is virtue' laid the foundation for his belief in the ethical responsibility of citizens to seek truth and uphold justice in societal governance .

Internal colonialism in India results in economic disparities where resource-rich regions remain underdeveloped due to policies that favor other regions. This neglect can foster regional grievances and strengthen local identities, undermining a cohesive national identity. Additionally, the perceived exploitation by centralized policies may exacerbate insider-outsider tensions, nurturing nativism and son-of-the-soil ideologies. This can lead to political unrest as regional political leaders exploit these sentiments for vested interests, further fragmenting national unity and contributing to a crisis in nation-building .

Left-wing nationalism is rooted in ideals of social equality, popular sovereignty, and national self-determination. It aligns itself with national liberation movements and emphasizes secularism, advocating for a separation between state and religious institutions. On the other hand, right-wing nationalism is heavily influenced by Romantic Nationalism, where a state claims its legitimacy through cultural components such as language, race, and customs. This ideology often supports the inclusion of religion in public life and relies on traditional hierarchies and established authorities. Right-wing nationalism is more conservative, while left-wing nationalism is progressive, focusing on reform and equality .

The crisis of nation-building in non-Western countries is largely due to historical factors such as colonialism and imperialism. Many modern states in these regions are products of colonial borders, which often disregarded the existing social and ethnic divisions, leading to internal conflicts. Additionally, geographical isolation, uneven development, neglect of regions, and political vested interests exacerbate regional differences and create weak national identities. This is further compounded by internal colonialism, where economic disparities exist despite abundant natural resources, due to policies that benefit one region over another. Reactionary responses to imposed ideologies and linguistic aspirations also contribute to regionalism and hinder nation-building efforts .

Realism and idealism present divergent approaches to ethics and politics. Realists prioritize goals over means and accept the use of power and pragmatism in political actions. For example, Machiavelli's political philosophy emphasized the necessity of a ruler being willing to use deceit and monarchical power to maintain stability. Conversely, idealism values ethics and the means used to achieve ends as integral to virtuous rule. Socrates, as an idealist, argued that a good life required virtuous action and knowledge, influencing Plato's idea of philosopher-kings governing to ensure moral governance. While realists focus on power dynamics, idealists advocate ethical integrity and the pursuit of philosophical truth in politics .

You might also like