0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views12 pages

Visual Management in MRO Production

This document outlines a visual management deployment project at Airbus Helicopters from November 2013 to December 2014. The project aimed to set up Airbus Helicopters' visual management system in the MRO production workshops to improve quality, cost, delivery, and safety. Key achievements included setting up boards in all workshops. Assessment found the new system provided transparency of information and a daily management tool, compared to the previous partial and outdated information.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views12 pages

Visual Management in MRO Production

This document outlines a visual management deployment project at Airbus Helicopters from November 2013 to December 2014. The project aimed to set up Airbus Helicopters' visual management system in the MRO production workshops to improve quality, cost, delivery, and safety. Key achievements included setting up boards in all workshops. Assessment found the new system provided transparency of information and a daily management tool, compared to the previous partial and outdated information.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Visual Management deployment

MRO – Dynamic Components


DEPLOYMENT IN PRODUCTION WORKSHOP

Sebastien Daufes / EBSRL


Visual Management MRO – Dynamic Components
 Duration: November 2013 to December 2014
 Scope: Setup of the Airbus Helicopters Visual Management system in the MRO activity
 Objectives: Setup of the Airbus Helicopters Visual Management system in the production workshops
 Team: [Link]: Transfo Plan manager, [Link]: Project manager & deployer, [Link]: Sponsor
QUALITY COST DELIVERY
 Ensure compliance with AH
VM standard  Self-financed boards and  Operational boards at the
 Appropriation of VM and means end of August 2014
SQCDP as a management  Sustainable savings on  Improvement of 0.1 point on
tool for teams Security, Quality, Cost, the maturity assessment
 Ensure relevant and up-to- Delivery and People
date KPIs
 Planning:

D RAnalysis
I V E R
Definition of Definition of Test Deployment workshop by workshop Autonomy Stabiliza-
of existent
the project indicator phasis  Transformation and coaching & Review tion
content

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3 month
30/11/2013 31/12/2013 31/01/2014 31/03/2014 30/06/2014 31/08/2014 31/09/2014

 Main achievements: 100% boards setup: Heavy gear boxes workshop, Rotors workshop, Light gear boxes
workshop, Sub-modules workshop, Stripping & Painting workshops, Surface treatment & NDI workshops
 Next weeks targets: Office of the production manager, basement workshop, support functions
 Risks: Keep the pressure and daily coaching required
2
Assessment of the situation
BEFORE NOW
 Diversity and non-regulated boards in workshops  Each unit of product has its own visual management
harmonized and standardized
 Scheduled boards already deployed  Very useful, key tools for the local work organization:

WHO DOES, WHAT and WHEN?


Am I on time or late compared to the forecast?

Team leaders are the best support to update the boards


 Few KPIs for the activity Relevant KPIs for each unit of product:
 KPI that can generate action plan
 KPI not always red or green
 Flexible KPI
 Objectives linked to each KPI
PARTIAL INFORMATION TRANSPARENCY OF INFORMATION
 Everybody has same level of information.
 Problems are shared and discussed
KPI = INFORMATIVE BOARD KPI = MANAGEMENT TOOL
Passive attitude: Active attitude:
 Information for high-level manager or for specific  It is what you put on your board that makes it
events interesting
 Not always up-to-date  Showing and explaining problems give 50% of the
solution
 Improvement tool
Monthly update Daily tool of management
Context
 VM integrated in Airbus Helicopters Transformation Plan
 Lean maturity assessment

VISUAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – 4 PILLARS

Manage Activities Manage Teams Manage Performance Manage Problems

• Visual planning and scheduling


• Task allocation boards • Pareto chart
systems
• Qualification Matrix • Priority matrix
• Time – Time charts • SQCDP Standard
• Team Planning • Practical Problem Solving
• Visual Q-Gates
• … (using 8D standard)
• …

Exhibit 4.1 - Visual Management guide G007A

4
Deployment planning
2013 2014
DEPLOYMENT
Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

PLAN phase
Phase analyses “As is” / Maturity of 4 pillars of VM and define “To Be” X

Detailed action plan for each pillar X

Focal points with managers and operational people X X

DO phase
Kick-off meeting X

Definition of indicators and processes X

Rework & adjustment of indicators (CP/CE) X

Feedback and integrating changes X

Validation of indicators and targets X

Pilot case study on UAP C – Light gear boxes X X

Progress report with managers and operational people X X

Feedback and integrating changes X X

Validation of indicators and targets X X

Format definition of the panels X

Quote launched and control panels X

Review and adjusting the operation panels X

Deployment workshop after workshop: Transformation and coaching X X X X

UAP A – Heavy gear boxes X

UAP B – Rotors X

UAP G – Sub-modules X

UAS – Transversal operations: Stripping & Painting X

UAS – Transversal operations: Surface treatment & NDI X

CHECK phase
VM Process Confirmation, use of VM checklist with Lean focal points and [Link] X X X

ACT phase
VM System autonomous & continuous improvement process X X X
Visual Management on MRO Dynamic Components

Manage Teams

Manage Activities Manage Performance Manage Problems

FLASH 5’ SQCDP FLASH 30’

6
Indicators SQCDP – MRO Dynamic Components
Visual Sheet Issue Sheet Daily/Weekly/Monthly Trend Sheet
Sheet
1st KPI: Work accident  If accident is written, Team
 Red: if accident and risks Leader gives a nb to the HSE
 Green: if no accident and summarizes facts  Monthly monitoring of 5S  Annual monitoring of
evaluation work accidents and
2nd KPI: 5S area assessment  If the score is less than 3.5 / 5,
risks
 Red: if the rating is below 3.5 / 5 fast actions are taken on the 3
 Green: if the rating is higher than 3.5 / 5 lowest scores
 Red: if more than 5 non-conformities are  Histogram of daily  Histogram of monthly
identified with an impact on the quality of the  List of new problems monitoring monitoring
product and / or process - Resolved at workshop level
 Green: if less than 5 non-conformities detected - Or escalated to the higher level 1st KPI: Flow assembly 1st KPI: Flow assembly
1st KPI: Flow assembly 2nd KPI: Flow dismantling 2nd KPI: Flow dismantling
2nd KPI: Flow dismantling

 Red: if the performance of the workshop is  Histogram of weekly  Histogram of monthly


below 80% for the week  List of new problems monitoring monitoring
 Green: if the performance of the workshop is  Analysis of the causes of non-
over 80% for the week performance 1st KPI: Flow assembly 1st KPI: Flow assembly
st
1 KPI: Flow assembly 2nd KPI: Flow dismantling 2nd KPI: Flow dismantling
2nd KPI: Flow dismantling

 Red: if the rate of the commitments workshop  Histogram of weekly  Histogram of monthly
is below 80% for the week  List of new problems monitoring monitoring
 Green: if the commitments workshop is over  Analysis of the causes of non-
80% for the week compliance with commitments 1st KPI: Flow assembly 1st KPI: Flow assembly
1st KPI: Flow assembly 2nd KPI: Flow dismantling 2nd KPI: Flow dismantling
2nd KPI: Flow dismantling

 Red: if variation of more than 5 persons  Histogram of daily  Histogram of monthly


between forecasts and reality  List of new problems monitoring monitoring
 Green: if variation of less than 5 persons  Analysis of the problem:
between forecasts and reality absences, understaffed, means 1st KPI: Flow assembly 1st KPI: Flow assembly
1st KPI: Flow assembly failure, unplanned emergency… 2nd KPI: Flow dismantling 2nd KPI: Flow dismantling
2nd KPI: Flow dismantling
Flash 5’ and Flash 30’ communication
Flash 5’ Flash 30’
 Manage activities:  Manage activities:
- detail process - vision of the production unit process
- organize daily work - display of FOD organization and SGS
- monitor WIP
- mobilize the team on the objectives  Continuous improvement:
- commit to deliver the operation on time - communicate on quality, unit performance and
continuous improvement (Flash Quality/Security)
 Manage teams: - reminder of 10 golden rules of quality
- allocation of the dedicated person to specific - Share the strong unit messages
operations - display ideas from “ide@box”

 Manage problems:  Manage teams:


- identify and track the resolution of sticking points - develop involvement and commitment of the staff
encountered - vision of the organization within the production unit,
the planning and the Airbus Helicopters objectives
 Manage productivity indicators: - qualification matrix of the team
- commitment to the objectives: OTD & OTQ
- rates of the production output  Manage problems:
- Pareto chart
- priority matrix
- Practical Problem Solving (using 8D standard)

 Manage productivity indicators:


- indicators of the global TAT, flows (assembly and
dismantling)
- performance indicators of the unit production (tbd)
8
The Visual Management System:

MANAGE ACTIVITIES MANAGE PERFORMANCE


Escalation system

LEVEL 3
KPI
Hot spot

MANAGE PROBLEMS
Head of activities
MRO DC
Weekly / 2 h
Weekly / 2 h

LEVEL 2 Progress status CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT FLASH 30’


CP / CE / LOG per unit of prod per unit of prod

Weekly / 2 h / unit Weekly / 30 min / unit

LEVEL 1
FLASH 5’ SQCDP
CE / Leader / Frequency: Daily Frequency: Daily &/or Weekly
Technician Duration: 5 min
Duration: 10 min

MANAGE TEAMS
Every manager solves problems at HIS level
“everyone does its own job”
9
First experience feedbacks

Positive feedbacks:

 People and team leaders are happy with their own boards, it is not “the boss board”
 Problem are now visible and everyday they can be weighted in euro
 Now, we discuss together about a problem or about what we have to deliver
 Fear of red => it is a warning: I DO have a problem today that takes time, that costs money to the
company, that makes visible that, now, I am late
 Flash 5’ & SQCDP take 5 to 15 min per shift

Points to be secured:

 Difficulty to debrief each team with 2 or 3 different shifts and one single manager and different boards
 To complete the action plan
 To sum up clearly a problem into a simple sentence

10
Next achievements:

Visual Management in workshops:

 Finalize implementation
 Audit & check phases to be done

Visual Management in offices:

 Deployment of VM in support functions (procurement, supply chain, quality…)


 Deployment of VM in Technical center, Logistics …

11
Thanks for your attention
Do you have any question?

12

You might also like