0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views1 page

Reading Models and Composing Meaning

The document summarizes several models of reading: 1) Rumelhart's model from 1977 focuses on using prior knowledge about topics, vocabulary, and context to understand words while reading. 2) Stanovich's 1980 model describes top-down and bottom-up reading processes, with bottom-up starting by reading the full text and top-down providing context before reading. 3) Anderson and Pearson's 1984 schematic view focuses on connecting new lessons to prior knowledge through questions about related experiences. 4) Pearson and Tierney's model sees reading as a collaborative act between reader and author where readers compose meaning from clues and by answering questions about the text.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views1 page

Reading Models and Composing Meaning

The document summarizes several models of reading: 1) Rumelhart's model from 1977 focuses on using prior knowledge about topics, vocabulary, and context to understand words while reading. 2) Stanovich's 1980 model describes top-down and bottom-up reading processes, with bottom-up starting by reading the full text and top-down providing context before reading. 3) Anderson and Pearson's 1984 schematic view focuses on connecting new lessons to prior knowledge through questions about related experiences. 4) Pearson and Tierney's model sees reading as a collaborative act between reader and author where readers compose meaning from clues and by answering questions about the text.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Ramir C.

Catuday

READING MODELS

RUMELHART MODEL 1977

In this model, readers use what they already knew about the topic. Letter-sound knowledge,
mechanics of writing, vocabulary and contextual understanding. For example, if a student is reading
something in the class. Not only that he/she is saying the words that he/she is reading. It also activates
his/her own understanding about the words he/she is reading.

STANOVICH MODEL 1980

This uses the top-down or bottom-up processes. Example for the bottom-up is letting the
readers read the whole text first. After that, that’s the time you will engage to the readers by asking
them about what did they understand about the topic or if there are some words they are not familiar
with. Bottom-up processing may be easier for a reader who is skilled at word recognition but doesn’t
know much about the text topic. Then the top-down process, for example, before you let the readers
read the text. You will give them first some ideas or clues about the coming lesson. This way they can
already think or visualize the lesson they are about to read. Top-down processing is easier for the poor
reader who is slow at word recognition but has knowledge of the text topic.

ANDERSON AND PEARSON SCHEMATHEORETIC VIEW 1984

This fucoses on the previous knowledge that the learner has about the lesson and using that old
knowledge to lead them or connect them to the current lesson. For example, the lesson is about sea
creatures. You’ll ask them first if have they have been to the sea and what did they saw there. The
children will recall their past memory and they’ll think about water, fish, trees, etc. At that point, you
are already connecting your pupils to the lesson you will be discussing.

PEARSON AND TIERNEY MODEL

This model assumes a great deal of collaboration between the reader and the author, and
collaboration with the text. Readers are view as composers because reading is an act of composing
rather than recitation or regurgitation. For example, in the classroom the teacher will give some clues
about the coming lesson so that the students can visualized or connect to the topic. Then after they read
the text of the topic and they are able to understand and are able to answer the why and what
questions about the topic. That’s the time they can be called the composers.

MATHEWON’S MODEL OF ATTITUDE

This model shows how attitude and motivation do to readers and how it affects their learning or
reading skills. For example, if a teacher shows impowering attitude to its students during classes, there
is a high chance that the students will be motivated. Also, making attractive visual aids can motivate
students to read more or give them more interest in reading.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The Rumelhart Model focuses on activating existing knowledge to aid comprehension, emphasizing how background knowledge and contextual understanding facilitate the reading process . This approach implicitly boosts motivation by increasing familiarity and reducing the cognitive load required to decode new texts. Mathewson's Model of Attitude, however, explicitly addresses how attitudes and motivations influence reading behavior. It highlights the role of positive reinforcement, such as a teacher's supportive demeanor or engaging visual aids, in enhancing student motivation and interest in reading . While Rumelhart's Model underscores cognitive ease as a motivational factor, Mathewson's approach directly targets the affective domain, suggesting that motivation and attitude are critical catalysts for effective learning experiences. Combined, these models suggest that understanding and motivation are deeply intertwined and essential for successful reading outcomes.

In the Anderson and Pearson Schematheoretic View, prior knowledge is crucial as it serves as the foundation for connecting new information. This model demonstrates how learners use existing knowledge, or schema, to relate and integrate new concepts, enhancing understanding and retention. For instance, discussing sea creatures involves recalling personal experiences related to the sea, which facilitates an engaging and meaningful connection to the lesson . By tapping into these pre-existing mental frameworks, learning becomes more relevant and accessible, fostering deeper comprehension.

Mathewson’s Model implies that teaching strategies should be designed to cultivate a positive and inspiring reading environment to enhance motivation and engagement. It suggests incorporating elements such as positive reinforcement, supportive teacher attitudes, and attractive visual aids to stimulate interest . Teachers could develop strategies that involve dynamic interaction, relate reading materials to students' interests, and recognize achievements, thereby fostering a supportive learning atmosphere. Additionally, creating opportunities for students to express their interpretations and encouraging an open dialogue about texts can build a sense of investment and excitement. Tailoring these strategies to individual needs and cultivating an inclusive, positive classroom culture can dramatically affect engagement levels and reading comprehension success.

Mathewson's Model of Attitude highlights the critical role of psychological and emotional factors in reading engagement and learning. A positive, empowering attitude from educators, along with motivational tools like engaging visual aids, can significantly enhance student interest and willingness to read . This model implies that motivation is equally as important as cognitive abilities in reading; when students are positively encouraged, they are more likely to find reading activities enjoyable and engaging, which can increase their eagerness to participate and learn. Thus, fostering a positive reading attitude can lead to improvements in comprehension and academic performance, underscoring the model's broader impact on educational outcomes.

The Stanovich Model employs both top-down and bottom-up processes to aid reading comprehension. In the bottom-up process, readers focus on the words and letters first, then build towards a general understanding. This is beneficial for readers skilled at word recognition but unfamiliar with the text topic as it allows them to construct meaning as they progress . Conversely, the top-down process involves providing contextual ideas or themes before delving into the text. This assists readers who may struggle with word recognition but possess background knowledge of the topic, allowing them to visualize and comprehend the story from a pre-set context . These processes offer tailored strategies for different readers, enhancing the reading experience based on individual needs.

The Anderson and Pearson Schematheoretic View enhances comprehension by promoting an interactive approach where students link new information to existing knowledge schemas, making the learning experience more relevant and personal. For example, when exploring topics like sea creatures, students might draw on personal experiences, imagining or recalling related elements such as water or marine life . This connection not only helps students visualize and relate to the content but also fosters a deeper understanding as they incorporate new concepts into familiar contexts. The model implies that comprehension is enhanced when students actively engage with text through these personal connections, facilitating enriched learning experiences that reflect their unique perspectives and prior knowledge.

The Pearson and Tierney Model presents reading as an act of composing rather than simple regurgitation, suggesting a collaborative process between the reader, the author, and the text. This model supports the idea that comprehension involves constructing meaning through active engagement and interaction with the content . Teachers may provide clues or thematic insights prior to reading, enabling students to anticipate and connect with the material. This participatory approach values the reader's contribution, treating them as active creators of knowledge who interpret and integrate textual information contextually. Such a perspective is significant because it promotes a deeper, more reflective understanding of texts, empowering readers to engage critically and personally with what they read.

One potential challenge in applying the Pearson and Tierney Model is that it requires readers to actively participate and construct meaning, which can be difficult for students who are less engaged or struggle with critical thinking. Furthermore, this model demands a high degree of flexibility and creativity from both educators and students, which could be challenging in rigid curricula or standardized testing environments . To overcome these challenges, educators might focus on creating dynamic and interactive lesson plans that encourage discussion and personal interpretation of texts. Providing ample scaffolding, such as guided questioning and collaborative projects, can help students build the confidence necessary to engage as 'composers' of meaning. Additionally, fostering a classroom culture that values diverse perspectives and supports risk-taking in interpretation can mitigate resistance and nurture deeper engagement with texts.

Rumelhart's Model posits that activating pre-existing knowledge allows readers to approach texts with a greater contextual framework, easing the comprehension process by helping them relate new information to what they already know. As readers encounter familiar concepts within a text, the cognitive load is lessened, and comprehension is facilitated . This activation process aids in predicting and filling in gaps within the text, allowing readers to fluently connect ideas and themes while reading, thereby streamlining understanding and interpretation.

The Stanovich Model benefits poor readers through its top-down process, which leverages their existing knowledge about a topic to support comprehension while minimizing the focus on word recognition. By providing context or thematic clues beforehand, struggling readers can use their background knowledge to anticipate the content of the text, making the material more accessible . This approach builds confidence and reduces the cognitive overload often associated with decoding unfamiliar words, allowing students to focus on understanding the material itself. Consequently, this strategy enhances reading proficiency by emphasizing comprehension and engagement over precise word recognition, promoting a more holistic approach to reading.

You might also like