Performance Securing Declaration Template
Uploaded by
Joseph Raymund BautistaPerformance Securing Declaration Template
Uploaded by
Joseph Raymund Bautista- Performance Securing Declaration
Common questions
Powered by AIIf the supplier fails to submit the Performance Securing Declaration within the ten-day period after receiving the Notice of Award, they will not fulfill their conditional requirements to guarantee the faithful performance under the contract and may face automatic disqualification from future bids for a period of one year for the first offense or two years for a second offense, as per the Blacklisting Order policy .
The Performance Securing Declaration ensures compliance from the contractor by acting as a conditional tool that commits the contractor to fulfill their contractual obligations under threat of disqualification from future bids for non-compliance. However, its limitations include its reliance on compliance monitoring by the Procuring Entity and the fact that it ceases to be valid upon either issuing a Certificate of Final Acceptance, given no claims are filed, or being replaced by a performance security per Section 39.2 of the 2016 revised IRR of RA No. 9184 .
Replacing the Performance Securing Declaration with traditional performance securities may occur due to the latter's perceived higher assurance level, with tangible backing like bank guarantees. Procedurally, this transition is rationalized by ensuring enhanced confidence in financial accountability and contract execution reliability, which are more concretely represented in traditional securities .
The Performance Securing Declaration serves a dual role in risk management: it mitigates risks by assuring contract fulfillment with consequences for non-performance, and it manages bidder entry risks by providing an alternative to conventional sureties, potentially lowering financial barriers. Its effectiveness in risk management depends on rigorous oversight and its conditional penalty clauses, necessitating clear procurement process integration .
The Performance Securing Declaration includes protective measures such as the retention of punitive measures like blacklisting for non-compliance, which deters bidder default. It requires satisfactory conditions be met before the Declaration ceases, like the absence of claims and fulfilling contract terms, ensuring performance accountability .
Signing the Performance Securing Declaration binds the bidder to comply with the obligations under the contract according to the procuring entity's conditions. It exhibits a legal commitment with potential penalties, such as disqualification from future bidding, should the obligations not be met, hence maintaining legal and procedural accountability for contract performance .
The Performance Securing Declaration ceases to be valid under two key conditions: first, upon the issuance of the Certificate of Final Acceptance by the Procuring Entity, which requires no claims be filed against the contractor and fulfillment of other contractual terms; second, if replaced by a performance security in one of the forms prescribed under Section 39.2 of the 2016 revised IRR of RA No. 9184. The first condition emphasizes satisfactory contract completion, while the second provides a substitution option, highlighting differences in procedural focus .
Acknowledging the Blacklisting Order condition in the Performance Securing Declaration acts as a deterrent by explicitly linking non-compliance with severe consequences: a specified disqualification period from future procurements. This explicit risk discourages negligence and incentivizes bidders to rigorously adhere to their contractual obligations, maintaining a high compliance standard .
A Performance Securing Declaration can be a strategic advantage for bidders as it offers a flexible alternative to traditional performance securities, potentially reducing initial financial burdens and ensuring continued eligibility in future procurements if obligations are met. Conversely, it can be a disadvantage if the contractor fails to meet terms, leading to blacklisting and an inability to bid on future projects, thus requiring strategic planning and performance assurance from bidders .
Violation of the Performance Securing Declaration could significantly reduce a bidder's competitiveness by actively disqualifying them from future bids for one to two years, depending on offense history. This reduces market opportunities and signals unreliability to other potential clients, indirectly influencing their market standing and future profitability prospects .
