0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views3 pages

Theory of R-Modules: Direct Products & Sums

1. This chapter discusses modules over a ring R, including direct products, direct sums, and free modules of modules. 2. It defines commutative diagrams and establishes universal properties of direct products and direct sums of modules. 3. For a family of modules indexed by a set I, the direct product has a universal property such that there is a unique homomorphism from any other module to the direct product satisfying certain conditions. Dually, the direct sum has a universal property for homomorphisms in the other direction.

Uploaded by

Van Vi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views3 pages

Theory of R-Modules: Direct Products & Sums

1. This chapter discusses modules over a ring R, including direct products, direct sums, and free modules of modules. 2. It defines commutative diagrams and establishes universal properties of direct products and direct sums of modules. 3. For a family of modules indexed by a set I, the direct product has a universal property such that there is a unique homomorphism from any other module to the direct product satisfying certain conditions. Dually, the direct sum has a universal property for homomorphisms in the other direction.

Uploaded by

Van Vi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter 1: Further Theory of Modules

In this Chapter, we assume that R is a ring with identity 1 6= 0 and M


is a unita right R-module.

§1. Supplement to Direct Product, Direct Sum of


Modules and Free Modules.
1.1. Universal Properties.
1.1.1. Definition. The commutativity of the diagram (commutative square)
α
A −→ B

γ↓ ↓β
δ
D −→ C
indicates that βα = δγ.
The commutativity of the diagram (commutative triangular)
α
A −→ B

γ& ↓β

C
indicates that βα = γ.
Let R be a ring and (Ai |i ∈ I) be a family of right R-modules Ai , for
each i ∈ I and the direct product (direct sum, resp.) of the family (Ai |i ∈ I),
denoted by Y M
Ai ( Ai , resp.)
i∈I i∈I

We recall some following special homomorphisms:


Y
πj : Ai −→ Aj
i∈I

(ai )i∈I 7−→ aj


M Y
σ: Ai −→ Ai
i∈I ⊂∈I

Typeset by AMS-TEX

1
2

(ai )i∈I 7−→ (ai )i∈I


M
ηj : Aj −→ Ai
i∈I
a 7−→ (ti )i∈I
in which ti = 0 if i 6= j and ti = a if i = j.
Now we give the universal property of direct product of modules as fol-
lows:

1.1.2. Theorem. For every right R-module C and every family (γi |i ∈ I) of
right R-module homomorphisms γi : C −→ Ai , i ∈ I, there exists a unique
homomorphism Y
γ : C −→ Ai
i∈I
such that γi = πi γ, i ∈ I, i.e., the following diagram is commutative:
Q πi
Ai −→ Ai
i∈I

γ - ↑ γi

C
Proof. We give the disired mapping
Y
γ : C −→ Ai
i∈I
Let c ∈ C, we get Y
γ(c) = (γi (c))i∈I ∈ Ai .
i∈I
Then γ is a homomorphism and we have immediately
(πi γ)(c) = πi (γ(c)) = γi (c), c ∈ C,
thus γi = πi γ, ∀i ∈ I.
We continue proving the uniqueness of γ. Let also
Y
γ 0 : C −→ Ai
i∈I

such that γi (c) = (πi γ 0 )(c) = πi (γ 0 (c)), then it follows that


γ 0 (c) = (γi (c))i∈I = γ(c), ∀c ∈ C,
thus γ 0 = γ.

Dually, we give the universal property of direct sum of modules as follows:


3

1.1.3. Theorem. For every right R-module B and every family (βi |i ∈ I) of
right R-module homomorphisms βi : Ai −→ B, i ∈ I, there exists a unique
right R-module homomorphism
M
β: Ai −→ B
i∈I

such that βi = βηi , i ∈ I, i.e., the following diagram is commutative:


ηi
⊕ Ai ←− Ai
i∈I

β & ↓ βi

Proof. We also give the disired mapping


M
β: Ai −→ B
i∈I
L
Let (ai )i∈I ∈ Ai , we get
i∈I
X
β((ai )i∈I ) = βi (ai ) ∈ B.
i∈I

From the definition of ⊕Ai , the sum runs over the i ∈ I, however ai = 0 for all
except a finite number ai ∈ Ai , thus the sum is thereby meaningful. We also
have β is a homomorphism and

(βηi )(ai ) = β((ti )i∈I ) = βi (ai ), ai ∈ Ai ,

where all tj = 0 for all j ∈ I, except ti = ai . Thus βi = βηi , ∀i ∈ I.


We continue proving the uniqueness of β. Let also
M
β0 : Ai −→ B
i∈I

such that βi = β 0 ηi , then it follows that

βi (ai ) = β 0 ηi (ai ), ∀ai ∈ Ai ,

and every element from ⊕ Ai has a finite support, thus we deduce that β 0 = β.
i∈I

Common questions

Powered by AI

The uniqueness of homomorphisms ensures that mappings between modules are deterministic and predictable, preserving the module structure and facilitating further algebraic construction and analysis. This uniqueness, as exhibited in both direct product and direct sum universal properties, underlies the ability to extend module operations consistently and ensures the preservation of module homomorphism properties across complex constructions .

Module homomorphisms maintain structural integrity within algebraic systems by ensuring compatibility between module operations and preserving module attributes such as linearity and scalar multiplication. These mappings guarantee that several algebraic properties are retained under transformation, facilitating seamless integration or decomposition of module elements as required by operations such as direct sum and product, and supporting the creation of larger, complex algebraic systems .

The uniqueness of the homomorphism in direct sum \(\beta : \bigoplus_{i \in I} A_i \to B\) implies a clear and deterministic mechanism for constructing composite modules from component modules. It ensures that the algebraic operations performed are well-defined and consistent, fostering reliable module decomposition and reassembly into coherent composite structures. This determinism supports advanced algebraic manipulations and the study of module behavior across various contexts .

The universal property of the direct sum of modules concerns a family of homomorphisms \((\beta_i|i \in I)\) with each \(\beta_i : A_i \to B\), ensuring the existence of a unique homomorphism \(\beta : \bigoplus_{i \in I} A_i \to B\) such that \(\beta_i = \beta \eta_i\) for all \(i \in I\). The direct product property focuses on a co-domain family of homomorphisms from a single module C, while the direct sum property revolves around outgoing homomorphisms to a single module B with finite support conditions, allowing for the meaningful summation involved in \(\beta\).

Commutative diagrams in module theory serve as a visual and logical tool to express relationships between morphisms. They ensure a structured integrity where different paths through the diagram lead to the same result. For example, in a commutative square diagram, if \(\alpha, \beta, \gamma, \delta\) are morphisms such that \(\beta \alpha = \delta \gamma\), the diagram confirms the compatibility of these mappings .

In triangular diagrams, the commutative property indicates that different pathways through the diagram, such as \(\beta \alpha = \gamma\), yield the same result. This property is crucial as it validates the relationships and transformations between module elements, thus ensuring that composed mappings preserve the structure and compatibility of modules. It simplifies complex interactions among morphisms, providing clarity and closure in theoretical proofs and applications .

The finiteness condition ensures that in a direct sum, \(\bigoplus_{i \in I} A_i\), only finitely many components \(a_i\) are non-zero for any element. This makes the sum meaningful and ensures that the homomorphism \(\beta((a_i)_{i \in I}) = \sum_{i \in I} \beta_i(a_i)\) is well-defined. Without this condition, the possibly infinite sum could lead to indeterminacy, obstructing a coherent algebraic structure .

Universal properties act as guiding principles that unify diverse algebraic operations under a common framework, providing a standardized way to construct, decompose, and analyze complex structures. By specifying unique mappings between different structures, these properties ensure consistent characteristics and behaviors across operations like product and sum, enabling mathematicians to derive broader theoretical insights from specific properties and relationships .

The universal property of the direct product of modules states that for every right R-module C and every family \((\gamma_i|i \in I)\) of right R-module homomorphisms \(\gamma_i : C \to A_i\), there exists a unique homomorphism \(\gamma : C \to \prod_{i \in I} A_i\) such that \(\gamma_i = \pi_i \gamma\) for all \(i \in I\). The proof involves defining a map \(\gamma\) such that for any \(c \in C\), \(\gamma(c) = (\gamma_i(c))_{i \in I}\). This map is shown to be a homomorphism by checking that \(\pi_i(\gamma(c)) = \gamma_i(c)\) for each \(c \in C\). The uniqueness of \(\gamma\) follows by showing any other homomorphism \(\gamma'\) with the same property must satisfy \(\gamma'(c) = \gamma(c)\) for all \(c \in C\).

\(\pi_i\) and \(\eta_i\) are special homomorphisms associated with the universal properties of modules. \(\pi_i\) maps elements from the direct product \(\prod_{i \in I} A_i\) to individual modules \(A_i\), effectively projecting a component from the product. Conversely, \(\eta_i\) maps elements from individual modules \(A_i\) to the direct sum \(\bigoplus_{i \in I} A_i\), embedding each element by emphasizing its role within a broader structure. These mappings ensure coherent construction and deconstruction of module elements .

You might also like