Scribd
Upload
9 views7 pages

Design Analysis of 203x203x46 UKC Section

1) The document analyzes and designs columns in a building with multiple floors. 2) It calculates the compression forces, nominal moments, and checks the adequacy of a 203x203x46 UKC cross section for the roof floor, second floor, and first floor columns. 3) For each column, it determines the section satisfies design criteria with factors of safety below 1.0.

Uploaded by

Jong_Tien_Iou_7605
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
9 views7 pages

Design Analysis of 203x203x46 UKC Section

1) The document analyzes and designs columns in a building with multiple floors. 2) It calculates the compression forces, nominal moments, and checks the adequacy of a 203x203x46 UKC cross section for the roof floor, second floor, and first floor columns. 3) For each column, it determines the section satisfies design criteria with factors of safety below 1.0.

Uploaded by

Jong_Tien_Iou_7605
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Column F1

From Roof Floor to Second Floor


1/E-F 1/F-H
Compression = 25.45kN

F/1-2

Try Section 203x203x46 UKC


ANALYSIS
DESIGN COMPRESSION FORCE
Reaction from Beam 1/F-H = 3 kN
Reaction from Beam F/1-2 = 50.8 kN
Reaction from Beam 1/E-F= 3 kN
Design Compression from truss= 25.45kN
Total Compression force in Roof Floor column
NEd = 3 + 3 + 50.8 + 25.45 = 82.3 kN
Nominal moments
M2,y,Ed = F2,d(h/2+100) = (3-3)kN x (203.2/2+100)mm = 0 kNm
M2,z,Ed = (F1,d – F3,d)(tw+100) = (50.8) x (7.2/2 +100)mm = 5.21kNm
Distribution of Nominal Moments
About y-y axis: My,Ed = 0 kNm
About z-z axis: Mz,Ed = 5.21kNm

Design
Classification of Cross Section
c 235
tf
=8<9 ε ; ε=

d
fy√ 235
tw
=22.3<33 ε ; ε=
√ fy
Section 203x203x46 UKC is Class 1
Checking Criteria:
N Ed M y , Ed M z ,Ed
+ +1.5 ≤1.0
N min, b , Rd M y ,b , Rd M z ,b , Rd
Nmin,b,Rd
Buckling Resistance about y-y axis, Ny,b,Rd
χy A f y
N y , b , Rd=
γM1
Slenderness abouy y-y axis
Lcr 3000
λ́= = =0.39
i y λ1 88.2× 86.39
Selection of buckling curve:
h/b = 203.2/203.6 = 1 < 1.2 and tf = 11mm<100mm,
curve “b” , α = 0.34
2
Therefore, ϕ y =0.5 [ 1+∝ ( λ y −0.2 )+ λ y ] =0.61
1
χy= =1.19
ϕ y + √ ϕ y 2−λ y 2
Buckling Resistance about y-y axis, Ny,b,Rd
χ Af y
N z ,b , Rd = z
γM1
Slenderness abouy y-y axis
L 3000
λ́= cr = =0.68
i y λ1 51.3× 86.39
Selection of buckling curve:
h/b = 203.2/203.6 = 1 < 1.2 and tf = 11mm<100mm,
curve “c” , α = 0.49
2
Therefore, ϕ y =0.5 [ 1+∝ ( λ y −0.2 )+ λ y ] =0.85
1
χy= =0.76
ϕ y + √ ϕ y 2−λ y 2
χ A f y 0.76 ×5870 ×275
N min ,b , Rd = z = =1226.8 kN
γM1 1.0

Lateral Torsional Buckling Resistance


h/b = 203.2/203.6 = 1.0<2, curve “b”,α = 0.34
Wyf y
λ ¿=
√
M cr
, where

π 2 E I z I w L2 G I T
M cr =C1
L2
3
497 ×10 ×275
√ +
I z π2 E I z
=564.0 kNm

λ ¿=
√
Therefore,
564 ×106
=0.49

ϕ ¿=0.5 [ 1+∝ ( λ¿ −0.4 )+ 0.75 λ ¿2 ]=0.61


1
χ¿= =1.03
ϕ¿ + √ ϕ¿2− λ¿2
497 ×103 ×275 −6
M y ,b , Rd =1.03× ×10 =140.78 kNm
1.0
W pl , z f y 231 ×103 ×275 −6
M z ,b , Rd= = × 10 =63.5 kNm
γM1 1.0

82.3 0 5.21
+ +1.5 =0.19<1.0
1226.8 140.78 63.5

SECTION 203 X 203 X 46 UKC IS ADEQUATE.


From 2nd Floor to 1st Floor
1/E-F 1/F-H
Compression = 82.3kN

F/1-2

Try Section 203x203x46 UKC


ANALYSIS
DESIGN COMPRESSION FORCE
Reaction from Beam 1/F-H = 181.94 kN
Reaction from Beam F/1-2 = 26.73 kN
Reaction from Beam 1/E-F= 138.25 kN
Design Compression from the Roof Plan = 82.3kN
Total Compression force in Second Floor column
NEd = 181.94 + 26.73 + 138.25 + 82.3 = 429.22 kN
Nominal moments
Consider nominal moments at First Floor because these moments will be transferred to Second
Floor column.
M2,y,Ed = F2,d(h/2+100) = (181.94 – 138.25)kN x (203.2/2+100)mm = 8.81 kNm
M2,z,Ed = (F1,d – F3,d)(tw+100) = (26.73) x (7.2/2 +100)mm = 2.77kNm
KR2 = K21 = EI/3
Distribution of Nominal Moments
About y-y axis: My,Ed = 8.81 x 0.5 = 4.41 kNm
About z-z axis: Mz,Ed = 2.77 x 0.5 = 1.39kNm
Design
Classification of Cross Section
c 235
tf
=8<9 ε ; ε=

d
√fy
235
tw √
=22.3<33 ε ; ε=
fy
Section 203x203x46 UKC is Class 1
Checking Criteria:
N Ed M y , Ed M z ,Ed
+ +1.5 ≤1.0
N min, b , Rd M y ,b , Rd M z ,b , Rd
Nmin,b,Rd
Buckling Resistance about y-y axis, Ny,b,Rd
χ Afy
N y , b , Rd= y
γM1
Slenderness abouy y-y axis
L 3000
λ́= cr = =0.39
i y λ1 88.2× 86.39
Selection of buckling curve:
h/b = 203.2/203.6 = 1 < 1.2 and tf = 11mm<100mm,
curve “b” , α = 0.34
2
Therefore, ϕ y =0.5 [ 1+∝ ( λ y −0.2 )+ λ y ] =0.61
1
χy= =1.19
ϕ y + √ ϕ y 2−λ y 2
Buckling Resistance about y-y axis, Ny,b,Rd
χz A f y
N z ,b , Rd =
γM1
Slenderness abouy y-y axis
Lcr 3000
λ́= = =0.68
i y λ1 51.3× 86.39
Selection of buckling curve:
h/b = 203.2/203.6 = 1 < 1.2 and tf = 11mm<100mm,
curve “c” , α = 0.49
2
Therefore, ϕ y =0.5 [ 1+∝ ( λ y −0.2 )+ λ y ] =0.85
1
χy= =0.76
ϕ y + √ ϕ y 2−λ y 2
χ z A f y 0.76 ×5870 ×275
N min ,b , Rd = = =1226.8 kN
γM1 1.0
Lateral Torsional Buckling Resistance
h/b = 203.2/203.6 = 1.0<2, curve “b”,α = 0.34
Wyf y
λ ¿=
√
M cr
, where

π 2 E I z I w L2 G I T
M cr =C1
L2
+
√
I z π2 E I z
3
497 ×10 ×275
=564.0 kNm

λ ¿=
√
Therefore,
564 ×106
=0.49

ϕ ¿=0.5 [ 1+∝ ( λ¿ −0.4 )+ 0.75 λ ¿2 ]=0.61


1
χ¿= =1.03
ϕ¿ + √ ϕ¿2− λ¿2
497 ×103 ×275 −6
M y ,b , Rd =1.03× ×10 =140.78 kNm
1.0
W pl , z f y 231 ×103 ×275 −6
M z ,b , Rd= = × 10 =63.5 kNm
γM1 1.0

429.22 4.41 1.39


+ +1.5 =0.41<1.0
1226.8 140.78 63.5

SECTION 203 X 203 X 46 UKC IS ADEQUATE.

From 1st Floor to Ground Floor


1/E-F 1/F-H
Compression = 429.22kN

F/1-2

Try Section 203x203x46 UKC


ANALYSIS
DESIGN COMPRESSION FORCE
Reaction from Beam 1/F-H = 212.82 kN
Reaction from Beam F/1-2 = 26.4 kN
Reaction from Beam 1/E-F= 130.15 kN
Design Compression from the Second Floor = 422.92kN
Total Compression force in First Floor column
NEd = 130.15 + 212.82 + 26.4 + 422.92 = 798.59 kN
Nominal moments
M2,y,Ed = F2,d(h/2+100) = (212.82 – 130.15)kN x (203.2/2+100)mm = 16.67 kNm
M2,z,Ed = (F1,d – F3,d)(tw+100) = (26.73) x (7.2/2 +100)mm = 2.77kNm
KR2 = K21 = EI/3
Distribution of Nominal Moments
About y-y axis: My,Ed = 16.67kNm
About z-z axis: Mz,Ed = 2.77 kNm
Design
Classification of Cross Section
c 235
tf
=8<9 ε ; ε=

d
√
fy
235
tw
=22.3<33 ε ; ε=
√ fy
Section 203x203x46 UKC is Class 1
Checking Criteria:
N Ed M y , Ed M z ,Ed
+ +1.5 ≤1.0
N min, b , Rd M y ,b , Rd M z ,b , Rd
Nmin,b,Rd
Buckling Resistance about y-y axis, Ny,b,Rd
χ Afy
N y , b , Rd= y
γM1
Slenderness abouy y-y axis
L 3000
λ́= cr = =0.39
i y λ1 88.2× 86.39
Selection of buckling curve:
h/b = 203.2/203.6 = 1 < 1.2 and tf = 11mm<100mm,
curve “b” , α = 0.34
2
Therefore, ϕ y =0.5 [ 1+∝ ( λ y −0.2 )+ λ y ] =0.61
1
χy= =1.19
ϕ y + √ ϕ y 2−λ y 2
Buckling Resistance about y-y axis, Ny,b,Rd
χz A f y
N z ,b , Rd =
γM1
Slenderness abouy y-y axis
Lcr 3000
λ́= = =0.68
i y λ1 51.3× 86.39
Selection of buckling curve:
h/b = 203.2/203.6 = 1 < 1.2 and tf = 11mm<100mm,
curve “c” , α = 0.49
2
Therefore, ϕ y =0.5 [ 1+∝ ( λ y −0.2 )+ λ y ] =0.85
1
χy= =0.76
ϕ y + √ ϕ y 2−λ y 2
χ z A f y 0.76 ×5870 ×275
N min ,b , Rd = = =1226.8 kN
γM1 1.0
Lateral Torsional Buckling Resistance
h/b = 203.2/203.6 = 1.0<2, curve “b”,α = 0.34
Wyf y
λ ¿=
√ M cr
, where

π 2 E I z I w L2 G I T
M cr =C1
L2
3
√ +
I z π2 E I z
497 ×10 ×275
=564.0 kNm

λ ¿=
√
Therefore,
564 ×106
=0.49

ϕ ¿=0.5 [ 1+∝ ( λ¿ −0.4 )+ 0.75 λ ¿2 ]=0.61


1
χ¿= =1.03
ϕ¿ + √ ϕ¿2− λ¿2
497 ×103 ×275 −6
M y ,b , Rd =1.03× ×10 =140.78 kNm
1.0
W f 231 ×103 ×275
M z ,b , Rd= pl , z y = × 10−6 =63.5 kNm
γM1 1.0

798.59 16.67 2.77


+ +1.5 =0.83<1.0
1226.8 140.78 63.5

SECTION 203 X 203 X 46 UKC IS ADEQUATE.

You might also like