100% found this document useful (4 votes)
243 views7 pages

Swimming Pool Structural Design Calculations

The document provides calculations for lateral load (F1, F2, F3), earthquake load analysis, and moment capacity of a 1m wall strip. It also includes designs for steel reinforcement of a footing, considering wide beam shear and two-way punching shear. Key parameters calculated include lateral loads, base shear, seismic coefficients, period of vibration, moment capacity, footing dimensions, steel reinforcement diameter and area.

Uploaded by

Frederick Quinto
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (4 votes)
243 views7 pages

Swimming Pool Structural Design Calculations

The document provides calculations for lateral load (F1, F2, F3), earthquake load analysis, and moment capacity of a 1m wall strip. It also includes designs for steel reinforcement of a footing, considering wide beam shear and two-way punching shear. Key parameters calculated include lateral loads, base shear, seismic coefficients, period of vibration, moment capacity, footing dimensions, steel reinforcement diameter and area.

Uploaded by

Frederick Quinto
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Lateral Load Calculations
  • Earthquake Load Analysis
  • Load Cases
  • Reaction Summary
  • Moment Capacity Calculation
  • Designing Steel Reinforcement for Footing
  • Design of Reinforcement

LATERAL LOAD CALCULATIONS

F1 Calculation

γsat1 = 20.00 kN/cu.m


φ1 = 30.00 degrees
H1 = 1.39 m

k1 = 0.33
P1 = γsat1 *k1*H1
= 9.27 kN
F1 = P1*H1
= 12.88 kN

F2 Calculation

γ= 10.00 kN/cu.m
φ2 = 0.00 degrees
H2 = 1.39 m

k2 = 1.00
P2 = γsat2 *k2*H2
= 13.90 kN
F2 = 0.5*P2*H2
= 9.66 kN

F3 Calculation

γsat3 = 10.00 kN/cu.m


φ3 = 0.00 degrees
H3 = 0.71 m

k3 = 1.00
P3 = γsat3*k3*H3
= 7.10 kN
F3= 0.5*P3*H3
= 2.52 kN
Earthquake Load Analysis

Computation of Total Weight of Structural Frame


Volume kN/sq.m/kN/cu.m Weight (kN)
Walls 46.19 24 1108.56
Slabs 54.01 24 1296.24

1m Strip 2404.80
160.32

Soil Profile Type SD


Seismic zone gactor Z = 0.4 (Table 208-3)
Near Source factor Na = 1.05 (Table 208-5) Na Table 208-5 Nv Table 208-6
Near Source factor Nv = 1.3 (Table 208-6) 5 1.2 5 1.6
Seismic coefficient Ca = 0.462 (Table 208-7) 8.7 1.05 8.7 1.3
Seismic coefficient Cv = 0.832 (Table 208-8) 10 1 10 1.2
Importance factor I = 1.25 (Table 208-1)
Numerical coefficient R = 4.5 (Table 208-11)

Numerical coefficient for frame Ct = 0.0731


Total height Hn = 3.6 m

0.75
Period of vibration T = Ct Hn 0.19 sec

Total Seismic Dead Load W = 160.32 kN


Base shear V = Cv I W / (RT) 193.94 kN
V should not be less than V1 = 0.11 Ca I W 10.18 kN < 193.94 kN OK
V should not be less thanV2 = 0.80 Z Nv IW / R (for Zone 4) 18.53 kN < 193.94 kN OK
V need not exceed V3 = 2.50 Ca I W / R 51.44 kN < 193.94 kN OK
Use V = 51.44 kN

Additional lateral force concentrated at top of the structure Ft:


If T > 0.7 sec, Ft = 0.07V T but not exceeding 0.25V 0.25V = 48.48 kN
If T < 0.7 sec, Ft = 0
Ft = 0

Lateral Forces acting on the structure


Earthquake Loads (Input as Joint Loads to STAAD)
Level Wx (kN) hx (m) Wx hx (kN-m) Fx = Wx hx (V-Ft)/∑Wx hx) Z - Direction - Z - Direction X - Direction -X - Direction EL +X EL -X EL +Z EL -Z
Pool Top 160.32 3.60 577.15 51.44 3 3 3 3 17.15 17.15 17.15 17.15
Moment Capacity of 1m Wall strip

Given:
Wall Width, B= 1000.0 mm
Wall Thickness,H= 200.0 mm
Number of Tension Reinforcement= 5.0 pcs
or 212.50 mm
Diameter of Tension Reinforcement= 12.0 mm
Number of Compression Reinforcement= 5.0 pcs
Diameter of Compression Reinforcement= 12.0 mm
or 212.50 mm
Concrete Cover= 75.0 mm
fc'= 17.24 MPa
fy= 270.0 MPa

Solution:
Effective Depth, D= 119.0 mm
Steel Area, As= 565.49 [Link]
Steel Area, As'=As2= 565.49 [Link]
Concrete Area, Ac= 23,800.0 [Link]

As1= .0 [Link]

a= .0 mm

β1= 0.85
c= .0 mm

d'= 81.0
fs'= -108131641329.25 MPa

If fs' > fy, Mu is:

Mu= 5.22 kN-m

If fs'< fy, Mu is:

c= 49.93 mm
a= 42.44 mm

fs'= -373.28 MPa


Mu= 47.51 kN-m

since fs' < fy, Mu = 47.51 kN-m

Use:

200mm THK. WITH


Ø12-200 EACH FACE, EACH WAY
FOR TYPICAL SLAB ON GRADE AND WALLS
Designing Steel Reinforcement for Footing

Given:
P= 83.33 kN
Pu= 125.0 kN
Depth from Top of Soil To Footing Base= 800.0 mm
Soil Bearing Capacity, qa= 100.0 kPa
Assumed Depth of Footing= 400.0 mm
Unit Weigth of Soil, γsoil= 16.0 kN/cu.m
Unit Weigth of Concrete, γconcrete= 23.50 kN/cu.m
Preferred Length of Footing, L= 1.0 m
Diameter of Reinforcement= 12.0 mm
Concrete Cover From the base= 75.0 mm
Wall Width, c= 200.0 mm
fc'= 20.700 MPa
fy= 275.00 MPa
Solution:
Effective Soil Bearing Capacity, qe= qa-sum(γh)
= 84.20 kPa
Area of Footing= P / qe
= .99 sq.m
Computed Footing Dimension, W= .99 m

Ultimate Soil Bearing Capacity, qu= 0.126 MPa

Considering Wide Beam Shear


Vu= qu x (L/2-c/2-d) x W
Vc= 1/6 sqrt(fc') b d
Vu= ф Vc

Along Length, D= 65.54 mm


Along Width, D= 64.70 mm

Considering Wide Two-Way Punching Shear


Vu= qu (L W - (c + d)^2
Vc= 1/3 sqrt(fc') 4(c + d) d

a= 5.28
b= 1,081.79
c= (119,948.00)
depth, D= 80.0 mm

Use the biggest size of computed d.


D= 150.0 mm
Overall Depth, H= 231.0 mm
Design of Reinforcement

Mw= 10.0 kN-m

ML= 9.85 kN-m


Ruw= .498963
RuL= .486206

ρW = .001841
ρL= .001793
ρmin= 1.4/fy
= .005091
β1= 0.85
ρb= .037292
ρmax= .027969

Since ρw<ρmin, use ρmin


Use ρW= .005091
Since ρL<ρmin, use ρmin
Use ρL= .005091
Asw= 755.78 [Link]
AsL= 763.64 [Link]

Number of Bars Along Width= 7.0 pcs


Number of Bars Along Length= 7.0 pcs

USE:

300Dx1000W STRIP FOOTING


7-Ø12 ALONG
Ø12-200 ACROSS

Common questions

Powered by AI

Seismic coefficients Ca and Cv are critical in influencing the design of structural frames, as they reflect the expected ground motion parameters and hazard level of a site. Coefficients are used to calculate design seismic forces where Ca pertains to the acceleration at short periods and Cv involves long periods. Correct values of Ca and Cv ensure base shear (V) calculations are representative of real potential seismic forces. This assessment guides the material strength, resilience, and detailing force demand provisions in the structure, ensuring its strength and deformation align with safe seismic performance while avoiding overdesign .

Comparing the calculated base shear with multiple threshold values ensures the structural design adheres to minimum and maximum safety criteria under seismic loading. These thresholds are based on different considerations like building importance, seismic zones, and factor sensitivities. For example, V should not be less than values related to minimum requirement (V1 = 0.11CaIW) or a zone-specific magnitude (V2 = 0.80ZNvIW/R). Additionally, V need not exceed maximum capacity thresholds (V3 = 2.50CaIW/R). This comprehensive checking helps derive a shear force that adequately prepares the structure for potential hyperstatic conditions without overestimating load requirements .

Using a minimum reinforcement ratio in footing design is important to ensure adequate safety margins against cracking and to provide ductile structural behavior. This ratio prevents brittle failure under ultimate loads by maintaining a balance between concrete and steel, promoting a controlled post-yield deformation. The minimum reinforcement ratio is determined as ρmin = 1.4/fy, where fy is the yield strength of the steel. This calculation ensures a baseline level of reinforcement irrespective of the structural loads, preventing under-reinforcement and ensuring robustness of the footing under expected service conditions .

The period of vibration (T) in seismic design is critical because it influences the additional lateral force (Ft) calculation. For structures with T > 0.7 sec, Ft is determined using Ft = 0.07V * T but is limited to 0.25V. This ensures the structure's dynamic response accurately reflects potential seismic forces, preventing under-design. T is determined by the expression T = Ct * Hn^0.75 where Ct is a coefficients, and Hn represents the total height of the structure, serving as a determinant of the building's stiffness and mass distribution properties .

Soil depth (H) and thickness directly influence the calculation of lateral earth pressure through the pressure equation P = γ * k * H, where γ is the soil density, k is the lateral earth pressure coefficient, and H is the depth. Greater soil depth results in higher earth pressure due to increased weight and potential overburden stress. Thickness affects the passive and active earth pressure coefficients, which change with soil type and conditions such as water content. These parameters determine the lateral force exerted on the retaining wall (e.g., F = P * H) and directly impact the design and stability considerations for walls .

Using an incorrect seismic importance factor (I) can significantly impact the assessment of base shear, leading to either underestimation or overestimation of the seismic forces acting on a structure. This factor scales the seismic coefficient, affecting the calculated base shear (V = Cv I W / (RT)). An underestimated I could result in inadequate structural design and potential failure during an earthquake, whereas an overestimated I may lead to an unnecessarily costly design without added benefit to structural safety. An accurate assignment of I is critical for compliance with safety standards and to ensure both economical and safe structural design .

When selecting reinforcement for a footing, it is crucial to match the soil's bearing capacity with the anticipated structural loads. First, determine the correct soil bearing capacity, factoring in effective depths and unit weights of materials (qe = qa - sum(γh)). The footing size is computed based on the updated bearing capacity to ensure load transfer efficiency (Area of Footing = P / qe). Reinforcement is then designed based on the footing dimensions, ensuring compliance with minimum reinforcement ratios (e.g., ρmin = 1.4/fy) and accommodating stress results from bending moments (Mw, ML). Correct bar sizing, spacing, and lengthwise distribution should confirm that the footing can sustain bending and shear demands .

Soil unit weight is crucial for determining the effective soil bearing capacity as it contributes to the summation of vertical stresses acting on the soil, affecting bearing capacity calculations (qe = qa - sum(γh), where γ is the unit weight and h is depth). The correct estimation of γ ensures that the supporting soil will not exceed its bearing capacity under structural loads and provides a precise calculation of the necessary footing area to ensure stability and prevent settlements jeopardizing structural integrity .

When tension reinforcement in a structural section does not yield, the moment capacity is determined by the condition fs' < fy, where fs' is the stress in the steel and fy is the yield strength of the steel. In such cases, the moment arm a, and the compressive force depth parameter c are recalculated. For example, when fs' < fy, Mu (moment capacity) is calculated as c = 49.93 mm with a corresponding moment Mu = 47.51 kN-m . This involves using the stress distribution calculations and considering the least value between steel stress and concrete crushing strength to find a conservative moment capacity for the section .

The lateral load on a structure is calculated by summing up contributions from static lateral loads and earthquake-induced loads. For static loads, lateral loads are calculated using parameters like the density of the soil (γsat), height (H), and lateral earth pressure coefficient (k) to find the pressure (P) and force (F) exerted (e.g., P1 = γsat1 * k1 * H1 for the first soil layer). For earthquake loads, important factors include the weight of the structural frame (W = 160.32 kN), seismic coefficients (Ca, Cv), the period of vibration (T), and the base shear (V). Calculations align the base shear V based on magnitude so that it does not exceed or go below predefined thresholds related to the seismic zone, structures' importance, and more .

LATERAL LOAD CALCULATIONS
F1 Calculation
 γsat1 =
20.00
kN/cu.m
φ1 =
30.00
degrees
H1 =
1.39
m
k1 =
0.33
P1 = γsat1 *k1*H1
=
Earthquake Load Analysis 
Computation of Total Weight of Structural Frame
Volume
kN/sq.m/kN/cu.m
Weight (kN)
Walls
46.19
24
1
Given:
Wall Width, B=
1000.0 mm
Wall Thickness,H=
200.0 mm
Number of Tension Reinforcement=
5.0 pcs
or
212.50 mm
Diameter of
Given:
P=
83.33 kN
Pu=
125.0 kN
Depth from Top of Soil To Footing Base=
800.0 mm
Soil Bearing Capacity, qa=
100.0 kPa
Assumed
Design of Reinforcement
Mw=
10.0 kN-m
ML=
9.85 kN-m
Ruw=
.498963
RuL=
.486206
ρW=
.001841
ρL=
.001793
ρmin=
1.4/fy
=
.005091

You might also like