0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views84 pages

Understanding Development Finances

The document discusses key concepts in development finances, including: - Developers make money by investing capital to create new value from a development. - They use leverage, borrowing from banks at a fixed interest rate to increase their investment. - For a development to be profitable, the new value must exceed total costs (interest paid and developer's original investment) so the developer earns a return and profit. - Developers assess potential developments through financial appraisals to forecast costs and new value to determine if a project is worth undertaking.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views84 pages

Understanding Development Finances

The document discusses key concepts in development finances, including: - Developers make money by investing capital to create new value from a development. - They use leverage, borrowing from banks at a fixed interest rate to increase their investment. - For a development to be profitable, the new value must exceed total costs (interest paid and developer's original investment) so the developer earns a return and profit. - Developers assess potential developments through financial appraisals to forecast costs and new value to determine if a project is worth undertaking.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

'Without development, there is no profit,

without profit, no development'


J A Schumpter, economist (1883-1950)

Professional studies
levels 4&5

Development finances
The purpose of this workshop is for you to appreciate some of
the factors in development finances. It will not give you a full
understanding

CAUTION! SIMPLIFICATION
You need to be awake for this. At the end, you will have to do
some work, so make sure you're following the explanation and
ask questions if you feel lost.
The context
Change, or die….
First: about costs
Costs in the design process (typical)
Costs in the design process (typical)

agreed budget
Costs in the design process (typical)

 agreed budget

cost plan
Costs in the design process (typical)

 agreed budget
check
cost plan
Costs in the design process (typical)

 agreed budget

 cost plan

pre-tender estimate
(PTE)
Costs in the design process (typical)

 agreed budget

 cost plan

 pre-tender estimate

tender price
Costs in the design process (typical)

 agreed budget

 cost plan

 pre-tender estimate

CONTRACT SUM
Costs in the design process (typical)

 agreed budget

 cost plan

 pre-tender estimate

 CONTRACT SUM

variations
Variations?

WARNING! costs may go up (though rarely down)


Buildings are complicated and usually bespoke.
There is always a trade-off

the control triangle


COST

QUALITY TIME

This is probably the most difficult area of a project and where disputes usually occur,
because money is committed at this point
Quantity surveyor

Tools: Methods / services:

BCIS Measurement:
Building Cost SMM
Information Standard Method of
System Measurement

Price books  Planning


(Spons)
 Estimating

 Bills

 Procurement advice
Typical cost plan structure (very low level of detail)

Item quantity Rate (cost per unit / area) Total £


Substructure length, area, volume £/m or £/msq
Structure or number or £/item
Services
External envelope
Internal walls and ceilings
Internal finishes
Fixtures and fittings
External works

Prelim.s site setup costs (anticipated) %


OH&P overheads and profit (anticipated) %

Contingency (client's contingency) %

£
So, in parallel with the design process, costs are estimated in
increasing detail and these are checked back against the budget

This provides a clear reporting process for those investing their


money (the client)
So, in parallel with the design process, costs are estimated in
increasing detail and these are checked back against the budget

This provides a clear reporting process for those investing their


money (the client)

As you know more about the design, you know more about the
cost. If costs go up and beyond the budget, you can make
changes to make savings
All fairly straightforward, but there's an important question that
architects often don't (or can't) ask:
All fairly straightforward, but there's an important question that
architects often don't (or can't) ask:

Where does the budget come from?

(part of the reason we’re in trouble…)


'Without development, there is no profit,
without profit, no development'
J A Schumpter, economist (1883-1950)
The world changed in the 1980s
If you want to know how, these are a good place to start

and also... Marshall Berman's All that is solid melts into air
Speculative development is the current hegemony

Most construction clients are developers

To understand where budgets come from, you need to appreciate


what developers do

Nonetheless, the state remains an important part of the construction industry. Public
sector finances have different implications from private finance and these are briefly
discussed later.
So what do developers do?
So what do developers do?

They create value

or to put it another way,

they make money out of money

(usually other people's money)


So what do developers do?

They create value

or to put it another way,

they make money out of money

(usually other people's money)

That's it.

(design? Architecture?)
Some key concepts about development finances:

Money has to earn its keep.


Unless money earns more money, it loses value.

So time and money are intrinsically linked:


Time really is money.
Some key concepts about development finances:

Banks hold a lot of money that needs to be put to use, so they will
happily loan it, at a cost (interest)
Some key concepts about development finances:

Banks hold a lot of money that needs to be put to use, so they will
happily loan it, at a cost (interest)

A developer invests the bank's money in a project that he estimates


will earn more than it costs to borrow the money.
Some key concepts about development finances:

Banks hold a lot of money that needs to be put to use, so they will
happily loan it, at a cost (interest)

A developer invests the bank's money in a project that he estimates


will earn more than it costs to borrow the money.

This difference is his profit


Some key concepts about development finances:

Essentially its a calculated gamble: the developer earns his profit


by taking risk

Risk has a value, that can be traded

(so the developer takes a greater risk than the bank, to create his
profit margin – in theory)
An illustration

A developer uses some of his own money as a basis to borrow


more money from the bank

Developer's £
Gearing or Leverage is the ratio of the developer's investment to
the bank's eg. 4:1 gives a total investment of £5

Developer's £1

Total investment
Bank's £4
The total investment is put to work to create a new value
(by the developer)

New value
eg. £7
Investment £5

Time of development
The difference between the new value and the investment is the
return

Return £2

Investment £5
Return £2

(this is called the internal return – it is not the same as the developer's return, or profit)
The return on the investment has to pay the cost of the leveraged
part of the investment, before the developer makes a profit

Profit £1
Interest £1 Developer's £1

Bank's £4 Profit as a % of original


investment

Interest charged as a
% of amount borrowed

This is the case when the bank charges a fixed rate of interest and the developer takes all
the risk for the development. There are different mechanisms for transferring risk
So, in this scenario everybody wins

The return is large enough so that the bank can earn its interest
and the developer can still make a profit

But, where is the risk?


What if the return is less than the interest?

Interest £2 Return £1

Investment £5
What if the return is less than the interest?

Developer's £1
Interest £2 Return £1

Investment £5

If the bank's interest rate is fixed, then the developer would have
to pay the difference

Then he loses: it has cost him money to do the project


So, before taking on a project, a developer needs to assess
whether it is worth doing:

a development appraisal

Is this difference big


enough?

The forecasted
All the costs new value
First, he needs to forecast all the costs

CAPITAL REVENUE

All the costs


CAPITAL REVENUE

Land costs Management

Design fees Maintenance

Management fees Servicing

Overheads Repairs

Statutory fees Marketing


All the costs
Tax

Construction
costs

Marketing
Then, forecast the return

CAPITAL REVENUE

New value Rent


(derived from the
revenue) Service charges

The return,
or the new value
In forecasting both costs and returns, time becomes important

A cashflow illustration:

income

time

cost
In a typical construction project, costs are mainly incurred at the
start:

income
Land, construction etc.

time

cost
Once the building(s) are completed, they can open for business
and operational costs are incurred (management, maintenance
etc.)

opening
income
operation costs

time

cost
At the same time, income is generated, eg. through rents

income

time

cost
operation
income

It is normal for buildings not to be fully rented, all of the time and this would be forecast
in the cashflow – known as ‘voids’
In this scenario, a lot of cost is incurred before any income is
generated

income

time

cost

Cumulative
costs

Debt peak
(minus
developer's
investment)
But at the same time, the new land and buildings have a capital
value to offset the costs (let's say the same as the costs)

Capital value

income

time

cost
Through the development, the developer is converting
investment into capital assets (land, buildings etc.)

But the value of assets are not fixed, they fluctuate according to
the market demand.

The market demand is ultimately dependent on the forecasted


revenue income in the future.
If the market falls significantly, the
value of assets falls, against the
investment
Capital value

value

time

investment

Investment
If the market falls significantly, the
value of assets falls, against the
investment
Capital value

value

time

investment

Investment
The balance becomes negative –
the developer has spent more than
he can cover with the value of the
assets

If developers have a high ratio of


debts to assets, they can become
value bankrupt very quickly

time

investment
Negative
balance of cost
to value
Whilst the developer keeps hold of the asset, he is exposed to
risk.

Development companies are vehicles for borrowing money,


generating value through assets and realising the value through
quick disposal.

They take a high level of risk, for a relatively short period of time
then sell their assets to other lower geared companies.

eg. residential developments, are sold to individuals who take out mortgages with
banks, who are not so highly geared and so can carry the risk better (in theory!)

PFI (Private Finance Initiative) or similar arrangements are different as the developer
continues to own the asset for a period of time (say 30 years), but they have a virtually
guaranteed income and value as the tenant is usually the state.
Development sold to realise
An idealised situation: new value (= investment +
internal return)

Capital value

Development Cost and income realised


risk period by new owner

income

time

cost

Investment
In order to carry out his appraisal before investment and to sell
the assets once development is complete, the developer has to
assess the value of the assets
The capital value is related to
the anticipated future income,
so the developer needs to
Capital value forecast this in his appraisal

income

time

cost
There are various methods of forecasting

Producing a time-based forecast like this one is known as the


‘cashflow’ method

income

time

cost

Different methods have different pros and cons. The cashflow method clearly shows all
the assumptions about income and expenditure during each period of time shown, but it
is detailed and cumbersome.
A common ‘shorthand’ method is the yield

The yield compares an average, stabilised year’s return to the


investment

income

time

cost

Investment
Calculating yield from the cashflow forecast:

The return for each year is simply the income minus


the costs

The income needs to account for an average


occupancy rate eg. 20% voids is 80% occupied
The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is then calculated to find the
present value of the future income

Present value of return Return increases over


is future returns, time due to inflation
adjusted for inflation

income

time

cost
IRR Internal Rate of Return
Yt Return for year t (income – costs)
r Rate of inflation
t Total number of years of appraisal

This continues for the total


number of years, t

IRR =
( Y1
(1+r)1
+ Y2
(1+r)2
+ Y3 + ....
(1+r)3 )
t
Investment %

The period of time, t can be chosen, but inflation and income rates will fluctuate over
time, so longer periods are not necessarily more accurate.
Year 1 should be the first year that income and costs have stabilised.
Let’s say that on an initial investment of £10m over 4
consecutive years, the income is estimated to be:

£960,000, £1,000,000, £1,100,000 and £1,120,000.

Inflation is taken to be fixed at 3%

( )
IRR = 960,000 + 1,000,000 + 1,100,000 + 1,120,000

(1+0.03)1 (1+0.03)2 (1+0.03)3 (1+0.03)4

4
10,000,000
(%)
IRR = 9.7%

The maths are fairly straightforward, but there are a lot of steps. Work out each step
and write them down as you go. Don’t forget to convert between decimals and
percentages. A calculator with a 1/x is very helpful.
This is the yield of the investment: it provides a simple method
for developers to compare one investment against another

6% yield 9% yield 12% yield

The yield is not transparent in the same way as cashflow and so the assumptions
behind any yield need to be considered when comparing it with investments.
The yield is the relationship between the rate of return from the
project, and the total investment (why it is called internal)

If the investment is geared, the developer still has to pay


interest out of the return, so he can compare the yield and the
interest rate, to make sure the return is greater and so generate
a profit.
Discount rate method:

A further appraisal method is to ‘benchmark’ the development


against other investments with a similar risk.

In this case, you take the yield of a benchmark investment (eg.


from the stockmarket) and ‘discount’ the development appraisal
by this amount. This essentially cancels out the two yields if
they are equal.

If the answer is negative, then the development is less


attractive, if its positive then more attractive. If they’re equal, its
equal.

Developers or banks might do this if inflation is too volatile to


accurately predict.
Factors affecting development:

Cost of development:

If costs increase beyond the costs allowed in the appraisal, this


comes directly off the profit
Factors affecting development:

Time:

The longer the period of the development, the greater the


exposure

The longer the period of the development, the longer the period
of interest payments on any loan, so the greater the cost

The greater the risk, the greater the cost of borrowing.


‘Phasing’ a project can help to reduce borrowing rates, by
reducing the exposure.

Inflation means that costs and income increase, but developers


usually incur a lot of cost before they realise any income.
Time:

Capital value

The longer the period of risk, the


greater the cost of borrowing
nb. cost of borrowing is external
so doesn’t appear in the yield
directly

income

time

cost

Phasing reduces the peak debt


and may allow income from
earlier phases to pay for later
phases so less borrowing

Investment
Factors affecting development:

The market:

If demand drops unexpectedly, rent drops and so yields drop. If


this happens during the period of development, the
development loses money.

If the development can attract higher rent than its competitors,


at no extra cost it will have a higher yield

If cost inflation changes differently to income inflation, the yield


will change
Factors affecting development:

Sensitivity:

A good way of assessing the sensitivity of a development to


these factors is to run the assessment several times, changing
one factor at a time. The bigger percentage change to the
outcome, the more sensitive.

This is called sensitivity analysis


Summary:

Developers invest money to create value.

The (potential) value has to be realised at some point in the future

The potential of each investment is usually measured by


comparing yields

Developers usually sell their assets after development to realise a


profit. The value is related to the yield.

Profit may be quite high: typically 20%

But they take a lot of risk: risk costs money and if the risk is
reduced, the cost is reduced

Development is sensitive to all factors that affect cost and income


and therefore yield
Public sector finances:

Any development that directly involves public money and


sometimes public assets, is different mainly as follows:

There are specific rules, to ensure transparency, fairness and


competitiveness. These rules are mainly governed by the
European Union

Generally, ‘best value’ must be demonstrated, in a way that can


be measured.

Non-financial concerns can be considered as part of the


appraisal: eg. improvements in health or education can count
instead of financial gain (known as benefits).

Public finance rules are quite complicated and it is worth taking


time to understand the basics if you are involved in a public
project. Government bodies publish advice.
Now your turn….
A prize for the most correct answers
Scenarios:

1. Draw a graph to show how phasing a project reduces the


level of borrowing.

How will this affect the yield?


Scenarios:

2. Explain all the ways that a shorter construction period will


reduce the cost of a development

How will this affect the yield?


Scenarios:

3. As part of a planning permission, a retail development is


required to include a public gallery. This adds cost to the
project, but it means there will be more customers for the
shops.

How will this affect the yield?


Scenarios:

4. The cost of borrowing suddenly increases, but rents stay the


same. What does this mean for developments?

How will this affect the yield?


And finally: assignment
Brief on UELplus, 50% of marks, deadline 26.04.11

Common questions

Powered by AI

Developers balance risk and return by investing in projects where the estimated returns exceed the costs, especially the costs of borrowed money. They typically use gearing or leverage, investing some of their own money to borrow more from banks. This is calculated up front in development appraisals. Developers take on greater risk than banks in pursuit of profit margins, trading the risk value itself. Risk management mechanisms include conducting sensitivity analyses, phasing projects to reduce peak borrowing, and forecasting both costs and returns over time with methods like cashflow analyses and calculating the Internal Rate of Return (IRR). Each project is ultimately a calculated gamble; success or failure highly depends on market conditions which can affect demand, and thus yield and profitability .

Shorter construction periods can reduce development costs by minimizing exposure to risks related to interest rate fluctuations, labor cost increases, and inflation. This leads to lower carrying costs since the developer incurs fewer interest payments over time. Quicker completion also allows income generation from tenants or sales sooner, improving cash flow and enhancing the overall yield. However, rushing construction could impact quality, potentially leading to increased maintenance costs or decreased asset value .

Gearing or leverage is the ratio of borrowed funds to the developer's own funds in a project. A higher gearing ratio means fewer personal funds are at risk, but it also increases the potential for profit if the project succeeds because the developer controls a larger asset base with a smaller initial investment. Profitability increases when the return on investment exceeding the cost of debt, including interest payments. However, higher leverage also increases risk if the project's return does not cover these costs or if market conditions worsen, potentially wiping out the developer's equity .

A longer development period increases costs, as it prolongs exposure to risks such as fluctuating interest rates and market demand changes. Phasing a project can mitigate these effects by reducing peak debt and allowing income from earlier phases to fund later stages, thereby decreasing the amount of external borrowing needed. This reduces interest payments and other associated holding costs, and may improve the yield by allowing for better cash flow management .

The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is significant as it provides a measure of the profitability of a potential investment by calculating the rate at which future cash flows (income minus costs) discount back to equal the initial investment cost. It accounts for the time value of money and inflation, thereby enabling developers to compare the potential profitability of different projects on a standardized basis. A higher IRR indicates a more lucrative investment, assuming similar levels of risk; it must exceed the project's cost of capital or borrowing costs to be attractive .

Developers use the cashflow method in appraisals to detail the timing of income and expenses across the project's lifecycle, providing transparency for planning and decision making. It reflects all assumptions clearly, allowing visibility on cash inflow against investment outlay over time. Advantages include its detailed nature, capturing fluctuations and timing of cash flows which are useful for identifying potential liquidity issues. Unlike shorthand methods like yield, cashflow accounts for specific-period risks and variations, though its complexity requires thorough data compilation and analysis .

Market demand is crucial in determining the value of development assets, as it influences rental income and capital appreciation potential. High demand increases asset values, boosting returns and making developments more attractive investments. Conversely, demand downturns can lower asset values, leading to potential losses, especially for highly leveraged developers. Fluctuations necessitate strategic planning, with developers potentially revising investment and exit strategies based on real time market data to manage risks and protect profitability .

A sudden increase in borrowing costs, while rents remain constant, reduces a development's yield because the additional interest payments reduce the net return on investment. Unless rents also rise to balance these costs, the project's profitability decreases. This scenario forces developers to reassess project viability and potentially delay or restructure. Higher borrowing costs without corresponding rent increases also increase the project's risk profile, potentially deterring future investments and affecting market attractiveness .

Sensitivity analysis assists developers by quantifying how variations in critical assumptions, such as costs, income, or market conditions, impact project outcomes. By systematically adjusting one factor at a time while holding others constant, developers identify which variables most significantly affect the yield and profitability. This approach reveals the project's sensitivity to different risks, aiding in strategic planning and decision-making. It provides developers with insight into the best response strategies in fluctuating markets, and helps prioritize which assumptions need more accurate forecasts or hedging strategies .

Public sector finance rules differ from private finance primarily in their emphasis on transparency, fairness, and competitiveness, often governed by strict regulations such as those from the European Union. Projects must demonstrate 'best value' which includes non-financial benefits like health and education improvements. Unlike private finance, where profit maximization is central, public finance assesses wider societal gains. Additionally, public finance often involves more rigid compliance and auditing processes, contrasting with the flexibility and profit focus of private sector financing .

You might also like