Table of Contents
Module 1 – Immigration law in context.....................................................................................3
1.1 Border Theories................................................................................................................3
1.2 Origins of sovereignty......................................................................................................3
Module 2 – Evolution and Overview of Australian Migration Law..........................................5
2.1 Early influences on Australian migration laws................................................................5
2.2 Federation: Centralised control of immigration...............................................................5
2.3 Post-war developments in migration................................................................................6
2.4 Overview of Migration Legislation..................................................................................7
Module 3 – Key parts to the migration legislation.....................................................................9
3.1 Visa Structure and other concepts....................................................................................9
3.1.1 Foundation concepts....................................................................................................10
3.1.2 The essential nature of a visa......................................................................................10
3.3 – Valid visa application requirements............................................................................11
3.3.1 – Legislative constraints..............................................................................................12
Module 4 – Introduction to Refugee Law................................................................................14
4.1 What is a refugee?..........................................................................................................14
4.2 Refugee Status Under UN Refugee Convention............................................................15
Module 5 – Refugee Law in Australia.....................................................................................17
5.1 Offshore refugee and humanitarian visas.......................................................................17
5.2 Onshore Protection Visas...............................................................................................17
5.3 – Unauthorised Maritime Arrivals.................................................................................19
Module 6 – Temporary Visa System 1 (Temp Visas)..............................................................21
6.1 – Bridging Visas.............................................................................................................21
6.1.2 Introduction to Bridging Visas 2.................................................................................22
6.1.3 Introduction to Bridging Visas 3.................................................................................23
6.2 Visitor Visas...................................................................................................................24
6.3 – Student visas................................................................................................................25
6.4 Temporary Residence Visas...........................................................................................27
Module 7 – Australian Visa System 2 (Family Visas).............................................................29
7.1 Partner Visas..................................................................................................................29
7.1.1 End of Partner Relationship........................................................................................31
7.2 Child Visas.....................................................................................................................33
7.3 Parent Visa.....................................................................................................................33
7.4 Other Family Visas........................................................................................................34
Module 8 – Australia’s Visa System 3 (Permanent, employer sponsored and skilled visas). .36
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
8.1 Employer Sponsored Visas............................................................................................36
8.2 – Intro to General Skilled Visas.....................................................................................37
8.2.1 - Temporary Skilled Visas..........................................................................................38
8.2.2 Skilled Visas and SkillSelect......................................................................................39
Module 9 – Visa Compliance and Cancellation.......................................................................42
9.1 – Border Security...........................................................................................................42
9.1.1 – Unlawful Non-Citizens............................................................................................43
9.2 – Introduction and Approach to Visa Cancellation........................................................43
9.2.1 – Natural Justice Procedures.......................................................................................44
9.3 – s 109 Cancellation Grounds........................................................................................46
9.3.1 – S 109 Cancellation Process......................................................................................46
Module 10 – General and Character Cancellation Powers......................................................48
10.1 – Section 116 Cancellation Grounds............................................................................48
10.2 – Cancellation Process.................................................................................................49
10.3 – Assessing Character Cancellation.............................................................................50
Module 11 – Merits Review of Visa Decisions.......................................................................52
11.1 – Introduction to Merits Review..................................................................................52
11.1.2 – Jurisdiction of the AAT..........................................................................................53
11.2 – Adding the deemed notification period.....................................................................54
11.3 – Part 5 reviewable decisions.......................................................................................54
11.3.1 – Part 7 reviewable decisions....................................................................................55
113.2 – AAT General Division Process...............................................................................56
Module 12 – Judicial Review in Migration Decisions.............................................................58
12.1 Attempts to thwart judicial review...............................................................................58
12.2 Jurisdictional error trumps privative clause.................................................................59
12.3 Judicial Review process...............................................................................................60
Page 2 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Module 1 – Immigration law in context
1.1 Border Theories
Immigration should be controlled.
Communitarians, partialists argue:
Nation state is a distinct community
With right to self determination
Citizens should be prioritized over non-citizens
Global liberals and utilitarians argue:
States are moral agents and have moral obligation to
Treat citizens and non-citizens equally
Immigration restrictions gross violation of human rights
Open borders policy
Radical challenge to current practice
Open borders – Restrictions may be imposed for security reasons
Closed borders – Up to the state to form its own policies with respect to entry and those
policies should reflect values of citizens of that state
Australian Constitution
Australia has long taken the stance of closed border approach to immigration. The Australian
Constitution allows parliament the power to make laws on:
Aliens (non-citizens)
Immigration
Silent regarding citizenship
Border control continues to drive our regional engagement. The excision of outlying
Australian island territories (and the mainland) from Australia’s migration zone continues, in
the face of international human rights obligations to the contrary – Crock p11
Unlimited power to make migration laws?
Not overarching human rights act
Limited influence of international law.
o Making immigration law in Australia is a purely domestic decision, based on
absolutely right to decide.
1.2 Origins of sovereignty
Strict control of borders. For example:
MV Tampa Sept 2001
Rescued 433 asylum seekers
Page 3 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Australian government refused entry to Australia waters
New era of border control began
Pacific Solution and Operation Sovereign Borders
Sovereignty as justification
Nation states: Absolute control over entry = Absolute sovereignty
A fixed concept
Or contingent on historical events?
Definition of sovereignty:
Reciprocal recognition
Within a group of nation states
Of each state’s rights to govern and control territory
Migration – Right to control entry into and conditions of stay within territory
Restrictive migration
Human migration for millennia
Fixed borders and border control a 20th century development
Europe pre-sovereignty
No nation-state
Collection of smaller and larger political units
Composite-states
Composite states
Larger political units
Often separated by sea or another stat
o Spanish Hasburg monarchy
o Hohenzollern Brandenburg monarchy
o England and Ireland
Nation-state sovereignty
Emerged gradually due to events in Europe 1300-1648
Treaty of Westphalia
o Birth of sovereignty
Sovereignty limits
Presumption:
Nation-state has absolute control over entry into territory
Reliance on early legal scholars to justify this position
o Lawful reason to enter – economic reasons
o Necessity
Vattel: State has duties as well as rights – Free passage and residence
Limitation ignored
Deep seated belief in absolute sovereignty
Important to reflect on how history impacts the present
And how history can inform the future
Page 4 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Module 2 – Evolution and Overview of Australian Migration Law
2.1 Early influences on Australian migration laws
1846 – Early waves of migration controlled
Gold Rush
Migration boom
Non-British Europeans
Non-European – Chinese
Other push factors
Irish – Potato famine
Scots – Clearances
Europeans – Wars, etc.
Transfer of power
Australian Colonies Act 1850
o Regulation of entry to Australia
o Transferred from colonial authorities in London
Each colony now able to administer own immigration policies
Race-based immigration restrictions
Act to Make Provisions for Certain Immigrants 1855 (Vic)
First ever race-based immigration restriction legislation
Nafziger’s article
Toy case important precedent for absolute sovereignty
Nafziger critical of Toy’s counsel
o No argument re freedom of movement
o No direction regarding exceptions to State’s right to exclude
Federation
Federation debates focus on white immigration
Reasons for restrictions on non-white immigration
o Contamination of white population
o Undermining political systems of Commonwealth
o Prevent racial conflicts seen elsewhere
Decisions made at Federation would impact migration law for the next century, and
continue today.
Page 5 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
2.2 Federation: Centralised control of immigration
Debates at the 1891 Federation Convention reveal desire to:
Control immigration
Restrict non-white immigration
Australian Constitution
Section 51 (xix)
o Naturalisation and aliens
Section 51 (xxvii)
o Immigration and emigration
Immigration Restriction Act 1901
Section 3 (IRA 1901)
Control of immigrants
Prohibited immigrants denied entry
o Section 3 IRA
o Failed dictation test
Dictation Test
Any European language. Not just English
Applied also to immigrants already in Australia
1903: 13/153 applicants passed
Judicial interpretation of new power
Case law on ‘immigrant’
Immigrant not defined in IRA
Ah Sheung v Lindberg [1906] VLR 323
o ‘Immigrant’ temporary entrant with domicile and naturalised
Potter v Minahan [1908] 7 CLR 277
o Majority of HC held that Minahan was not an immigrant
o Test: Did he remain a constituent part of the Australian community?
Tests of community applied in:
Ah Yin v Christie (1907) 4 CLR 1428
Ah Yin born in China
Father (Chinese, naturalised) domiciled in Australia
Ah Yin held to be an immigrant. Failed dictation test, deported
Donohoe v Wong Sau (1925) 36 CLR 404
Born in Australia to parents naturalised Australians
Raised in Chine and sought to re-enter as spouse of NSW resident
Wong Sau held to be an immigrant, failed dictation test, deported.
2.3 Post-war developments in migration
Post-war, new statute
Immigrant Restriction Act 1901 turned to Migration Act 1958
Ending dictation test
Page 6 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Migration Act 1958
Similar to IRA: Machinery legislation
o Departmental policies provided the detail
o Officers had wide discretion to apply these policies
o No objective visa criteria
Policy reigned supreme
Ended White Australia Policy
Objective Criteria
Criticism of Migration Act and policies. No transparencies
Recommendations and reviews
Increase in judicial review of department decisions
Migration Regulations 1989 (Cth)
Introduced objective visa criteria
2.4 Overview of Migration Legislation
Migration Act 1958
Legislation administered by Minister for Home Affairs relating to immigration
Control non-citizens in Australia
Avenues of review and appeal
Regulates migration agents
o Not as relevant after March 2021
Migration Act 1994
Supplements Migration Act
Provides the technical details eg visa application fees
The Minister
Act refers to the minister, refers to Department case officers that do that work
Delegates his or her power to officers of the Department
Except when stating ‘the Minister personally’
Citizenship Legislation
Australian Citizenship Act 2007
Citizenship by birth, descent or grant
Deferral, loss and resumption of citizenship
Australian Citizenship Regulations
Supplement the Citizenship Act
Prescribe fees and procedures for citizenship applications
Other migration legislation includes:
Immigration (Guardianship of Children) Act (Cth) and regulations
Migration (Skiing Australians Fund) Charges Act 2018 (Cth)
Migration (Visa Application) Charge Act 1997 (Cth)
Page 7 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Migration (United Nations Security Council) Regulations 2007 (Cth)
Other relevant legislation includes:
Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (Cth) and Regulations 2001
Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) and Social Security (Assurance of Support)
Determination
Other Acts that amend the Migration legislation
Migration legislation can be found under the Home Affairs portfolio, using LEGENDcom
Page 8 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Module 3 – Key parts to the migration legislation
3.1 Visa Structure and other concepts
Visa Classes and Subclasses
The visa structure is made up of
o Visa Class; and
o Visa Subclass
Each visa class contains one or more visa subclasses
Schedule 1 to the Migration Regulations lists the visa classes and the subclasses of visa
within each class.
Under s46, applicants must apply for a visa of a particular class
To be eligible for the grant of that visa class, they must meet the criteria for one of the
visa subclasses in that visa class
Substantive and Non-substantive Visas
Take notice of ‘substantive’
Section 48: A non-citizen in the migration zone who does not hold a substantive visa and who
has either been refused a visa or had a visa cancelled cannot apply for any other visa other
than a prescribed visa? ‘Substantive’ visa defined under s5 of the Migration Act.
Substantive visas take precedence over non-substantive visas (exception: special
category visas)
Once a substantive visa is granted, it automatically ceases any previous substantive
visas held (other than special purposes visas, see ss82 and 33)
A substantive visa can be temporary or permanent
A non-substantive visa is always temporary
Section 31: Most visas are prescribed in Schedule 1 of the Migration Regulations
Some visas are found elsewhere, see s31
Action words include:
Granting of a visa occurs when a decision maker makes a decision to approve a visa
application
Cancelling cancels the visa and does affect the immigration status of the person. Upon
cancellation, a person becomes an unlawful non-citizen and is subject to mandatory
detention.
Evidencing is the physical and separate manifestation of the grant, now only by
electronic means with no level or other evidencing
Voiding renders a visa label inoperative but does not render visa invalid and
immigration status not affected usually done after re-evidencing
With the Department no longer placing visa labels in passports upon a visa grant, visa holders
as well as employers, schools and other institutions can used VEVO to check a visa status.
Visa Entitlement Verification Online (VEVO) is a free, online service, accessed through the
Department website which allows visa holders and registered Australian organisations to
check the details and entitlements of a visa.
Page 9 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Do always advise your client to retain their visa grant letter and keep a copy of it with their
passport when they are travelling.
Passport Requirements
Visa applicants must hold a valid passport at the time of visa grant
Unless unreasonable e.g.: applicants for refugee and humanitarian and protection
visas
This allows the Department to collect passport details for streamlined and efficient
entry processing at immigration clearance ports
Passport requirements can be waived in some circumstances e.g.: emergencies
If a person gets a new passport between visa application and visa grant, they should
tell the Department in order to avoid delays and boarding.
3.1.1 Foundation concepts
Concept of Lawfulness
Migration Status: Lawful or unlawful?
Lawful: Migration Act, s13
Unlawful, Migration Act s14
Role of Non-Substantive Visas
Bridging Visa
Criminal Justice Visas and
Enforcement Visas
Essential role to keep non-citizen lawful while in Australia
Definitions can be found in:
S5 of the Migration Act
Regulation 1.03 of the Migration Regulations
Start of each subclass in Schedule 2 under interpretation
Other parts of the Act and Regulations as well
Legislative Instruments
Made in the exercise of a power delegated by Parliament
Has legal authority – authorized by the Minister
As they are supported by legislation, they are legally binding
Ise used to change the law quickly by replacing outdated instrument
Ministerial Directions
Authority is from s499 of the Migration Act
Permits the Minister to make written directions in performance of his or her functions
Decision makers are obliged to comply with directions made
3.1.2 The essential nature of a visa
Broad Requirements
Sch 1 – Valid application requirements
Sch 2 – Visa subclass/program specific requirements
Defined terms
Page 10 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Various schedules in the Migration Regulations
Building a visa – Methodology
1. Visa Subclass
2. Sch 1 = Validity requirements
a. Legislative instruments Ministerial Directions, PAM and case law
Definitions
3. Eligibility requirements
1. Consider schedule 1 and 2 as checklists
2. Diverge and delve deeper by examining the definitions and information contained in
other parts of the legislation, specifically the schedules
Schedule 1
Program specific requirements
Schedule 1 (Valid Application)
The requirements listed in schedule 1 reflect what s46 of the Migration Act regards as a valid
application
Schedule 2
Program specific requirements
Schedule 2 (Eligibility requirements): These are the nuts and bolts for building your
visa
Sets out the eligibility requirements for visa grant, refers to other schedules and definitions
within the regulations (as relevant), refers to ministerial directions and legislative instruments
(as relevant)
Health Requirements
Panel doctor examination
Chest Xray
HIV test
Vaccinations
o PIC 4ScH005/4007/requirements
Character Requirements
Penal or Police clearance PIC 4001
Security clearance PIC 4002
3.3 – Valid visa application requirements
Legislative Requirements:
S 45 + 46 MA
Schedule 1 MR
Part 2 Div 2.2 MR (eq reg 2.07)
Section 46 Requirements 1
Visa Application must:
Specify visa class
Satisfy criteria prescribed in Regulations
Include residential address of visa applicant
Page 11 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Section 46 Requirements 2
Pay visa application charged
Not be constrained by s 48 etc
Not hold visa with No Further Stay Condition
Provide personal identifiers
Reg 2.07 Requirements
Approved visa application form used
Correct visa application charge must be paid
Other matters in schedule 1 satisfied
Schedule 1 may prescribe other matters via legislative instruments
Applicant’s residential address included in form
Reg 2.10
Directs where application to be made
But only if schedule 1 does not provide location of application
Schedule 1
This schedule sets out the specific ways in which a non-citizen applies for a visa of a
particular class. An application that is not made as set out in this Schedule is not valid and
will not be considered, see the Act.
Visa Classes
Remember that most of the visa classes are in Sch 1
E.g.:
Child (Migrant) (Class AH) Item 1108
Front Loading
Legislators continue to add more criteria into schedule 1
Therefore, more requirements to be met to ensure a valid visa application
Significant issue
3.3.1 – Legislative constraints
What is a legislative constraint?
S 46(1)
Application won’t be valid if it is prevented by the following provisions
o 48
o 48A
o 91E
o 91K
o 91P
o 161
o 164D
o 195
o 501E
o 46A
Page 12 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
o 46B
o 41(2)(a)
Section 48
Significant
Could apply to any visa holder in Australia
Assessable
Elements
Non-citizen
In migration zone
Does not hold a substantive visa
Since last entry to Australia
Applied for and was refused a visa (except refusal of bridging visa or refusal on
character grounds)
o Whether or not finally determined
Has had a visa cancelled (except on character grounds)
Cannot make a valid visa application
Except for visas prescribed in regulation 2.12
Application
Loophole – leave Australia
Ok if hold substantive visa
Section 41(2)(a) and 41(2A)
8503 – Not able to make any visa application except a protection visa
8534
8535
8540
Unless Minister waives the condition (reg 2.05(4) (4AAA) (5)(5A)
8503 Waivers
In writing
Major changes to situation
Due to compelling and compassionate circumstances
Which arose after visa was granted
And they had no control over the changes
Practice Point
Cannot lodge valid application
Until waiver has been granted
NFS condition applies if NFS on last visa held, therefore if non-citizen does not hold valid
visa, is subject to detention.
Page 13 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Module 4 – Introduction to Refugee Law
4.1 What is a refugee?
Common meaning: Flight from danger
Legal definition: 1951 UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and 1967 Protocol.
Article 1A(2)
Intention
Broad
Provide universal protection
For all categories of refugees
Mass movements and individual applications
Motivated by preceding 30 years of mass displacement
History
What happened to people seeking safety prior to UN Convention?
European focus because the UN Refugee Convention is a product of European
political focus
Historical responses to displacement
Varied but easier
Medieval rulers: Universalist approach
Mid 1800’s onwards: acknowledged induvial liberty and promoted enrichment
Example: Huguenots fled from France due to religious persecution
Origin of word ‘refugee’
Westphalian system of nation states complicated the free movement of persons by confirming
more rigid territorial boundaries – Nafziger 1983
Beginning of border controls
Hathaway
Political self-determination
Within defined territory
Common culture
Use of immigration to shape nation
Economic interest over humanitarian
Enforcing border control
Maley
Need sophisticated infrastructure
Income
Passport and visas
Refugees not first choice for migration
Response to unprecedented displacement
Europe forced to manage huge numbers of displaced persons
1933 Convention
Page 14 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
1938 Convention
1951 Convention Relating to Status of Refugees
4.2 Refugee Status Under UN Refugee Convention
Unprecedented displacement after WWII
10 Million refugees
Built on 1933 and 1938 Conventions which where:
o Limited to specific groups
o Not universal
Searching for a way to share the burden
1967 Protocol
Non-refoulment Article 33
A refugee should not be returned to a country where he or she faces serious threats to
his or her life or freedom
Part of customary international law
Therefore, applies to non-signatories of Convention
Other rights
1. Non-Expulsion 32
2. No punishment for illegal entry 31
3. Work 17-19
4. Housing 21
5. Education 22
6. Public relief and assistance 23
7. Freedom of religion 4
8. Court access 16
9. Freedom of movement 26
10. Identity and travel documents 27, 28
Article 1F Exclusion clauses
Crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity
Serious non-political crimes
Acts contrary to purposes and principles of UN
Article 1C Cessation clauses
Change in personal circumstances of refugee caused refugee
Change in objective circumstances relating to refugee claims
Such that international protection no longer justified
Fundamental durable and effective (objective circs only)
Refugee Convention is international law
Sources of international law include:
General principles of law
Customary international law
Convention in force between countries
Effects of international law
Page 15 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
No effect in domestic law
Until incorporated into domestic law
Refugee Convention was directly incorporated not Australian domestic law until 2014
Page 16 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Module 5 – Refugee Law in Australia
5.1 Offshore refugee and humanitarian visas
Refugee and Humanitarian (Class XB)
200 Refugee
201 In-Country Special Humanitarian
202 Global Special Humanitarian
203 Emergency Rescue
204 Women at Risk
Validity and eligibility criteria for Class XB Visas includes:
Section 46 and regulation 2.07
Schedule 1
o Legislative instrument LIN 20/169
o From 842 (and 681 if proposer)
o No VAC (if only individual)
o Applicant outside Australia
o Note UMA barriers to Valid applicates
Schedule 2
Policy documents
Only 14.03% visas were granted in 2019/2020 in class XB
Proposers
No sponsors in the Humanitarian Program – Instead they are proposers who can be
individuals or organisations
Optional for all class XB visas except SC 202 (required)
Proposer obligations: they pay airfare and assist in settlement
Split Family
Member of immediate family of a person granted an SC266 of Offshore R and H is eligible
for a visa to Australia within 5 years of the original visa applicant.
Note women at risk
Note processing priorities
5.2 Onshore Protection Visas
Australian Refugee and Humanitarian visas – Onshore Visa
806 – Protection
735 Temporary Protection
790 Safe Haven Enterprise Visa
Applicant must be in the migration zone at the time of the application and visa grant.
Onshore Protection Visa
Applicable Law – Subclass 866 Protection Visa
S 35A Protection visas – classes of visas
S 36 Protection visas – Criteria (Critical legislation for procedures)
o In addition to schedule 1 and 2 criteria, refugee or significant harm
Refugee definition – S 5H-5M
Other requirements for Valid Visa Applications are found in section 46
Page 17 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Item 1401 Protection (Class XA) information slide 1.9
Eligibility Criteria for SC866
S 36(2)(a) – Refugee protection
o Definition 5H
S 36(2)(aa) – Complementary protection
o See Section 36(2A) (2B) (2C) Migration Act
Convention definition of ‘refugee’ under Article 1A(2) of the Convention
Elements of refugee set out in section 5H and 5J
Reasons for The Convention Grounds include:
Race
Religion
Nationality
Membership of a particular social group may be a controversial Convention ground.
Applicant S v MIMA (2004) 217 CLR 387
Conscripts able bodied young men , caste-based groups, gender based, homosexuals,
academics
Section 5L: Shared characteristic other than persecution, innate, immutable or
fundamental to identity or distinguishes group from society.
Political Opinion
Case law indicates a broad understanding of political opinion
Includes right to freedom of expression and political beliefs
Imputed political opinion also accepted
Complementary Protection
Significant harm
Not necessary to link 5J reason
What is Complementary Protection?
International obligations arising from Australia being signatory to ICCPR, CAT and
CROC
14 October 2011 – Complementary Protection law
Protects people who do not qualify as refugees but run the risk of significant hard if
returned home to country
Law broadens criteria for refoulment for asylum seekers beyond narrow refugee
definition
Significant harm – section 36(2A)
a) Arbitrarily deprived or his or her life; or
b) Death penalty will be carried out; or
c) Subjected to torture; or
d) Subjected to cruel or inhuman treatment or punishment; or
e) Subjected to degrading treatment or punishment
Significant harm would not arise in s 36(2B)
Exclusion clauses in s 36(2C)
Page 18 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Review of Onshore Protection Visa Decisions
Merits Review
o AAT – refugee division
Judicial review
o Privative clause
o Jurisdictional Error
o Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] HCA 2
Ministerial Intervention s 417 MA
5.3 – Unauthorised Maritime Arrivals
Legislative bars on UMA applications
Boat people
Asylum seekers arriving by boat in Australia or to an Australian territory with a visa
Historically, were able to lodge a protection visa application
2001 Tampa Affair led to legislative changes:
Arrival at excised offshore place
Barred from lodging visa application
Sent to Nauru, PNG – Pacific Solution
UMA’s barred from seeking protection
Section 46A prevents these asylum seekers from seeking protection in Australia
Note also Class XA Schedule 1 Item 1401(3)(d)
Migration and Maritime Powers Amendment (Resolving the Migration Legacy
Caseload) Act 2014 – Any UMA arriving from 1 Jan 2014 will not be resettled in
Australia
Legislative Changes
Before July 2013 UMA claims still processed by Australia
Before August 13 2012 – Claims were processed according to a ‘Protection
Assessment Process.’ – This process was not part of the migration legislation
After August 13 2012 – Can be removed to a regional processing country which
processes their claims under their own laws.
o SS 198AA-B
o PNG and Nauru
o Ministerial Discretion not to transfer
From July 2013 UMAs transferred to PNG and Nauru for processing and settlement
Unauthorized Maritime Arrival – S 5AA
Excised Offshore Place – S 5(1)
Fast-track applicant – s 5(1)
Assessment process
Applicants are processed by departmental officers
Interview is conducted
If refused, case referred to independent Immigration Assessment Authority – reviewed
and decided on the papers
Page 19 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Temporary Protection Visas (TPV)
TPV is a subclass 785 visa
Need to satisfy the s 36 and schedule 2 criteria
Visa is valid for three years, at the end of that period, to remain in Australia, they will
have to apply for another subclass 785 visa or SHEV subclass 790 and prove they are
eligible
Able to work or study in Australia and access job matching, Medicare and social
security benefits.
Safe Haven Enterprise Visa (SHEV)
Must satisfy s 36(2)(a) or (aa) and schedule 2 including regulation 790.227 – Minister
is satisfied visa is in national internet
Visa is valid for 5 years
Able to work or study in Australia and access Medicare and social security benefits
Possible pathway to a permanent visa after meeting eligibility period – by applying
for a range of prescribed permanent visas (see reg 2.06AAB)
Page 20 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Module 6 – Temporary Visa System 1 (Temp Visas)
6.1 – Bridging Visas
What is a Bridging Visa?
Bridging visas are used by the Department to give lawful status to non-citizens
who would otherwise be unlawful
Temporary visa but not a substantive visa
They are a type of compliance visa
Types of Bridging Visas
Bridging A (class WA, sub 010)
Bridging B (class WB, sub 020)
Bridging C (class WC, sub 030)
Bridging D (class WD, sub 040, 041)
Bridging E (class WE, sub 050, 051)
Bridging F (class WF, sub 060)
Bridging R (class WR, sub 070)
Applying for a Bridging Visa
Onshore application only (except for BVF)
Section 46 applies
o Must be a valid application
o Schedule 1 Criteria must be met
S 72 and reg 2.20
Automatic or separate application
Automatic Application for a BV
Valid application for an offshore substantive visa = Valid application for a bridging visa (no
separate application, it is automatic)
Associated Bridging Visa
The associated bridging visa provides lawful status to an applicant during the
processing of their substantive visa application.
o Until 35 days after the final decision on the application (including any merits
review)
Note also s 48
What is an Associated BV?
Depends on visa status at the time of application for substantive visa (non-citizen)
o Valid substantive visa = BVA
o Unlawful and undetected = BVC
o Unlawful and Department compliance = BVE
Applying for a Bridging Visa
Separate Application
Page 21 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Review of visa cancellation
Judicial review
Ministerial intervention
Permission to work or a variation of the work conditions
Permission to travel
Invalid application
Unlawful making voluntary departure arrangements
Seeking release from detention
Of interest in relation to trafficking matter.
6.1.2 Introduction to Bridging Visas 2
Which BV when?
BVA (010): Non-citizen
o Holds a valid substantive visa or BVA/B
o Not in detention
o Making another application for another substantive visa that can be granted
offshore
o Applying for merits or judicial review
o Minister has applied for a judicial review
o Already hold BVA or BVB without work rights and have compelling need to
work
o Revocation or setting aside of visa cancellation and substantive visa yet to be
reinstated
BVB (020)
o Hold BVA or BVB
o Not in detention
o Substantial reasons to travel outside Australia during visa application
processing
o Return to Oz not contrary to public interest
BVC (030)
o Unlawful (do not hold a substantive visa)
Had not held BVE
Immigration cleared or bypassed clearance and has not come to
Department notice within days of arrival
Not in detention
o Making substantive visa application; or
o Lodged judicial review application; or
o Minister commenced judicial review
BVD (041 and 041)
o Not common
o Unlawful or about to be unlawful
o Granted for 5 working days to enable something to happen
Substantive visa application to be made; or
Compliance officer available to interview
BVE (050)
o Threshold requirements
Page 22 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Not eligible non-citizen per regulation 2.20(7,8, 9, 10, 11: Certain
persons who had bypassed immigration clearance and come to
Department notices within 45 days of arrival
Unlawful or hold BVE
Must also meet one criteria
o Making application for substantive visa; or
o Have applied for merits review; or
o Making suitable arrangements to depart Australia; or
o Applied for substantive visa in Australia; or
o Applied for substantive visa in Australia; or
o Applied for judicial review of decision on substantive visa application or
Minister has applied for judicial review; or
o Hold BE without work rights and have compelling need to work
o Visa has been cancelled and applying for revocation or merits/judicial review
o Merits/judicial review of Citizenship Act decision
o Seeking Ministerial Intervention (eg: s 351, s 48A)
o In criminal detention
o In detention and made application for BV
BE (051)
o Eligible non-citizen in regulation 2.20(7, 8, 9, 10, 11)
o Had applied for protection visa and provided written undertaking that they will
depart Australia or present themselves for removal
BVF (060)
o Person is of interest to police in relation to trafficking offences
o Granted either onshore or offshore
BVR (070)
o Removal Pending Bridging Visa
o For unsuccessful protection visa applicants in detention for long periods
o Allows them to stay in the community pending their removal from Australia
6.1.3 Introduction to Bridging Visas 3
Bridging visa conditions
Permission to work
o Compelling need to work
Financial hardship – not defined
Other conditions include
Makes a valid application within time period
Does not study
Pays surety for release from detention
Reports to immigration
Resides at specified address and notifies change
Pays costs relating to detention and removal
When Bridging Visas Begin
A substantive visa takes precedence over a Bridging visa therefore BV’s begin:
o Upon grant only if person does not hold substantive visa; or
Page 23 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
o When substantive visa ceases; or
o If a child is born to a parent holding a bridging visa
When Bridging Visas Cease
Cancelled
Substantive visa granted
More beneficial BV granted
Visa holder leaves Australia (unless they hold a BVB)
Period of BV validity expired
Substantive visa cancelled
When Associated BV Ceases
Upon visa grant
35 days after a decision to refuse the visa
35 days after merits review decision
28 days after judicial review proceedings completed
35 days after withdrawal of application
35 days after decision that application is invalid
Upon cancellation of substantive visa
Legislative Basis
S 5(1) – Not a substantive visa
S 73 – Power to grant bridging visas to be ‘eligible non-citizens’
S 74 – Bar on second application within 30 days of the refusal of first application (or
30 days of first review decision)
S 75 – Deemed grant for applicants in detention
S 82(3) – Any bridging visa held will cease upon grant of substantive visa (other than
a special purpose visa); and
S 68(4) – Reactivation of bridging visa ceased under s 82(3)
R2.21 – Most beneficial visa – s 68(4)
BACDREF
6.2 Visitor Visas
Purpose
Tourism
Visiting friends and relatives
Business
Medical reasons
All visitor visa applicants have to comply with Schedule 1 and 2 requirements of the
legislation.
Categories
Visitor subclass 600 Visa
Electronic Visas
Medical Visa subclass 602
APEC Business Travel Card
Proposed Five year temporary sponsored visa for parents
Page 24 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Subclass 600 Visa Streams
Class FA Item 1236 – Can apply for Visitor Visa under one of the following streams.
Tourist stream 600.22
Sponsored Family Stream 600.23 – To see family and friends
Business Visitor Stream – 600.24
Approved Destination Status (or ADS) stream 600.25
Approved Destination Status (or ADS) stream 600-25 – For designated tour with
registered Chinese travel agents from China
Frequent Traveller Stream – 600.26
Sponsored Family Stream – 600.23
Must be sponsored
Sponsor to lodge Form 1149
Applicant to lodge Form 1418
Application processed in Australia
Security bond – A discretion
Electronic Visitor Visas
Electronic Travel Authority (ETA) visa (SC 601 – ETA is applied from outside
Australia (Class UD Item 1208A)
eVisitor Visa (SC 651) – lodged via departmental website (Class TV Item 1218AA)
Medical Visa Subclass 602
Class UB Item 1214A
For people seeking medical treatment/medica consultation
Confirm arrangements made for treatment in Audtralia
Have funds to pay for medical treatment and can support themselves in Australia,
include meeting travel costs
Treatment in public hospital has been approved by the treating hospital
APEC Business Travel Card
APEC Business Travel Card (ABTC) is a travel facility for business purposes
Preclearance by APEC country
No separate visa application
ABTC is valid for 5 years
ABTC is used in conjunction with a valid passport
6.3 – Student visas
Student Visas
Class TU Item 1222
Subclass 500 Student Visa
Subclass 590 Student Guardian (for guardians of students under 18)
Key Schedule 2 Criteria
CI 500.211 Enrolled in a course of study
Cl 500.212 Genuine applicant:
o Genuine intent to stay temporarily
o Intent to comply with visa conditions
Page 25 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Cl 500.213 Evidence of English language proficiency
Cl 500.214 Evidence of sufficient funds
Cl 500.215 Evidence of adequate health insurance
Plus, other criteria include Schedule 4 PIC, Schedule 5…
Student Visa – Assessment
Student visa applicants are assessed under 2 categories
A streamlined student visa applicant; or
A regular evidentiary student visa applicant
Streamlined evidentiary requirements under SSVF
Beneficiaries from the streamlined SSVF evidentiary requirements:
Student enrolled at education providers with the lowest immigration risk ratings
Students from countries with the lowest immigration risk ratings; and
Students enrolled at education providers with medium immigration risk ratings,
provided the student’s country of citizenship has a low or medium immigration risk
rating.
Immigration Risk Ratings
Document Checklist tool
Updated every six months
Uses Document Checklist tool and see the difference between streamlined and regular
evidentiary requirement streams
Genuine Temporary Entrant (GTE) Test
CI 500.212
Integrity measure for proper use of student visa program
Not to be used as a way to get ongoing residency in Australia
Assessing genuine intent
Dept case must assess applicant’s genuine intent
How to assess state of mind
Direction 69: Assessing the Genuine Temporary Entrant Criterion
o Made under s499 of the Migration Act
Direction 69
Applicant’s circumstances
Applicant’s immigration history
If applicant is under 18 years old, the intention of their parent. legal guardian or
partner
Any other relevant matter
Factors
Applicant’s circumstances in home country and in Australia
o Reasonable reasons for not studying at home
o Personal ties to home country or Australia and significant incentives
o Economic circumstances of applicant
Immigration history – Previous applications
Page 26 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
If a minor – Intention of guardian
Any other matters
GTE Requirement – Statement of Purpose
List reasons why student wishes to undertake the course, how the studies will benefit their
future when they return to their home country etc.
Applicants wishing to supplement their applications can provide documentary
evidence such as an offer of employment in their home country, evidence of assets in
their home country etc.
Providing quality supporting documentary evidence is pivotal to satisfying the GTE
requirement
6.4 Temporary Residence Visas
Subclass 400 + series
Focus on SC 482 (TSS) Visa
Brief overview of:
o SC 400 Temporary Work (Short Stay Specialist)
o SC 407 Training
Other temporary resident visas include:
SC 400 Temporary Work (Short Stay Specialist) visa
SC 403 Temporary Work (International Relations) visa
SC 405 Investor Retirement visa
SC 407 Training visa
SC 408 Temporary Activity visa
SC 417 Working Holiday visa
SC 462 Work and Holiday visa
Temporary Skill Shortage Visa
TSS is a newly created visa
Replaced the Temporary Work (Skilled) SC 457 visa
TSS has similarities with the 457 visa
Temporary Work (Skilled) (SC 547) Visa
Significant visa program in 457 visas and sometimes controversial
Previously known as Business (Long Stay) 457 visa
TSS (SC 482) Visa
The TSS program replicates the 457 program with a similar three stage process
Sponsorship – valid for 5 year when approved
Nomination – employer nominates its nominees
Application – Nominee applies for TSS visa
Sponsorship requirements
Section 140E and regulation 2.59
o Lawfully operating a business in our outside Australia
o Record of commitment to employing commitment to employing local labour
o Declare no discriminatory practices
Page 27 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Sponsorship is valid for 5 years
Process for existing sponsors to renew sponsorship
Accredited sponsorship
TSS Criteria for Nomination
Section 140GV and reg 2.72
Contribution to the Skilling Australia Fund (SAF) by Employers.
o Payable at time of nomination
o Amount depends on turnover of sponsoring business and proposed period of
stay of applicant
Nomination made for occupation in STSOL or MLTSSOL
Market salary and Temporary Skilled Migration Income Threshold (TSMIT)
Labour Market Testing: s 140 GBA and reg 2.72AA
Non-Discriminatory workforce test to ensure employers are not engaging in
discriminatory recruitment practices against Australian workers.
TSS Schedule 2 Criteria Clause 482
Short-Term stream
Medium-Term stream
Labour Agreement steam
Cl 482.21 Common criteria includes:
Previous visa compliance
Approved nominated by approved work sponsor
Genuine intention and genuine position
Applicant has necessary skills – Assessment if necessary
No payment for sponsorship made
Health insurance, Sch 4 PIC, Sch 5 SRC
Cl 482.22 Short Term Stream Criteria
Worked in nominated occupation for at least two years
Genuine temporary entrant test
Language
Temporary Work (Short Stay Activity) Visa (Subclass 400)
Undertake short-term, highly specialized, non-ongoing work
Participate in an activity or work relating to Australia’s interests (in limited
circumstances – such as assisting in natural disasters)
Period of stay: Usually 3 months by may extend to 6 months
Training (SC 407) Visa
The visa allows applicants to
Take part in workplace based training to enhance the applicant’s skills in their current
occupation, area of tertiary study or field of expertise
Participate in a professional development training program in Australia
Period of stay – Up to 2 years
Page 28 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Module 7 – Australian Visa System 2 (Family Visas)
7.1 Partner Visas
Prospective Marriage (Temp) TO/300 (Item 1215)
Partner (Provisional) UF/309 (Item 1220A)
Partner (Migrant) BC/100 (Item 1129)
Partner (Temp) UK/820 (Item 1214C)
Partner (Residence) BS/801 (Item 1124B)
Dependent Child TK/445 (Item 1211)
Partner (Spouse and De Factor)
Spouse (S 5F and R 1.15A)
Marriage recognised under Australian law
Mutual commitment to shared life as husband and wife to exclusion of all others
Genuine and continuing
Live together, or do not live apart on permanent basis
De Facto (S 5CB and R 1.09A, R 203A
Mutual commitment to shared life to exclusion of all others
Genuine and continuing
Live together, or do not live apart on permanent basis
Not related by family
At least 18
12 month requirement
Marriage
Most marriages solemnized in Australia are recognised under Australian law at a
marriageable age.
Marriages not recognised for immigration purposes
Polygamous
Underage marriages
Marriages within prohibited degrees of relationship
Customary, arranged and proxy marriages
Contrived marriages or marriages of convenience
De Facto Relationship
Reg 2.03A states relationship must be at least 12 months old
Unless relationship is registered in one of the following jurisdictions:
o Queensland
Page 29 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
o NSW
o Victoria
o Tasmania; or
o ACT
Partner Requirements Under the Act
The couple have:
a. A mutual commitment to a shared life to the exclusion of all others and
b. The relationship is genuine and continuing and
c. They
a. Live together; or
b. Do not live separately and apart on a permanent basis
Partner Requirements Under the Regulations
Four factors have to be met
1. Joint financial aspects of the relationship – How they share finances
2. Joint nature of the household arrangement – How the couple share a home
3. The social aspects of the relationship – How the couple are perceived publicly; and
4. The nature of the couple’s commitment to one another
Assessing Genuineness (Regulation 1.15A and 1.09A)
Partner Visa
Offshore Application: Applicant applies for Partner (Migrant) (Class BC) and Partner
(Provisional) (Class UF) concurrently
Subclass 309
Subclass 100
Onshore Application: Applicant applies for Partner (Residence) (Class BS) and Partner
(Temp) (Class UK) concurrently
Subclass 820
Subclass 801
Partner visas – Application Process
Two stages: Temporary
Temporary visa
Apply for permanent visa at the same time
Partner visa numbers not capped
Temp visas valid for 2 years
Relationship re-assessed after 2 years
Visa holder entitled to Medicare, AMEP and some social benefits
2 year provisional period can be waived for some long term relationships see
Regulation 1.03
Permanent Stage
Automatic application: 1 form, 1 fee
Processing begins 2 years from lodgment of SC820/801 VA
Relationship needs to be reassessed on basis of new evidence
Permanent visas granted if still genuine and ongoing unless exception applies
Visa holder entitled to all benefits applicable to all other Australian residents
Page 30 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Where there is Long Term Relationship
A long term relationship (reg 1.03) – At the time of application, the couple’s relationship has
been either:
3 years or more; or
2 years or more where the couple have a dependent child from their relationship
Prospective Marriage Visa – SC 300 Visa
An offshore visa
Main requirements
o Couple have met in person and are known to one another (Cl 300.214)
o Parties genuinely intend to marry within 9 month visa validity (Cl 300.215);
and
o Parties genuinely intend to live together as spouses (Cl 300.216)
1. For travel to marry Australian Sponsor
2. Applicant and sponsor over 18 at TOA
3. Applicant has met Australian sponsor personally since they turned 18
4. No impediment to marry under Australian law (TOD)
5. Must not marry prior to entering Australia
6. Temp visa valid for 9 months from grant
7. Must travel, marry and apply for 820/801 visa within 9 months
8. Cannot extend 300 visa if persons do not marry
9. If no marriage applicant should leave Australia bu can be sponsored subsequently
10. If applicant marries sponsor before decision, 300 VA taken to be a 309/100 VA
11. If 300 VA refused and AAT review pending and applicant marries sponsor, AAT to
remit case to Dept as a 309/310 visa application
Offence under the Migration Act
Section 237
Section 239
Sections 240/41
Section 243
Section 245
Special Provisions for Long Term Illegal Partners
Cl 820.211 in Sch 2 of MR
3001
3003 and 3004
Sponsorship Limitations – R 1.20J
Other sponsorship limitations include:
R 1.20KA
R 1.20KB
R 1.20KB
Woman at risk (SC204)
Page 31 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
7.1.1 End of Partner Relationship
When a relationship ceases
Death of a sponsor; or
Child or children from their relationship; or
Family violence
Two year Exception
Family violence
Child of the relationship
801.221
Family Violence
Family violence provisions – Permit victims in an abusive Partner relationship to
continue with migration application
Must satisfy delegate that relationship was genuine until it ceased, and that family
violence took place during the relationship (reg 1.23(12) and (14))
Exception only available to partner visa applicants already in Australia and
prospective marriage visa holders who are already in Australia and have married
sponsor.
Regs 1.21-1.27
Acceptable Evidence
Judicially determined evidence; or
Non-judicially determined evidence
See special provisions relating to Family Violence – Div 1.5 of Part 2 of the Regulations
Evidence of Family Violence
Judicially determined evidence
Court injunction
Intervention order (not interim order)
Court conviction
Non-judicially determined evidence
Joint undertaking before court
Opinion by a prescribed independent expert that the alleged victim has suffered
relevant family violence, if the Minister is not satisfied based on other non-judicial
evidence that the alleged victim has suffered relevant family violence; or
Other prescribed evidence
Judicially determined evidence
Court injunctions under Family Law Act 1975
Certain court orders against the partner made under an Australia state or territory law
The sponsoring partner has been convicted (or has recorded a finding of guilt) of an
offence of violence against the victim
Non-judicially determined evidence
Page 32 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Reg 1.24; plus
At least 2 evidence from legislative instrument list
o See instrument IMMI12/116
Or Joint Undertaking (reg 1.23(8)(b)) before Court that Sponsor has committed
violence against victim
Independent Assessment
Doubts on non-judicially determined claim may be referred to independent expert
Independent expert will provide opinion to Department
Independent expert’s onion must be accepted by the Department
7.2 Child Visas
There are three different visas for children:
Child
Adoption
Orphan relative
See Child (migrant) (Class AH)
For onshore visa subclasses See Child (Residence (Class BT)
Child Visa – SC 101 or 802
Applicant is a dependent child (reg 1.03) of an A/C, PR or ENZC
Under 25 years old
Sponsored by Australian parent or parent’s cohabitating partner
If aged between 18 and 25 is not engaged or never married or in de fact relationship;
and
Not in full time work but rather full time study
7.3 Parent Visa
Two main categories
Non-contributory Parent – Process can take up to 30 years
Contributory Parent – Process can take almost 5 years and a $43,600 2nd instalment
VAC
Sponsor
Sponsor must be Australian permanent resident or eligible NZ citizen
Sponsor must be settled – defined in reg 1.03
o Means lawfully resident in Australia for a reasonable period
Under Policy a reasonable period means two years
Balance of Family Test
Reg 1.05 (2C) states a parent satisfies the balance of family test if the number of
eligible children (in Australia) is greater than or equal to the number of ineligible
children
This means either
o At least half of the applicant’s children live permanently in Australia; or
Page 33 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
o More of the applicant’s children live permanently in Australia than any other
country
Parent visas – 2 divided categories
Non-contributory Parent
Parent Visa Subclass 103 – Offshore visa
Aged Parent visa Subclass 804 – Onshore visa
Contributory Parent
Contributory Parent Visa (Subclass 143) Offshore visa
Contributory Parent (temp) Visa (Subclass 173) Offshore visa
Contributory Aged Parent Visa (Subclass 864) onshore visa
Contributory Aged Parent (Temp) visa (Subclass 884) onshore visa
Parent Visas: Offshore and onshore
Offshore Visas
Parent Visa SC 103
Contributory Parent Visa SC 143
Contributory Parent (Temp) Visa SC 173
Onshore Visas
Aged Parent visa SC 804
Contributory Aged Parent Visa SC 864
Contributory Aged Parent (Temp) Visa SC 884
Non-Contributory Parent vs Contributory Parent Visa
Non-Contributory Parent
Considerably cheaper in visa fees
Assurance of Support bond is smaller and is held for four years
Wait time in the queue is 30 years
Contributory Parent
High cost of second instalment VAC at $43 600 per parent
Assurance of Support bond is larger and is held for 10 years
Processing time is just under 5 years
Assurance of Support (AoS)
Legal document and commitment
Assurer gives warranty that applicant will not apply for government assistance for
period of AoS
Bond for Non-Contributory parent visa for four uears
o $5000 for main applicant and $2000 for secondary applicant
Bond for Contributory Parent visa for 10 years
o $10,000 for main applicant and $4000 for secondary applicant
Capping and Queuing
Cap and Queue: Under s 85 of the Act, the Minister can limit the number of visas
granted in a year
Parent visa classes have a cap placed on them – see determination made under s 85
Page 34 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Applicants in a queue for a visa that has reached the cap, will wait in the queue until
more visa places become available
7.4 Other Family Visas
3 visas in this group include:
Carer visa;
o SC 116 and 836
Aged Dependent Relative Visa; and
o 114 and 838
Remaining Relative Visa
o 115 and 835
All Other Family visas – Requirements
Assurance of Support is required
Meeting health requirements
Meeting character requirements
o Any other specific public interest criteria
Adoption Visa – SC 102
Inter-county adoption can only succeed if following occurred:
a. Authorisation of State or Territory Government is approved before adoption
can proceed; or
b. Sponsoring Parent has resided overseas for more than 12 months before
child’s application is lodged and is not done to circumvent Australia’s
adoption laws
Orphan Relative – SC 117 or 837
The child (under 18) cannot be cared for by their parents because they are either
deceased, permanently incapacitated or whereabouts unknown – reg 1.14
Sponsor is an eligible relative: sibling, grandparent, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, or a
relative’s current cohabiting spouse or de facto partner. And the sponsor must be over
18 years old, and is settled in Australia
7.4 – Other Family visas
Carer Visa SC 116 & 836
Def of Carer in reg 1.15AA
To care for an Australian relative with a medical condition that prevents them for
caring for themselves
Bupa Medical Visa Services must make a favourable medical assessment on need for
care of sponsor’s medical condition
The assistance needed cannot be provided by any relative in Australia or by health
services in Australia
Applicant is willing and able to provide the assistance
Aged Dependent Relative Visa
Defined in reg 1.03
Remaining Relative Visa
Defined in reg 1.15
Page 35 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Applicant and their partner must have all their relatives in Australia, and no relatives
outside Australia
Sponsor must be a relative of the applicant who is an Australian citizen, permanent
resident or an eligible NZ citizen, is over 18, is settled and is not subject to a
sponsorship limitation
Module 8 – Australia’s Visa System 3 (Permanent, employer sponsored and skilled
visas)
8.1 Employer Sponsored Visas
ESV
Employer Nominated Scheme (ENS): Class EN SC 186 visa
Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme (RSMS): Class RN SC 187 visa
3 Streams – ENS (RSMS only TRT and A-Stream)
Temporary Residence Transition stream
Direct Entry stream
Agreement stream
Key Schedule 2 Requirements for ENS and RSMS
1. Front end – Employer
a. Nominee must be nominated by an approved employer (reg 5.19)
b. Employer must meet nomination requirements
2. Back end – Nominee/applicant
a. Be under 45
b. Meet the skills and qualifications requirements
c. Meet English language requirements
There are exemptions relating to age, skills and English language ability. Important that you
check for the correct Legislative Instruments as they can change quickly over time
ENS – Employer’s Requirements
Actively and lawfully operating a business
Genuine need for employee – Labour Market testing
Position must be for at least 2 years
Nominated Occupation must be from the MLTSSL (unless a 457 grandfathered
situation – held or applied for a 457 prior to 19 April 2017
Market Salary and meeting the temporary skilled migration income threshold
(TSMIT)
Training requirement – payment to skilling Australians Fund
o Lump sum payable at the time of nomination
Page 36 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
o Businesses with an annual turnover less that 10 million $3000
o Businesses with an annual turnover more than 10 million $5000
Employee’s Requirements – Stream dependent
Temporary Residence Transition stream
SC 457 or TSS 482 visa holders
No skills assessment
Has competent English IELTS 6 equivalent
Direct Entry stream
Positive skills assessment from MLTSSL occupation
3 years work experience
Has competent English IELTS 6 equivalent
Agreement stream
Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme (RSMS)
Two streams – TRT and Agreement
Same requirements as for ENS except
o Occupation needs to be located in a regional area
o Genuine position requirements may be different and easier to evidence in
regional areas
8.2 – Intro to General Skilled Visas
What is a GSM?
Targets migrants with skills needed in Australia
Components of the Skilled Program:
Temp Residence Visas; and
Perm Residence Skilled Visas
Visas in the Skilled Program
Temp Residence Visas
Graduate Skilled Class VC SC 485 visa
Permanent Residence Skilled Visas
Skilled Independent Class SI SC 189 visa
Skilled Nominated SC Class SN 190 visa
Skilled Regional Provisional Class SP SC 489 visa – pathway to perm residence
What is SkillSelect?
Online process – onshore and offshore application
Front end loaded system
Lodge Expression of Interest (EOI)
Page 37 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Not a visa application
Valid for 2 years, after which validity will cease
Candidates invited to apply for visa based on highest points reached from EOI
database
Applicants granted visas when Sch 1 and 2 requirements
Benefits of SkillSelect
Responsiveness to changing needs of the economy
Responsiveness to skill needs of employers with targeted skills lists
Allocated places to best candidates with merit based points test
Fair and equitable skilled migration program
EOI process reduces visa processing times
Streamline and optimize State and Territory migration plans
Employers able to search for and contact skilled workers
Addresses regional skilled shortages
SkillSelect is Australia’s service for managing its skilled migration program, incorporating
an online service.
The Points Test
Schedule 6D MR
Points test based on a range of requirements
Age
English language
Work Experience
Qualification
Professional year
Specialist Educational Qualification
Australian study
Regional study
Credential community language
Partner skill
State or territory nomination
Minimum Threshold Requirements
Under 45
Achieve minimum Points Score of 65 points
Competent English equivalent
Qualifications recognised by relevant Assessing Authoring
8.2.1 - Temporary Skilled Visas
Temporary Skilled Visas:
Skilled Provisional Class VC SC 485 (temporary graduate) visa
Skilled Provisional Class VF SC 476 (recognised graduate) SC 476 visa
Subclass 485 Streams
Graduate Work Stream cl 485.22
o Recent graduates (2 year study)
Page 38 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
o From Australian Tertiary Institutions – Uni, TAFE, CRICOS approved
colleges
o Apply onshore within 6 months of completing 2 year Australian study
o Occupation is on MLTSSL and skills are positively assessed
o Other threshold requirements: Competent English unless exempt
o No points test
o 18 months stay
Post-study work stream cl 485.23
o Tertiary graduates with Bachelor or higher degree and applied for student
visas after 5 November 2011
o Visa period depends on Australian qualification
Bachelors, honours, masters by coursework – two years
Masters by research – three years
PhD – Four years
o Must apply onshore within 6 months of completing two year tertiary study
program (CRICOS 92 weeks study)
o Competent English unless exempt national
o No points test, no MLTSSL requirement and no skills assessment
8.2.2 Skilled Visas and SkillSelect
Skilled Independent Class SI (Perm SC 189)
Skilled Nominated Class SN (Perm SC 190)
Skilled Regional Class SP (Provisional SC 489)
Skilled Independent Class SI – SC 189
No sponsor or nominator
Must be invited and must apply within 60 days of invitation
Application must be lodged online
At time of invitation must:
o Be under 45
o Have skill, already assessed on MLTSSL
o Have competent English
o Meet gazetted points test (current 65 points) and has achieved points score not
less than the score stated in the invitation
Outcome: Permanent Residence
Subclass 189 Skilled Independent (New Zealand) stream for NZ Special Category (SC 444)
visa holders
Skilled Nominated SC 190
Nominated by State or Territory government
If invited, must apply within 60 days of invitation
Application is lodged online
At time of invitation must:
o Be under 45
o Have skill, already assessed on the Combined MLTSSL and STSOL
o Have competent English
Page 39 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
o Meet gazetted points test and has achieved points not less than score in the
invitation
Skilled regional provisional SC 489
If nominated by state/territory government (needs to be on SSOL) or if sponsored by
eligible relative in a designated area (occupation needs to be on MLTSSL)
At time of the invitation
o Be under 45
o Skill is positively assessed
o Have competent English
o Points score is not less than the score stated in the invitation
Skilled Regional SC 887
Second Stage visa processing for Provisional holder of 489 Visa
Not subject to SkillSelect nor invitation from department
No sponsorship required – from relative or state/territory government
Must live in regional area for 2 years
Must work full time for one year in the regional area while holding provisional visa
Outcome: Permanent Residence
SkillSelect – Process
1. EOI Preparation
2. Lodgment of EOI
3. Invitation to apply for visa
4. Application for Visa
5. Visa decision: Grant or refusal
How to lodge a complete and decision ready EOI
1. Check occupation is on MLTSSL or combined MLTSSL and STSOL for relevant visa
2. Check candidate
a. Meets threshold requirements (age, English, skill)
b. Can get minimum gazetted points test, currently 65
3. Assess English language competency
4. Get skills assessed by relevant assessing authority; and
5. Lodge EOI if able to meet the gazetted pass mark
Lodgement of EOI
No fee
Candidates can be onshore or offshore at time of lodgement
Onshore candidates do not get a BC as this is not an application
EOI’s remain in the system for 2 years or until visa is granted
Candidates are ranked by points and date (and time) of lodgement
Invitation to apply for visa
Invitation for SC 189 are subject to:
Every occupation in 189 program has a ceiling
Occupations compete on a merits basis – highest points receive invitation
EOI claims are frozen at time of invitation
Invitees have 60 days to lodge application
Page 40 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
A maximum of only 2 invitations may be sent
EOI’s will be removed from SkillSelect if second invite is not accepted
Department expects a ‘decision ready’ application to be lodged
EOI will remain in the SkillSelect database for 2 years
Invitation to apply for visa – for 190 and 489 Visa
Invitations sent when nominations authorized by State and Territory Governments; or when a
relatives 489 nomination is accepted by DHA:
Check State and Territory Governments for their varying requirements
State and Territory Governments notify DHA of their nominees and this triggers Dept
invitation
For 489 relative-nominations, invitations sent when DHA accepts nomination
Other processes similar to subclass 189 processes
Application for Visa
Online visa application must be lodged within 60 days allocated
All Sch 1 and 2 requirements must be met
All supporting documents must be lodged in support of visa application
As SkillSelect is a front-end loaded system all required documents should be available
when the EOI is lodged.
Visa Decision
If application is approved
Dept sends approval letter with:
o Visa grant number
o Visa conditions (including a specified initial entry date)
o Details of what the applicant must do next
If application is refused
Dept sends refusal letter stating:
o Why visa was not approved
o Review right (if any)
o Time fame for lodging an appeal (if applicable)
Summary
Temp residence (Not points tested and not under SkillSelect)
Temp Graduate Visa SC 485
Skilled – Recognised Graduate Visa SC 476
Points Tested (Operates under SkillSelect)
189 skilled independent (perm)
190 Skilled nominated (perm)
Regional – two stage process
489 Skilled regional provisional – 1st stage
887 Regional (perm) – 2nd stage
All require EOI under SkillSelect Program
Page 41 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Module 9 – Visa Compliance and Cancellation
9.1 – Border Security
Role of Home Affairs Department
The new Dept of Home Affairs will have responsibility for ensuring a nationally consistent
approach to terrorism, cyber security, organised and transnational crime, while securing the
integrity of Australia’s migration programmes and protecting out borders by managing the
movements of people and goods.
Ensures Compliance via:
Visa Refusal and Cancellations
Bridging Visas
Detention
Removal
Compliance Tools
Border Protection/Immigration Clearance
Power to collect Personal Identifiers
Power of Entry and Search – integrity checks on non-citizens
Also
Data Matching with Centrelink and ATO
Employer Monitoring and Sanctions
Visa refusal and cancellation
Deportation (ss 200-206) and removal (ss 198 and 199)
Exclusions and Bans on re-entry: Sch 4 and 5
Immigration Clearance
Process of ensuring non-citizen had authority to enter Australia
Page 42 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Valid visa
Entry via a port
Identification at port
Immigration cleared s 172(1)
Enters at a port
Provides identification
Leaves with clearance officer permission; or
Enters elsewhere but provides ID within time limit
Clearance refused or bypassed s172(3)
Refused – Return flight
Visa cancelled at border
Unsatisfactory identification or authority
Bypassed (Unlawful non-citizen
Entered at port but bypassed clearance
Did not enter port
Personal Identifiers
Visa applicants required to provide a variety of personal identifiers
Section 166 and 5A
9.1.1 – Unlawful Non-Citizens
Definitions – ss 13-14
Non-citizen
No visa in effect
S 82 – Visa cease
Visa cancellation: immediately no longer in effect
After expiry date
Mandatory Detention
Section 189
If compliance officer knows or reasonably suspects person in migration zone is
unlawful non-citizen, the officer must detain the person
o Note non-compliance with immigration clearance is a ground for detention
Meaning of ‘detain’
Section 5: Take into, keep in immigration detention by whatever force reasonably necessary
Immigration detention
In the company of and restrained by a Dept officer
Held in a detention, prison etc.
Duration of detention
Section 196: Kept in detention until:
Page 43 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Removed from Australia
Taken to regional processing country
Deported
Granted a visa
Unlawful detention
Vivian Alvarez Solon (R)
Cornelia Rau (L)
Independent inquiries, scathing reports by Ombudsman
A lawyer’s duty
No duty to report unlawful non-citizen client
Provide competent advice on visa status, risk of detention and options
9.2 – Introduction and Approach to Visa Cancellation
What is visa cancellation?
What are the consequences of cancellation?
It is different to a visa simply expiring or ceasing.
Section 82(2) – cessation is not the same thing and it does not have the same consequences as
a cancellation
Consequences of Cancellation
Immediate effect:
Unlawful non-citizen
Liable to immigration detention
Exception: Business visas
Section 48 will apply:
If non-citizen in Australia attempts to apply for another visa
Is no longer holding a substantive visa (because it was cancelled)
Cannot lodge a valid application (ss 46 and 48)
Unless listed in reg 2.12 (e.g. bridging visa)
How to approach visa cancellation
What is the cancellation ground or power?
Each cancellation power has a specific process that must be followed by the Dept
The Cancellation Powers
S109
S116
S501
S128
S134
S137Q
D140
Page 44 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
9.2.1 – Natural Justice Procedures
Natural Justice
A person whose interests may be affected by a decision is entitled to be heard decision is
made
Most of the cancellation powers have an associated natural justice procedure that must be
followed.
Cancellation with Notice
Notice of intention to consider cancellation of a visa (NOICC)
S116 – 119
S109 – 107
S501 – 501D
Is the NOICC valid?
Visa holder’s response within prescribed period
Decision to cancel or not cancel
Proper Notification
Method of notification: ref 2.55
Deemed notification
Prescribed Matters for s 109
Regulation 2.41
Policy Matters for s116
Decision maker takes into consideration
Purpose of the travel and stay in Australia
IS the person inside or outside Australia
Person’s history of compliance with visa conditions
Hardship caused if visa cancelled
Circumstances of ground for cancellation
Visa holder’s record of behaviour with Immigration
Decision to cancel
Review rights if visa cancelled in Australia
Time limits for lodging review application
S 82(1): Visa ceases to be in effect immediately upon decision to cancel (except for
business visas)
S 134(8): Business visa ceases 28 days after
Cancellation without notice
S 128
S 129
Minster can revoke cancellation after receiving response (s 131)
Page 45 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Personal Ministerial Powers
Without notice
S 133A(3)
S 133C(3)
Minister may cancel the visa without notice
S 133(F)
Notification of Cancellation
Must include grounds and particulars
Invite response within prescribed period
Minister can revoke cancellation after receiving response
Response to NOICC/NOC
There are prescribed periods for response to NOICC/NOC
Prescribed periods for response vary depending on
Cancellation power used
Location of person
S 116 – S 121 and reg 2.44
S 109 – s 107(1A)
S 128 – s 129 and reg 2.46
S 133A – ss 133E and F
S 133C
9.3 – s 109 Cancellation Grounds
Sections 101 and 102: All answers to questions in VA forms and Passenger cards must be
answered and be correct
Cancellation Grounds
S 98
S 99
S 100
S 103
Ss 105-105
S 106
Process
S 107: Minister may send NOICC to immigration cleared person if the Minister
becomes aware they provided incorrect information
o S 107A
o S 108
o S 109
Page 46 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Extent of power
SS 110 – 111
S 112
S 113
S 114
S 116 and reg 2.43(o)
Personal Ministerial Powers
With notice: s 133A(1)
Without notice: s 133A(3)
Minister may cancel the visa without notice
S 133F: Minister sends notification of cancellation
9.3.1 – S 109 Cancellation Process
Process
S 107
S 107A
S 108
S 109
Cancellation with Notice
Notice of intention to consider cancellation of visa (NOICC)
S 109 – s 107
S 133A(1)
Visa holders response within prescribed period
Decision to cancel or not cancel
Proper Notification
Method of notification: reg 2.55
Deemed notification
Prescribed Matters for s 109
Regulation 2.41 – Dept considers theses factors when deciding whether or not to cancel
Notification
Section 107 sets out NOICC procedures
Method of notification: reg 2.55
Time given to respond s 107(1A)
o Temp visa: A reasonable period
o For another visa: 14 days
Page 47 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Module 10 – General and Character Cancellation Powers
10.1 – Section 116 Cancellation Grounds
Section 116(1)Cancellation Grounds
a) Circumstances no longer exists
b) Holder has not complied with visa conditions
c) Another person has not complied with visa condition (e.g., secondary applicant/visa
holder)
d) Holder outside Australia and incorrect information provided, including where person
not yet immigration cleared
e) Presence in Australia a risk to health, safety or good order
f) Visa should not have been granted due to contravention of law
g) Non-genuine student (breaching visa conditions, conduct not contemplated by the
visa)
S 116(1)(g)
S 116(3)
Reg 2.43(1)
Reg 2.4.3(2)
Reg 2.43(1) – Prescribed Ground
Discretionary
Visitor visas held by minors in breach of parental orders
Non-genuine visitor on ETA/visitor visa
Temporary work sponsor fails to meet obligation
Temporary visa holder convicted of an offence (any offence)
Page 48 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Reg 2.43(3) Mandatory Ground
Minister must cancel:
Visa holder’s presence:
o Contrary to Australia’s foreign policy interests or may be involved in
proliferation of weapons of mass destruction
o Risk to Australia’s security
Newer Cancellation Grounds
S116(AA) – Minister may cancel a visa if he or she is not satisfied as to the visa
holder’s identity
S116(1AB) – Minister may cancel a visa if incorrect information was given to the
Dept and that information was taken into account in the decision to grant a visa
S116(1AC) – Cancellation if benefit is given for sponsorship
Can a permanent visa be cancelled under s116?
S 117(2): Possibly
Permanent visa cannot be cancelled under 116(1) if:
The visa holder is in Australia; and
Was immigration cleared on last entry
However a permanent visa can be cancelled under:
Ss116(1AA-1AC)
Other sections (109, 501, 501A, 501B)
Personal Ministerial Powers
With notice – s 133C(1)
Minister must provide NOICC
Without notice – s133C(3)
Minister must send NOC
10.2 – Cancellation Process
Cancellation with Notice
Notice of intention to consider cancellation of visa (NOICC)
S 116 – s 119
S 133C(1) – common law
Policy Matters for s 116
Decision maker takes into consideration:
Purpose of the travel and stay in Australia
Is the person inside or outside Australia
Person’s history of compliance with visa conditions
Hardship caused if visa cancelled
Circumstances of grounds for cancellation
Visa holder’s record of behaviour with Immigration
Page 49 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
S 116 Notification
Method of notification: Reg 2.55
Time given to respond s 121 and reg 2.44
Other than at an interview
5 working days in Australia
Either 5 or 28 days outside of Australia
If extension sought: A further 5 working days
If no response within prescribed period, Minister may cancel visa without further notice
Cancellation without notice
S 128
o Visa holder is outside Australia
o S 116 cancellation grounds
Minister may cancel the visa without notice
S 129
o Minister sends notification of cancellation
Minister can revoke cancellation after receiving response (s 131)
Personal Ministerial Powers
Without notice
S 133C(3) – Minister’s personal power, minister may cancel the visa without notice
S 133F – Minister sends notification of cancellation (NOC)
Section 128 Notification
Method of notification
o Reg 2.47 and 2.55
Time given to respond:
o Reg 2.46
o 28 days outside Australia
o 5 minutes in immigration
Here the response time is for the purpose of seeking revocation of cancellation under s 131
Persons in Immigration Clearance
NOICC – S 116
The period of immigration clearance s 125; or
If in questioning detention, before the end of 4 hours s 126
NOC – S 128
5 minutes to respond; or
If the person departs Australia as soon as possible and wishes the cancellation to be
reconsidered while they are outside Australia – 28 days s 129 and reg 2.46
10.3 – Assessing Character Cancellation
Direction 90
Important Context
Page 50 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Long term residents
May have visas cancelled under s 500
Note also s 201: Deportation of PR and NZ citizens in Australia less than 10 years and
convicted of offence (life or more than 1 year)
Commonwealth Ombudsman’s 2006 Report very critical of the policies and
procedures used to cancel the residence visas of long term Australian residents.
Assessing Character Cases
S 499 Ministerial Direction No 90 – Visa refusal and cancellation under s 501 and revocation
of a mandatory cancellation of a visa under s 201CA
Purpose and Nature
Direction decision makers how to:
Exercise s 501 discretionary cancellations; and
Deal with requests to revoke mandatory cancellation under s 501CA
Binding on decisionmakers, including merits review tribunals
Different to normal policy documents
Ministerial Direction No. 90
Has three parts
o Part A – Considerations relevant to visa holders when considering whether to
exercise the discretion to cancel
o Part B – Considerations relevant to visa applicants when considering whether
to exercise the discretion to refuse a visa application
o Part C – Considerations relevant too former visa holders when considering
whether to exercise the discretion to revoke a visa cancellation
All Parts contain Primary and Other Considerations to be taken into account. Noting Item 7
Part 2:
Directs how to apply the directions
Primary consideration given greater weight than other considerations
1 or more primary considerations may outweigh other primary consideration
Direction 90 Preamble
5.2 Principles:
Australia has sovereign right to determine whether character concerns can stay here
If serious character concerns, irrelevant if no measurable risk of causing physical
harm to Australian community
Certain types of conduct e.g.: family violence or crimes against children or vulnerable
community members are so serious that irrelevant if countervailing considerations
exist
Higher level or tolerance of criminal or serious conduct of non-citizen living in
Australian community for most of their life, or from a very young age.
Item 8 Primary considerations
8 (1)
8 (2)
Page 51 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
8 (3)
8(4)
Other considerations
International non-refoulment obligations
Extent of impediments if removed
Impact on victims
Links to the Australian community, including:
o Strength, nature and duration of ties
o Impact on Australian business interests
Module 11 – Merits Review of Visa Decisions
11.1 – Introduction to Merits Review
Merits (or Administrative) Review
Review by an independent executive tribunal
A re making of the decision
Reviewer stands in the shoes of the original decision maker
Tribunal can consider new evidence
Difference between Merits and Judicial Review
Judicial review
Review of an administrative decision
By the Courts to assess if decision was made lawfully
Looking for an error of law
Court cannot re-make the decision
Court cannot consider new evidence
Notification of Review Rights
Section 66
Must notify applicant of decision
Explain reasons for decision
Notify applicant of review rights including:
o Decision can be reviewed
o Who can apply
o Where to apply
Page 52 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
o Time limits
AAT
Migration Division: s 338
o Part 5 reviewable decisions
o S 336M – 379G
Refugee Division: S 411
o Part 7 reviewable decisions
o S 408 – 441G
General Division S 500 and others
AAT may:
Affirm the decision
Vary the decision
Remit the matter for reconsideration
Set the decision aside and substitute a new decision
11.1.2 – Jurisdiction of the AAT
Jurisdiction – Migration and Refugee Division
Migration Cases – Part 5, Reviewable decisions: s 338
AAT can review decisions in relation to:
Onshore applications
Sponsored applications
General visa cancellations if holder is onshore
Business sponsorship
Detention due to visa cancellation
Refugee Cases Part 7 – Reviewable decisions: s 411
AAT can review decisions to:
Cancel or refuse protection visa
Does not review
Offshore humanitarian cases or offshore cancellations
Nor unauthorised maritime arrivals (see IAA)
Who can apply for a review
Review applicant (Part 5):
Visa applicant if in Australia
Sponsor/close relative if VA offshore
Business/ENS/RSMS sponsors
Review applicant (Part 7):
Protection visa applicant in Australia
Page 53 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Jurisdiction – General Division
Reviews decisions relating to:
Refusing/cancelling a visa on character grounds – S 500 (delegate)
Refusing/cancelling a protection visa on character grounds – S 500 (delegate) [unless
s 501(4) applies]
Cancelling business visas – S 136
Deporting a PR under criminal deportation S 201-203
Adverse ASIO assessments S 54 ASIO Act
Citizenship refusal s 54 Citizenship Act
Decisions made under FOI Act
Decisions not reviewed by AAT
Decisions made in immigration clearance
Personal decisions of the Minister
Decisions in relation to which the Minister has issued a conclusive certificate under s
339
IAA reviews
Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA)
Independent body, separate to the AAT (s 473JA)
Reviews decisions relating to unauthorised maritime arrivals entering Australia 13.08.12-
01.01.14
By referral only – no right to review
Review on the papers
11.2 – Adding the deemed notification period
Legislation
Method:
o S 494b
o Reg 2.55 (cancellation)
Deemed Notification Period
o S494C
o Reg 2.55 (cancellation)
Example
Edwards application for an onshore aged parent visa has been refused. He was notified by a
letter from the Dept.
Can he seek a review?
o Yes – AAT under s 338(2)
How much time does he have to lodge the review application?
o 21 days from the notification – reg 4.10(1)(a)
Include the DNP in your answer
o Notification by letter, 7 working days – s494C
o Total time limit – 7 working days plus 21 days, start from the day after the
date on the letter.
Page 54 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Jane’s remaining relative visa was cancelled under s 109 by a delegate. She was notified via
email.
Can she seek review?
o Yes – under s 338(3)
How much time does she have to lodge the review application?
o 7 working days from the date of notification – reg 4.10(1)(b)
Include the DNP in your answer
o Notification by email – immediate notification – reg 2.55
o Total time limit – 7 working days, 0 days of DNP
11.3 – Part 5 reviewable decisions
Making a Valid Review Application
1. Form
2. Fee
3. Time
Fee – MRD
Prescribed in s 347 and reg 4.1.2-4.1.3
Biennials increase
Currently $1826
o Fee halved if:
Financial hardship
Successful application
Pre-hearing procedure – MRD Part 5
Section 359:
AAT can obtain any information it considers relevant
Can make decision if information not given
o Right to oral hearing lost if no response
Section 359A Adverse information
AAT must invite applicant to comment on it
Unless non-disclosable
If no response
o Lose right to oral hearing
o Likely to be negative decision
Hearing – MRD Part 5
Review applicant has a right to appear – s 360
RA can appoint agent or solicitor – s 366A
RA can request interpreter – s 366C
Representative may not present arguments or address AAT at hearing – but may make oral
submissions upon request
Evidence – MRD Part 5
RA may request AAT to call witnesses
AAT may summon persons to appear or provide evidence
Failure of RA to appear at hearing:
Page 55 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
o AAT may make decision or dismiss application
Decisions
Sets out decision and reasons
Sets out finding on material questions of fact
Refer to the evidence/material upon which findings based
May make oral decision at end of hearing but must make a written statement
afterwards
11.3.1 – Part 7 reviewable decisions
Making a Valid Review Application
1. Form
2. Fee
3. Time
Fee – MRD
Prescribed in s 347 and reg 4.1.2-4.1.3
Biennials increase
Currently $1764
o Fee halved if:
Financial hardship
Successful application
Fee – Refugee Division
Prescribed in s 347 and reg 4.1.2-4.1.3
Biennials increase
Currently $1826
o Fee halved if:
Financial hardship
Successful application
Part 7 Decisions – Procedure
S 420
o Not necessary to observe technicalities, legal forms and rules of evidence
o Act according to substantial justice and merits of the case
S 424
o AAT can obtain any information it considers relevant
o Can make decision if information not given
Right to oral hearing lost if no response
Adverse information
Section 424A
o AAT must invite applicant to comment on it
o Unless non-disclosable
o If no response
Lose right to oral hearing
Likely to be a negative decision
Page 56 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Hearings
Conducted in private
Can make a favourable decision on the papers
Must be RA right to appear unless no response to request for information
All PV decisions censored
Evidence
By phone, CCTV…
RA can:
o Request witnesses
o Appoint agent/solicitor
o Request interpreter
AAT can require Dept to make investigations/medical exams and provide reports
Decisions
Sets out decision and reasons
Sets out finding on material questions of fact
Refer to the evidence/material upon which findings based
113.2 – AAT General Division Process
Fee – General Division
Prescribed in AAT Regulations 1976
Biennial increase
Currently $952
Fee reduced in certain circumstances
Hearing
RA may:
Appear to give evidence
Appoint RMA/Solicitor
Also
Generally public hearing
AAT may summons persons
Special Provisions for s 500 Reviews
No statement of reasons provided
Review application and decision letter and documentation
AAT must
Notify Minister
Wait 14 days before hearing
Provide documentation to Minister
Make decision within 84 days of original decision
Page 57 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
Module 12 – Judicial Review in Migration Decisions
12.1 Attempts to thwart judicial review
What is Judicial Review?
For migration decisions:
Review by the Federal Circuit Court, Federal Court or High Court of Australia:
• “It is where a court reviews a decision to make sure that the decision-maker used the
correct legal reasoning or followed the correct legal procedures” (ARC “The Scope of
Judicial Review – 2003 Discussion Paper)
Comparing to merits review
“It is not the function of the court to substitute its own decision for that of the administrator
by exercising a discretion, which the legislator has vested in the administrator. Its role is to
set limits on the exercise of that discretion, and a decision made within those boundaries
cannot be impugned” (Mason J (as he then was) in Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-
Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24, 40-41)
Prior to 1993
• Judicial review for migration decisions the same as for other administrative decisions:
▪ Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth)
▪ s39B Judiciary Act 1903
Page 58 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
▪ S75(v) Constitution
First attempts to limit
1980s & 1990s: massive increase in Federal Court judicial review
Government tried to limit judicial review:
Migration Reform Act 1992 (Cth): created Part 8 Migration Act 1958
& other legislation - initially reduced the number of successful cases
Migration Act Part 8
Part 8 excludes the application of the AD(JR) Act 1977 (Cth), which would otherwise apply
• section 474 (the privative clause);
• section 476 (Federal Circuit Court jurisdiction)
• section 476A (limit on Federal Court’s role in judicial review)
• section 484 (exclusive jurisdiction of Federal & High Courts)
• sections 477, 477A and 486A (time limits for judicial review
Reasons for restrictions
• Existence of extensive merits review
• Ongoing conflict between Federal Courts and the executive because of Federal
Court’s expansive reading of old Part 8 created by Migration Reform Act 1992 (Cth)
• Too many appeals from tribunals to Federal Court and High Court
• Perceived abuse of judicial review system
What is a privative clause?
A legislative provision intended to exclude review, by the courts, of administrative decisions
made under the migration legislation.
474(1) A privative clause decision:
a) is final and conclusive; and
b) must not be challenged, appealed against, reviewed, quashed or called in question in
any court; and
c) is not subject to prohibition, mandamus, injunction, declaration or certiorari in any
court on any account.
But is it valid?
Short answer is YES
BUT…
Not if the decision-maker has made a jurisdictional error!
Dept explanation
Section 474 (the “privative clause”) of the Migration Act was enacted with the intention of
restricting access to judicial review. The clause has been interpreted narrowly by the courts,
however, and now has little practical operation. Decision makers must always act in
accordance with their delegated legislative powers and responsibilities. A failure to do so is
likely to result in decisions being overturned on review. (PAM3 GenGuideA Visa App
Procedures)
12.2 Jurisdictional error trumps privative clause
Plaintiff s157 and s134
The High Court ruled:
Page 59 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
• Parliament had power to enact ‘privative clause’ legislation
• Privative clauses are valid
BUT: Decisions affected by ‘jurisdictional error’ are not privative clause decisions
• Decisions affected by ‘jurisdictional error’ are not actually decisions at all
What is a jurisdictional error?
MIMA v Yusuf (2001) 180 ALR 1
High Court upheld Craig v South Australia
‘Jurisdictional error’: decision maker or tribunal:
Falls into an error of law identifies a wrong issue; asks itself a wrong question; ignores
relevant material; or relies on irrelevant material; and makes erroneous finding; reaches
mistaken conclusion If so, the decision maker has exceeded its authority or power and has
made a jurisdictional error.
Common categories of jurisdictional error
• Identifies wrong issue or asks the wrong questions
• Consideration of irrelevant material or failing to consider relevant material
• Fails to follow mandatory procedures
• Doesn’t consider the entirety of the applicant’s claims as made
• Actual or apprehended bias
• Illogical, irrational, unreasonable decision
Examples
Ignoring relevant material:
Khanam v Minister for Immigration (2009) 111 ALD 421
MRT failed to consider stated reason for applicant’s motive for visiting mother in Australia
Taking irrelevant material into account
Sidhu v Migration Review Tribunal [2004]FCAFC 341; BC200409037
MRT found student to be “non-genuine” by taking into account that he ultimately wished to
secure permanent residence in Australia.
Failure to follow mandatory procedure
SAAP v Minister for Immigration (2005) 228 CLR 294
RRT failed to comply with mandatory requirement to put any adverse information to the
applicant in writing
VFWY v MIMIA [2005] FCA 1723: the interpreting was so poor that the FC considered there
was no hearing
SZFDE v MIMAC [2007] HCA35: High Court held that the fraudulent behaviour of the
removed migration agent affected the decision
Practical Effect of s 157
• To determine whether there is jurisdictional error,
• Court must hear review application!
12.3 Judicial Review process
Page 60 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
After s 157
• Only avenue was direct application to High Court
• Parliament gave Federal Magistrates Court the same original jurisdiction as High
Court
• Also gave Federal Court limited jurisdiction
Jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit Court FCCA – Section 476
The FCCA reviews all migration decisions except:
(a) a primary decision:
A decision that was Part 5, 7 or s500 merits reviewable
but no review was sought
Primary Decision – s 476(4)
Primary decision means a privative clause or purported privative clause decision (see s5E)
that:
• is reviewable under Part 5 or 7 or section 500 whether or not it has been reviewed or
• would have been reviewable if an application for such review had been made within a
specified period
Federal Circuit Court: No jurisdiction for:
(b) a privative clause decision, or purported privative clause decision, of the Administrative
Appeals Tribunal on review under section 500;
(c) a privative clause decision, or purported privative clause decision, made personally by the
Minister under section 501, 501A, 501B or 501C;
(d) a privative clause decision or purported privative clause decision mentioned in subsection
474(7).
Limit to Federal Court Jurisdiction s 476A
Section 476A (1)(b) - the decision is a privative clause decision or purported privative
clause decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal under section 500 of the Act; or
Section 476A (1)(c) - the decision is a privative clause decision or purported privative
clause decision made personally by the Minister under sections 501, 501A, 501B or 501C of
the Act
High Court of Australia
Original jurisdiction under s 75 of the Constitution:
• …to make it constitutionally certain that there would be a jurisdiction capable of
restraining officers of the Commonwealth from exceeding Federal power: Bank of
NSW v The Commonwealth (1948) 76 CLR 1 at 363.
Appellate jurisdiction to review decisions of the FCA where special leave granted –
judgements binding on all lower courts
Parliament cannot limit the jurisdiction.
Outcomes
A Court cannot remake the decision.
It can either:
• dismiss the application; or
• 'quash' or set aside decision
Page 61 of 62
5124LAW – Immigration and Refugee Law
If successful:
• visa refusal - case returns to the Tribunal
• cancellation – it is as if the visa was never cancelled (but it may have long expired)
Time limits
Section 477(1)
• Application within 35 days of the date of the migration decision.
• No deemed notification date
Section 477(2)
• FCC may extend TL if in interests of administration of justice
Section 477(5)
• 35 days begins to run irrespective of the validity of the migration decision.
FCA – s 477A
HCA - s 486A
Visa status during JR
BV will expire 35 days after notification of decision
If apply for JR within time will normally be entitled to same BV
MUST APPLY FOR NEW BRIDGING VISA
Caution
Section 486I lawyer certifies in writing - reasonable grounds for believing - reasonable
prospect of success
Section 486E(1)…must not encourage litigant to commence or continue migration litigation
if it has no reasonable prospect of success;
Section 486E(2)…
“migration litigation need not be:
• (a) hopeless; or
• (b) bound to fail;
for it to have no reasonable prospect of success.”
Page 62 of 62