0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views9 pages

Understanding Student Development Trends

Development refers to long-term personal changes that unfold over time and have multiple influences and effects. Students' development is important for teachers to understand, though what aspects are most relevant depends on how classes are organized. Developmental trends vary in their breadth and whether changes happen in a strict, predictable sequence or more variably over time.

Uploaded by

Husna Ahmed
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views9 pages

Understanding Student Development Trends

Development refers to long-term personal changes that unfold over time and have multiple influences and effects. Students' development is important for teachers to understand, though what aspects are most relevant depends on how classes are organized. Developmental trends vary in their breadth and whether changes happen in a strict, predictable sequence or more variably over time.

Uploaded by

Husna Ahmed
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

 

Module 12: Student Developmen


Introduction to Student Development 


Development refers to long-term personal changes that have multiple sources


and multiple effects. 

Some human developments are especially broad and take years to unfold
fully.



Example:

A person's ever-evolving ability to “read” other's moods may take a lifetime to


develop fully. Other developments are faster and more focused, like a
person's increasing skill at solving crossword puzzles.



The faster and simpler the change is, the more likely it is to be called
“learning” instead of development. The difference between learning and
development is a matter of degree. 



Example:

When a child learns to name the planets of the solar system the child may not
need a lot of time, or does the learning involve a multitude of experiences. So
it is probably better to think of that particular experience, learning to name the
planets, as an example of learning rather than of development (Salkind, 2004;
Lewis, 1997).

Students’ development matters for teachers, but the way it matters depends
partly on how schooling is organised. 

In teaching a single, “self-contained” class level, the benefits of knowing about


development will be less explicit, but just as real, as if teaching many class
levels.


Working exclusively with a single class highlights differences among students


that happen in spite of their similar ages, and obscures similarities that
happen because of having similar ages.


Under these conditions it is still easy to notice students’ diversity, but harder
to know how much of it comes from differences in long-term development,
compared to differences in short-term experiences. 

Knowledge about long term changes is still useful, however, in planning


appropriate activities and in holding appropriate expectations about students. 

What changes in students can a teacher expect relatively soon simply from
his current program of activities, and which ones may take a year or more to
show up? 

This is a question that developmental psychology can help to answer.


If a teacher teaches multiple class levels then his need for developmental
knowledge will be more obvious because he will confront wide age differences
on a daily basis. 



Example:

A physical education teacher may teach kindergarten children at one time


during the day, but sixth-graders at another time, or teach seventh-graders at
one time but twelfth-graders at another.


Students will differ more obviously because of age, in addition to differing


because of other factors like their skills or knowledge learned recently. 


Nonetheless, the instructional challenge will be the same as the one faced by
teachers of single-level classes: all teachers want to know what activities and
expectations are appropriate for their students. 


To answer this question, teachers need to know not only about how students
are unique, but also about general trends of development during childhood
and adolescence.

Developmental Trends

Developmental trends in human beings vary in two important ways.



 Their Generality
 Sequence and Hierarchy

1) Developmental trends differ in their generality

Some theories or models of development boldly assert that certain changes happen to
virtually every person on the planet, and often at relatively predictable points in life. 

A theory may assert that toddlers acquire a spoken language, or that teenagers form a
sense of personal identity. Individuals who do not experience these developments would
be rare, though not necessarily disabled as a result. Other theories propose
developmental changes that are more limited, claiming only that the changes happen to
some people or only under certain conditions. 

Example:

Developing a female gender role does not happen to everyone, but only to the females in
a population, and the details vary according to the family, community or society in which
a child lives.

2) Developmental trends differ in how strictly they are sequenced and hierarchical

In some views of development, changes are thought to happen in a specific order and to
build on each other like a sort of “staircase” model of development (Case, 1991, 1996). 

Example:

A developmental psychologist might argue that young people must have tangible, hands-
on experience with new materials before they can reason about the materials in the
abstract. The order cannot be reversed. 

In other views of development, change happens, but not with a sequence or


end point that is uniform. This sort of change is more like a “kaleidoscope”
than a staircase (Levinson, 1990; Lewis, 1997; Harris, 2006). 




Example:

A person who becomes permanently disabled may experience complex long-


term changes in personal values and priorities that are different both in timing
and content from most people's developmental pathway.


The preference for integrative perspectives makes sense given educators’


need to work with and teach large numbers of diverse students both efficiently
and effectively. 


But the approach also risks over generalising or over simplifying the
experiences of particular children and youth. It can also confuse what does
happen as certain children (like middle-class ones) develop with what should
happen to children.

To understand this point, imagine two children of about the same age who
have dramatically very different childhood experiences - for example, one who
grows up in poverty and another who grows up financially well-off. 




In what sense can we say that these two children experience the same
underlying developmental changes as they grow up? 

And how much should they even be expected to do so? 


Developmental psychology highlights the “sameness” or common ground


between these two children. As such, it serves as counterpoint to knowledge
of their obvious uniqueness, and places their uniqueness in broader
perspective.

The main points from this module are as follows:



Development refers to long-term personal changes that have multiple sources


and multiple effects. The faster and simpler the change is, the more likely it is
to be called “learning” instead of development.

Students’ development matters for teachers, but the way it matters depends
partly on how schooling is organised. 

Developmental trends in human beings vary in two important ways.


Developmental trends differ in:

1. Their generality

2. How strictly they are sequenced and hierarchical


In some views of development, changes are thought to happen in a specific


order and to build on each other like a sort of “staircase” model of
development (Case, 1991, 1996). 

In other views of development, change happens, but not with a sequence or


end point that is uniform. This sort of change is more like a “kaleidoscope”
than a staircase (Levinson, 1990; Lewis, 1997; Harris, 2006). 

Common questions

Powered by AI

In single-level classrooms, understanding of student development helps teachers notice differences among students due to similar ages, though not as explicitly as in multi-level setups . In multi-level classrooms, the need for developmental knowledge is more evident because teachers encounter wider age differences, which helps in planning appropriate activities and expectations for diverse student needs .

Developmental psychology suggests that educators should integrate knowledge of general developmental trends with awareness of individual student differences to manage diverse classrooms effectively . By understanding common growth patterns and individual uniqueness, teachers can plan appropriate activities and set realistic expectations tailored to each student's developmental stage. This balanced approach fosters both efficiency and sensitivity in education, accommodating wide-ranging abilities and needs within a classroom .

Developmental hierarchies and sequences, viewed as a "staircase" model, suggest that earlier skills must be mastered before advancing to more complex ones . This understanding impacts instructional strategies by guiding educators to structure lessons that build foundational knowledge progressively. For instance, ensuring students have tangible experiences before abstract reasoning ensures cognitive readiness for more complex tasks. Conversely, recognizing that not all changes follow a strict sequence allows flexibility in adapting instruction to meet diverse student needs .

Generality in developmental trends refers to changes that are nearly universal, occurring at predictable life stages, like language acquisition in toddlers, while sequence pertains to whether these changes occur in a specific order . Educators need to consider both these dimensions to effectively tailor learning experiences. The generality aspect ensures they address common developmental milestones, while understanding sequence allows teachers to scaffold learning appropriately, recognizing that some skills build on others in a "staircase" manner .

Integrative perspectives risk oversimplifying children's experiences by generalizing developmental trends, potentially overlooking unique experiences of individual children. This is problematic as it may conflate typical experiences of specific groups (e.g., middle-class children) with what should universally happen, ignoring socio-cultural influences and individual paths . Therefore, while integration aids in managing diverse classrooms, educators must avoid excessive generalization that could undervalue individual student needs .

The primary distinction between learning and development is the time and complexity involved. Development refers to long-term personal changes with multiple sources and effects, taking years or even a lifetime to unfold. In contrast, learning is typically faster and more focused, often involving straightforward changes that do not require a multitude of experiences .

Having knowledge of developmental psychology helps teachers tailor their instruction to the varied needs and abilities present in different age groups within the same subject area. For example, older students might engage in more complex reasoning tasks, while younger students require foundational, hands-on experiences, reflecting the hierarchical sequence in development. This understanding enables educators to employ appropriate teaching strategies, manage expectations, and foster optimal learning environments across age-diverse classrooms, ultimately enhancing educational outcomes .

Developmental psychology balances focus on differences and commonalities to provide a comprehensive understanding of human growth. Emphasizing commonalities helps identify fundamental developmental milestones and trends applicable to most children. Simultaneously, acknowledging differences ensures that educators and psychologists consider the unique contexts and individual pathways that shape each child's development. This dual focus allows for more informed and sensitive approaches to teaching and support .

A teacher might apply the concept of developmental stages to subjects like mathematics, where skills build progressively. By aligning lessons with students' cognitive and developmental readiness, starting from concrete experiences before addressing abstract concepts, the teacher ensures a systematic growth in understanding. This approach follows the hierarchical development model, supporting skill acquisition at each stage and providing scaffolding where needed, thus facilitating a steady increase in mathematical competency .

According to the document, children who grow up in poverty and those who grow up financially well-off may have distinct childhood experiences, yet development psychology emphasizes the same fundamental developmental changes in both groups . However, socioeconomic status can dramatically impact the specific experiences, resources, and support available to each child, affecting educational outcomes and personal growth. Educators must bridge these gaps, fostering environments that recognize these disparities while promoting equitable learning opportunities for all students .

You might also like