Laplace Transform in Engineering Math
Laplace Transform in Engineering Math
Course objectives
o To introduce students to integral transformations and their application to the solution
of Ordinary Differential Equations
o Introduce the power series solution technique to Ordinary Differential Equations
o To develop problem solving skills and proof skills by working on specific problems
o To focus on analytical techniques for the classical linear PDE of physics and
engineering (heat, wave and Laplace equations), and their frequent occurrence in
applications.
Course outline
1. Fourier and Laplace transforms
2. Power series solution to ODEs
3. Gamma and Beta functions
4. Bessel functions
5. Legendre functions
6. Applied Statistics
7. Applied Probability
Reference text books
1. Advanced Engineering mathematics by Stroud
2. Calculus and analytical geometry by Edwards
3. Advanced Engineering mathematics by Wylie
4. Advanced engineering mathematics by Kreyszig
5. Advanced Engineering mathematics by Bajpai
Course assessment
Three course work assignments with an assignment at the end of every pair of chapters
and two tests with a test at the end of three chapters.
1 EM
THE LAPLACE TRANSFORM
2 EM
Department of Mechanical Engineering
INTRODUCTION
In this way the laplace transformation reduces the problem of solving a differential
equation to an algebraic problem. Relatively simple operations on the transform
correspond to more complicated operations on the function being transformed.
L f (t ) = F ( s) = f (t )e − st dt
0
f (t ) = L -1 (F )
k
L (f) = L (k) = ke dt = − e − st
− st
0
s 0
L (1) =
k
s
Example 2. What is L (cos at ) ?
3 EM
e − st (− s cos at + a sin at)
L (cos at ) = cos ate dt = − st
0
s2 + a2 0
s
= 2 s0
s + a2
s
cos at = L−1 2 2
s + a
1 −( s − a )t
L ( e )= e e dt =
at at − st
e ;
0
a−s 0
1
L ( e at )=
s−a
We have noted that given a function f (t ) , we can find the Laplace transform F ( s ). Now
we would like to find f (t ) , given F ( s ).
it follows from the uniqueness property of Laplace transform that the function f (t ) of t ,
s
whose Laplace transform is 2 must be cos at. In other words,
s + a2
s
L−1 2 2
= cos at.
s + a
The symbol L−1 denotes the Inverse Laplace Transform Operator. Below we tabulate a
few transforms with the corresponding inverses.
4 EM
F (s) f (t ) F (s) f (t )
1 1 a a
s s
1 t 1 e − at
s2 s+a
1 e at n! tn
s−a s n +1
1 sin at 1 t n −1
s + a2
2
a sn (n − 1)!
s cos at s cosh at
s + a2
2
s − a2
2
Laf (t ) + bg(t ) = aL ( f ) + bL (g )
Proof. By definition,
1 1 1
L (cosh at ) =
1 1
L(e at ) + L(e − at ) = +
2 2 2s−a s+a
That is, when s>a,
L (cosh at ) =
s
s − a2
2
5 EM
Example 5. Prove that L (t n ) =
n!
s n +1
We begin by briefly introducing a special function which will enable us do the proof.
This is the gamma function which is defined as
(x ) = t x −1e −t dt ,
0
Using several values of x:
(1) = e −t dt = −e −t
=1
0
0
(2) = te −t dt = −t e −t
+ e −t dt =1
0
0 0
0
0 0
= 0 − nt n −1e −t + n(n − 1) t n − 2 e −t dt
0
0
Since n 0 , the last term decreases to n=0 with progressive integrations yielding
Thus,
(n + 1) = n! (1)
L ( t ) = t n e − st dt
n
Let p = st , dp = sdt and the limits remain the same such that
n
p dp
L ( t )= e − p
n
0
s s
1
p e
n −p
= dp
n +1
(2)
s 0
The improper integral above can be related to the Gamma function. One has to put into
consideration that p is only a dummy variable and that
6 EM
0 0
p
n
e − p dp = (n + 1)
0
And,
(n + 1) n!
L ( t n )= n +1
= n +1 , using (1)
s s
dn
If L−1 F ( s) = f (t ) , then L−1 n F ( s ) = (−1) n t n f ( t ) .
ds
1
Thus, for instance, since L−1 2 = t , there follows that
s
d 1 −2 2 2!
L−1 2 = L−1 3 = −L−1 3 = −L−1 2+1 = (−1)t t = −t 2 .
ds s s s s
7 EM
PARTIAL FRACTIONS
Examples:
5s 2 + 14s + 2
1. Find L−1 2
;
( s − 2)( s + 3)
We note that
5s 2 + 14s + 2 A B C
= + + .
( s − 2)( s + 3) 2
( s − 2) ( s + 3) ( s + 3) 2
On putting the right hand on the same denominator, and equating the numerators,
we find that
5s 2 + 14s + 2 = A( s + 3)2 + B( s − 2)( s + 3) + C ( s − 2) ,
where upon A = 2, B = 3 and C = −1. Therefore
5s 2 + 14 s + 2 −1 2 −1 3 −1 1
L−1 = L + L - L 2
( s − 2)( s + 3) 2
( s − 2) ( s + 3) ( s + 3)
= 2e 2t + 3e −3t − te −3t .
s 2 + 3s − 7
2. Find L−1 .
( s − 1)( s + 2)
2
We note that
8 EM
s 2 + 3s − 7 A Bs + C
= + 2 .
( s − 1)( s + 2) ( s − 1) ( s + 2)
2
On putting the right hand on the same denominator, equating the numerators, we
find that
s 2 + 2s − 7 = A( s 2 + 2) + Bs( s − 1) + C (s − 1) ,
whereupon A = −1, B = 2 and C = 5. Therefore
s 2 + 3s − 7 −1 −1 −1 2s −1 5
L−1 =L +L 2 +L 2
( s − 1)( s + 2) ( s − 1) ( s + 2) ( s + 2)
2
5
= −et + 2 cos 2t + sin 2t.
2
Exercises: Express the following transforms in partial fractions and find the
corresponding inverse Laplace transforms:
7s − 5 2s 2 + 1 s 2 + 5s + 3 s2
i) ; ii) ; iii) ; iv)
( s − 1)( s − 2)( s − 3) s ( s + 1) 2 s 2 + 7 s + 10 ( s + 2)3
s +1
v) 2 .
( s + 7 s + 2) 2
( s − 2) 4
= 6L- −1 2
+ 2L- −1 2
( s − 2) + 4 ( s − 2) + 4
2 2
2s − 8
4. Find L−1 2 .
( s − 8s + 15)
Note that this is a straightforward case, since the degree of the numerator is lower
than that of the denominator! Hence
9 EM
2s − 8 A Bs + C
= + .
s − 8s + 15 ( s − 3) ( s − 5)
2
Again on putting the right hand on the same denominator, equating the
numerators, we find that
2s − 8 = A( s − 5) + B( s − 3) ,
whereupon A = 1 and B = 1. Therefore
2s − 8 −1 1 −1 1
L−1 2 =L +L =e +e .
3t 5t
s + −8s + 15 ( s − 3) (s − 5
5s − 8
5. Find L−1 .
s ( s − 4)
Note that this is also a straightforward case, since the degree of the numerator is
lower than that of the denominator! Hence
5s − 8 A B
= + .
s( s − 4) s ( s − 4)
Once again, putting the right hand on the same denominator, equating the
numerators, we find that
5s − 8 = A( s − 4) + Bs ,
where upon we find that A = 2 and B = 3. Therefore
5s − 8 −1 2 −1 3
L−1 = L +L = 2 + 3e .
4t
s ( s − 4) s s − 4
3s + 7
6. Find L−1 2 .
s − 2s − 3
Note that we can give a shift of 1 to s and thus recast the transform as
3s + 7 3( s − 1) + 10 3( s − 1) + 10 ( s − 1) 2
= = =3 +5 .
s − 2 s − 3 ( s − 1) − 4 ( s − 1) − 2
2 2 2 2
( s − 1) − 2
2 2
( s − 1) 2 − 2 2
Hence
3s + 7 −1 ( s − 1) 2
L−1 2 = 3L 2
+ 5L−1 2
s − 2s − 3 ( s − 1) − 2 ( s − 1) − 2 .
2 2
So far we have used classical techniques in evaluating the constants in the partial
fractions. There are, however, other shorts to the evaluation of these coefficients at the
poles, that is, at those values of s for which the denominators of the partial fractions
varnish. From example, consider the transform
5s − 8 A B
= +
s( s − 4) s s − 4
10 EM
Multiplying through by s and taking the limits as s → 0 , we have
5s − 8 5s − 8 As Bs
lim s = lim = 2 = lim + lim = A.
s →0 s( s − 4) s →0 ( s − 4) s →0 s s →0 s − 4
Hence
5s − 8 2 3
= +
s( s − 4) s s − 4
and
5s − 8 −1 2 −1 3
L−1 = L +L = 2 + 3e .
4t
s ( s − 4)
s s − 4
Using the same “cover-up” rule, we can express transforms in forms that we can
recognise as standard ones and thus easily generate the corresponding inverse transforms.
−1 2s 2 − 4
Example 1: Find L
( s − 3)( s − 2)( s + 1)
Expressing the transform in partial fractions as
2s 2 − 4 A B C
= + +
( s − 3)( s − 2)( s + 1) s − 3 s − 2 s + 1
Using the “cover-up rule”, we have
2s 2 − 4 2s 2 − 4 14 7
A = lim( s − 3) = lim = = ,
s →3 ( s − 3)( s − 2)( s + 1) s →3 ( s − 2)( s + 1) 1 4 2
2s 2 − 4 2s 2 − 4 4 4
B = lim( s − 2) = lim = =− ,
s →2 ( s − 3)( s − 2)( s + 1) s →2 (s − 3)(s + 1) (−1) 3 3
2s − 4
2
2s − 4
2
−2 1
C = lim( s + 1) = lim = =− .
s →−1 ( s − 3)( s − 2)( s + 1) s →3 ( s − 2)( s − 3) (−3) (−4) 6
Therefore,
2s 2 − 4 7 1 4 1 1 1
= − − ,
( s − 3)( s − 2)( s + 1) 2 s − 3 3 s − 2 6 s + 1
and
−1 2s 2 − 4 7 −1 1 4 −1 1 1 −1 1
L = L − L − L
( s − 3)( s − 2)( s + 1) 2 s − 3 3 s − 2 6 s + 1 ,
7 4 1
= e 3t − e 2 t − e − t .
2 3 6
11 EM
2 − 11s
Example 2: Find L−1
( s − 2)( s + 2s + 2)
2
and
2 − 11s −1 1 −1 ( s + 1) −1 1
L−1 = −2 L + 2L − 5L
( s − 2)( s + 2 s + 2) s − 2 ( s + 1) + 1 ( s + 1) + 1 ,
2 2 2
In case of repeated simple poles we can use the “cover-up rule” also. For example, for the
s+3
transform F ( s ) = , we may first of all recast it as
( s − 2)( s + 1) 2
s+3 1 s+3 1 A B
= = +
( s − 2)( s + 1) 2
s + 1 ( s − 2)( s + 1) s + 1 ( s + 1) ( s − 2)
where
s+3 s+3 2
A = lim( s + 1) = lim =−
s →−1 ( s − 2)( s + 1) s →−1 ( s − 2) 3
12 EM
and
s+3 s+3 5
B = lim( s − 2) = lim =
s →2 ( s − 2)( s + 1) s → 2 ( s + 1) 3
With these coefficients, the transform then becomes
s+3 5 1 2 1
= −
( s − 2)( s + 1) 2
3 ( s + 1)( s − 2) 3 ( s + 1) 2
Further still, the first partial fraction on the right can be expressed as
1 C D
= +
( s + 1)( s − 2) s + 1 s − 2
where upon we have
1 1 1
C = lim( s + 1) = lim =− ,
s →−1 ( s + 1)( s − 2) s →−1 s − 2 3
1 1 1
D = lim( s − 2) = lim = ,
s →2 ( s + 1)( s − 2) s →2 s + 1 3
With the latter results, the whole transform them becomes
s+3 5 1 5 1 2 1
= − −
( s − 2)( s + 1) 2
9 ( s − 2) 9 ( s + 1) 3 ( s + 1) 2
Hence
s+3 5 −1 1 5 −1 1 2 −1 1
L−1 2
= L − L − L 2
( s − 2)( s + 1) 9 s − 2 9 s + 1 3 ( s + 1)
5 5 2
= e2t − e−t − te −t
9 9 3
1
Example 3: Find L−1 2
( s + 1)( s + 4)
2
where
1 1 1
A = lim ( s 2 + 1) 2 = lim = ,
s →−1
2
( s + 1)( s + 4) s →−1 ( s + 4) 3
2 2 2
1 1 1
B = lim ( s 2 + 4) 2 = lim =− .
s →−4
2
( s + 1)( s + 4) s →−4 ( s + 1)
2 2 2
3
With these values of the coefficients, the transform becomes
1 1 1 1 1
= − 2 .
( s + 1)( s + 4) 3 s + 1 3 s + 4
2 2 2
Therefore,
1 1 −1 1 1 −1 2 1 1
L−1 2 = L 2 − L 2 = sin t − sin 2t.
( s + 1)( s + 4) 3 s +1 6 s + 4 3
2
6
13 EM
s
Example 4: Find L−1 2
( s + 1)( s + 4)
2
Regarding s 2 as again a simple pole and using the preceding results, we may recast the
transform as
s 1 s 1 s
= − 2 .
( s + 1)( s + 4) 3 s + 1 3 s + 4
2 2 2
Therefore,
s 1 −1 s 1 −1 s 1 1
L−1 2 = L 2 − L 2 = cos t − cos 2t.
( s + 1)( s + 4) 3 s +1 3 s + 4 3
2
3
1
Example 5: Find L−1 5
( s + 4)
1 t
n
−1
Invoking the Shift Theorem, and remembering that L n +1 = w, e get
s n!
1 e t −4 t 4 −4 t 4
e t
L−1 5
= = .
( s + 4) 4! 24
1
Example 6: Find L−1 2
s + 4s + 9
Giving a shift to s , the transform becomes
1 1 1 1 5
= = = .
s + 4s + 9 ( s + 2) + 5 ( s + 2)2 + 5
( ) ( 5)
2 2 2 2
5 ( s + 2) 2 +
Hence
−1 1 1 −1 5 1 −2t
L 2 = L 2
= e sin 5t.
s + 4s + 9 5 ( s + 2) 2 +
( )5
5
14 EM
3s − 8 1 s +1
viii) F (s) = ; ix) F (s) = ;
4 s 2 + 25 s2 s2 + 1
s+2 1
x) F (s) = 2 ; xi) F ( s) = ;
s ( s + 3) s ( s + 4 s + 13)
2
s+3 3s + 7
xii) F ( s) = 2 ; xiii) F ( s) = 2 .
( s + 6 s + 25) 2 s − 2s − 3
Solutions:
2 s + 1 3t
iv) L−1 2
= e (2t + 7);
( s − 3)
s
L−1 2 = e ( cos t + sin t ) ;
t
v)
s − 2 s + 2
3s + 2 1
L−1 2 = ( 23e + 7e ) ;
7t −3 t
vi)
s − 4 s − 21 10
1 1 2t
vii) L−1 4 3
= ( e − 1 − 2t − 2t 2 ) ;
s − 2 s 8
3s − 8 3 5t 4 5t
viii) L−1 2 = cos − sin ;
4 s + 25 4 2 5 2
1 s +1
ix) L−1 2 2 = 1 + t − cos t − sin t ;
s s + 1
s+2 2 1 1 −3t
x) L−1 2 = t+ − e ;
s ( s + 3) 3 9 9
s+3 1
xi) L−1 2 2
= ( 3 − 2e−2t sin 3t − 3e−2t cos 3t ) ;
( s + 6s + 25) 39
3 s + 7 1 −3 t
xii) L−1 2 = te sin 4t.
s − 2s − 3 8
15 EM
LAPLACE TRANSFORMS OF DERIVATIVES
dv du
Setting u = e − st and = f (t ), so that = − se − st and v = f (t ), and invoking
dt dt
the formula for integration by parts to perform the integrand on the right-hand
side, we have
L f (t ) = e− st f (t ) + s e− st f (t )dt.
0
0
part yields only − f (0). Therefore, we are left with the expression
L f (t ) = − f (0) + s e− st f (t )dt.
0
If then we recognise that the remaining integral is in fact the Laplace transform of
f (t ) , there immediately follows that
L f (t ) = sF (s) − f (0),
which confirms our assertion.
16 EM
L f ( n ) (t ) = s n L f (t ) − s n − k f ( k −1) (0)
n
k =1
where f (0)
(0) = f (0).
The above results or formulae are very fundamental in the solution of differential
equations. Thus if we let
dx d2x dnx
x t =0 = x0 , = x1 , = x2 , …, = xn
dt t =0 dt 2 t =0 dt n t =0
with L f (t ) = X , then we have
L f (t ) = sX − x0 .
L f (t ) = s 2 X − sx0 − x1 ,
L f (t ) = s3 X − s 2 x0 − sx1 − x2 ,
L f (iv ) (t ) = s 4 X − s3 x0 − s 2 x1 − sx2 − x3 ,
L f ( v ) (t ) = s5 X − s 4 x0 − s3 x1 − s 2 x2 − sx3 − x4 ,
and so on. In general, therefore,
L f ( n ) (t ) = s n X − s n − k xk −1 .
n
k =1
Exercises:
a) Find L sin(bt − ) ;
b) Find L cos(at + )
c) Find L e−2t ( cos t + 6sin t )
1 1
d) Find L sin at − cos bt
a b
17 EM
SOLUTIONS OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS BY USE OF LAPLACE
TRANSFORMS
In solving differential equations by use of Laplace transforms, four distinct steps are
followed:
1. The differential equation in question is written in terms of its Laplace transform,
2. The initial conditions are inserted or applied,
3. The transform equation is re-arranged to give the transform of the solution,
4. The inverse of the transform of the solution is determined.
Given a function f (t ) , we recall that the Laplace transforms of the derivatives of the
various orders of this solution are given by:
L f (t ) = sF (s) − f (0)
L f (t ) = s 2 F (s) − sf (0) − f (0),
L f (t ) = s3 F (s) − s 2 f (0) − sf (0) − f (0),
L f (iv ) (t ) = s 4 F (s) − s3 f (0) − s 2 f (0) − sf (0) − f (0),
and so on, such that in general we have
L f ( n ) (t ) = s n F ( s ) − s n − k f ( k −1) (0), n = 1, 2,3,
n
k =1
18 EM
L f ( n ) (t ) = s n X − s n − k xk −1 , n = 1, 2,3,
n
k =1
dx
Example 1: Solve − 4 x = 8 , given that x = 2 at t = 0.
dt
A convenient notation would of course have been x − 4x = 8 , x = 2 at t = 0.
19 EM
Taking the inverse transform, we thus find that
x = 4e − 2.
4t
dx
Example 2: Solve 2 + 3 x = e 4t , given that x = 5 at t = 0.
dt
Let us convenient write the equation as
2 x + 3 x = e 4t , with x = 5 at t = 0.
20 EM
dx
Example 3: Solve 2 + 5 x = e −2t , given that x = 1 at t = 0.
dt
Let us convenient write the equation as
2 x + 5 x = e −2t , with x = 3 at t = 0.
dx
Example 4: Solve 3 − 4 x = sin 2t , given that x = 1/ 3 at t = 0.
dt
Let us conveniently write the equation as
21 EM
3x − 4x = sin 2t , with x = 1/ 3 at t = 0.
or
2 (9 / 26)( s 2 + 4) + ( Bs + C )(3s − 4)
= .
( s 2 + 4)(3s − 4) ( s 2 + 4)(3s − 4)
Multiplying out the numerator on the right-hand side and collecting coefficients
of powers of s , we have
2 [(9 / 26) + 3B) s 2 + (3C − 4 B) s + [18 /13 − 4C )
= .
( s 2 + 4)(3s − 4) ( s 2 + 4)(3s − 4)
Equating coefficients of powers of s on both sides, we get the system of
equations:
(9 / 26) + 3B = 0,
18 /13 − 4C = 2,
3C − 4B = 0.
22 EM
3
From the first equation, we have B = − . From the second equation we
26
2
have C = − .
13
With these values of the coefficients, the transform equation becomes:
2 9 (3s + 4)
= − ,
( s + 4)(3s − 4) 26(3s − 4) 26( s 2 + 4)
2
or
2 3 1 3 s 4
= − − ,
( s + 4)(3s − 4) 26 s − (4 / 3) 26 s + 4 26( s 2 + 4)
2 2
Therefore,
1 2
X = + 2
3s − 4 ( s + 4)(3s − 4)
1 1 3 1 3 s 4
= + − −
3 s − (4 / 3) 26 s − (4 / 3) 26 s + 4 26( s 2 + 4)
2
35 1 3 s 4
= − − .
78 s − (4 / 3) 26 s + 4 26( s 2 + 4)
2
d2x dx
Example 5: Solve 2
− 4 x = cos 2t , , given that x = 2, = 3 at t = 0.
dt dt
dx
A convenient notation would of course have been x − 4x = cos 2t , x = 2, = 3 at t = 0.
dt
23 EM
s s 3
X = +2 2 + 2
( s + 4)( s − 4)
2 2
s −4 s −4
Step 4: Take the inverse transform of X :
s
First break 2 into partial fractions as
( s + 4)( s 2 − 4)
s As + B C D
= 2 + + .
( s + 4)( s − 4) s + 4 s + 2 s − 2
2 2
d2x dx dx
Example 6: Solve 2 − 3 + 2 x = 0, given that x = 4, = 3 at t = 0.
dt dt dt
24 EM
( s 2 − 3s + 2) X − 4s + 9 = 0
Step 3: Re-arrange to make X the subject of the expression:
4s − 9 4s − 9
X = 2 =
s − 3s + 2 ( s − 2)( s − 1)
Step 4: Take the inverse transform of X :
4s − 9
First break into partial fractions as
( s − 2)( s − 1)
4s − 9 A B
= + .
( s − 2)( s − 1) s − 2 s − 1
On gathering the right-hand side over the same denominator, we have
4s − 9 ( A + B) s − ( A + 2 B)
= .
( s − 2)( s − 1) ( s − 2)( s − 1)
Upon equating the coefficients of the various powers of s in numerators, we get
A + B = 4,
A + 2 B = 9.
Solving this system of equations, we find that
A = −5, B = 9.
Hence
5 9
X =− + .
s − 2 s −1
and therefore
x(t ) = 9et − 5e2t .
d2x dx dx
Example 7: Solve 2 − 7 + 12 x = 2, given that x = 1, = 5 at t = 0.
dt dt dt
25 EM
Step 4: Take the inverse transform of X :
s 2 − 2s + 2
First break into partial fractions as
s( s − 4)( s − 3)
s 2 − 2s + 2 A B C
= + +
s( s − 4)( s − 3) s s − 4 s − 3
Using the cover-up rule, we have
s 2 − 2s + 2 s 2 − 2s + 2 1
A = lim s = lim = ,
s →0 s( s − 4)( s − 3) s → 0 ( s − 4)(s − 3) 6
s 2 − 2s + 2 s 2 − 2s + 2 10 5
B = lim( s − 4) = lim = = ,
s →4 s( s − 4)( s − 3) s →4 s( s − 3) 4 2
s 2 − 2s + 2 s 2 − 2s + 2 5
C = lim( s − 3) = lim = ,
s →3 s( s − 4)( s − 3) s →3 ( s − 4) s 3
Hence
11 5 1 5 1
X = + − .
6 s 3 s −4 2 s −3
and therefore
1 5 5
x(t ) = + e 4t − e3t .
6 2 3
d2x dx dx
Example 8: Solve 2 − 6 + 8 x = e3t , given that x = 0, = 2, at t = 0.
dt dt dt
26 EM
13 − 4s A B C
= + +
( s − 4)( s − 2) s − 4 s − 3 s − 2
Using the cover-up rule, we have
2s − 5 2s − 5 3
A = lim( s − 4) = lim = ,
s →4 ( s − 4)( s − 3)( s − 2) s →4 ( s − 3)( s − 2) 2
2s − 5 2s − 5
B = lim( s − 3) = lim = −1,
s →3 ( s − 4)( s − 3)( s − 2) s →3 ( s − 4)( s − 2)
2s − 5 2s − 5 1
C = lim( s − 2) = lim =− .
s →2 ( s − 4)( s − 3)( s − 2) s → 4 ( s − 3)( s − 4) 2
Hence
3 1 1 1 1
X = − −
2 s −4 s −3 2 s −2
and therefore
3 1
x(t ) = e 4t − e3t − e 2t .
2 2
Example 9: Use Laplace transform techniques to determine the expression for the current
i (t ) flowing in the circuit at any time t . Find the steady-state value.
i (t ) E0
L R
An RL-Circuit
Recall that the differential equation governing the system is given by the expression
di
L + Ri = E0
dt
and we assume that i = 0 at t = 0. Taking the Laplace transform of each term, we have
di
LL + R L i = L E0 .
dt
On invoking the formula for the Laplace transform of derivatives, we get
E
sLI − Li0 + RI = 0 ,
s
Under the assumption that initially there is no current flowing in the circuit, we get
27 EM
E0
sLI + RI =,
s
The Laplace transform of the current we wish to determine is therefore given by
E0 E 1 E 1
I = = 0 − 0 ,
s ( sL + R ) R s R s + R / L
Taking the inverse Laplace transform, we get the desired expression for the current as
As t → , the current in the circuit attain a steady-state value given by
E
lim i(t ) = i = 0 .
t → R
i (t )
Graph of i (t )
E0
R
Example 10
Determine the current in the RLC electrical circuit below, assuming that initially no
current is flowing in the circuit and the applied voltage is a constant E0 .
R
e
i
L C
The differential equation governing the current flow in the circuit is given by
di q
L + Ri + = e (0.1)
dt C
Using Laplace transformation to re-write this equation, we have
1
sLI − Li (0) + RI + L q = L e . (0.2)
C
Given that
28 EM
dq
i=
dt
there follows that
dq
L i = I = L = sQ − q (0).
dt
Consequently,
I q(0)
+ = Q = L q .
s s
The transformed equation thus becomes
1
sLI − Li (0) + RI + I + q (0) = L e . (0.3)
sC
Considering the initial conditions i(0) = 0, e(0) = E0 , q(0) = 0; this expression becomes
I E
sLI + RI + = 0 .
sC s
since Solving for the transform of the current, we have
1 E0 E0
I = E0 = = (0.4)
1 1 R L ( s + ) + n 2
2 2 2
s 2 L + sR + R
L s + + −
C
2L LC 2 L
where
2
R 1 R
= , n2 = − . (0.5)
2L LC 2 L
LC 2 L
Taking the inverse of the transforms of the current for the three cases, we have
E
I = 0 e− t sin nt (0.6)
nL
for case (i),
E
I = 0 te− t (0.7)
nL
for case (ii), and
E
I = 0 e− t sinh kt (0.8)
kL
for case (iii).
29 EM
Example:
Now determine the current in the RLC electrical circuit below, assuming that there is no
applied voltage but that the initially is initially charged to a voltage E0 = q(0) / C and no
current initially flows within the circuit.
R
e
i
L C
The differential equation governing the current flow in the circuit is given by
di q
L + Ri + = 0. (0.9)
dt C
Using Laplace transformation to re-write this equation, and imposing the initial
conditions, we have
I CE
sLI + RI + = − 0 . (0.10)
s s
Replacing I by Q
I q(0)
L q = Q = + ,
s s
Consequently,
I q(0)
+ = Q = L q .
s s
The transformed equation thus becomes
1
sLI − Li (0) + RI + I + q (0) = 0 .
sC
q (0)
Considering the initial conditions i (0) = 0, = E0 , this expression becomes
C
I E
sLI + RI + =− 0 .
sC s
Since I = sQ − q(0) , we may re-write this expression in terms of Q as
30 EM
add some thing here
Example 11
d 2x dx dx
Solve the equation 2 − 2 + 5 x = e2t , given that x = 0 and = 0 when t = 0.
dt dt dt
1 1 1 4 1 s −1
= + −
5 s − 2 5 ( s − 1) + 4 5 ( s − 1) 2 + 4
2
31 EM
1 2 1
x(t ) == e 2t + et sin 2t − et cos 2t.
5 5 5
32 EM
SOLVING SIMULTANEOUS EQUATIONS USING LAPLACE TRANSFORMS
33 EM
7 s 2 − 68s 1
D = lim = 10 (68 − j 21),
s →3 j ( s + 3 j )( s 2 + 4)
Hence
1 (34 + 7 j ) 1 (34 − 7 j ) 1 (68 + 21 j ) 1 (68 − 21 j )
X =− − + +
5 s+2j 5 s−2j 10 s + 3 j 10 s − 3 j
68 s 28 1 68 s 63 1
=− − + +
5 s + 4 5 s + 4 5 s + 9 5 s2 + 9
2 2 2
On the other hand, had we multiplied the first equation by −5 and the second equation by
s + 4 , we would have
s
−5( s + 4) X − 25Y = −35 2 ,
s +4
s ( s + 4)
( s − 4)( s + 4)Y − 5( s + 4) X = 8 2 .
s +4
On subtracting the first expression from the second and solving for Y , we then find that
8s 2 + 67 s
Y = 2 .
( s + 4)( s 2 + 9)
Next we express the left-hand side as partial fractions and thereby have
8s 2 + 67 s A1 B1 C1 D1
= + + + .
( s + 4)( s + 9) s + 2 j s − 2 j s + 3 j s − 3 j
2 2
34 EM
8s 2 + 67 s
Y =
( s 2 + 4)( s 2 + 9)
1 67 − j16 1 (67 + j16) 1 67 − j 24 1 67 + j 24
= + − −
10 s + 2 j 10 s − 2 j 10 s + 3 j 10 s − 3 j
67 s 32 s 67 s 72 s
= − − +
5 s + 4 5 s + 4 5 s + 9 5 s2 + 9
2 2 2
35 EM
(−68 / 5) As + (−28 / 5) (68 / 5) s + (63 / 5)
X = +
s2 + 4 s2 + 9
68 s 28 1 68 s 63 1
=− − + +
5 s + 4 5 s + 4 5 s + 9 5 s2 + 9
2 2 2
and
(−67 / 5) s + ( −32 / 5) (67 / 5) s + (72 / 5)
Y = +
s2 + 4 s2 + 9
,
67 s 32 1 67 s 72 1
=− − + +
5 s2 + 4 5 s2 + 4 5 s2 + 9 5 s2 + 9
Looking –up the inverses then, we have
68 14 68 21
x(t ) = − cos 2t − sin 2t + cos 3t + cos 3t
5 5 5 5
and
67 16 67 24
Y = − cos 2t − sin 2t + cos 3t + sin 3t. ,
5 5 5 5
36 EM
SPECIAL CASES OF LAPLACE TRANSFORMS
t
Proof: Let g (t ) = f (u )du . Then g (t ) = f (t ) and g (0) = 0. Taking the Laplace
0
a t 1 a
Example: Since L sin at = 2 , then L sin audu = .
s +a s (s + a )
2 2 2
0
i (t ) I
Likewise, since the earlier example we had L = , there follows that
C C
1 t I
L i (u )du = .
C 0 sC
37 EM
2 d 2 4s
We note that L sinh 2t = . Therefore L t sinh 2t = − 2 = 2 .
s −4
2
ds s − 4 ( s − 4) 2
ii) L t 2 sinh 2t.
2
We again note that L sinh 2t = . Therefore
s −4 2
d 2 2 d 4s 4(3s 2 + 4)
L t 2 sinh 2t = (−1)2 2 2 = = .
ds s − 4 ds ( s 2 − 4) 2 ( s 2 − 4)3
b) Division by t
f (t ) f (t )
Theorem: If L f (t ) = F ( s) , then L = F (u )du, provided lim exists.
t s t →0 t
f (t )
Proof: Let g (t ) = . Then clearly f (t ) = tg (t ) . Taking the Laplace transform of both
t
sides, we have
d
L f (t ) = L tg (t ) = − G ( s) = F ( s)
ds
In other words,
s
f (t ) − st
G( s) = − F (u )du = F (u )du = e dt ,
s 0
t
as asserted.
f (t )
Under the assumption that lim exists, and that the function f (t ) is itself regular and
t →0 t
of exponential order on the interval [0, ), it follows that the order of integration on the
right-hand side can be interchanged, so that we have
− st
e − st
e − st
s F (s)ds = 0 f (t ) s e ds dt = 0 f (t ) (−t ) dt =0 f (t ) 0 + t dt
s
f (t ) − st f (t )
= e dt = L .
0
t t
For example, knowing that
38 EM
a
L sin at = ,
s + a2 2
Note that by taking inverses in the assertion of the foregoing theorem and then solving
for f (t ) , we obtain the following useful result as a Corollary:
If L f (t ) = F ( s) , then f (t ) = L F ( s) = t L F ( s)ds .
−1 −1
s
Restated as a tool for finding the inverses, this Corollary states that “The inverse of a
transform is equal to t times the inverse of the integral of the transform from s to . ” This
Corollary is often invoked to find inverses when then the integral is simpler to work with
than the transform itself.
Homework Assignments:
a) Evaluate te−2t sin tdt.
0
cos at − cos bt 1 s + b
2 2
b) Show that L = ln 2 .
2 s +a
2
t
39 EM
3
c) Show that te−3t sin tdt = .
0
50
cos 6t − cos 4t 3
d) Show that
0
t
dt = ln .
2
40 EM
THE HEAVISIDE STEP FUNCTION
f (t ) 1, t a,
f (t ) =
0, t a.
1
0 a t
The above sketch is the Heaviside Unit Step Function, and is denoted by
f (t ) = H (t − a ).
Thus, the Heaviside Unit Step Function for a = 4 is denoted by
f (t ) = H (t − 4).
and has the graph depicted below.
f (t ) 1, t 4,
f (t ) =
0, t 4.
1
0 4 t
If the Heaviside Unit Step Function occurs at the origin, then we have
f (t ) = H (t )
and the graph is depicted below.
41 EM
f (t ) 1, t 0,
f (t ) =
0, t 0.
1
0 t
We may express composite functions through the use of Heaviside Unit Step Functions,
as depicted in the following examples.
y1 (t ) 1, t a,
y1 (t ) =
0, t a.
1
0 a t
y2 (t )
e −t , t 0,
1 y2 (t ) =
0, t 0.
0 a t
f (t )
f (t ) = y1 (t ) y2 (t ) = H (t − a)e−t
1
0 a t
42 EM
f (t )
f (t ) = H (t − / 2) sin t
1
/2 3 / 2 2 t
f (t )
f (t ) = H (t − a) sin(t − a)
1
2
a t
From definition
L H (t − a ) = e − st H (t − a )dt
0
e − as
a
= e H (t − a )dt + e H (t − a )dt = 0 + e − st dt =
− st − st
0 a a
s
Hence
e− as
L H (t − a) =
s
and, consequently,
1
L H (t ) =
s
43 EM
Laplace Transform of Composite Functions: H (t − a ) f (t − a ).
From definition,
L H (t − a ) f (t − a ) = e − st H (t − a ) f (t − a )dt
0
a
= e − st H (t − a ) f (t − a )dt + e − st H (t − a ) f (t − a )dt
0 a
= 0 + e − st f (t − a )dt = e − st f (t − a )dt.
a a
Hence
L H (t − a) f (t − a) = e− sa F (s) = e− sa L f (t ).
Examples:
L H (t − 3)(t − 3) 2 =
2! −3s 2 −3 s
e = 3e .
s3 s
e−5 s
L H (t − 5)et −5 = e−5 s L et = .
s −1
s se−2 s
L H (t − 2) cos(t − 2) = e −2 s
= .
s2 + 1 s2 + 1
4!e− s
L H (t − 1)(t − 1) 4 = 5 e − s = 5 .
4!
s s
2 2e− ( / 3) s
L H (t − / 3)sin 2(t − / 3) = 2 e− ( / 3) s = 2 .
s +4 s +4
Examples:
1
L−1 e −2 s t −5
= H (t − 2)e ),
s − 5
44 EM
3
L−1 e − s 2 = H (t − 1) sin 3(t − 1),
s + 9
s 1
L−1 e −3 s 2 = H (t − 3) cos 4(t − 3), L−1 e −4 s 2 = H (t − 4)(t − 4),
s + 16 s
3 2
L−1 e −5 s = 3H (t − 5), L−1 e −3 s 3 = H (t − 3)(t − 3) 2 .
s s
Summary:
1, t c,
1. H (t − c) = .
0, t c,
e − cs
2. L H (t − c) = ,
s
1
3. L H (t ) = ,
s
4. L H (t − c) f (t − c) = e− cs F (s) = e−cs L f (t ) ,
5. If F ( s) = L f (t ) , then e−cs F (s) = L H (t − c) f (t − c)
The above statements are all that we need for Laplace transforms of and inverse Laplace
transforms of functions involving the Heaviside Unit Step Function.
45 EM
Exercises:
Determine the functions f (t ) whose Laplace transforms are given here below:
3 4e− s 5e−2 s
1. L f (t ) = − 2 + 2 ;
s s s
−s
2 5e 8e−3s
2. L f (t ) = − + ;
s s s
1 e− s e−2 s e−3s
3. L f (t ) = 2 − 2 + 2 − 2 .
s s s s
Answers:
1. f (t ) = 3H (t ) − 4(t − 1) H (t − 1) + 5(t − 2) H (t − 2);
2. f (t ) = 2 H (t ) − 5H (t − 1) + 8H (t − 2);
3. f (t ) = tH (t ) − (t − 1) H (t − 1) + (t − 2) H (t − 2) − (t − 3) H (t − 3).
Further Exercises:
1. A function is defined by the statement
3, 0 t 1,
f (t ) =
t, 1 t.
Sketch the graph of the function and find its Laplace transform
f (t )
3, 0 t 1,
f (t ) =
t, t 1.
3
0 1 2 3 t
46 EM
Hence
f (t ) = 3H (t ) − 3H (t − 1) + tH (t − 1). (1.1)
In other words, f (t ) = 3 is switched off at t = 1 , while f (t ) = t is switched on at t = 1.
To find the Laplace transform of (1.1), we first note that
t = (t − 1) + 1 (1.2)
Using this equivalent expression in equation (1.1), we get
f (t ) = 3H (t ) − 3H (t − 1) + (t − 1) H (t − 1) + H (t − 1)
(1.3)
= 3H (t ) − 2 H (t − 1) + (t − 1) H (t − 1).
Taking Laplace transforms of the various terms on the right-hand side, we have
3 2e− s e− s
L f (t ) = 3L H (t ) − 2L H (t − 1) + L (t − 1) H (t − 1) = − + 2 ..
s s s
t 2 , 0 t 2,
f (t )
f (t ) = 4, 2 t 5,
0, t 5.
4
0 t
1 2 3 4 5
47 EM
Hence
f (t ) = t 2 H (t ) − t 2 H (t − 2) + 4 H (t − 2) − 4 H (t − 5). (1.4)
To find the Laplace transform, we first note that
t 2 = (t − 2)2 + 4(t − 2) + 4 (1.5)
Using this equivalent expression in equation (1.1), we get
f (t ) = t 2 H (t ) − (t − 2) 2 H (t − 2) − 4(t − 2) H (t − 2) − 4H (t − 5). (1.6)
Taking Laplace transforms of the various terms on the right-hand side, we have
2 2e−2 s 4e−2 s 4e−5 s
L f (t ) = 3 − 3 − 2 − .
s s s s
Special Consideration of H (t − t0 )
f (t )
(t − t0 ) H (t − t0 )
t
t0
For any function f (t ) , we have
f (t ), t t0 ,
f (t ) H (t − t0 ) =
0, t t0 ,
Periodic Functions
Periodic Functions may be represented by a series of terms involving Heaviside Unit Step
Functions. Fpr example,
Recall that
e− st0
L H (t − t0 ) =
s
48 EM
f (t )
f (t )
f (t ) f (t1 )
t
t T t1 2T 3T
49 EM
T
1 − e − sT
L f ( t ) ) = e − st
f (t )dt − e − st1
f (t1 )dt1 = e− st f (t )dt (1.9)
0 T 0
Thus,
T
L f ( t ) ) =
1
− sT
e− st f (t )dt (1.10)
1− e 0
for a periodic function of period T , as asserted above.
Example: Consider the square wave function below, defined by the expression
1, 2n t 2n + 1,
f (t ) = n = 0,1, 2,
−1, 2n + 1 t 2n + 2,
with a period of T = 2.
f (t )
0 t
1 2 3 4
−1
50 EM
Example: Consider the sawtooth wave function below, defined by the expression
f (t ) = t / 2, 0 t 3; f (t ) = f (t + 3).
with a period of T = 3.
f (t )
0 t
3 6 9 12
51 EM
THE IMPULSE FUNCTION
We have met the Heaviside Unit Step Function, which provides us with the means of
expressing the switching on and off items in the physical problem.
We now consider the impulse function, representing an extremely large force acting for
acting for a minutely small interval of time, or a “shock” voltage applied to an electrical
circuit. It is equivalent to a sudden blow, rather than a continuous force.
f (t )
1
b
0 a t
b
1
Figure: A Rectangular Pulse of Width b and Height
b
1 b
The are of the pulse is b = 1. Now, if the width of the pulse is reduced to , and the
b 2
2
value of the area maintained constant (unity), then the height becomes . Evidently, as
b
1
the with b → 0, the height → . In such a case the function exists for a minutely small
b
interval, but during that interval, the magnitude of the function is extremely large. The
function represented by the limiting stage of this process is called the Dirac Delta
Function or the Unit Impulse Function, and is denoted by (t − a) .
Graphically, it would require a rectangular pulse of zero width and infinite height, and for
convenience, is represented by a single vertical line with an arrow at its head.
(t − a)
0 a t
Figure: The Dirac Delta Function
52 EM
Note that in all cases and at all times the area of the pulse is unity.
Mathematically, the Dirac Delta Function is defined as below:
, t = a ,
(t − a) =
0, t a,
For a Dirac Delta Function centred at the origin, we have
, t = 0,
(t ) =
0, t 0,
Schematically, it is depicted in the Figure below.
(t )
0 t
Figure: The Dirac Delta Function Centred
at the Origin
q a q
referred to as the Filtering Property of the Dirac Delta Function. In obtaining the
result we invoke the fact that the integrand f (t ) (t − a) is non-zero only at t = a.
53 EM
3. Laplace Transform of The Dirac Delta Function
If p = 0 and q = , we have f (t ) (t − a)dt = f (a),
0
a 0, 0 a . If then
e (t − a)dt = e− sa , a 0, 0 a .
− st
we set f (t ) = e − st , there follows that
0
Hence,
L (t − a) = e− sa , a 0, 0 a .
Consequently,
L (t ) = 1.
4. L f (t ) (t − a) = e− st f (t ) (t − a)dt = f (a)e− sa .
0
0 0
e f (t ) (t )dt = f (0).
− st
1 (t − a )
0 t
(−2) (t − 2a)
54 EM
The function f (t ) we have here is given by
f (t ) = (t − a) − 2 (t − 2a) + 4 )t − 3a).
Taking the Laplace transform, we then have
L f (t ) = e− sa − 2e−2 sa + 4e−3sa .
5. Relationship Between the Dirac Delta and the Heaviside Unit Step Functions.
Recall that
t
0, t a,
( − a)d = 1,
0
t a.
But the right-hand side is precisely the Heaviside Unit Step Function! Therefore,
t
( − a)d = H (t − a).
0
Examples:
1. L 5 (t − 3) = 5e−3s ,
2. L t 2 (t − 2) = 4e−2 s ,
3. L cos 2t (t − ) = cos 2 e− s = e− s ,
4. L sinh t (t ) = sinh 0 e−0 = 0.
Summary:
q
1. (t − a)dt = 1,
p
p a q.
2. f (t ) (t − a)dt = F (a),
p
provided p a q.
3. L (t − a) = f (a).
4. L (t ) = 1.
5. L f (t ) (t − a) = f (a)e− sa .
55 EM
Some Illustrative Examples
Example 1: An impulsive voltage E (t ) is applied to a circuit containing an
inductance L and capacitance C in series. If current and charge are
initially zero, find the expression for the current at time t .
di
VL = L
dt
E (t ) q
VC =
C
Let q be the charge on the capacitor at time t , whereby the current through the capacitor
is given by
dq
i= .
dt
The voltage across the inductance is of course given by
di
VL = L .
dt
As the total drop in voltage in the circuit must equal the applied voltage, the differential
equation governing the voltage in the circuit is given by
di q
VL + VC = L + = E (t ).
dt C
Expressing this in Laplace transform, we have
Q
sLI − Li (0) + = E.
C
dq I q(0)
As i = , there follows that I = sQ − q(0) or + = Q. Accordingly, he Laplace
dt s s
transform of the circuit voltage equation becomes
I q(0)
sLI − Li(0) + + = E.
sC sC
With i (0) = 0 and q (0) = 0 , this equation degenerates into
1
sL + I = E.
sC
The transform of the current is thus given by
s E s
I = E0 = 0 .
1 L 2 1
s L+
2
s +
C LC
The desired current is thus given by
E 1
i (t ) = 0 cos t.
L LC
56 EM
CONVOLUTION
Consider a linear system in which the effect at the present time t of a stimulus f ( ) at
any past time is proportional to the stimulus. On physical grounds we assume that the
proportionality constant depends on the elapsed time t − and hence has the
form g (t − ) .
The lower limit of this integral is 0 because we assume that the process started at time
t = 0; in other words, f ( ) = 0 for 0.
Expression (1.2) is called the convolution of f and g . It gives the response at the present
time as the weighted superposition over the inputs at the times t. The weighting
factor g (t − ) characterises the system, and f ( ) characterises the past history of the
input. Because of this physical interpretation, the convolution is sometimes called the
superposition integral.
Note that the product behaves very much like the normal multiplication, in that
a (b + c) = a b + a c, a b = b a, (a b) c) = a (b c).
57 EM
We now show that convolution in the time domain actually corresponds to multiplication
in the frequency domain.
L f g = L f L g = F (s)G(s).
e e
− s − s
F (s) = H ( ) f ( )d and G ( s ) = H ( ) g ( )d ,
− −
wherein we see that the lower limits of integration have now shifted from 0 to . With
these expressions, we thus find that the product of the Laplace transforms of f (t ) and
g (t ) may be expressed as
− s − s
F ( s)G ( s) = e H ( ) f ( )d e H ( ) g ( )d .
− −
The separated integrals on the right may of course be expressed in the form of a double
integral as
e
− s ( + )
F ( s )G ( s ) = H ( ) H ( ) f ( ) g ( )d d .
− −
58 EM
1, 0,
H ( ) =
0, 0,
1, t − 0, or t ,
H (t − ) =
0, t − 0, or t.
as can be deduced from the schematic representation.
H ( )
t
H (t − )
t
H ( ) H (t − )
t
The integrand of the integral in the brackets is thus zero everywhere, except over the
interval 0 t , since
f ( ) g ( ), 0 t ,
f ( ) H ( ) H (t − ) g (t − ) =
0, elsewhere.
Hence we may express the non-vanishing portion as
59 EM
t
− 0 f ( ) H ( ) H (t − ) g (t − )d dt .
− st
F ( s)G ( s) = e
However, considering further that by virtue of the definition of the Heaviside function,
H (t ) H ( − t ) g ( − t ) = 1, 0 t ,
the product of the two Laplace transforms may actually be written as
t
− 0 f ( ) g (t − )d dt .
− st
F ( s)G ( s) = e
Recognising the integral in the brackets to the function h(t ), derived in expression (1.2),
we thus have
F ( s )G ( s ) = e
− st
h(t )dt = L h(t ) = L f g .
−
Note that the interchanges of order of integrals are justified because we assume that the
conditions for the existence of the Laplace transforms of the functions f and g are in
place. It thus follows that
t
L−1 F ( s)G( s) = f g = f ( ) g (t − )d .
0
The convolution is often used in solving integral equations where the unknown function
to be determined is under the integral sign, as illustrated in the following example.
t
Example: Solve the integral equation y (t ) = 3t + y ( )sin(t − )d .
0
60 EM
The convolution theorem is often useful in obtaining solutions to differential equations in
which there are functions whose Laplace transforms are difficult or even impossible to
find, as illustrated by the following example.
Although this integral cannot be evaluated exactly, it can be handled numerically. Hence
application of the convolution theorem has led to an alternative route of solving the initial
value problem.
It is worthwhile to note that if the right-hand side of the differential equation in the above
initial value problem had been, say, et instead of e − t , the Laplace transform would not
2 2
Thus, as in the above example, formally the method of Laplace transform can be used to
arrive at possible solutions which can then be checked.
The fact that Laplace transform techniques can lead to correct results even in cases where
functions do not have Laplace transforms seems to indicate that there is something more
basic than the Laplace transform, but still closely related to it, which can be used in its
place. From the above example it would seem that the convolution itself is the desired
concept. This is indicated further by the fact that the convolution obeys many of the usual
laws of algebra, such as the Commutative, Associative and Distributive Laws. This has
thus lead some authors to avoid Laplace transforms altogether and deal only with
convolutions. By use of this procedure it is possible to make rigorous impulse functions
such as the Dirac Delta Function.
61 EM
INITIAL AND FINAL VALUE THEOREMS
The Initial Value Theorem:
Recall that
L f (t ) = f (t )e− st dt = sF ( s) − f (0)
0
However, if f (t ) is continuous piecewise and of exponential order, meaning there are
real constants M and , such that f (t ) Me− t , then
lim f (t )e− st dt = 0,
s →
0
f (t )e
− st
dt = L f (t ) = sF ( s) − f (0)
0
0
f (t )dt = lim f (t )dt.
p →
0
Hence,
lim sF ( s) − f (0) = lim f (t ) − f (0) .
s →0 t →
and so we have
lim sF (s) = lim f (t ).
s →0 t →
62 EM
THE SINE, COSINE AND EXPONENTIAL INTEGRALS
63 EM
Its Laplace transform is thus given by
cos u ln( s 2 + 1)
L Ci(t ) = L du = ..
t u 2 s
cos u
Proof: Let f (t ) = du. Then quite clearly
t
u
cos t
f () = 0 , f (t ) = − and tf (t ) = − cos t.
t
Invoking the formula for the Laplace transform of a derivative, we get
d
L tf (t ) = − sF ( s ) − f (0)
ds
Therefore, with
L tf (t ) = −L cos t ,
there follows that
d d s
sF ( s) − f (0) = F ( s) = 2
ds ds s +1
Hence
sds 1
sF ( s ) =
= ln( s 2 + 1) + C
s +1 2
2
64 EM
e−u
Proof: Let f (t ) = du. Then quite clearly
t
u
e−t
f () = 0 , f (t ) = − and tf (t ) = −e−t .
t
Invoking the formula for the Laplace transform of a derivative, we get
d
L tf (t ) = − sF ( s ) − f (0)
ds
Therefore, with
L tf (t ) = L e−t .
there follows that
d d 1
sF (s) − f (0) = F (s) =
ds ds s +1
Hence
ds
sF ( s ) =
= ln( s + 1) + C
s +1
where C is an arbitrary constant of integration.
Therefore, C = 0. Hence
sF ( s ) = ln( s + 1)
Accordingly,
ln( s + 1)
F ( s) = = L Ei(t )
s
as asserted.
65 EM
Boundary conditions play a critical role in solving differential equations with Laplace transforms by aiding the evaluation of constants in the transformed domain. When transforms are applied, initial values replace derivative terms, effectively simplifying algebraic manipulation. These conditions ensure the uniqueness and correctness of the inverse-transformed solution, determining a specific solution consistent with the physical problem being modelled, rather than a generic one .
Partial fraction decomposition is significant in solving inverse Laplace transforms because it simplifies complex rational expressions into simpler fractions, making it easier to apply inverse Laplace transform tables or rules. By breaking down the expression, each term can be individually transformed back into the time domain. This approach is crucial for dealing with expressions that arise from the solution of linear differential equations using the Laplace transform method .
The cover-up rule assists in finding partial fraction decomposition by allowing for quick determination of constants related to simple linear factors. When decomposing a fraction, this rule suggests covering up the factor in the denominator of the term being solved for. By substituting the root of this factor into the remaining expression, the coefficient of the partial fraction is directly obtained. This significantly speeds up the decomposition process, particularly when dealing with complex fractions seen in Laplace transform problems .
Inverse Laplace transforms for functions with exponentials and trigonometric terms can be derived using partial fraction decomposition, inverse transform tables, and residue theorem techniques. Functions are often represented in terms of simpler expressions with known inverse transforms. By decomposing complex fractions into sums of simpler terms, each can be individually transformed, leveraging trigonometric or exponential rules from tables that detail common function pairs. This approach handles poles and branch points effectively, allowing for accurate conversion back to the time domain .
Laplace transforms offer the advantage of converting differential equations into algebraic equations, simplifying the analysis, especially with linear time-invariant systems. They efficiently handle initial conditions and can process systems involving delayed, piecewise, or periodic inputs. However, they may be limited by the necessity for function regularity and complexity in handling nonlinear systems or functions with non-exponential growth characteristics. Compared to numerical methods, Laplace transforms provide exact solutions but can be computationally intensive for complex systems .
In electrical engineering, Laplace transforms model and analyze circuit systems by converting circuit differential equations into the s-domain. This transformation manages complex circuits with reactive components (inductors and capacitors), simplifying the analysis of transient and steady-state behaviors. Engineers utilize these transforms to solve for voltages and currents, handle initial conditions directly in the algebraic domain, and design control systems. By applying inverse transforms, engineers obtain time-domain responses crucial for practical scenarios .
The theorem states that if L{f(t)} = F(s), then L{f'(t)} = sF(s) - f(0). The proof begins by applying the definition of the Laplace transform to the derivative f'(t). Integration by parts is used, leading to an integral involving f(t) and the term sF(s) minus the value of the function at zero, f(0). This shows that the Laplace transform of a derivative is the original transform multiplied by s, minus the initial value of the function .
The division by t theorem states that if L{f(t)} = F(s), then the transform of f(t)/t involves integrating the transform F(s) with respect to s. This theorem is useful for functions where division by time constrains introduce additional behavioral conditions at zero. The implication is that complex functions, often involved in control systems, can be managed by altering their Laplace domain representations without explicit time-domain operations. The proof relies on changing the integral order to demonstrate the equivalence and regularity needed for the integration process .
Laplace transforms help in solving systems with periodic functions by converting the time-domain equations into s-domain representations, where periodicity is handled through exponential terms in the transformed domain. The Laplace transform of a periodic function simplifies analysis because it accounts for the repeating nature through shifted exponents and enables direct frequency domain manipulations. This can reduce the complexity associated with direct time-domain periodic solution methodologies .
The Laplace transform technique solves differential equations by transforming the equation from the time domain into the s-domain, making it easier to manipulate algebraically. First, the differential equation is expressed in terms of Laplace transforms, replacing derivatives with algebraic multipliers of the Laplace-transformed function. Initial conditions are then inserted into this transformed equation. The equation is rearranged to solve for the Laplace-transformed function, X(s). Finally, the inverse Laplace transform is applied to convert it back to the time domain, giving the solution function with respect to time .