0% found this document useful (0 votes)
194 views3 pages

Skull X-Ray Positioning Techniques

This document provides descriptions of positioning and techniques for various radiographic views of the head and neck. It lists over 30 different named views or methods, describing the patient positioning and orientation of the central ray for each. The views demonstrate various anatomical structures such as the temporal bone, mandible, zygomatic arch, and cranial foramina from different angles.

Uploaded by

Joeriz Bartolome
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
194 views3 pages

Skull X-Ray Positioning Techniques

This document provides descriptions of positioning and techniques for various radiographic views of the head and neck. It lists over 30 different named views or methods, describing the patient positioning and orientation of the central ray for each. The views demonstrate various anatomical structures such as the temporal bone, mandible, zygomatic arch, and cranial foramina from different angles.

Uploaded by

Joeriz Bartolome
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

ALBERS-SCHONBERG angles to the film. Centre to the the perpendicular.

Raise the
Demonstrates the TMJs. nasion with the tube angled 20 chin until the radiographic
Head in the lateral position, degrees towards the head baseline is 30 degrees to the
then rotate the head 20 degrees perpendicular. Centre through
towards the film. Centre to the BLONDEAU the orbit in contact with the
TMJ in contact with the film, OM facial bones overtilted by 5 film, with the tube angled 10
with the tube angled 20 degrees degree degrees towards the feet.
upwards.
CAHOON ERASO METHOD
ALEXANDER METHOD View to demonstrate the styloid Projection of the jugular
View of the optic canal in cross processes of the skull. foramina.
section. Position as for Bertel's The patient is positioned as for
Both sides for comparison. view and angle the tube 25 an AP skull. The chin is then
Patient sat with the back of head degrees cranially. raised and the central ray is
against the skull table. Upper angled upwards to make an
border of the skull table angled CALDWELL angle of 65 degrees to the OM
backward 15 degrees . Position Routine OF 20 view of the line. Centre to the midline at the
the patients head so that the skull.  level of the EAM.
midsagittal plane makes an
angle of 40 degrees to the plane CHAUSSE II HAAS
of the bucky. Head extended so Oblique transoral view of the Demonstrates the petrous
that the acanthomeatal line is at foramen jugulare. temporal region, foraman
right angles to the plane of the The patient is positioned as for magnum, and dorsum sellae.
bucky. Centre to the lower outer an AP skull with the mouth Head in the PA position with
margin of the orbit away from wide open. Rotate the head 10 the radiographic baseline at
the film. degrees away from the side in right-angles to the film. Centre
question. Direct the central ray in the midline to the external
ALTSCHUL up through the open mouth so occipital protuberance with the
Position as for Townes (half- that it makes an angle of 35 central ray angled 25 degrees
axial skull view) view but angle degrees to a line joining the cranially.
35 degrees rather than 30 superior border of the EAM and
degrees. the anterior nasal spine. HENKELTOPF
Routine infero-superior view of
ARCELIN CHAUSSE III the zygomatic arches (jug
Demonstrates  the petrous Head in the PA position then handles).
temporal region. rotate the head 5-10 degrees
towards the unaffected side. HENSCHEN
Head in the AP position and
Centre along the radiographic Demonstrates the petrous
rotate 45 degrees away from the baseline midway between the temporal region.
side being examined with the outer canthus and the EAM. Head in the lateral position.
radiographic baseline at right
Centre 5cm above the EAM
angles to the film. Centre to the CHAUSSE IV
See Stenvers view (C-Ear). away from the film, with the
baseline at a point 2.5cm in
tube angled 15 degrees towards
front of the EAM, with the tube
DUTT'S VIEW (JOHNSON the feet.
angled 10 degrees to the feet.
AND DUTT)
PA oblique of the cribiform HICKEY (skull)
BERTEL plate. The profile view of the mastoid
Demonstrates the orbital floors Head in the PA position. The region
and the infra-orbital fissure. head is then rotated towards the
Head in the PA position with affected side until the median-
radiographic baseline at right sagittal plane is 40 degrees to
HIRTZ  floor and posterior wall of the MACQUEEN-DELL
antrum. Transpharyngeal view of the
The routine SMV projection. Patient sitting PA with the head head of the mandibular condyle.
Some cases overtilt by 15 fully extended so that the chin The film is parallel to the
degrees and zygoma of the side of median sagittal plane and
interest, and the nose, are in centred to the EAM of the
HOUGH METHOD contact with the cassette. Angle affected side. The central ray is
Projection of the sphenoid strut. the central ray upward 30 angled 5 degrees cranially and 5
Patient positioned as for a PA degrees from the horizontal and degrees posteriorly towards the
skull with the radiographic centre to the lower antrum. condyle to be examined.
baseline horizontal. Turn the
head 20 degrees towards the LOW-BEER METHOD MAYER
side being examined. The Parietotemporal projection. To demonstrate the petrous
horizontal central ray is angled Position the head in the lateral temporal region.
downwards by 7 degrees so that Patient in the AP position with
position. Angle the horizontal
is emerges through the orbit on the radiographic baseline at
the side being examined central ray upward 10 degrees right-angles to the film. Rotate
and anteriorly 33 degrees. the head 45 degrees towards the
JOHNSON AND DUTT Centre to the back of the head side being examined, and centre
See Dutt's view. so that the beam enters at the through the EAM nearest the
level of the lower orbital margin film, with the tube angled 45
JUG HANDLE VIEW and passes through the foraman degrees towards the feet.
SMV projection of the
magnum. 
zygomatic arches. MILLER METHOD
Similar appearances Projection of the hypoglossal
KEMP-HARPER METHOD to Stenvers view. canal.
SMV projection of the jugular Patient positioned as for an AP
foramina. LYSHOLM METHOD skull with the radiographic
Patient with back to the vertical Profile view of the petrosa, baseline horizontal. Rotate the
bucky. IAM, and the mastoid cells. head 45 degrees towards the
Chin elevated until the OM line Head in the lateral position then side in question. The horizontal
is vertical. Angle the horizontal rotate 15 degrees towards the central ray is angled downwards
central ray 20 degrees affected side. Angle the central an unknown number of degrees
downwards. Centre below the ray 30 degrees from the vertical so that it passes through the
chin so that the central ray and centre through the foraman foraman magnum.
passes between and through the magnum.
EAM on the side in question. MODIFIED FUCHS
MAY View METHOD
LAW View to demonstrate the Projection of the temporal
Demonstrate the petrous zygomatic arch. styloid process. Details not
temporal region. Head in the PA position with known.
Head in the lateral position, the chin raised as far as
then rotate the head 15 degrees possible. The head is then PIRIE
towards the film. Centre 5cm rotated 15 degrees away from This is the routine OM 30 sinus
above and 5cm behind the EAM the side being examined. Centre view with the mouth open. 
away from the film with the through the zygomatic arch,
tube angled 15 degrees towards with the tube angled towards PORCHER-POROT
the feet. the feet so that the central ray is Oblique transmaxillary view of
at right-angles to the the foramen jugulare.
LAW METHOD (FACIAL radiographic baseline. The radiographic baseline is
BONES) vertical. The tube is angled 55
Projection to demonstrate the degrees cranially. The head is
then rotated 40 degrees away with the centre of the bucky WIGBY-TAYLOR METHOD
from the affected side. Centre 2.5cm in front of the EAM and Open mouth oblique projection
midway between the EAM and 1cm above the orbitimeatal line. of the styloid process of the
the angle of the mouth on the skull.
The tube is angled 10 degrees
affected side. Position the patient as for an AP
towards the head, and 30 skull then rotate the head 78
REVERSE TOWNES degrees towards the face. The degrees to the affected side.
Demonstrates the condyles, grid must be rotated accordingly Angle the central ray cranially 8
condylar heads and condylar degrees and centre to the styloid
hypo/hyperplasia. TAYLOR METHOD process nearest the film.
PA Townes ( half-axial skull) (MASTOID) Both sides for comparison.
with 30 degree angulation. SMV projection to demonstrate
the mastoid processes,IAM WORMS 
REVERSE WATERS ,EAM and inferior petrosal AP skull
Method (AP) facial bonoes. 25 degree angle between OM
sinuses.
baseline and central ray
RHESE METHOD Patient sitting, OM line
The routine PA oblique of the vertical. Centre to the midline ZANELLI METHOD
optic foramen. 2.5cm anterior to the level of Projection to demonstrate the
the EAM at an upward angle of TMJs in the open and closed
20 degrees [Link] lateral with the
ROCHER 
head 30 degrees away from the
AP Skull centred through orbits
TITTERINGTON vertical i.e. top of head against
The routine of zygoma OM 30 the cassette. Centre 2.5cm
SANSREGRET
view. anterior to the EAM.
MODIFICATION OF
CHAUSSE III METHOD
TOWNES  ZIMMERS VIEW
Slight oblique projection of the
petrosa and attic wall. The routine half-axial view of Transorbital TMJ view.
Patient supine. Rotate the head the skull. Patient holds cassette behind
10 degrees away from the side TMJ. Mouth open wide.
of interest. Adjust the VALDINI Position the tube at the outer
infraorbitomeatal line so that it Demonstrates the squamous canthus of the opposite eye and
is 30 degrees from the vertical. portion of the occipital bone
aim downwards and backwards
Centre to a point 2.5 cm medial and the foramen magnum. Head
in the PA position with the chin across the orbit to the condyle
to the EAM at the level of the
upper orbital margin on the tucked in as far as possible and under investigation
affected side. the frontal region resting on the
film, with the radiographic
SCHULLER base-line tilted 45-50 degrees
Lateral view of the petrous downwards. Centre in the
temporal region. midline at the level of the EAM.

STENVER VOGT BONE-FREE


Oblique view of the petrous PROJECTIONS
temporal region. AP and lateral views of the eye
using dental film.
STOCKHOLM C
Similar to Stenver's view but WATERS
designed for use with a skull The routine OM view of the
unit. sinuses
Head in the lateral position,

Common questions

Powered by AI

The TAYLOR METHOD (used for the mastoid processes, IAM, EAM, and inferior petrosal sinuses) involves an SMV projection with the patient sitting and the OM line vertical, and centering to the midline 2.5cm anterior to the level of the EAM at an upward angle of 20 degrees . By contrast, the JUG HANDLE VIEW, also an SMV projection, primarily demonstrates the zygomatic arches, with patients positioned similarly but often requiring adjustment to target those specific facial structures .

The MAY View achieves visualization of the zygomatic arch by positioning the head in PA with the chin raised and rotated 15 degrees away from the side being examined. The central ray is angled toward the feet to be at right angles to the radiographic baseline . The TITTERINGTON method uses the routine OM 30 view for the zygoma, typically involving cephalometric alignment that may vary but generally maintains an open mouth position to aid better visualization . While both techniques aim to visualize the zygomatic arch, the MAY View provides a more angled approach assisting in differentiating the arch's dimensions compared to the frontal approach of TITTERINGTON.

The HAAS method demonstrates multiple structures including the petrous temporal region, foramen magnum, and dorsum sellae by positioning the head in a PA position and angling the central ray 25 degrees cranially . It provides a comprehensive visualization of the posterior cranial structures. In contrast, the MAY View specifically focuses on demonstrating the zygomatic arch by positioning the head PA and rotating it 15 degrees away from the side examined, offering targeted visualization with the tube angled towards the feet . The HAAS method is more suitable for detailed studies involving the cranial base, whereas the MAY View is ideal for targeting specific facial features.

The ERASO METHOD involves positioning the patient as for an AP skull, then raising the chin. The central ray is angled upwards to make a 65-degree angle to the outer canthus of the ocular margin (OM) line, and the center is to the midline at the level of the EAM .

The ALBERS-SCHONBERG method is used to demonstrate the temporomandibular joints (TMJs). Key positioning details include placing the head in the lateral position and then rotating it 20 degrees towards the film. The central ray is directed to the TMJ that is in contact with the film, and the tube is angled 20 degrees upwards .

The SCHULLER method for imaging the petrous temporal region involves a lateral view with positioning to accurately reflect the anatomical area of interest. The STENVER View, as an oblique view of the petrous temporal region, requires specific oblique positioning of the head, typically involving head lateralization and tilting for optimal differentiation of the skull’s temporal anatomy . The SCHULLER method provides a straightforward lateral image, while the STENVER adds complexity through angled perspectives, offering a more comprehensive view but requiring careful positioning to avoid distortion.

The LAW technique is used specifically to demonstrate the petrous temporal region, involving positioning the head in the lateral position and rotating it 15 degrees towards the film, centering 5cm above and 5cm behind the EAM with the tube angled 15 degrees towards the feet . On the other hand, the LAW METHOD (FACIAL BONES) is used to demonstrate the floor and posterior wall of the antrum, with the patient sitting PA, fully extending the head so that the chin, zygoma, and nose of interest are in contact with the cassette, and the central ray angled upwards 30 degrees from the horizontal centered to the lower antrum .

The Modified FUCHS Method is theoretically used for projecting the temporal styloid process, suggesting a focus on detailed skull base anatomy. Although specific technique details are not available, modern imaging could apply principles such as precise angulation and meticulous patient head positioning to optimize visualization of the temporal styloid area. Its benefits lie in potentially improving diagnostic clarity when assessing disorders involving the styloid process, such as elongation or fractures, by engendering a targeted imaging approach despite lack of procedural specifics .

The ALEXANDER METHOD provides a view of the optic canal in cross-section, with the patient sat with the back of the head against the skull table. The upper border of the skull table is angled backward 15 degrees, and the head is positioned so that the midsagittal plane makes a 40-degree angle to the plane of the bucky. The head is extended so that the acanthomeatal line is perpendicular to the bucky plane, and the central ray is directed to the lower outer margin of the orbit away from the film .

The CHAUSSE II method for an oblique transoral view of the foramen jugulare involves positioning the patient as for an AP skull, with the mouth wide open. The head is rotated 10 degrees away from the side in question, and the central ray is directed up through the open mouth, creating a 35-degree angle with a line joining the superior border of the EAM and the anterior nasal spine . This view can be particularly useful for assessing the foramen jugulare’s patency or for detecting masses or lesions that may affect the structures passing through this crucial skull base aperture, such as jugular vein abnormalities or tumors.

You might also like