0% found this document useful (0 votes)
70 views7 pages

First Catholic Mass Site Controversy

1) The document discusses a controversy around the site of the first Catholic mass in the Philippines. Two primary sources, the logs of Francisco Albo and Antonio Pigafetta, provide accounts of Ferdinand Magellan's voyage that reached the Philippines in 1521. 2) Albo's account describes the fleet visiting several islands, including Mazaua, whose location matches the island of Limasawa. Pigafetta's more detailed record describes visiting Homonhon island and exchanging gifts with locals, before reaching Mazaua, identified as Limasawa, on Holy Thursday, March 28, 1521, where the first mass was held. 3) Scholars have used these primary sources to debate

Uploaded by

Kyla Tripoli
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
70 views7 pages

First Catholic Mass Site Controversy

1) The document discusses a controversy around the site of the first Catholic mass in the Philippines. Two primary sources, the logs of Francisco Albo and Antonio Pigafetta, provide accounts of Ferdinand Magellan's voyage that reached the Philippines in 1521. 2) Albo's account describes the fleet visiting several islands, including Mazaua, whose location matches the island of Limasawa. Pigafetta's more detailed record describes visiting Homonhon island and exchanging gifts with locals, before reaching Mazaua, identified as Limasawa, on Holy Thursday, March 28, 1521, where the first mass was held. 3) Scholars have used these primary sources to debate

Uploaded by

Kyla Tripoli
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Site of the First Catholic

LESSON 1
Mass in the Philippines

Learning outcomes:
At the end of this module, the students are able to:
1. Discuss the controversy about the first catholic mass in the Philippines.
2. Identify the different accounts about the controversy.

Introduction

To put into use what so far has been learned about the historian’s work as
well as the historical inquiry, this module deals with the analyses of Philippine
history’s four historiographical issues. 

The two vital concepts: interpretation and multi-perspectivity shall be defined


prior to the historical analysis of the issues in the history of the Philippines.
Being able to interpret historical events using primary sources, to recognize
the multiplicity of interpretation, and to demonstrate the ability to argue for or against
a particular issue using primary sources are therefore expected of you, history
students.

One Minute Paper

Direction: Write a short statement about the topic. Write your answer on yhe
space provided.

___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
Analysis

Guide Questions:

1. What can you infer about the issues past?


______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
2. How it affects the historical events?
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________

Abstraction

Controversy 1: Site of the First Mass in the Philippines


For three centuries, Butuan was believed to be the site of the First Mass in the
Philippines as evidenced by the 1872 monument near Agusan River which
commemorates the expedition’s arrival and celebration of the first Mass on April 8,
1521. Such a claim is based on a rudimentary reading of this event’s primary
sources.

However, towards the end of the 19 th century and the beginning of


20th century, mounting scholarship from more nuanced readings [by Filipino and
Spanish scholars] of the existing evidences revealed findings that disproved this
accepted interpretation.
Investigations on the identification of the Site of the First Mass in the
Philippines is carried out by referring to only two primary sources. One is the record
kept by Francisco Albo, navigator of one of Magellan’s ships, Trinidad and one of the
18 survivors that returned from the world circumnavigation aboard Victoria. The
other, which is a more complete primary source is Antonio Pigafetta’s First Voyage
Around the World. Like Albo, Pigafetta was part of Magellan’s expedition thus an
eyewitness to the events documented in the account specifically, the site of the first
Mass.

Albo’s Log
1. While sailing westward from Ladrones [now the Marianas Islands] on the
16th of March 1521, land towards the northwest was spotted; however, due to
shallow areas, the fleet did not approach the island which was later found out
to be Yunagan.
2. Sailing southwards that same day brought the fleet to a small island
called Suluan where Magellan and his men anchored and where they saw
canoes that sped away at their approach.
3. The fleet then sailed westward to Gada, an uninhabited island where the
Spaniards collected wood and water. The sea around this island, according to
Albo was free from shallows. [Although this particular log does not include the
island’s latitude, in Pigafetta’s account, the island appears to
be Aquada or Homonhon.]
4. Departing that island, the fleet sailed westwards towards Seilani, a huge,
inhabited island known to have gold. [Pigafetta calls this island Ceylon – an
island in Leyte.]
5. Sailing southwards along the Seilani’s coast, the fleet turned southwest
to Mazaua, a small island where the natives were good and where the
Spaniards erected a cross upon its mountaintop. There, they were shown
three islands to the west and southwest and told about the abundance of gold.
The Spaniards were shown how gold, which came in pieces the size of peas
and lentils, was gathered.
6. From Mazaua, the fleet sailed northwards back to Seilani following its coast
in a northwesterly course ascending to up to 10 degrees latitude where they
spotted the three islands shown to them beforehand.
7. Sailing some ten leagues westwards, the fleet spotted three islets where
anchors were dropped for the night and in the morning, the fleet sailed some
twelve leagues southwest down to a latitude where the fleet entered a
channel between two islands, Matan and Subu.
8. Sailing down the channel, the fleet turned westward and anchored at the town
of Subu where the Spaniards stayed for many days, obtained provisions, and
entered into a peace-pact with the local king.
9. Subu was on the east-west direction of Suluan and Mazaua. Shallows
between Mazaua and Subu forced the Spaniards to take the longer, alternate
route.
 “Diario o’ derotero del viage de Magallanes desde el cabo se S. Agustin en el Brazil hasta el regreso a Espana
de la nao Victoria, escrito por Frandsco Albo,” Document no. xxii in Collecion de viages y descubrimientos que hicieron por

los Espanoles desde fines del siglo XV,Ed. Martin Fernandez de Navarette (reprinted Buenos Aires 1945, 5 Vols.) IV, 191-

225. As cited in Miguel A. Bernad “Butuan or Limasawa? The Site of the First Mass in the Philippines: A Re-examination of

Evidence” 1981, Kinaadman: A Journal of Southern Philippines, Vol. III, 1-35.

In Albo’s account, Mazaua’s location fits that of Limazawa at the southern tip
of Leyte. Additionally, although Albo mentioned the cross being erected upon a
mountaintop where the three islands to the west and southwest which is an account
consistent with the southern end of Limasawa, the first Mass was not brought up. 
Pigafetta’s Account on the Route of Magellan’s Expedition
1. Saturday, 16 March 1521 – Some 300 leagues westward of Ladrones
[Marianas Islands], Magellan’s fleet spotted a highland called Zamal.
2. Sunday, March 17 – After spotting Zamal, the fleet landed on an uninhabited
island called Humunu [Homonhon] which lay to the right of Zamal. Here, the
Spaniards set up two tents for the sick crew members and slain a sow for
them.
3. That same day, Magellan christened the whole archipelago the Island of
Saint Lazarus owing to the Gospel for that Lenten season Sunday Mass
which was the 11th chapter of St. John which tells of Lazarus being raised
from the dead.
4. Monday, March 18 – In the afternoon of the Spaniards’ second day in
Homonhon, they spotted an approaching boat of 9 men. This later brought
about an exchange of gifts and a request from Magellan for food supplies.
The men swore to bring rice and other provisions in four days.
5. Homonhon had two springs of water and the Spaniards also noticed some
indications of gold in the island; hence, Magellan renamed Homonhon,
the Watering Place of Good Omen.
6. Friday, March 22 – The natives, this time in two boats laden with food
supplies, returned by noon.
7. Magellan and his men stayed for eight days in Homonhon that is from March
17 to March 25.
8. Monday, March 25 – The fleet weighed anchor to leave Homonhon when
Pigafetta went overboard but rescued. He ascribed his escape from death as
grace through the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary as in the
ecclesiastical calendar, March 25 was the feast of the Annunciation, thus “Our
Lady’s Day.”
9. In the direction of west, southwest between the islands of Cenalo,
Hiunanghan, Ibusson, and Albarien was the route taken by Magellan’s fleet
after departing Homonhon. Most likely, Cenalo is an orthographical error in
the document for what Pigafetta, in his map, calls Ceilon and Albo calls
Seilani both referring to the island of Leyte. Hiunanghan which is a misspelling
of Hinunangan and which is on the mainland of Leyte [i.e. Ceylon] seemed to
Pigafetta a separate island. Hibuson which is to Pigafetta, Ibusson, is an
island east of the southern tip of Leyte. Along these lines, it was easy to
decipher what Pigafetta meant by sailing in a west, southwest direction past
the prior mentioned islands: that they left Homonhon navigating westward
towards Leyte, following its coast southward, sailing between Hibuson on their
portside and on their starboard, Hinunangan Bay. The fleet continued to sail
southward subsequently turning westward to Mazaua.
10. Thursday, March 28 – The fleet anchored in Mazaua where the Spaniards
spotted either a light or a bonfire the previous night – it was in the morning of
Holy Thursday. Pigafetta ensured the inclusion in his record of the island’s
latitude and longitude and its being 25 leagues from Aquada or Homonhon.
That same day, a small boat with eight natives aboard approached the
Spanish fleet and obtained trinkets tossed by Magellan as presents. The
natives rowed away but two balanghai turned up two hours later with the
native king seated in one of them under a canopy of mats. Some of the
natives went aboard one of the ships at Magellan’s invitation though the
native king remained seated in his boat. Gifts were exchanged then the
Spanish fleet weighed anchor and went closer to shore and moored near the
native king’s village in the afternoon of that day.
11. Friday , March 29 – Intending to ask the native king for the expedition’s food
supplies and to inform him that they had come as friends, Magellan sent his
slave interpreter ashore. As a response, the king himself accompanied by six
or eight of his men came in a boat and this time climbed aboard Magellan’s
ship. The two embraced and exchanged more gifts. Returning ashore, the
native king and his men brought with them two members of the expedition as
guests for the night – Pigafetta was one of these two.
12. Saturday, March 30 – Pigafetta and his companion returned to their ship after
spending the previous night dining with the native king and his son. He,
however, regretted having eaten some meat as it was Good Friday.
13. Sunday, March 31 – Early Easter Sunday, Magellan sent the priest and some
of his men ashore to prepare for the Mass which was celebrated later in the
morning with Magellan, fifty of his men, the king of Mazaua and the king
of Butuan. Magellan and his men returned to their ships for lunch and went
back ashore in the afternoon to have the venerated cross erected at the
summit of the Mazaua’s highest hill. Both native kings were also in
attendance. While on the summit, Magellan asked the native kings for a port
to acquire more food supplies. He was told that there were three ports to
choose from: Ceylon, Zubu, and Calagan. Of these three, according to the
kings, Zubu’s port had the riches trading going on so Magellan informed the
kings that he wished to sail there the following morning and requested for a
guide. Although the native kings assured him that guides will be available any
time, the king of Mazaua offered to escort the expedition himself after
bringing his harvest in with the help of some of Magellan’s men that he
requested.
14. Monday, April 1- Despite having sent some of his men ashore to help,
Magellan was informed that no harvest was carried out as the native kings
were sleeping off their drinking stint the night before.
15. Tuesday, April 2 and Wednesday, April 3 – Helped the natives with their
harvest.
16. Magellan and his men stayed in Mazaua for seven days.
17. Thursday, April 4 – Escorted by the king of Mazaua who sailed in his own
boat, the Spanish fleet departed the island sailing towards Subu past the
islands of Ceylon, Bohol, Canighan, Baibai, and Gatighan.
18. Upon reaching Gatighan, the fleet sailed westward towards the three island
of Camotes: Poro, Pasihan, and Ponson where the Spaniards waited for the
king of Mazaua on board his native balanghai that was much inferior to the
Spanish fleet in speed.
19. The Spanish fleet escorted by the king of Mazaua aboard
his balanghai sailed southwards towards Subu from the Camotes Islands.
20. Suunday, April 7 – It had taken the Spanish fleet three days to navigate
from Mazaua to Camotes Islands and ultimately to Subu entering its harbor
at midday.

 Emma Blair and James Alexander Robertson, The Philippine Islands, Vols 33


and 34, as cited in Miguel A. Bernad, “Butuan or Limasawa? The Site of the
First Mass in the Philippines: A Re-examination of Evidence” 1981,
Kinaadman: A Journal of Southern Philippines, Vol. III, 1-35.

Both Albo and Pigafetta’s accounts corroborate each other. Pigafetta,


however, afforded historians a more detailed record of the Spanish fleet’s weeklong
sojourn in Mazaua.

With the information afforded by these primary sources, the Jesuit priest,
Miguel A. Bernad argued that Pigafetta’s account does not mention Butuan’s distinct
geographic and crucial aspect that is its river. Situated on the Agusan River, Butuan
is a riverine settlement; hence the curious omission of the river itself which makes
part of Butuan’s geographic characteristic that seemed too vital for an oversight,
does make a valid contention.

Pigafetta’s account seemed to have documented the survivors sailing towards


Butuan and vividly depicted a trip along a river. It must be underscored, however,
that such account was only penned after Magellan’s death.

Application: Let's apply

Direction: Answer the following questions.

1. What can be learned from the controversy?


________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
2.
What conclusion can be drawn to end the controversy?
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

Reference:

[Link]
histories-controversies-and-conflicting-views-in-philippine-history/

Common questions

Powered by AI

Francisco Albo's logs provide a navigational account capturing the broader directions and movements of Magellan's fleet, such as the navigation around the islands and the significant landmarks. His log describes the fleet's movements such as sailing towards Seilani, Mazaua, and Subu, indicating a detailed path but does not specifically mention the mass. On the other hand, Antonio Pigafetta's account gives a vivid daily itinerary and detailed descriptions of interactions with natives, geography, and exact proceedings, including the mass on Mazaua, making his account more comprehensive for historians. Both sources combined offer a compelling understanding of the fleet's route and clarify the historical navigation path .

The controversy revolves around whether Butuan or Limasawa was the site of the first Catholic mass in the Philippines. Historically, Butuan was considered the site due to a monument and early readings of accounts. However, later scholarship and analysis of primary sources by figures like Francisco Albo and Antonio Pigafetta pointed towards Limasawa as the site. Pigafetta's detailed diary records the event on the island of Mazaua (thought to be Limasawa), while Albo's logs also support this, but any specific mention of the mass site is absent. The geographical and historical analysis by scholars like Miguel A. Bernad further supports Limasawa with the omission of Butuan's significant geographical feature, the Agusan River, in accounts of the event .

Francisco Albo's logs provide a navigational framework, detailing the fleet's approach and interactions with Limasawa, known as Mazaua, where Spaniards erected a cross. Although Albo doesn't explicitly detail the site of the mass, Pigafetta offers a complementary account, describing interactions with the natives, preparation for the Easter Sunday mass, and the ceremony itself. Pigafetta records Magellan sending a priest to organize the mass attended by the Spanish and local leaders, and the subsequent erection of a cross, affirming religious and cultural encounters. These accounts together form a richer understanding of the event, emphasizing the strategic and ceremonial importance of the landing .

Interpretation and multi-perspectivity are critical in historical analysis, as illustrated by the First Mass controversy in the Philippines. Historians must interpret primary sources, such as Albo's logs and Pigafetta's account, through various lenses, including the geographical, cultural, and navigational contexts provided by these sources. The differing interpretations offer insights into the historiographical debate, where scholars like Miguel A. Bernad interpret these accounts to argue for Limasawa, emphasizing how nuances in description and omission influence conclusions. The varied interpretations demonstrate the importance of considering multiple perspectives to achieve a comprehensive understanding of historical events .

Geographical descriptions in primary sources like those of Pigafetta are pivotal to the debate on the site's location. Pigafetta offers detailed maps and notes, which allow for the precise plotting of Magellan's route, aligning the described latitudes and observed landmarks with Limasawa rather than Butuan. The absence of any riverine description in the mass event accounts, a notable characteristic of Butuan, further supports Limasawa's claim. Additionally, Pigafetta's explicit mention of Mazaua being 25 leagues from Homonhon contributes to identifying Limasawa, highlighting the role geographical descriptions play in validating historical events and sites .

Miguel A. Bernad utilized the primary sources of Pigafetta and Albo by focusing on the specific geographic and logistical details they contained. He noted the absence of Butuan's defining geographic features, such as the Agusan River, in accounts which supported the argument for Limasawa. Pigafetta’s detailed diary entries provided descriptions aligning with Limasawa's geography, particularly the proximity to Homonhon and the layout of island interactions. Bernad's analysis contrasted the descriptive oversight in Butuan's claim with the clear terrain and site identifiers supporting Limasawa, using this as a basis to conclude the first mass took place there .

The controversies highlight challenges historians face, such as relying on incomplete or subjective sources, potential biases in early accounts, and the difficulty of reconciling conflicting narratives. The debate over the first mass's site reflects these challenges with differing interpretations of primary sources by Albo and Pigafetta, each emphasizing different aspects of navigation and geographic details. The lack of specific mentions of critical geographic features such as Butuan's river contrasts with the precise navigation data supporting Limasawa. This exemplifies how interpretation requires critical analysis of source reliability, context, and corroborative evidence to construct coherent historical narratives .

Interpretation of historical primary sources is crucial in resolving controversies such as the First Mass in the Philippines. Different interpretations of Francisco Albo's and Antonio Pigafetta's accounts highlight the significance of multi-perspectivity in historical analysis. Albo's logs offer navigational data, while Pigafetta provides detailed daily records. The nuanced scholarship that later emerged focused on geographical information, missing data, and contextual understanding of descriptions, allowing historians like Miguel A. Bernad to argue for Limasawa. This process underscores how diverse interpretative approaches can clarify historical events by examining inconsistencies, cultural contexts, and corroborations from multiple accounts .

Pigafetta recorded several key events during the Spanish fleet's stay on Mazaua, including the arrival and interaction with the native king and the exchange of gifts with the Spaniards. On Easter Sunday, March 31st, Magellan sent a priest ashore to prepare for a mass attended by himself, 50 of his men, and the native kings. After the mass, a cross was erected atop the island's highest hill. Magellan also inquired about potential ports for provisioning and planned to sail to Zubu. Pigafetta captured detailed interactions and reflections on these engagements, including cultural exchanges and observations of the native society and physical environment .

The interactions between Magellan's crew and the local kings of Mazaua provide insights into early cross-cultural exchanges during exploration periods. The respectful exchanges of gifts and the hosting of Pigafetta overnight indicate a level of diplomacy and mutual curiosity. The ceremonial erection of a cross suggests significant ritualistic influence, portraying Magellan's strategic religious and alliance-building initiatives. These engagements reflect the foundational establishment of European influence through both amicable exchanges and religious impositions, marking the beginnings of longer-term impacts on indigenous societies under exploration contexts .

You might also like