Scribd
Upload
32 views14 pages

Salamon and Lund (2002) - Tools Approach

Uploaded by

Mitzi Samson
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
32 views14 pages

Salamon and Lund (2002) - Tools Approach

Uploaded by

Mitzi Samson
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Chapter Two ——_——— THE TOOLS APPROACH: BASIC ANALYTICS THE TOOLS APEAGACE: bk Lester M, Salamon and Michoel S. Lund orion Lang. “Power and Admini publle management paradox.” se Salamon, a7 intargovernmas penuitres, Employe i fray Camiston on Inlrgveramentl Real ion, DG, 1900) and Robart A: Kap, Golng By the Book: The “empia Univeral Pee Bey Porta te — Lestec Selano~ 24 Tools of Government tions, to identify the basic analytics ot Policy Analysis the major approaches hhas changed increasingly from a focus on govern- amines the basi to a concern about government’s “outputs” fends by 2 (o the societal effects of these ‘The tools approach grew research paradigms domino tion, policy analysi a first step to cl these vo pursued rogram focus. Of central concern rogram-orlented research has beon the question of how ef- individual programs really aro in achieving their societal ives and what changes in program design or oper differs from them. Broadly speaking, the analysis of government action can be distinguished. jionships. The central coné resources and systems jons regarding wl ad to what sorts of consequences. sms of programs or jency to program goals with est iscourages the search for al Basic Analytics. 27 {cy's consequences, not on either a ‘societal consequences. programs had uncovers: intended by federal ind research on policy types ore fort to use thest ‘make responsible ‘achieving public goa: a urposeful governme ingly underdeveloped. What one survey of ‘oncluded in 1976 continues to have ‘entifying the Domain af the Tools Approach ‘A Working Definit from several other common concoy tive tool, and function. the carefull ‘argument of recent implemon- ‘embody certain “dispositions” or 3 dilemmas for their managers, for more efficient and effect rat fiold of government portation). A policy can thus ve work to clarify what is meant by & fe major tools now in use, and d& ich diffe likely to flow from ly to produce these conse purposes and the till make th se tasks that we now turn, 30 Tools of Government theoreti- coverage and it . of Federal Domes from purposes tools are (OMB group- CFDA for grants ve purpos ics to the outcomes of sification schomos above others because ferent from “insured loans” in official ly. Tool terms used them would suggest. Is used for classes of govornm« fon seam to be used honorifi describe of how particular instrumer hhas had only {esr Pomgeang wBoy]09 ANON PORY oBNONND) “Pe Pe spina gra “spe stan any. PUR Wrweany HoqDy w} EIAAOD ped eM 1] Fee BRENT 40d [OS veant nduseaus peysigndun rprie ot sure] abuasseg pur esd Teept soba s#eP aBDEGwD) SUS|UDYIEN VONNGLINIG srouy foto pu na UY Sr cooraasays ae 2) ]urunnso} Bu WOON), AANA 1 Sua raepeg fo sssjouy joustouopy Y “auey KUEN pow soBuiiey wey se-sf2 {1061 rare "wowepes sie] 7 “owes “sooner ofS sesssnnc anand) sesjouy Aqog Buiosdu “pa -yHen wg suonDUNG DEHEAIOD pur spowN seu Aoyeg. "Hl "WRPRN TENG } Foe ere erage apg “ye eo}WOH #10 suoroys PeUrT 2/049 HMAYig “DUMMY UI UYU IOg 190d HKD a HE mung sug 29a cHetE HoenaRi9N0D 7 eg Farum amp pu YRLTEZAADD Aa: pALL uMwReUNY O19 BAPE nna ynauy-woneaeisipy angnd 2) fe!oeg ueSweWY Ye poruerad sedeg cuonuessmUyfojog Jo AOayL MON © pIEMOL.. “TF syoequequenoy) mtasy worransjunupY aug

You might also like