100% found this document useful (1 vote)
2K views17 pages

USDA Soil Classification Overview

This document describes several systems for classifying soils based on their engineering properties and composition. It discusses the USDA textural classification system, which names soils after their principal components of sand, silt, and clay. It then describes the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) developed by Casagrande, which categorizes soils as coarse-grained or fine-grained based on their particle sizes and uses symbols to indicate gradation and plasticity. The document also discusses the AASHTO classification system, which sorts soils into seven major groups based on particle size distribution and plasticity. It provides details on determining classification and evaluating soils' suitability for use as subgrades based on their group index values.

Uploaded by

Light House
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
2K views17 pages

USDA Soil Classification Overview

This document describes several systems for classifying soils based on their engineering properties and composition. It discusses the USDA textural classification system, which names soils after their principal components of sand, silt, and clay. It then describes the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) developed by Casagrande, which categorizes soils as coarse-grained or fine-grained based on their particle sizes and uses symbols to indicate gradation and plasticity. The document also discusses the AASHTO classification system, which sorts soils into seven major groups based on particle size distribution and plasticity. It provides details on determining classification and evaluating soils' suitability for use as subgrades based on their group index values.

Uploaded by

Light House
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)
  • USDA Textural Classification
  • Introduction
  • AASHTO Classification System
  • Sample Problems

SOIL CLASSIFICATION

I. Introduction
Different soils with similar properties may be classified into groups and sub-groups according
to their engineering behavior. Classification systems provide a common language to concisely express
the general characteristics of soils, which are infinitely varied, without detailed descriptions. Most of
the soil classification systems that have been developed for engineering purposes are based on simple
index properties such as particle-size distribution and plasticity. Although several classification systems
are now in use, none is totally definitive of any soil for all possible applications because of the wide
diversity of soil properties.

II. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) textural classification


In this classification system, the soils are named after their principal components. There are a
number of classification systems developed by different organizations. This method is based on the
following limits of particle size.

Sand size: 2.0 to 0.05mm in diameter


Silt size: 0.05 to 0.002mm in diameter
Clay size: smaller than 0.002mm in diameter

III. Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)


The USCS uses symbols for the particle size groups. These symbols and their representations
are G - gravel, S - sand, M - silt, and C - clay. These are combined symbols expressing gradation
characteristics - W for well graded and P for poorly graded - and plasticity characteristics - H for high
(LL is more than 50) and L for low (LL is less than 50), and a symbol, O, indicating the presence of
organic material. A typical classification of CL means a clay soil with low plasticity, while SP mean a
poorly graded sand.
The original form of this system was proposed by Casagrande in 1942 for use in the airfield
construction works undertaken by the Army Corps of Engineers during World War II. In cooperation
with the U.S Bureau of Reclamation, this system was revised in 1952. At present, it is used widely by
engineers (ASTM Test Designation D-2487). The unified classification system in Table 5.2.

This system classifies soils into two broad categories:


1. Coarse-grained soils that are gravelly and sandy in nature with less than 50% passing through
the No. 200 sieve. The group symbols start with a prefix of G (gravelly soil) and S (sand or sandy
soil)
2. Fine-grained soils are with 50% or ore passing through No.200 sieve. The group symbols start
with prefixes of M (inorganic silt), C (inorganic clay), O (organic silts and clay). The symbol Pt is
used for peat, muck, and other highly organic soils.
For proper classification according to this system, some or all of the following information must be
known:
1. Percent of gravel - that is, the fraction passing the 76.2mm sieve and retained on the No.4 sieve
(4.75mm opening)
2. Percent of sand - that is, the fraction passing the No.4 sieve (4.75mm opening) and retained on
the No.200 sieve (0.075mm opening
3. Percent of silt and clay - that is, the fraction finer than the No.200 sieve (0.075mm opening)
4. Uniformity coefficient (Cu) and the coefficient of gradation (Cc)
5. Liquid limit and plasticity index of the portion of soil passing the No.40 sieve.

The group symbols for coarse-grained gravelly soils are GW, GP, GM, GC, GC-GM, GW-GM, GW-GC, GP-
GM, and GD-GC. Similarly, the group symbols for fine-grained soils are CL, ML, OL, CH, MH, OH, CL-ML,
and Pt.

More recently, ASTM designation D-2487 created an elaborate system to assign group names to soils.
 Fine fraction = percent passing No.200 sieve
 Coarse fraction = percent retained on No.200 sieve
 Gravel fraction = percent retained on the No.4 sieve
 Sand fraction = (percent retained on No.200 sieve) - (percent retained on No.4 sieve)

Flow chat for classification of coarse-grained soils


(<50% passing No.200 sieve)
Flow chat for classification of organic fine-grained soils
(≥50% passing No.200 sieve)

Particle-Size Distribution Curve (Sieve Analysis)


Sieve analysis consists of shaking the soil sample through set of sieves that have progressively
smaller openings. These sieves are generally 200mm in diameter.
To conduct a sieve analysis, the soil is first oven-dried and then all lumps must be broken into small
particles. The soil is then shaken through a stack of sieves with openings of decreasing size from top to
bottom. A pan is placed below the stack.

A particle-size distribution curve can be used to determine the following four parameters for a given
soil:
a) Effective size, D10
This parameter is the diameter in the curve corresponding to 10% finer. The effective size of a
granular soil is a good measure to estimate the hydraulic conductivity and drainage through soil.

b) Uniformity coefficient, Cu
�60
�� =
�10
Where:
D60 = diameter corresponding to 60% finer
c) Coefficient of gradation or coefficient of curvature, Cc

(�30 )2
�� =
�60 � �10
Where:
D30 = diameter corresponding to 30% finer

d) Sorting coefficient, So
�75
�� =
�25
where:
D75 = diameter corresponding to 75% finer
D25 = diameter corresponding to 25% finer

The particle-size distribution curve shows not only the range of particle sizes present in the soil, but
also the type of distribution of various-size particles.
 Poorly graded soil - most of the soil grains are the same size
 Well graded soil - particle sizes are distributed over a wide range. A well graded soil has Cu
greater than about 4 for gravels and 6 for sands, and Cc between 1 and 3 for gravels and sands.
 Gap graded soil - characterized by two or more humps in the grading curve.

Different Types of Particle-Size Distribution Curve


IV. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Classification
System
The AASHTO system of soil classification was developed in 1929 as the Public Road Administration
classification system. This classification in present use is given in the table. According to this system, soil is
classified into seven major groups: A-1 through A-7. Soils classified under groups A-1, A-2, and A-3 are granular
materials of which 35% or less of the particle pass through the No. 200 sieve. Soils of which more than 35% pass
through the No. 200 sieve are classified under groups A-4, A-5, A-6 and A-7. These soils are mostly silt and clay-
type materials. This classification system is based on the following criteria:
1. Grain Size
a. Gravel: fraction passing the 75mm (3in) sieve and retained on the No. 10(2mm) sieve.
b. Sand: fraction passing the No.10 (2mm) sieve and retained on the NO. 200 (0.075mm)
sieve.
c. Silt and clay: fraction passing the No. 200 sieve

2. Plasticity: The term silty is applied when the fine fractions of the soil have a plasticity index of 10 or less.
The term clayey is applied when the fine fractions have a plasticity index of 11 or more.

3. If cobbles and boulders (size larger than 75mm) are encountered, they are excluded from the
portion of the soil sample from which classification is made. However, the percentage of such materials is
recorded.

*To classify a soil according to the table, apply the test data from left to right. By process of elimination,the first
group from the left into which the test data fit is the correct classification.
**To evaluate the quality of a soil as a highway sub-grade material, one must incorporate a
number called “group index” with the groups and sub-groups of the soil.

GI = (F200 − 35) 0.2 + 0.005(LL − 40) + 0.01 F200 − 15 PI − 10

where:
F200 = percentage passing through the No.200 sieve
LL = liquid limit
PI = plasticity index

The first term of equation that is (F200 − 35) 0.2 + 0.005(LL − 40) - is the partial group index
determined from the liquid limit. The second term -that is, 0.01(F200 - 15)(PI - 10)- is the partial group
index determined from the plasticity index.

Following are some rules for determining the group index:


1. If computed value of GI is negative, take it as zero.
2. The group index calculated is rounded off to the nearest whole number(i.e G.I = 3.4 is rounded
off to 3; G.I = 3.5 is rounded off to 4)
3. There is no upper limit for the group index
4. The group index of soil belonging to groups A-1-a, A-1-b, A-2-4, A-2-5, and A-3 is always zero.
5. When calculating the group index for soils that belong to groups A-2-6 and A-2-7, use the partial
group index for PI, or

GI = 0.01 F200 − 15 PI − 10

In general, the quality of performance of a soil as a subgrade material is inversely proportional to the
group index.
SAMPLE PROBLEMS

1. A soil has the following particle-size distribution:


Gravel = 20%
Sand = 10%
Silt = 30%
Clay = 40%
Classify the soil according to USDA textural classification system.
Solution:
%sand
Modified % sand =
100 − %gravel
10
Modified % sand = = ��. �%
100 − 20

%silt
Modified % silt =
100 − %gravel
30
Modified % silt = = ��. �%
100 − 20

%clay
Modified % clay =
100 − %gravel
40
Modified % clay = = ��%
100 − 20

The lines correspond to each percentages intersect on the clay region, thus the soil is CLAY.
2. The table below shows the laboratory results of the sieve analysis of a sample. Plot the grain size
curve of the soil in the attached figure. The soil has a liquid limit of 35% and plasticity index of 26%.
Classify the soil according to a) USCS, b) USDA, and c) AASHTO.

Size (mm) Weight Retained


0.25 18.96
0.149 33.18
0.074 45.03
0.052 54.51
0.02 42.66
0.01 11.85
0.004 4.74
0.001 4.74
Pan 21.33

Solution:

Size (mm) Weight Retained Accumulated Weight Percent Finer


0.25 18.96 18.96 92%
0.149 33.18 52.14 78%
0.074 45.03 97.17 69%
0.052 54.51 151.68 36%
0.02 42.66 194.34 18%
0.01 11.85 206.19 13%
0.004 4.74 210.93 11%
0.001 4.74 215.67 9%
Pan 21.33 237
Total 237.00
a) USCS
Percent passing No.200 sieve (0.074mm) = 59% > 50%
Therefore, the soil is FINE GRAINED

LL = 35% < 50% (ML, CL, or OL)


From the plasticity chart, with LL = 35% and PI = 26%, the soil is CL.
b) USDA
Percent sand (2.0mm to 0.05mm in diameter) = 100 - 33 = 67%
Percent silt (0.05mm to 0.002mm) = 33 - 10 = 23%
Percent clay = 10%

From the chart shown, the soil is SANDY LOAM.


c) AASHTO
Percent passing No.200 sieve (0.074mm) = 59% > 35% (silt clay materials)

The soil cannot be A-4 because its PI = 26%>10%


The soil cannot be A-5 because its LL = 35% < 41%
The soil is A-6.

Solving for GI:


GI = (F200 - 35)[0.2 + 0.005(LL - 40)] + 0.01(F200 - 15)(PI - 10)
GI = (59 - 35)[0.2 + 0.005(35-40)] + 0.01(59 - 15)(26 - 10)
GI = 11.24 = 11

Thus, the soil is A-6(11)

3. The table below shows the laboratory results of the sieve analysis of a sample. Plot the grain size
curve of the soil in the attached figure. Determine the following:
a) Determine the nearest value of the effective size.
b) Determine the nearest value of the coefficient of uniformity.
c) Classify the soil according to the Unified Soil Classification System.

Sieve No. Diameter (mm) Percent Passing (%)


4 4.76 90
8 2.38 64
10 2.00 58
20 0.84 35
40 0.42 22
60 0.25 15
100 0.149 10
200 0.074 4
Solution:
a) Effective Size
The effective size, D10 is the diameter of the particles of which 10% of the soil is finer.
D10 is an important value in regulating flow through soils and can significantly influence the
mechanical behavior of soils.
Based from the table presented, D10 = 0.149mm.

b) Coefficient of uniformly
�60
�� =
�10
From the grain size curve shown, D60 = 2.2mm

2.2��
�� = = ��. �
0.149��

c) Classification of soil
Percent gravel (retained in #4 sieve) = 100 - 90 = 10%

(�30 )2
�� =
�60 � �10

From the graph, = 0.63mm


(0.63)2
�� = = 1.21 (������� 1& 3)
0.149 �2.2

Since Cu > 6, Cc is between 1&3, the soil is SW (well graded sand)


(refer to the table below)

4. The grain-size curve for soils A and B is shown in the figure. It is required to classify the soils
according to the Unified Soil Classification System.
a) Determine the value of the coefficient of uniformity of soil A.
b) What is the classification of soil A.
c) What is the classification of soil B.
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Percent Passing
Sieve No. Diameter (mm)
Soil A Soil B
4 4.76 100 90
8 2.38 99 64
10 2.00 98 58
20 0.85 92 35
40 0.425 70 22
60 0.25 46 15
100 0.15 25 10
200 0.074 0 4

Solution:
a) Coefficient of Uniformity of Soil A
D10 = 0.10
D60 = 0.32
D30 = 0.17
�60
�� =
�10

0.32��
�� = = �. �
0.17��

b) Classification of Soil A
Passing on No.200 sieve = 0% (More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve)
Therefore the soil is a Coarse-Grained Soil.
Passing on No.4 sieve = 100% > 50% (Sands more than 50% of coarse fraction passes No.4 sieve.)

Refer to the attached flow chart.


Coefficient of Curvature
(�30 )2
�� =
�10 � �60

0.172
�� = = 0.903
0.10(0.32)
Cu = 3.2 < 6 & Cc = 0.903 (Not between 1 & 3).

Soil A does not meet both criteria for SW, therefore soil A is SP (poorly graded sand)
c) Classification of Soil B
D10 = 0.15
D30 = 0.66
D60 = 2.1
Uniformity Coefficient
�60
�� =
�10

2.1��
�� = = ��
0.15��

Coefficient of Curvature
(�30 )2
�� =
�10 � �60

0.662
�� = = 1.38
0.15(2.1)

Passing on No.200 sieve = 4% (More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve)
Therefore the soil is a Coarse-Grained Soil.
Passing on No.4 sieve = 90% > 50% (Sands more than 50% of coarse fraction passes No.4 sieve.)

Cu = 14 > 6 & Cc = 1.38 (Between 1 & 3)


Soil B meet both criteria for SW, therefore soil A is SW (Well graded sand)
Refer to the attached flow chart.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The USDA classification system categorizes soils based on their particle-size distribution specifically using terms like sand, silt, and clay with defined size ranges (sand: 2.0 to 0.05mm, silt: 0.05 to 0.002mm, clay: smaller than 0.002mm). The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS), however, uses symbolic representations for particle size groups (G for gravel, S for sand, M for silt, and C for clay) along with gradation and plasticity characteristics, such as W for well graded, P for poorly graded, H for high plasticity, and L for low plasticity . Additionally, the USCS is tailored for engineering applications and considers properties such as the percentage of material passing certain sieves, the uniformity coefficient (Cu), and the coefficient of gradation (Cc).

Differentiating soil types based on the percentage passing through the No. 200 sieve is crucial because it helps classify soils into coarse-grained or fine-grained categories, which have distinct engineering properties. In the USCS, soils with less than 50% passing the No. 200 sieve are considered coarse-grained, indicating better drainage and strength properties due to higher content of sand or gravel particles . Similarly, in the AASHTO classification system, this parameter is pivotal to determine groupings, with more than 35% passing indicating silt or clay-type materials, which often exhibit higher plasticity and lower permeability, affecting behavior in construction . Proper classification informs suitable usage in construction such as load-bearing capacity and hydraulic conductivity.

The AASHTO soil classification system assesses the quality of soil mainly based on grain size, plasticity, and group index. Soils are categorized into seven groups from A-1 to A-7, with A-1 to A-3 being granular materials and the rest mostly silt and clay . The group index (GI) is calculated using a formula that incorporates the percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve (F200), the liquid limit (LL), and the plasticity index (PI). Lower group index values indicate better performance as a highway sub-grade material .

A soil sample classified as CL in the Unified Soil Classification System denotes a clay soil with low plasticity . Such soils have a moderate plasticity index and a liquid limit less than 50%, reflecting lower sensitivity to moisture content changes compared to high plasticity soils. This makes CL soils relatively stable and less prone to shrinkage or swelling, making them suitable for various engineering applications such as foundations in both load-bearing and flexible pavement structures. However, careful consideration is needed in terms of drainage design and compaction to mitigate risks of reduced permeability and strength .

Cobbles and boulders—materials larger than 75mm—are excluded from classification criteria in systems like the AASHTO because they do not significantly impact the engineering properties of the soil matrix that governs mechanical behavior when evaluating standard particle sizes . This exclusion is important when classifying soils for construction purposes because these large particles do not contribute to many measured properties, like plasticity and compactability. However, their presence and percentage should be noted as they can affect handling and could be unconventional in typical engineering designs. This can particularly matter in contexts like roadbed design where homogeneity of the soil matrix is critical.

A particle-size distribution curve visually represents the range and distribution of different-sized particles in a soil sample. For a well-graded soil, the curve will exhibit a smooth and continuous grading over a wide range of particle sizes, indicating that the soil has a good mix of different particle sizes for stability and compaction . Mathematically, a well-graded soil would have a uniformity coefficient (Cu) greater than 4 for gravel and 6 for sand, and a coefficient of curvature (Cc) between 1 and 3 . Conversely, a poorly graded soil will display a particle-size distribution curve with an abrupt or narrow gradation, showing a dominance of certain particle sizes, which can lead to poor compaction and higher void ratios.

A soil sample with a liquid limit less than 50 and a plasticity index of 10 is typically indicative of low plasticity according to the Unified Soil Classification System. It would be classified with the symbol 'L' which indicates low plasticity, and if it falls under the category of clays, it would specifically be classified as CL . This classification is beneficial for understanding the soil's potential for volume change with moisture content and its suitability for construction purposes.

The uniformity coefficient (Cu) is significant because it provides an indication of the soil's particle-size distribution, influencing its engineering properties such as strength and permeability. Cu is calculated as the ratio of the diameter at 60% finer by weight to the diameter at 10% finer by weight (D60/D10). A higher Cu indicates a well-graded soil with a wide range of particle sizes . The coefficient of gradation (Cc) helps assess the soil's uniformity and ability to provide adequate interlocking characteristics; it is calculated as [(D30)^2/(D60*D10)] and should typically be between 1 and 3 for well-graded soils . Both coefficients are crucial for determining the suitability of soils in construction applications.

The effective size (D10) is a critical parameter for estimating the hydraulic conductivity and filtration properties of granular soils. It represents the particle diameter at which 10% of the soil's mass is finer, offering insights into the soil's drainage capabilities . The sorting coefficient (So) provides a measure of particle size uniformity, calculated as the ratio D75/D25, where D75 and D25 are diameters corresponding to 75% and 25% finer, respectively . A lower sorting coefficient indicates better uniformity, which can affect soil compaction and permeability characteristics. Both parameters are essential in predicting the soil's effectiveness in structural applications, particularly in subgrade roads and drainage systems.

The USDA textural classification system defines sandy loam soil as a mix where sand constitutes the dominant fraction, accompanied by lower proportions of silt and clay. Specifically, sand makes up 65-85%, silt 15-35%, and clay 0-20% of the soil texture . Such a soil classification ensures a balance between good drainage typical of sandy soils, with the nutrient-retaining capability provided by silt and clay. This balanced composition makes sandy loam ideal for agriculture and horticulture as it provides sufficient aeration and holds moisture adequately while supporting root growth.

SOIL CLASSIFICATION
I. Introduction
Different soils with similar properties may be classified into groups and sub-groups acco
The original form of this system was proposed by Casagrande in 1942 for use in the airfield
construction works undertaken by
For proper classification according to this system, some or all of the following information must be
known:
1. Percent of gra
Particle-Size Distribution Curve (Sieve Analysis)
Sieve analysis consists of shaking the soil sample through set of sieves th
c) Coefficient of gradation or coefficient of curvature, Cc
d) Sorting coefficient, So
The particle-size distribution curve s
IV. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Classification
System
The AASHTO system of so
**To evaluate the quality of a soil as a highway sub-grade material, one must incorporate a
number called “group index” with
SAMPLE PROBLEMS
1. A soil has the following particle-size distribution:
Gravel = 20%
Sand = 10%
Silt = 30%
Clay = 40%
Classif
2. The table below shows the laboratory results of the sieve analysis of a sample. Plot the grain size
curve of the soil in t
a) USCS
Percent passing No.200 sieve (0.074mm) = 59% > 50%
Therefore, the soil is FINE GRAINED
LL = 35% < 50% (ML, CL, or OL)

You might also like