0% found this document useful (0 votes)
233 views10 pages

Mayweather Promotions vs. PAC Breach Case

This document is a complaint filed by Mayweather Promotions against PAC Entertainment for breach of contract regarding an exhibition boxing match between Floyd Mayweather and Logan Paul. It summarizes that: 1) PAC approached Mayweather Promotions to host the event in Dubai and agreed to pay $110 million guaranteed in installments, but failed to make the first payment. 2) The parties then entered a new agreement for $115 million guaranteed, but PAC again failed to make the first payment, breaching the new agreement. 3) Mayweather Promotions is suing to recover amounts owed and damages from having to find a new venue due to PAC's breach.

Uploaded by

MMA Payout
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
233 views10 pages

Mayweather Promotions vs. PAC Breach Case

This document is a complaint filed by Mayweather Promotions against PAC Entertainment for breach of contract regarding an exhibition boxing match between Floyd Mayweather and Logan Paul. It summarizes that: 1) PAC approached Mayweather Promotions to host the event in Dubai and agreed to pay $110 million guaranteed in installments, but failed to make the first payment. 2) The parties then entered a new agreement for $115 million guaranteed, but PAC again failed to make the first payment, breaching the new agreement. 3) Mayweather Promotions is suing to recover amounts owed and damages from having to find a new venue due to PAC's breach.

Uploaded by

MMA Payout
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Case 1:21-cv-04378-VEC Document 1 Filed 05/14/21 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

MAYWEATHER PROMOTIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,
Civil Case No. ____________
v.
COMPLAINT
PAC ENTERTAINMENT WORLDWIDE LLC,

Defendant.

Plaintiff Mayweather Promotions, LLC (“Mayweather Promotions”), by and through its

undersigned counsel, allege as follows against Defendant PAC Entertainment Worldwide LLC

(“PAC”):

NATURE OF THE ACTION

1. Floyd Mayweather—widely considered the greatest boxer of his generation—will

participate in an exhibition bout with controversial social medial star, Logan Paul in Miami,

Florida next month. Since its announcement, the exhibition bout gained immense media attention,

but planning the exhibition was far from simple.

2. After the exhibition bout between Mayweather and Paul was announced, the search

for a suitable venue began. PAC approached Mayweather Promotions to pitch the idea of hosting

the event in Dubai. PAC informed Mayweather Promotions that it had numerous business contacts

in Dubai, had the financial wherewithal and capability to host a fight of this magnitude and

presented financial projections estimating the fight could generate guaranteed amounts for each

participant, plus result in the promoters earning more than $100 million in profits after covering

all purses and expenses. After extended negotiations, with both sides represented by counsel, the

parties struck a deal.

1
Case 1:21-cv-04378-VEC Document 1 Filed 05/14/21 Page 2 of 10

3. The financial terms required PAC to make timely and guaranteed installment

payments totaling $110 million to Mayweather Promotions on a specified schedule. Shortly after

signing an agreement, dated March 21, 2021, PAC breached the agreement when it defaulted on

its very first payment. Mayweather Promotions and PAC then entered into a March 31 Agreement

which restated the terms of the March 21 Agreement, but modified the Guaranteed Payments to

$115 million spread out over a different schedule to accommodate PAC. But PAC defaulted on

the first payment under that schedule as well, putting itself in breach of the March 31 Agreement.

4. Realizing that PAC could not or would not live up to the terms of its contracts,

Mayweather Promotions had no choice but to shoulder the heavy burden of finding a new venue

and planning the exhibition bout in Miami, Florida, which resulted in further delay and event

expenses, which PAC had agreed to cover.

5. This action is brought to remedy PAC’s unequivocal breach of contract, and to

compensate Mayweather Promotions for the amounts due under the signed agreement as well as

consequential damages incurred as a result of PAC’s breach.

THE PARTIES

6. Plaintiff Mayweather Promotions, LLC (defined above as “Mayweather

Promotions”), is a Nevada limited liability company with its principal place of business in Las

Vegas, Nevada.

7. Defendant PAC Entertainment Worldwide LLC (defined above as “PAC”) is a

Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business in New York, New York.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

8. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1332 because the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest

2
Case 1:21-cv-04378-VEC Document 1 Filed 05/14/21 Page 3 of 10

and costs, and is between Plaintiff Mayweather Promotions, incorporated and having its principal

place of business in Nevada, and Defendant PAC, incorporated in Delaware and having its

principal place of business in New York.

9. The Court has general personal jurisdiction over PAC because PAC’s principal

place of business is New York, rendering PAC “at home” in New York for the purposes of general

personal jurisdiction.

10. Venue in this Court is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) because the

Defendant’s principal place of business is within this District and because a substantial part of the

events giving rise to the claim occurred within this District.

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

11. Floyd Mayweather is widely considered the greatest boxer of his generation. He

has fought, and beaten, legendary fighters like Manny Pacquiao, Oscar De La Hoya, Shane

Mosley, Miguel Cotto, Canelo Alvarez, and Juan Manuel Marquez. He reigned as the number one

“pound for pound” fighter in the world for years. And in addition to his Olympic medal, he won

world titles at 130, 135, 140, 147, and 154 pounds. ESPN ranked Mayweather the greatest boxer,

pound for pound, of the last 25 years. Mayweather retired in 2015 with an undefeated record.

“Mayweather” is a household name, and is synonymous with greatness.

12. Floyd Mayweather is not just a boxer, but also a proven boxing promoter.

Mayweather Promotions is Floyd Mayweather’s live entertainment promotion company. And it

promoted, among many other bouts, Floyd Mayweather’s fights with Manny Pacquiao and Conor

McGregor—two of the most commercially successful fights of all time.

3
Case 1:21-cv-04378-VEC Document 1 Filed 05/14/21 Page 4 of 10

13. Logan Paul is a young, social media star. He gained notoriety as a YouTube host,

internet personality, actor, podcast host, and most recently—boxer. He has millions of followers

on YouTube, placing him amongst the most subscribed channels on the platform.

14. After several amateur boxing matches, Paul made his professional boxing debut in

2019 against fellow YouTuber “KSI.”

15. In December 2020, it was announced that Mayweather would fight Paul in an

exhibition bout. Although the exhibition was originally scheduled for February 2021, it was

postponed because of the lingering pandemic, in order to find a suitable venue (that allowed fans)

and to successfully promote the event. In March 2021, PAC approached Mayweather Promotions

about hosting the exhibition bout in Dubai.

16. PAC presented a deck to Mayweather Promotions highlighting PAC’s extensive

business experience, financial resources, and logistical ability to host and event of this size.

Further, PAC made representations to Mayweather Promotions that PAC was “well connected” in

Dubai and that the event would be a financial success. PAC presented financial projections

estimating net profits to the promoters in excess of $100 million after covering guaranteed

payments to the participants, plus expenses.

A. The March 21, 2021 Agreement

17. On March 21, 2021, PAC and Mayweather Promotions entered into an agreement

which gave PAC, inter alia, the right to host the event in Dubai, plus rights to distribute the event

in limited territories (“the March 21 Agreement”). In exchange, PAC would pay Mayweather

Promotions a minimum guaranteed amount of $110 million, on a prescribed payment schedule

from March 25, 2021 to May 9, 2021 (the “Guaranteed Payments”).

18. The March 21 Agreement expressly provided that if PAC failed to pay any of the

Guaranteed Payments or other amounts due under the contract, Mayweather Promotions could
4
Case 1:21-cv-04378-VEC Document 1 Filed 05/14/21 Page 5 of 10

immediately terminate the agreement. The March 21 Agreement specifically provided that in the

event of non-payment, PAC must immediately pay the balance of the Guaranteed Payments and

that Mayweather Promotions could retain any Guaranteed Payments that it already received or,

that were now payable.

19. Clauses that guarantee a fixed amount, regardless of whether an event comes to

fruition are frequently used in entertainment contracts to secure talent and aid in promotion of

events. Such clauses benefit both parties, by protecting the “talent” against losses incurred should

the project not go forward, and the “producer” to help secure talent, promote the event, and provide

a clear “walk away” amount should it be necessary.

20. Under the March 21 Agreement, PAC’s first Guaranteed Payment of $30 million

to Mayweather Promotions was due on March 25, 2021.

21. PAC failed to make the March 25 payment.

22. Accordingly, Mayweather Promotions terminated the March 21 Agreement in

writing, shortly after the breach.

B. The March 31, 2021 Agreement

23. On March 31, 2021, PAC and Mayweather Promotions entered into a new

agreement (the “March 31 Agreement”).1 The parties agreed that the March 31 Agreement restated

and superseded the March 21 Agreement, which—in any event—had been breached and

terminated six days prior.

24. Leonard Ellerbe, CEO, executed the contract on behalf of Mayweather Promotions,

and Aaron Pilchick, President, executed the contract on behalf of PAC.

1
The March 21 and March 31 Agreements between Mayweather Promotions and PAC contain
confidentiality provisions. As such, the actual agreements are not included with the Complaint
and only the relevant terms are described generally rather than quoting verbatim. These
agreements will be filed separately under seal, pending leave of court.
5
Case 1:21-cv-04378-VEC Document 1 Filed 05/14/21 Page 6 of 10

25. The March 31 Agreement gave PAC, inter alia, the right to host the event in Dubai,

plus rights to distribute the event in certain territories. In exchange, PAC would pay Mayweather

Promotions Guaranteed Payments totaling $115 million, on a prescribed payment schedule from

March 31, 2021 to June 2, 2021.

26. Like its predecessor agreement, the March 31 Agreement expressly provided that

if PAC failed to pay any of the Guaranteed Payments or other amounts due under the contract,

Mayweather Promotions could immediately terminate the agreement. The March 31 Agreement

also specifically provided that in the event of non-payment, PAC must immediately pay the

balance of the Guaranteed Payments and that Mayweather Promotions could retain any Guaranteed

Payments that it had already received or, that were now payable.

27. In addition, the March 31 Agreement stated that PAC’s non-payment of any of the

Guaranteed Amounts or other amounts due automatically terminates all of PAC’s rights under the

contract, including PAC’s right to host the live event and to distribute the event in the agreed-upon

territory.

28. Under the March 31 Agreement, PAC’s first Guaranteed Payment of $15 million

to Mayweather Promotions was due on April 1, 2021.

29. PAC failed to make the April 1 payment and all subsequent Guaranteed Payments.

30. Under the March 31 Agreement, PAC also agreed to pay Mayweather Promotions

$7.6 million, no later than April 15, 2021, for expenses that Mayweather Promotions would incur

for travel, lodging, per-diem, security, purses for the undercard, and other production expenses

related to the event (the “Expense Amount”).

6
Case 1:21-cv-04378-VEC Document 1 Filed 05/14/21 Page 7 of 10

31. PAC failed to make the $7.6 million Expense Amount payment by April 15, 2021.

To date, PAC has not paid Mayweather Promotions any of the $7.6 million owed under the

Expense Amount.

32. Under the March 31 Agreement, PAC also agreed to indemnify Mayweather

Promotions against any third-party claims arising from PAC’s material breach of the agreement,

including outside counsel fees and expenses.

C. Mayweather Promotions Terminates the March 31 Agreement

33. On April 7 and April 9, 2021, PAC paid Mayweather Promotions $5 million each,

in an attempt to off-set its growing damages and in a last ditch effort to lure Mayweather

Promotions into yet another amended contract. Mayweather Promotions wisely declined to engage

in further dealings with PAC.

34. PAC unequivocally breached the March 31 Agreement when it failed to pay

Mayweather Productions its $115 million in Guaranteed Payments, and the $7.6 million Expense

Amount.

35. Accordingly, PAC’s rights under the contract, including PAC’s right to host the

live event and to distribute the event in the agreed-upon territory were automatically terminated.

36. Mayweather Promotions sent a letter, dated May 13, 2021, confirming termination

of the March 31 Agreement, including all rights PAC may claim under the March 31 Agreement.

D. Mayweather Promotions Continues To Incur Costs To Re-Plan the


Exhibition Bout in Miami

37. Determined to proceed with the much anticipated event, Mayweather Promotions

shouldered the heavy burden of re-planning the exhibition bout. Mayweather Promotions secured

a new venue in Miami and handled all logistics to plan, promote and distribute the now revived

event.

7
Case 1:21-cv-04378-VEC Document 1 Filed 05/14/21 Page 8 of 10

38. As a result of the delay caused by PAC’s breach, Mayweather Promotions lost

significant market opportunities to capitalize on the timing and profitability of this exhibition fight,

in amounts that will be proved up at trial.

CAUSES OF ACTION

COUNT I
Breach of Contract (NDA)
New York Law

39. Mayweather Promotions incorporates and realleges the foregoing paragraphs by

reference as though fully set forth herein.

40. The March 31 Agreement is a valid, binding, and enforceable agreement that was

executed by Mayweather Promotions and PAC.

41. The March 31 Agreement granted PAC, inter alia, the right to host the event in

Dubai, with limited rights to distribute the event in certain territories. In exchange, PAC was

expressly obligated pay Mayweather Promotions a schedule of Guaranteed Payments totaling $115

million, from March 31, 2021 to June 2, 2021.

42. PAC was also obligated to pay Mayweather Promotions $7.6 million in advance

(and no later than April 15, 2021) for expenses Mayweather Promotions would incur in arranging

the event.

43. As explained more fully in paragraphs 17 through 38, PAC breached the contract

when it failed to pay the $115 million of Guaranteed Payments and the $7.6 million Expense

Amount. As a result of these breaches, the Guaranteed Payments and Expense Amount became

due and payable immediately, which PAC has not paid.

44. Mayweather Promotions fulfilled all of its obligations under the March 31

Agreement, up and until PAC’s material breach.

8
Case 1:21-cv-04378-VEC Document 1 Filed 05/14/21 Page 9 of 10

45. As a result of these breaches, Mayweather Promotions was damaged, in an amount

to be proven at trial.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE Plaintiff Mayweather Promotions LLC demands judgment against

Defendant PAC Entertainment Worldwide LLC as to the Count I of the Complaint stated against

it, for:

a) $122.6 million due as “Guaranteed Amounts” and “Expense Amount”

under to the March 31 Agreement;

b) Compensatory damages;

c) Consequential damages;

d) Reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, including those pursuant to the

Agreement;

e) Prejudgment interest;

f) Any and all other relief the Court deems just and proper.

9
Case 1:21-cv-04378-VEC Document 1 Filed 05/14/21 Page 10 of 10

Dated: New York, New York QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART


May 14, 2021 & SULLIVAN, LLP

By : /s/ Corey Worcester


Corey Worcester
Courtney C. Whang
Jonathan J. Clarke
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, New York 10010
Telephone: (212) 849-7000
coreyworcester@[Link]
courtneywhang@[Link]
jonathanclarke@[Link]

Michael E. Williams (pro hac vice forthcoming)


865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
michaelwilliams@[Link]

Attorneys for Plaintiff

10

Common questions

Powered by AI

Under the March 31 Agreement, PAC Entertainment Worldwide LLC was required to make Guaranteed Payments to Mayweather Promotions totaling $115 million on a prescribed schedule from March 31, 2021, to June 2, 2021 . Additionally, PAC was obligated to pay Mayweather Promotions $7.6 million by April 15, 2021, for event expenses . PAC breached these obligations by failing to make the first payment of $15 million due on April 1, 2021, failing to pay the $7.6 million for expenses, and missing all subsequent scheduled payments .

Following PAC's breach of the March 31 Agreement, Mayweather Promotions terminated the contract and sought compensation for the amounts due under the agreement as well as consequential damages caused by PAC's breach . This enforcement strategy is consistent with typical contract law practices, where a party may terminate the agreement and seek damages when the other party materially breaches the terms, particularly when specific payment schedules are violated, leading to significant financial and operational impacts .

The case between Mayweather Promotions and PAC highlights several challenges in international event promotions: ensuring parties fulfill financial commitments, managing logistical complexities across regions, and navigating different legal environments. PAC's inability to meet contractual financial obligations and logistical promises for hosting the event in Dubai underscores the importance of due diligence and contingency planning in international deals. It teaches promoters to carefully vet partners and ensure reliable legal structures and financial guarantees are in place before progressing with international endeavors .

Clauses guaranteeing fixed amounts in contracts provide security for both the 'talent' and the 'producer.' They ensure compensation regardless of event fruition, allowing promoters to attract talent by mitigating financial risk and providing clear ‘walk away’ terms if necessary . The failure to fulfill these clauses, as seen with PAC's non-payment, led to immediate termination of PAC's rights under the agreement and legal action for compensation by Mayweather Promotions, highlighting the gravity of breaching such critical contractual terms .

PAC's failure to meet its agreed financial obligations under the March 31 Agreement led to the automatic termination of its rights to host the event and distribute it in agreed territories . As PAC did not make the required payments, Mayweather Promotions exercised its contractual right to terminate the agreement , which legally removed PAC's rights, forcing Mayweather Promotions to seek damages through a legal complaint to recover losses incurred due to PAC's breach .

A promoter like Mayweather Promotions would consider financial projections, logistical capabilities, and potential market reach when selecting a venue. Initially, PAC proposed Dubai, highlighting business experience, financial resources, and projected net profits over $100 million . However, the strategy shifted to Miami after PAC failed to fulfill contractual obligations, leading Mayweather Promotions to pursue a venue they could manage efficiently. This decision involved considerations such as local regulations, audience capacity, potential revenue streams, media attention, and logistical costs .

Mayweather Promotions mitigated damages by independently securing a new venue in Miami and managing the planning, promotion, and distribution of the exhibition bout themselves . They faced challenges including the financial burden of re-planning the event without PAC's contributions and the delay caused by PAC's initial breach, which resulted in lost market opportunities and increased logistical complexities .

Post-breach, Mayweather Promotions adapted by shouldering the full responsibility for planning the event, including finding a new venue in Miami and restructuring the logistics and promotion independently . Legally, they pursued action against PAC to recover monetary damages owed under the agreements. These strategic adaptations ensured the continuation of the exhibition bout, despite significant operational and financial challenges posed by PAC's breach .

PAC's contractual failure, specifically the failure to make timely payments and expense reimbursements, significantly damages its reputation as a reliable partner in the highly competitive promotion industry. Not fulfilling such high-profile commitments may result in loss of trust with potential collaborators and partners, increasing skepticism around its financial stability and execution capabilities. This breach could deter future business opportunities, limiting PAC's ability to engage in similar ventures without demonstrating substantial changes in management and financial guarantees .

The case illustrates jurisdiction and venue use by basing the legal proceedings in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. This is appropriate because PAC's principal place of business is in New York, making the company subject to general personal jurisdiction. Additionally, a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred within this district, satisfying the venue requirements under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

You might also like