Complex Numbers and Their Properties
Complex Numbers and Their Properties
COMPLEX NUMBERS
Definition 1: Complex Number
A complex number is any number of the form z = a + ib where a and b are real numbers and i is the
imaginary unit.
Terminology
The notations a + ib and a + bi are used interchangeably. The real number a in z = a+ ib is called the real
part of z; the real number b is called the imaginary part of z. The real and imaginary parts of a complex
number z are abbreviated Re(z) and Im(z), respectively.
For example, if z = 4 − 9i, then Re(z) = 4 and Im(z) = −9. A real constant multiple of the imaginary unit is
called a pure imaginary number. For example, z = 6i is a pure imaginary number.
Complex numbers z1 = a1 + ib1 and z2 = a2 + ib2 are equal, z1 = z2, if a1 = a2 and b1 = b2. Equivalently, we
can say that z1 = z2 if Re(z1) = Re(z2) and Im(z1) = Im(z2).
Remark: The set of complex numbers is usually denoted by the symbol C. Because any real number a can
be written as z = a + 0i, we see that the set R of real numbers is a subset of C.
If z1 = a1 + ib1 and z2 = a2 + ib2, then addition and multiplication of two complex numbers is defined as:
The zero in the complex number system is the number 0 + 0i and the unity is 1 + [Link] zero and unity are
denoted by 0 and 1, respectively. The zero is the additive identity in the complex number system since, for
any complex number z = a + ib, we have z + 0 = z. To see this, we use the definition of addition:
Similarly, the unity is the multiplicative identity of the system since, for any complex number z, we have
z・1 = z・ (1 + 0i) = z.
Definition 4: Conjugate of a Complex Number
If z is a complex number, the number obtained by changing the sign of its imaginary part is called the
complex conjugate, or simply conjugate, of z and is denoted by the symbol z .In other words, if z = a+ib,
then its conjugate is z = a − bi .
Q.1. If the complex number lies in the third quadrant then its conjugate lies in the quadrant: (PPSC 2017)
(A) First (B) Second (C) Third (D) None of these
Solution: A complex number in third quadrant is like z = − x − iy then z = − x + iy which will lie second
quadrant. Therefore, the option (B) is the right choice.
Let z and w be the complex numbers, then following properties are true for conjugate:
1. (z) = z 5. ( zw ) = ( z )( w )
2. z + w = z + w z z
6. =
z−z w w
3. Im ( z ) =
2i z+z
7. Re ( z ) =
4. z − w = z − w 2
The modulus of a complex number z = x + iy, is the real number z = x 2 + y 2 . Equivalently, we can write
( Re ( z ) ) + ( Im ( z ) )
2 2
z = . The modulus z of a complex number z is also called the absolute value of z.
Let z and w be the complex numbers, then following properties are true for modulus:
1. zw = z w
z z
2. =
w w
3. z = −z = z = −z
z = zz
2
4.
z n = z where n = 1, 2,3,
n
5.
6. Re ( z ) Re ( z ) z
7. Im ( z ) Im ( z ) z
8. z+w z + w
y
where r = z is a unique positive number and = tan −1 is measured in radian called the argument of and
x
denoted by arg ( z ) .
1 − i 3 = 2 cos − + i sin − .
3 3
Observe that any one of the infinite values = − + 2n , n Z can be used to denote 1 − i 3 . For example
3
5 5
1 − i 3 = 2 cos + i sin , ( n = 1) .
3 3
Principal Argument
The symbol arg(z) represents a set of values and all its values differ by an integral multiple of 2 , but the
argument θ of a complex number that lies in the interval −π < θ ≤ π is called the principal value of arg(z) or
the principal argument of z. The principal argument of z is unique and is represented by the symbol Arg(z),
that is,
−π < Arg(z) ≤ π.
3
For example, the complex number −1 − i, which lies in the third quadrant, has principal argument − .
4
3
That is, Arg ( −1 − i ) = − .
4
It must be highlighted that because of the restriction −π < ≤ π of the principal argument , it is not true
5
that Arg ( −1 − i ) = .
4
3
Accordingly, arg ( −1 − i ) = − + 2n , n = 0, 1, 2,
4
Prof. Sardar Aqib Mahmood (WhatsApp +923222694000) sardaraqibsam@[Link]
Page |4
Note that the term Arg (z) on the right-hand side of above equation can be replaced by any particular value
of arg (z) and that one can write, for instance,
5
arg ( −1 − i ) = + 2n , n = 0, 1, 2,
4
−1 y
tan , x 0,
x
tan −1 y
+, x 0, y 0
x
y
Arg ( z ) = tan −1 −, x 0, y 0
x
2 , x = 0, y 0
− , x = 0, y 0
2
Example 3: Find the Arg (z) for each of the following complex numbers:
Solution: We will use the above table in determining the Arg (z) in each case:
1
(a) Since z = 1 + i lies in Quad-I with x = 1, y = 1 , so Arg ( z ) = tan −1 = tan −1 (1) = .
1 4
−1
(b) Since z = 1 − i lies in Quad-IV with x = 1, y = −1 , so Arg ( z ) = tan −1 = − tan −1 (1) = − .
1 4
1 3
Arg ( z ) = tan −1 + = − tan −1 (1) + = − + = .
−1 4 4
−1 3
Arg ( z ) = tan −1 − = tan −1 (1) − = − = −
−1 4 4
ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS
Definition 1: Limits of a Complex Function
Suppose that a complex function f is defined in a deleted neighborhood of z 0 and suppose that L is a
complex number. The limit of f as z tends to z0 exists and is equal to L, written as lim f ( z ) = L , if for
z → z0
If f approaches two complex numbers L1 L2 for two different curves or paths through z0, then lim f ( z )
z → z0
z
Example 1: Show that lim does not exist.
z →0 z
Solution: We show that this limit does not exist by finding two different ways of letting z approach 0 that
z x + iy
yield different values for lim = lim . First, we let z approach 0 along the real axis, then
z →0 z ( x , y ) → ( 0,0 ) x − iy
x + 0i 0 + iy
lim = 1 . On the other hand, if we let z approach 0 along the imaginary axis, then lim = −1 .Since
x → 0 x − 0i y → 0 0 − iy
z
the values are not the same for two different paths, we conclude that lim does not exist.
z →0 z
z
Q.2. lim = : (PPSC 2015)
z →0 z
1+ i
(A) (B) 1 (C) Does not exist (D) −1
1− i
Solution: We show that this limit does not exist by finding two different ways of letting z approach 0 that
z x − iy
yield different values for lim = lim . First, we let z approach 0 along the real axis, then
z →0 z ( x , y ) → ( 0,0 ) x + iy
x − 0i 0 − iy
lim = 1 , On the other hand, if we let z approach 0 along the imaginary axis, then lim = −1 .Since
x →0 x + 0i y → 0 0 + iy
z
the values are not the same for two different paths, we conclude that lim does not exist. The option (C) is
z →0 z
correct.
Suppose that f(z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y), z0 = x0 + iy0, and L = u0 + iv0. Then lim f ( z ) = L if and only if
z → z0
1
1. lim f ( z ) = if lim = 0,
z → z0 z → z0 f ( z)
1
2. lim f ( z ) = w0 if lim f = w0 ,
z → z →0
z
1
3. lim f ( z ) = if lim = 0.
z → z → 0 f (1 z )
iz + 3 z +1
1. lim = since lim = 0,
z →−1 z + 1 z →−1 iz + 3
2. lim
2z + i
= 2 since lim
( 2 z ) + i = lim 2 + iz = 2 ,
z → z + 1 z → 0 (1 z ) + 1 z →0 1 + z
2z3 −1
3. lim 2 = since lim
1 z +1
=
( )
lim
2
z + z3
= 0.
z → z + 1
( ) z →0 2 − z3
z →0 2 z3 −1
A complex function f is continuous at a point z0 if for every 0 there exists a 0 such that
f ( z ) − f ( z0 ) whenever z − z0 .
A complex function f is continuous at a point z 0 if each of the following three conditions hold:
If a complex function f is not continuous at a point z0 then we say that f is discontinuous at z0.
A function f(z) is said to be continuous in a region if it is continuous at all points of the region.
Suppose that f(z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) and z0 = x0 + iy0. Then the complex function f is continuous at the point
z0 if and only if both real functions u and v are continuous at the point (x0, y0).
If a complex function f is continuous on a closed and bounded region R, then f is bounded on R. That is,
there is a real constant M > 0 such that |f(z)| ≤ M for all z in R.
A complex function f is uniformly continuous in a region if for every 0 there exists a 0 such that
f ( z1 ) − f ( z2 ) whenever z1 − z2 . where z1 and z2 are any two points of the region.
Let f(z) be continuous in a closed and bounded region. Then f(z) is uniformly continuous there.
Solution: The best possible correct option is (C). (If you can add some information, please feel free to
contact me at 0334-4458227).
Remarks: Analyticity at a point is not the same as differentiability at a point. Analyticity at a point is a
neighborhood property; in other words, analyticity is a property that is defined over an open set.
A function that is analytic at every point z in the complex plane is said to be an entire function.
A point z at which a complex function w = f(z) fails to be analytic is called a singular point of f.
Since the rational function f ( z ) = 4 z ( z 2 − 2 z + 2 ) is discontinuous at 1+i and 1−i, f fails to be analytic at
these points. Thus by (ii) of Theorem 7, f is not analytic in any domain containing one or both of these
points.
In the following theorem we see that if a function f(z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) is differentiable at a point z, then
the functions u and v must satisfy a pair of equations that relate their first-order partial derivatives.
Prof. Sardar Aqib Mahmood (WhatsApp +923222694000) sardaraqibsam@[Link]
Page |9
Theorem 8: Cauchy-Riemann Equations
Suppose f(z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) is differentiable at a point z = x + iy. Then at z the first-order partial
derivatives of u and v exist and satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations
u v u v
= and =− .
x y y x
Remarks: Theorem 8 states that the Cauchy-Riemann equations are necessary conditions for the existence
of the derivative of a function f at a point z , they can often be used to locate points at which f does not
have a derivative. If the Cauchy Riemann equations are not satisfied at a point z, then f cannot be
differentiable at z .
u v u v
= 1, = 4, = 0, and =0.
x y y x
u v
Since =1 = 4 cannot be simultaneously satisfied at any point z. In other words, f is nowhere
x y
differentiable.
If the Cauchy-Riemann equations are not satisfied at every point z in a domain D, then the function f(z) =
u(x, y)+iv(x, y) cannot be analytic in D.
u v u v
we see that = − but that the equality = is satisfied only on the line y = 2x. However, for any
y x x y
point z on the line, there is no neighborhood or open disk about z in which f is differentiable at every point.
We conclude that f is nowhere analytic.
The Cauchy-Riemann equations do not ensure differentiability of a function f(z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) at a point
z = x + iy . It is possible for the Cauchy- Riemann equations to be satisfied at z and yet f(z) may not be
differentiable at z. However, when we add the condition of continuity to u and v and to the four partial
derivatives u x , u y , v x and v y , it can be shown that the Cauchy-Riemann equations are not
only necessary but also sufficient to guarantee analyticity of f(z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) at z.
Prof. Sardar Aqib Mahmood (WhatsApp +923222694000) sardaraqibsam@[Link]
P a g e | 10
Theorem 9: Criterion for Analyticity
Suppose the real functions u(x, y) and v(x, y) are continuous and have continuous first-order partial
derivatives in a domain D. If u and v satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations
u v u v
= and =−
x y y x
at all points of D, then the complex function f(z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) is analytic in D.
x y x y
For the function f ( z ) = −i 2 , the real functions u ( x, y ) = 2 and v ( x, y ) = − 2
x +y
2 2
x +y 2
x +y 2
x + y2
are continuous except at the point where x 2 + y 2 = 0 , that is, at z = 0. Moreover, the first four first-order
partial derivatives
u y2 − x2 u 2 xy
= , =−
x ( x 2 + y 2 )2 y ( x2 + y 2 )
2
u 2 xy u y2 − x2
= , and =
x ( x 2 + y 2 )2 y ( x 2 + y 2 )2
u y2 − x2 v u 2 xy v
= = and =− =−
x ( x + y )
2 2 2
y y ( x2 + y 2 ) x
2
that the Cauchy-Riemann equations are satisfied except at z = 0. Thus we conclude from Theorem 3 that f
is analytic in any domain D that does not contain the point z = 0.
z +3
Q.4. The function f ( z ) = ceases to be analytic at:
z ( z 2 + 1)
2
Solution: Since f ( z ) = 5 z 2 is a polynomial and hence it is an entire function. Therefore, the option (D) is
the right choice.
( z − 2i )
4
4 16 − 20
Solution: The rational function is not analytic when z 2 − 4 z + 5 = 0 which implies z = = 2i.
2
Therefore, the option (C) is the right choice.
If the real functions u(x,y) and v(x, y) are continuous and have continuous first-order partial derivatives in
some neighborhood of a point z, and if u and v satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations
u v u v
= and =−
x y y x
u v v u
f ( z) = +i = −i .
x x y y
u v
f ( z) = + i = 2 x + 2iy = 2 ( x + iy ) = 2 z .
x x
Solution The real functions u(x, y) = 2x2 + y and v(x, y) = y2 – x, the partial derivatives
u v u v
= 4 x, = 2 y, = 1, and = −1
x y y x
u v u v
are continuous at every point. We see that = − but that the equality = is satisfied only on the
y x x y
line y = 2x, it follows that f is differentiable on the line y = 2x.
1. If f ( z ) is constant in D, then f(z) is constant in D. (That is, an analytic function with constant modulus
is constant.)
2. If f ( z ) = 0 in D, then f(z) = c in D, where c is a constant.
3. If conjugate f ( z ) = u(x, y) − iv(x, y) is also analytic in a domain D, then f ( z ) is constant in D.
A real-valued function of two real variables x and y is said to be harmonic if it has continuous first and
second-order partial derivatives in a domain D and satisfies the partial differential equation
2 2
+ =0
x 2 y 2
known as Laplace’s equation.
2u
Result: If u ( x, y ) be a harmonic function, then = 0 . This is called the complex form of Laplace
z z
Equation.
Suppose the complex function f(z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) is analytic in a domain D. Then the functions u(x, y)
and v(x, y) are harmonic in D.
x y
Since the function f ( z ) = −i 2 is analytic at every nonzero point z, therefore
x +y
2 2
x + y2
x y
u ( x, y ) = and v ( x, y ) = − 2
x +y
2 2
x + y2
are harmonic throughout any domain in the xy plane that does not contain the origin.
U 2U U 2U
= e x cos y, = e x
cos y and = − e x
sin y , = −e x cos y
x x 2
y y 2
2U 2U
And hence + = e x cos y − e x cos y = 0 satisfies the Laplace’s Equation.
x 2
y 2
If a function f(z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) is analytic in a domain D, then its real and imaginary parts u and v are
necessarily harmonic in D. Now suppose u(x, y) is a given real function that is known to be harmonic in D.
If it is possible to find another real harmonic function v(x, y) so that u and v satisfy the Cauchy-
Riemann equations throughout the domain D, then the function v(x, y) is called a harmonic conjugate of
u(x, y). By combining the functions as u(x, y) + iv(x, y) we obtain a function that is analytic in D.
The function u(x, y) = x3−3xy2−5y is harmonic in the entire complex plane. Find the analytic function and the
corresponding harmonic conjugate function of u.
u u
Step I: = 3x 2 − 3 y 2 and = −6 xy − 5
x y
u u
Step II: f ( z ) = −i = 3x 2 − 3 y 2 − i ( −6 xy − 5 )
x y
f ( z ) = 3z 2 − 0 − i ( 0 − 5 ) = 3 z 2 + 5i
f ( z ) = x3 − 3xy − 5 y + ( 3x 2 y 2 − y 3 + 5 x + c ) i
Which is the required analytic function and the corresponding harmonic conjugate of u is given by
v ( x, y ) = 3 x 2 y 2 − y 3 + 5 x + c
ELEMENTARY FUNCTIONS
Definition 1: Complex Exponential Function
e z = e x ( cos y + i sin y )
Remark: Note that in defining the complex exponential function we have used where Euler’s formula
eiy = cos y + i sin y .
1. e 0 = 1 ( e z is never zero)
2. e z1 e z2 = e z1 + z2
e z1
3. z2
= e z1 − z2
e
4. (e )
z1 n
= enz1 , where n is an integer
5. ez = ex
6. eiz = 1
7. e z is periodic with a pure imaginary period 2πi.
8. e z = 1 if and only if z is an integral multiple of 2πi.
9. e z1 = e z2 if and only if z1 − z2 = 2k i , where k is an integer.
log z = ln z + i arg ( z )
Log z = ln z + iArg ( z )
Find the principal value of each complex logarithm: ( (a) Log ( −i ) (b) Log ( −2 )
−1
Solution: (a) Since z = −i so z = 1 and Arg ( z ) = tan −1 = − . Therefore, we have
0 2
Log ( −i ) = ln1 + i − = − i .
2 2
Solution: Since e 2 z is analytic everywhere and hence it is an entire function. Therefore, the option (C) is the
right choice.
z = e log z .
z = e Log z
Find the principal value of each complex power: (a) i i (b) ( −i ) (c) ( −1)
−i i
1
Solution: (a) Since z = i so z = 1 and Arg ( z ) = tan −1 = . Therefore, we have
0 2
=e(
iLog ( i ) i ln1+ i ( /2 ) )
ii = e = e − /2 .
−1
(b) Since z = −i so z = 1 and Arg ( z ) = tan −1 = − . Therefore, we have
0 2
=e (
− i ln1+ i ( − /2 ) )
( −i ) − iLog ( − i )
−i
=e = e− /2 .
( −1) =e
iLog ( −1)
=e(
i ln1+ i )
= e − .
i
=e(
i ln1+ i ( − /2 ) )
( −i ) =e
iLog ( − i )
= e /2 .
i
=e(
iLog ( i ) i ln1+ i ( /2 ) )
ii = e = e − /2 .
Suppose the continuous real-valued functions x = x(t), y = y(t), a ≤ t ≤ b, are parametric equations of a curve
C in the complex plane. We describe the points z on C by means of a complex-valued function of a real
variable t called a parametrization of C:
z ( t ) = x ( t ) + iy ( t ) , a t b
The point z(a) = x(a) + iy(a) or A = (x(a), y(a)) is called the initial point of C. The point z(b) = x(b)+iy(b) or
B = (x(b), y(b)) is called the terminal point of C.
The parametric equations x = cos t, y = sin t, 0 ≤ t ≤ 2π, describe a unit circle centered at the origin. A
parametrization of this circle is z(t) = cos t + i sin t, or z(t) = eit, 0 ≤ t ≤ 2π.
A curve C in the complex plane is said to be a simple if z ( t1 ) z ( t2 ) for t1 t2 , except possibly for t = a and
t = b.
On a simple closed curve C, the positive direction corresponds to the counterclockwise direction and the
negative direction corresponds to the clockwise direction.
A curve C in the complex plane is smooth if z ( t ) = x ( t ) + iy ( t ) is continuous and never zero in the
interval a ≤ t ≤ b.
Remarks:
If f is continuous on a smooth curve C given by the parametrization z(t) = x(t) + iy(t), a ≤ t ≤ b, then
f ( z ) dz = f ( z ( t ) ) z (t ) dt .
b
C a
1
Evaluate dz , where C is given by x ( t ) = cos t , y ( t ) = sin t , 0 t 2 .
C z
( )
1 2 2
C z 0 0 dt = 2 i .
− it
dz = e ie it
dt = i
Suppose that a function f is analytic in a simply connected domain D. Then for every simple closed contour
C in D, f ( z ) dz = 0 .
C
Since the interior of a simple closed contour is a simply connected domain, the Cauchy-Goursat
theorem can be stated in the slightly more practical manner:
Since the entire functions are analytic at all points within and on any simple closed contour C, it follows
from Cauchy-Goursat theorem
C
e z dz = 0, C
sin z dz = 0, C
cos z dz = 0, p ( z ) dz = 0
C
where p ( z ) = an z n + an −1 z n −1 + + a1 z + a0 , n = 0,1, 2, .
dz
, where the contour C is the ellipse ( x − 2 ) + 14 ( y − 5 ) = 1.
2 2
Evaluate 2
C z
Solution The rational function f ( z ) = 1 z 2 is analytic everywhere except at z = 0. But z = 0 is not a point
interior to or on the simple closed elliptical contour C. Thus, it follows from Cauchy-Goursat theorem that
dz
C z2
= 0.
z2 − z +1 1
Q.14. Evaluate C z − 1 dz , where C is the circle z = 2 : (PPSC 2015)
1
(A) 1 (B) 2 (C) (D) 0
2
z2 − z +1
C z − 1 dz = 0 .
If f is analytic in a simply connected domain D and z 0 is any point in D, the quotient f ( z ) ( z − z0 ) is not
defined at z 0 and hence is not analytic in D. Therefore, we cannot conclude that the integral of
f ( z ) ( z − z0 ) around a simple closed contour C that contains z 0 is zero by the Cauchy-Goursat theorem.
Indeed, as we shall now see, the integral of f ( z ) ( z − z0 ) around C has the value 2 if ( z0 ) . The first of two
remarkable formulas is known simply as the Cauchy integral formula.
Suppose that f is analytic in a simply connected domain D and C is any simple closed contour lying
entirely within D. Then for any point z 0 within C,
f ( z)
dz = 2 if ( z0 ) .
C z − z0
Since we often work problems without a simply connected domain explicitly defined, a more practical
restatement of Theorem is:
If f is analytic at all points within and on a simple closed contour C, and z 0 is any point interior to C, then
f ( z)
dz = 2 if ( z0 ) .
C z − z0
z2 − 4z + 4
Evaluate C z + i dz , where C is the circle z = 2 .
Solution: We see that z0 = −i is the only point within the closed contour C at which the integrand fails to
be analytic. So we identify z0 = −i and f ( z ) = z 2 − 4 z + 4 . The function f is analytic at all points within
and on the contour C. Hence, from Cauchy integral formula, we obtain
z
Evaluate C z +9
2
dz , where C is the circle z − 2i = 4 .
we can identify z0 = 3i and f ( z ) = z ( z + 3i ) . The function f is analytic at all points within and on the
contour C. Hence, from Cauchy’s integral formula, we have
z z ( z + 3i ) 3i
dz = ( z − 3i ) dz = 2 if ( 3i ) = 2 i = i .
C z +9
2 C 6i
cos z
Evaluate z(z
C 2
+ 9)
dz , where C be the positively oriented circle z = 1 about the origin.
cos z cos z
Solution By factoring the denominator, we can write z(z
C 2
+ 9)
dz = z ( z − 3i )( z + 3i ) dz . We see that
C
z0 = 0 is the only point within the closed contour C at which the integrand fails to be analytic. Then by
rewriting the integrand as
cos z cos z ( z 2 + 9 )
C
z ( z 2 + 9)
dz = C z −0
dz
we can identify z0 = 0 and f ( z ) = cos z ( z 2 + 9 ) . The function f is analytic at all points within and on the
contour C. Hence, from Cauchy’s integral formula, we have
cos z cos z ( z 2 + 9 ) 1 2 i
dz = dz = 2 if ( 0 ) = 2 i = .
C
z ( z 2 + 9) C z−0 9 9
dz
Q.15. If C is the circle z = 3 , then 1+ z 2
is equal to: (PPSC 2011)
we can identify f ( z ) = 1 for both integral. Hence, from Cauchy’s integral formula, we have
dz 1 dz 1 dz 1 1
1+ z 2
=−
2i z + i + 2i z − i = − 2i 2 if ( −i ) + 2i 2 if ( i ) = − (1) + (1) = 0 .
Thus the option (C) is correct.
Suppose that f is analytic in a simply connected domain D and C is any simple closed contour lying
entirely within D. Then for any point z 0 within C,
f ( z) 2 i ( n )
(z − z ) n +1
dz = f ( z0 ) .
C
0
n!
z +1
Evaluate C z + 2iz 3
4
dz , where C is the circle z = 1 .
z +1 z +1
Solution By factoring the denominator, we can write C z + 2iz 3
4
dz = C z3
( z + 2i )
dz . We see that z0 = 0 is
the only point within the closed contour C at which the integrand fails to be analytic. Then by rewriting the
integrand as
z +1 ( z + 1) ( z + 2i ) dz
C z 4 + 2iz3 dz = C ( z − 0)2+1
we can identify z0 = 0, n = 2 and f ( z ) = ( z + 1) ( z + 2i ) . The function f is analytic at all points within and
on the contour C. Now f ( z ) = ( 2 − 4i ) ( z + 2i ) and f ( 0 ) = ( 2i − 1) 4i . Hence, from Cauchy’s integral
3
z +1 ( z + 1) ( z + 2i ) dz = 2 i 2i − 1
f ( 0 ) = i
C z + 2iz 3
4
dz = C ( z − 0)2+1 2! 4i
=− + i.
4 2
exp ( 2 z )
Evaluate C z4
dz , where C is the circle z = 1 .
we can identify z0 = 0, n = 3 and f ( z ) = exp ( 2 z ) . The function f is analytic at all points within and on the
contour C. Now f ( z ) = 8exp ( 2 z ) and f ( 0 ) = 8 . Hence, from Cauchy’s integral formula for
Derivatives, we have
exp ( 2 z ) exp ( 2 z ) 2 i i 8 i
4
dz = ( z − 0) 3+1
dz = f ( 0 ) = ( 8) = .
C z C 3! 3 3
If p(z) is a nonconstant polynomial, then the equation p(z) = 0 has at least one root.
Remarks: The next theorem which gives a sufficient condition for analyticity is often taken to be the
converse of the Cauchy-Goursat theorem.
then f is analytic in D.
SERIES RESIDUES
Definition 1: Series
z
k =1
k = z1 + z2 + z3 + + zn +
Sn = z1 + z2 + z3 + + zn
converges. If Sn → L as n → , we say that the series converges to L or that the sum of the series is L.
az
k =1
k −1
= a + az + az 2 + + az n −1 +
a
S= , for z 1 .
1− z
n →
A Test for Divergence The contrapositive of the proposition in Theorem 1 is the nth term test for
divergence of an infinite series.
If lim zn 0 , then z diverges.
k =1 k
n →
ik + 5
Discuss the convergence or divergence of k =1
.
k
p-Series Test
1
In elementary calculus a real series of the form k =1
is called a p-series and converges for p > 1 and
kp
diverges for p ≤ 1.
An infinite series z is said to be absolutely convergent if
k =1 k k =1
zk converges. An infinite series
ik
k =1 k 2 converges absolutely or conditionally.
Discuss whether the series
ik 1
= k =1 2 converges by p-series test with p = 2 > 1, we conclude that
Solution: Since the series k =1 2
k k
ik
k =1 k 2 converges absolutely.
the series
Suppose z is a series of nonzero complex terms such that
k =1 k
zn +1
lim =L
n → zn
Suppose z is a series of nonzero complex terms such that
k =1 k
nn
Q.16. The series is (PPSC 2011)
( 2i )
n
n=0
(A) Convergent (B) Absolutely convergent (C) Divergent (D) None of these
nn nn n nn
Solution: Since lim n
( 2i )
= lim n = lim = , therefore we conclude that the series diverges
( 2i )
n → n n → n n → 2 n
2 n=0
a (z − z ) = a0 + a1 ( z − z0 ) + a2 ( z − z0 ) +
k 2
k 0
k =0
where the coefficients ak are complex constants, is called a power series in z − z0 . The power series is said
to be centered at z0; the complex point z0 is referred to as the center of the series.
Circle of Convergence
1. R = 0 (in which case the power series converges only at its center z = z0),
2. R a finite positive number (in which case the power series converges at all interior points of the circle
z − z0 = R ), or
3. R = ∞ (in which case the power series converges for all z).
4. No general statement concerning convergence at points on the circle z − z0 = R can be made
a (z − z )
k
Suppose k 0 is a power series then if
k =0
an +1 1
1. lim = L 0 , the radius of convergence is R = .
n → an L
an +1
2. lim = 0 , the radius of convergence is R = .
n → an
an +1
3. lim = , the radius of convergence is R = 0 .
n → an
( −1)
k +1
Find the radius of convergence for ( z −1 − i )
k
.
k =0 k!
( −1)
n+2
n!
with centre z0 = 1 + i converges absolutely for all z , that is, for z − 1 − i .
a (z − z )
k
Suppose k 0 is a power series then if
k =0
1
1. lim n an = L 0 , the radius of convergence is R = .
n → L
2. lim n an = 0 , the radius of convergence is R = .
n →
6k + 1 k
6n + 1 6n + 1
n
1
Solution: Since lim n
= nlim = 3 , therefore the radius of convergence R = . The circle of
n →
2n + 5 → 2n + 5 3
1 1
convergence of the series is z − 2i = ; the power series converges absolutely for all z − 2i .
3 3
( 3 + 4i ) z
n n
Q.17. The radius of convergence of is ____________. (PPSC 2015)
1
(A) (B) 5 (C) 7 (D)
5
1
Solution: Since lim n ( 3 + 4i ) = lim 3 + 4i = 9 + 16 = 5 , there the radius of convergence is
n
. Thus the
n → n → 5
option (A) is correct.
Theorem: Continuity
A power series ak ( z − z0 ) represents a continuous function f within its circle of convergence z − z0 = R .
k
k =0
A power series ak ( z − z0 ) can be differentiated term by term within its circle of convergence z − z0 = R .
k
k =0
Corollary: A power series defines an infinitely differentiable function within its circle of convergence and
each differentiated series has the same radius of convergence R as the original power series.
A power series ak ( z − z0 ) can be integrated term-by-term within its circle of convergence z − z0 = R ,
k
k =0
Corollary: A power series and its term by term integration form both have same circle of convergence
z − z0 = R .
Let f be analytic within a domain D and let z0 be a point in D. Then f has the series representation
f (z) =
f(
k)
( z0 )
( z − z0 )
k
k =0 k!
valid for the largest circle C with center at z0 and radius R that lies entirely within D. This series is called the
Taylor series for f centered at z0.
1. The radius of convergence R of a Taylor series is the distance from the center z0 of the series to the
nearest isolated singularity of f .
2. If the function f is entire, then the radius of convergence of a Taylor series centered at any point z0 is
necessarily R = ∞.
3−i
Suppose the function f ( z ) = is expanded in a Taylor series with center z0 = 4 − 2i . What is its
1− i + z
radius of convergence R?
Solution: Observe that the function is analytic at every point except at z = −1 + i , which is an isolated
singularity of f. The distance from z = −1 + i to z0 = 4 − 2i is
z − z0 = −1 + i − ( 4 − 2i ) = −5 + 3i = 25 + 9 = 34 .
This last number is the radius of convergence R for the Taylor series centered at z0 = 4 − 2i .
1.
1
= zk = 1+ z + z2 +
1 − z k =0
( z 1)
zk z z2
2. e z = = 1+ + + ( z )
k =0 k ! 1! 2!
z 2 k +1 z3 z5
3. sin z = ( −1)
k
= z− + + ( z )
k =0 ( 2k + 1)! 3! 5!
z 2k z2 z4
4. cos z = ( −1)
k
= 1− + + ( z )
k =0 ( 2k ) ! 2! 4!
z 2 k +1 z3 z5
5. sinh z = = z+ + + ( z )
k = 0 ( 2k + 1) ! 3! 5!
z 2k z2 z4
6. cosh z = = 1+ + + ( z )
k = 0 ( 2k ) ! 2! 4!
z 2 z3 z3
Q.19. 1 + z + + + + converges to: (PPSC 2017)
2! 3! 4!
(B) e− z (C) − z e
2
(A) e z (D) None of these
zk z z2
Solution: It is a well-known Maclaurin Series e z = = 1+ + + . Thus, the option (A) is correct.
k =0 k ! 1! 2!
Result: The power series expansion of a function, with center z0, is unique. On a practical level this means
that a power series expansion of an analytic function f centered at z0, irrespective of the method used to
obtain it, is the Taylor series expansion of the function.
1 z3
Find the Maclaurin expansion of (a) f ( z ) = (b) f ( z ) = .
(1 − z ) (1 − z )
2 2
1
= zk = 1+ z + z2 +
1 − z k =0
( z 1)
1
= 0 + 1 + 2 z + 3z 2 + = kz k −1 ( z 1)
(1 − z )
2
k =1
The radius of convergence of the last power series is the same as the original series, R = 1.
(b) Using the result from (a) we get the desired result as
z3
= z 3 + 2 z 4 + 3z 5 + = kz k + 2 ( z 1)
(1 − z )
2
k =1
1
Expand f ( z ) = in a Taylor series with centre z0 = 2i .
1− z
Solution: Consider
1 1 1 1 1
= = =
1 − z 1 − z + 2i − 2i 1 − 2i − ( z − 2i ) 1 − 2i 1 − z − 2i
1 − 2i
Prof. Sardar Aqib Mahmood (WhatsApp +923222694000) sardaraqibsam@[Link]
P a g e | 32
1 1
We write as a power series = zk = 1+ z + z2 + with symbol z replaced by the
z − 2i 1 − z k =0
1−
1 − 2i
z − 2i
expression :
1 − 2i
1 z − 2i z − 2i z − 2i
2 3
1
= 1 + + + +
1 − z 1 − 2i 1 − 2i 1 − 2i 1 − 2i
1 1 1 1 1
2 (
= + z − 2i ) + 3 (
z − 2i ) + 4 (
z − 2i ) +
2 3
1 − z 1 − 2i (1 − 2i ) (1 − 2i ) (1 − 2i )
Because the distance from the center z0 = 2i to the nearest singularity z = 1 is
z − z0 = 1 − 2i = 1 + 4 = 5 .
The Cauchy Integral Formula is particularly useful for evaluating integrals over circular paths because it provides a direct relationship between an integral over a closed path and the function's value at a point inside the path. When the path is a circle and the function is analytic within and on this circle, the formula simplifies the computation of integrals by relating them to the value of the analytic function at a specific point within the circle. This relationship is valuable in situations where direct computation of the integral is complex or cumbersome .
A Taylor series is a power series expansion of a function about any complex point z0, while a Maclaurin series is a specific type of Taylor series expanded about the point z0 = 0. In complex analysis, these series are used to express complex functions in terms of infinite sums that approximate them closely within a radius of convergence. The Maclaurin series is particularly useful for functions that have simple expansions when centered at the origin, often simplifying calculations and analysis .
The analytic nature of a function significantly affects the calculation of its radius of convergence. For an analytic function, the radius of convergence is determined by the distance from the center of the series to the nearest singularity. If the function is entire (analytic everywhere on the complex plane), the radius of convergence is infinite. The presence and location of singularities determine how far from the center the series can be expanded while still converging, making the understanding of analytic properties crucial .
The Root Test helps determine the convergence of a series by evaluating the limit of the nth root of the absolute values of the series terms. If this limit is less than 1, the series converges absolutely. If it is greater than 1 or infinite, the series diverges. If the limit equals 1, the test is inconclusive. This is particularly useful in complex analysis for series of complex numbers where convergence depends on the behavior of terms as their indices increase .
The Cauchy integral formula for derivatives is used when evaluating the derivatives of analytic functions at points within a contour. It generalizes the basic Cauchy Integral Formula to compute the nth derivative of the function at a point inside a closed contour by expressing it as an n-th order integral. This formula is particularly useful in complex analysis to find derivatives when direct differentiation might be cumbersome. It calculates (f^n)(z0) in terms of a contour integral, helping explore derivative behavior in analytic functions .
The radius of convergence for a power series centered at a complex point, denoted z0, determines the region within which the power series converges absolutely. Specifically, it defines a circle with radius R centered at z0 where the power series converges. Outside this circle, the series diverges. This concept is fundamental in characterizing how well the power series approximates the function it represents and is crucial for understanding the analytic properties of the function at different points in the complex plane. The radius is often determined by the distance from the center to the nearest singularity .
Factoring the denominator of a function before applying the Cauchy Integral Formula is essential because it simplifies the identification of singularities, or points at which the function becomes non-analytic. By clearly identifying these points, one can ensure that the contour does not pass through any singularities and correctly apply the integral formula. This step is crucial for determining which points inside the contour contribute to the value of the integral, as each singularity within the contour affects the outcome according to the formula .
The application of Cauchy's integral formula for derivatives supports the uniqueness of power series expansions in that it allows the calculation of any derivative of an analytic function inside a closed contour, providing coefficients for power series uniquely. Since each term of a Taylor series corresponds to a derivative of the function divided by a factorial, computed precisely by this formula, the series expansion that results is uniquely determined by the function and its domain. This ensures that any attempt to derive a Taylor or Maclaurin series for an analytic function will result in the same expansion .
The Cauchy-Goursat theorem applies straightforwardly in simply connected domains, where any simple closed contour within such a domain results in an integral of zero for an analytic function. However, in multiply connected domains, which contain 'holes,' the theorem requires modification as the presence of these 'holes' might affect the applicability of the theorem. If a function is analytic throughout a multiply connected domain, the integral over closed contours that bypass these 'holes' still evaluates to zero .
Analyticity is crucial in the application of Cauchy's Integral Formula, as the formula only holds for functions that are analytic within the simply connected domain containing the closed contour C. The formula allows the evaluation of integrals by expressing the function value inside the contour in terms of an integral over the contour. Specifically, for a function that is analytic within and on the contour C, and a point z0 inside C, the integral of f(z)/(z-z0) over C equals f(z0) times 2πi .









