100% found this document useful (1 vote)
3K views1 page

Eurocode Deflection Limits Overview

The document summarizes the key differences between the draft National Annex to Eurocode BS EN 1990 and BS 5950-1 regarding design factors and deflection limits. The National Annex proposes more stringent vertical deflection limits in Tables NA1 and NA2 that could increase costs. However, for longer span composite floors, a limit of L/300 may not affect design as natural frequency, not deflection, usually governs. The Steel Construction Institute encourages feedback on the draft by August 31st.

Uploaded by

ielle
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
3K views1 page

Eurocode Deflection Limits Overview

The document summarizes the key differences between the draft National Annex to Eurocode BS EN 1990 and BS 5950-1 regarding design factors and deflection limits. The National Annex proposes more stringent vertical deflection limits in Tables NA1 and NA2 that could increase costs. However, for longer span composite floors, a limit of L/300 may not affect design as natural frequency, not deflection, usually governs. The Steel Construction Institute encourages feedback on the draft by August 31st.

Uploaded by

ielle
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Vertical Deflections
  • Horizontal Deflections
  • Conclusions
  • Eurocode Design Factors and Limits

FEATURE

Eurocode design factors and limits


National Annex to BS EN 1990 – Draft for Public Comment
Charles King
BSI has published the draft National Annex to BS EN 1990, Eurocode - (Dead Load + 10% Imposed Load) would be approximately 0.5
Basis of Structural Design. BS EN 1990 gives information required for (10,000/300) = 16.7mm. Therefore, the natural frequency, f, of the beam
design in all materials covered by the Eurocodes. is f = 18/√δ = 18/√16.7 = 4.4Hz. If the beam were part of an internal
The National Annex floor bay of 10m x 10m with both primary and secondary beams, the
• defines which load combinations should be used for Ultimate Limit mode shape would be similar to Mode B of Design Example 2 in SCI P-
State and Serviceability Limit State, 076. Allowing for the combined affects of the flexibility of the primary
• gives values for partial factors for loads, beams, secondary beams and the slab, the resulting frequency of the
• gives values for load combination factors ψ (“psi”), entire floor would be 4.0Hz, which is the design value commonly used in
• gives “guidance” for deflections. practice for the design of a composite floor. Therefore, a limit of L/300
Steel designers may find the biggest surprises in Table NA1, “Examples would not have affected the design of this floor. For a bay in which
of limiting values of vertical deflections”, and in Table NA2, “Examples Mode B could not be assumed, the span at which the limit of L/300
of limiting values of vertical and horizontal deflections”. The National affects the design would be even less.
Annex states that “the serviceability criteria should be specified for
each project and agreed with the client. Tables NA1 and NA2 are given Horizontal deflections
below for guidance.” Although only given for guidance, such values Horizontal deflection limits are given in Table NA2, Examples of
tend to become the limits used in almost all specifications. limiting values of horizontal deflections. This contains no explicit
exclusion of portal frames as in Table 8 of BS 5950-1: 2000. However, the
Vertical deflections condition of “no cracking in bearing walls without reinforcement” and
Vertical deflection limits are given in Table NA1, Examples of limiting “no cracking in partitions” are not relevant to normal portal
values of vertical deflections. The values from a few categories in Table construction or detailing.
NA1 are given in Table 1. The values in this table are for the total
deflection from dead plus live loads (“permanent plus variable loads” in Conclusions
Eurocode terminology). They are clearly more onerous than the The differences between the National Annex to BS EN 1990 and
“suggested limits” given in Table 8 of BS 5950-1: 2000 which are BS 5950-1 are a cause for concern because they could result in increased
calculated for imposed load only, three of which are given in Table 2. cost of structures without good reason. Therefore, the SCI encourages
member companies to study the Draft for Public Comment and respond
Vertical deflections in longer span floors to BSI. (The SCI would also be glad to receive feedback either positive
For longer span structures, the proposed Table NA1 might cause less or negative feedback from members on this topic.)
concern because the dynamic response of a floor is often the governing The document is: Draft BS EN 1990 National Annex to BS EN 1990:
design criterion. Although minimum natural frequency alone cannot Basis of Structural design. DPC: 03/700353 DC
guarantee acceptable dynamic response, it has been common practice to It is obtainable from:
design composite floors to a minimum natural frequency of 4Hz. BSI, 389 Chiswick High Road, London W4 4AL
Natural frequency is often calculated using SCI P-076, Design Guide on Telephone +44(0)20 8996 9000 Fax +44(0)20 8996 7001
the Vibration of Floors, which recommends that the loading considered The latest date for comments is 31 August 2003. The responsible
for calculation of floor frequency is (Dead Load + 10% Imposed Load). committee secretary is given as Mr M.K. Greenley. The document
In many floors, (Dead Load + 10% Imposed Load) is approximately contains guidance on the acceptable format for the submission of
equal to 0.5 (Dead Load + Imposed Load). comments on the second page.
If an individual beam with a span of 10m were designed for a deflection Charles King, is Senior Manager – Standards, at The Steel Construction
of L/300 under (Dead Load + Imposed Load), then the deflection under Institute.
Table 1. Vertical deflections: Values from Table NA1 of the Draft for Public Comment of the National Annex to BS EN 1990
Vertical total deflection Calculated from
dead + imposed loads
Member supporting partition walls
• Brittle (not reinforced) ≤ L/500
• Reinforced ≤ L/300
• Removable ≤ L/300
Ceilings
• Plastered ≤ L/300
• Suspended ≤ L/200
Roofing and Flooring
• Rigid (e.g. ceramic tiles) ≤ L/500
• Flexible (e.g. flexible floor covering) ≤ L/250
Table 2. Vertical deflections: Values from Table 8 of BS 5950-1: 2000
Vertical imposed load deflection
Cantilevers ≤ L/180
Beams carrying plaster or other brittle finish ≤ L/360
Other beams (except purlins and sheeting rails) ≤ L/200

Common questions

Powered by AI

The National Annex to BS EN 1990 provides examples of limiting values for horizontal deflections in Table NA2. Unlike Table 8 of BS 5950-1, it does not explicitly exclude portal frames. The update implies that conditions such as 'no cracking in bearing walls without reinforcement' and 'no cracking in partitions' are not relevant for typical portal construction, which often uses different detailing and materials that do not rely on these limits. This suggests a broader applicability of these deflection criteria across various structural systems, potentially increasing design stringency .

The natural frequency of floors is a significant design criterion in ensuring adequate dynamic response, particularly in long-span structures. The common practice is to design composite floors with a minimum natural frequency of 4Hz to mitigate undesirable vibrations. Calculations typically consider Dead Load plus 10% Imposed Load, approximated to 0.5 (Dead Load + Imposed Load), which are common practice mentioned in the Eurocode. A deflection limit of L/300 is usually sufficient and does not typically compromise the floor’s dynamic performance. This consideration is crucial as it helps to ensure structural comfort and functionality .

Assuming different mode shapes, like Mode B, can significantly impact the deflection limits and the calculated natural frequency in floor bay design. For instance, in a 10m x 10m internal floor bay with primary and secondary beams, Mode B assumptions help compute a natural frequency that aligns with the practical 4Hz target for dynamic performance. Adjustment in mode shapes can necessitate recalibration of deflection allowances, affecting the structural resilience and dynamic response, thus influencing the choice of L/300 or more restrictive limits .

The Draft National Annex to BS EN 1990 actively solicits feedback and comments from stakeholders involved in structural design by setting a deadline for feedback submission, which was 31 August 2003. Additionally, it provides formats for submitting comments and encourages communication with appropriate persons, such as the responsible committee secretary. This process aims to incorporate stakeholder insights, balancing practical design needs with evolving standards .

The economic implications of changing deflection criteria from BS 5950-1 to the draft National Annex to BS EN 1990 include potential cost increases due to stricter deflection limits. Designs that adhere to more conservative guidelines generally require additional material or intricate designs, inflating project budgets. Member companies, like those represented by the Steel Construction Institute, express concern that these disparities may drive costs without clear justification, pressuring stakeholders to scrutinize and respond critically to the proposals .

Client agreement in setting serviceability criteria is crucial, as highlighted by the National Annex to BS EN 1990, to ensure that specific project needs and expectations are met. The serviceability criteria provide a framework for comfort, aesthetics, and functionality, impacting long-term satisfaction and utility of the structure. This collaborative establishment of criteria helps accommodate unique project demands beyond generic guidelines, fostering tailored and client-aligned construction solutions .

According to the National Annex to BS EN 1990, the serviceability criteria for a structural design project should be specified for each project and agreed with the client. This involves using guidance such as the limiting values of vertical and horizontal deflections provided in Tables NA1 and NA2 for ensuring suitability against deformation. However, the specific criteria should be tailored to meet project requirements and client needs, given the guidelines are intended as general guidance, rather than stringent rules .

The deflection limits proposed in the National Annex to BS EN 1990 are more restrictive and onerous compared to those in BS 5950-1: 2000, especially considering the limits are calculated from dead plus live loads, rather than imposed loads only. As a result, these differences could lead to increased costs in structural design due to potentially more conservative design requirements being mandated without substantial justification. This disparity between codes raises concerns about cost-effectiveness and design feasibility if implemented broadly .

Table NA1's introduction may assuage concerns for longer-span floors, as the design criteria typically consider dynamic responses, like natural frequency, which often govern over static deflection limits. Floors are generally designed to meet a minimum natural frequency of 4Hz, mitigating excessive movements more effectively than stringent deflection limits alone. Therefore, while Table NA1 suggests more restrictive deflections, the governing dynamic criteria might reduce fears of over-design in longer span flooring systems .

In BS EN 1990, partial factors and load combination factors, denoted as ψ, play crucial roles in ensuring structural safety and serviceability. Partial factors account for uncertainties in load assumptions and material strengths, whilst combination factors adjust for differing simultaneous applications of loads. These factors collectively ensure that structures withstand both ultimate and serviceability limit states, enhancing reliability across varied loading scenarios .

Vertical imposed load deflection
Cantilevers
≤L/180
Beams carrying plaster or other brittle finish
≤L/360
Other beams (except

You might also like