Scribd
Upload
17 views2 pages

Understanding Modal Verbs for Permission

The document discusses different modal verbs and expressions used to talk about permission, obligation, necessity, and what is allowed or supposed to happen. It explains that "can, could, may, might" are used to ask for and give permission, "must/have to" express obligation, "need to/have to" or "don't need to/don't have to" indicate necessity, and "be able to, be allowed to, be permitted to, be supposed to/meant to, had better" have other specific meanings around ability, rules, and expectations. Examples are provided to illustrate the meanings and uses of each modal verb and expression.

Uploaded by

Miljana
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
17 views2 pages

Understanding Modal Verbs for Permission

The document discusses different modal verbs and expressions used to talk about permission, obligation, necessity, and what is allowed or supposed to happen. It explains that "can, could, may, might" are used to ask for and give permission, "must/have to" express obligation, "need to/have to" or "don't need to/don't have to" indicate necessity, and "be able to, be allowed to, be permitted to, be supposed to/meant to, had better" have other specific meanings around ability, rules, and expectations. Examples are provided to illustrate the meanings and uses of each modal verb and expression.

Uploaded by

Miljana
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Permission

 
can, could, may, might
 
The most common modal verbs to talk about permission are can, could, may and might.
 Can I sit here. (informal; asking for permission)
 You can/can’t sit here.
 Could I use this chair? (more polite)
 You may use this chair. (formal; giving permission)
 Might/May I use this chair. (more formal; asking for permission)
 Sorry, you can’t use this chair. (informal; refusing permission)
 Sorry, you may not use this chair. (formal; refusing permission)
 
was/were allowed to, couldn’t
 
To talk about the past, we use the forms was/were allowed to or couldn’t.
 He wasn’t allowed to sit down during the lesson.
 He couldn’t sit down during the lesson. 
 He was allowed to receive visits.  (NOT could)
 
Obligation
 
must / have to
 
Must and have to are used to express obligation. When we use must this usually means that the obligations comes from the speaker, it’s like a
personal obligation, whereas have to normally means that the obligation is external.
 I must give up smoking. (I need to, I say so)
 I have to give up smoking. (I’m obliged. My doctor says so)
In informal English can also use ‘ve got to to express obligation  (⇒ See Have – auxiliary or main verb).
 I’ve got to be there before ten. 
In the past, we use had to in every instance.
 I had to give up smoking. (because I needed to, or because my doctor forced me to).
 
mustn’t / don’t have to
 
The negative forms mustn’t and don’t have to are completely different. Mustn’t is used to express prohibition (an obligation not to do something),
whereas don’t have to is used to express an absence of obligation. (⇒ See Have to, must, should – obligation, prohibition, necessity, advice)
 You mustn’t reveal where you get the information. (=you have the obligation not to do it)
 You don’t have to arrive before 7. (=you can do it, but it’s not necessary, there’s no obligation)
 
Necessity
 
need to, have to, don’t need to, don’t have to
 
We use need to/have to or don’t need to/don’t have to + infinitive to say that something is or is not necessary.
 We need to/have to confirm our reservations before Friday. 
 You don’t need to/don’t have to believe in God to be a good person. 
 
don’t need to / needn’t
 
We can use both don’t need to or needn’t + infinitive to say that it is unnecessary to do something. However, when we are talking about a general
necessity (in general, not on one specific occasion), we normally use don’t need to, and we can use both don’t need to or needn’t + infinitive when
we are talking about a specific necessity (on one specific occasion).
 The doctor said I don’t need to wear glasses. (in general, all the time)
 Tell him he doesn’t need to/needn’t wash the dishes. I’ll do it later. (on one specific occasion)
 
didn’t need to / needn’t have
 
When something was not necessary but we did it, we can use both didn’t need to + infinitive and needn’t have + past participle.
 Thanks, it’s very beautiful, but you didn’t need to buy/needn’t have bought anything. (=you did it)
However, when something was not necessary and we did not do it, we can only use didn’t need to.
 I didn’t buy any groceries because Sarah told me I didn’t need to buy anything.  (NOT needn’t have bought)
 
be able to, be allowed to, be permitted to, be supposed/meant to, had better
 
be able to / be allowed to
 
We can use person + be able to / be allowed to instead of can to express permission or possibility. (⇒ See Can, could, be able to – ability and
possibility)
 We were allowed to eat all that we wanted. 
 You won’t be able to finish before the deadline. 
We do NOT use it + be able to/be allowed to.
 You are not allowed to use your mobile phones.  (NOT It isn’t allowed to use …)
 
it is (not) permitted to
 
We can use it + be (not) permitted to +infinitive to express permission or prohibition in formal or official situations, to say what the rules or laws are.
 It is not permitted to take photos of the archive documents. 
 Picnics are not permitted in the park. 
 
be supposed to / be meant to
 
We can also use be supposed/meant to + infinitive to express obligation or permission, to say what we should or shouldn’t do.
 We are supposed/meant to check in one hour before take-off.  
 What are you doing? You aren’t supposed/meant to be here.
 
had better, had better not
 
We use had better + infinitive (without to) to talk about actions we think someone should or shouldn’t do. There is often a negative result if the action
is carried out. We normally use the shortened form ‘d better, and the negative form is never contracted: ‘d better not. 
 We’d better hurry up/meant to check in or we’ll miss our train.  
 You’d better not tell her you broke the vase –she’ll get very mad.

Common questions

Powered by AI

'Need to' is used when referring to both specific and general necessities, such as "We need to confirm our reservations before Friday." 'Needn't', however, is typically used for specific occasions where it is identified that an action is not necessary, as in "You needn't wash the dishes. I’ll do it later" .

Past permissions can be expressed using 'was/were allowed to', implying formal permission, while prohibitions are indicated with 'couldn’t'. Necessity or the absence of necessity is communicated through 'neededn't have' for past unnecessary actions that were done, and 'didn’t need to' for when no such action was taken .

'Be able to' and 'be allowed to' substitute modals like 'can' for expressing ability or permission. For instance, "You are not allowed to use your mobile phones" replaces "You can’t use your mobile phones." 'Be supposed to' introduces obligation or informal rules, as in "We are supposed to check in one hour before take-off," indicating expectation rather than direct permission .

'Don’t have to' is often used over 'needn’t' when discussing general necessity as it clearly indicates that some action is not required, without the formality 'needn’t' might imply. For example, "You don’t have to believe in God to be a good person" emphasizes the absence of necessity in an everyday context .

The phrase 'it is (not) permitted to' is used in formal or official contexts to express rules or laws, such as "It is not permitted to take photos of the archive documents." This is more formal than using 'can' or 'may', which tailor to less structured settings. It provides an authoritative tone suitable for regulations .

'Didn’t need to' is used when an action was not necessary and was subsequently not done, as in "I didn’t buy any groceries because Sarah told me I didn’t need to buy anything." 'Needn’t have', on the other hand, is used when an action was taken even though it was unnecessary, as in "you didn’t need to buy/needn’t have bought anything" .

In present contexts, 'could' is a polite way of asking for permission, such as "Could I use this chair?" For past contexts, 'could' implies an ability or permission at that past time, (e.g., "He couldn’t sit down during the lesson" signifying a lack of permission action in the past).

'Must' expresses a personal obligation, suggesting an internal source, while 'have to' implies an external source of obligation such as a rule or someone else's demand. Negatively, 'mustn’t' indicates a prohibition, meaning it is forbidden to do something, while 'don’t have to' suggests there is no obligation, indicating it is not necessary to do something .

Modal verbs are used differently based on the formality of asking for or giving permission. 'Can' and 'can’t' are typically used for informal requests or refusals, while 'could' is more polite and 'may' or 'might' are considered more formal. For example, "Can I sit here?" is an informal request, whereas "May I use this chair?" is formal .

The expression 'had better' underscores advice or strong recommendation, usually with an implied negative consequence if not followed. For example, "You’d better not tell her you broke the vase" suggests that telling her would result in her becoming very mad. It denotes an advisable action to avoid potential negative outcomes .

You might also like