0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views3 pages

MATH2040A/B Homework 8 Solutions

This document contains solutions to homework problems involving eigenvalues and eigenvectors, diagonalization of matrices, and linear transformations. It finds the eigenvalues and determines diagonalizability of specific matrices. It also discusses properties of linear transformations T including their relationship to the matrices [T] representing them under different bases and the structure of their invariant subspaces.

Uploaded by

PerepePere
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views3 pages

MATH2040A/B Homework 8 Solutions

This document contains solutions to homework problems involving eigenvalues and eigenvectors, diagonalization of matrices, and linear transformations. It finds the eigenvalues and determines diagonalizability of specific matrices. It also discusses properties of linear transformations T including their relationship to the matrices [T] representing them under different bases and the structure of their invariant subspaces.

Uploaded by

PerepePere
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

MATH2040A/B Homework 8 Solution

 
1 1 0 1−λ 1 0

1. (f) For A =  0 1 2  , det(A − λI) = 0 1−1 2 = (1 − λ)2 (3 − λ).

0 0 3 0 0 3−λ
Hence the eigenvalues of A are λ = 1 or 3. For λ = 1,
   
0 1 0 0 1 0
RREF
A − λI =  0 0 2  −→  0 0 1 
0 0 2 0 0 0

then Eλ = span{(1, 0, 0)T }. Since γA (1) = 1, µA (1) = 2, A is not diagonalizable.


2. Denote β 0 = 1, x, x2 as the standard ordered basis of P2 (R). Then we have


 
     0 0 1
T x2 β 0 = x2 β 0 [x]β 0 [1]β 0 =  0 1 0 
 
[T ]β 0 = [T (1)]β 0 [T (x)]β 0
1 0 0
We proceeds to find the characteristic function of T , given by
 
−t 0 1  
−t 1
fT (t) = det ([T ]β 0 − tI3 ) = det  0 1−t 0  = (1−t) det = −(1−t)2 (t+1)
1 −t
1 0 −t
The characteristic polynomial of T splits. It follows that the root is given by λ1 = 1
and λ2 = −2, and their algebraic multiplicity is given by 2 and 1 respectively. We then
find the eigenspaces one by one.
− (λ1 = 1) The eigenspace associated with the eigenvalue λ = λ1 = 1 is given by
       
−1 0 1  1 0 
Eλ1 = N ([T ]β 0 − I3 ) = N  0 0 0  = t  0  + s  1  : t, s ∈ R
1 0 −1 1 0
 

Therefore, µT (1) = 2 = dim (Eλ1 ) =: γT (1)


− (λ2 = −1) The eigenspace associated with the eigenvalue λ = λ2 = −1 is given by
     
1 0 1  1 
Eλ2 = N ([T ]β 0 + I3 ) = M  0 2 0  = t  0  : t ∈ R
1 0 1 −1
 

Therefore, µT (−1) = 1 = dim (Eλ2 ) =: γT (−1)


As µT (1) = γT (1) and µT(−1) = γT (−1), it follows that T is diagonalizable.
As T is
diagonalizable, also β1 := (1, 0, 1)T , (0, 1, 0)T and β2 := (1,0, −1)T are the ordered
basis of Eλ1 and Eλ2 respectively. It follows that β := β1 ∪β2 = (1, 0, 1)T , (0, 1, 0)T , (1, 0, −1)T
is an ordered basis for V consisting of eigenvectors and hence
 
1 0 0
[T ]β =  0 1 0 
0 0 −1
   
5 0 1 2
3. Diagonalize the matrix A by Q−1 AQ = D with D = and Q = .
0 −1 1 −1
So we know that  n 
n −1 5 0
n
A = QD Q = Q Q−1 .
0 (−1)n

1
4. As [T ]β is upper triangular, denote the i -th diagonal entries as δi , then we have
n
Y
fT (t) = det ([T ]β − tI) = (δi − t) = 0
i=1

have the roots δ1 , · · · , δn , where n = dim(V ). As proven in the previous assignment,


[T ]β and T has same set of eigenvalues. Therefore, δ1 , · · · , δn is the set of eigenvalues
for T and hence it must be the case that λi appears mi times exactly within δ1 , · · · , δn .
The statement then holds.
5. (a) We may pick one basis α such that both [T ]α and [U ]α are diagonal. Let Q = [I]βα .
And we will find out that
[T ]α = Q−1 [T ]β Q
and
[U ]α = Q−1 [U ]β Q.
(b)Let Q be the invertible matrix who makes A and B simultaneously diagonalizable.
Say β be the basis consisting of the column vectors of Q. And let α be the standard
basis. Now we know that
−1
[T ]β = [I]βα [T ]α [I]α
β =Q AQ
and
−1
[U ]β = [I]βα [U ]α [I]α
β =Q BQ.
 
1 0
6. (e) No. For ∈ W, we have
0 2
 
0 2
T (A) = ∈
/ W.
1 0

7. Let {Wi }i∈I be the collection of T -invatirant subspaces and W be the intersection of
them. For every v ∈ W, we have T (v) ∈ Wi for every i ∈ I, since v is an element is each
Wi . This means T (v) is also an element in W .
8. (a) Let w be an element in W . We may express w to be
k
X
w= ai T i (v)
i=0

And thus we have


k
X
T (w) = ai T i+1 (v) ∈ W.
i=0

(b) Let U be a T -invariant subspace of V containing v. since it’s T invariant, we know


that T (v) is an element in U . Inductively, we know that T k (v) ∈ U for all nonnegative
integer k. By Theorem 1.5 we know that U must contain W .
Remark: Theorem 1.5: The span of any subset S of a vector space V is a subspace
of V. Moreover, any subspace of V that contains S must also contain the span of S
9. If w is an element in W, it’s a linear combination of
v, T (v), T 2 (v), . . .


So w = g(T )(v) for some polynomial g. Conversely, if w = g(T )(v) for some polynomial
g, this means w is a linear combination of the same set. Hence w is an element in W .
10. Define
   
0 0 ··· 0 −a0 −t 0 · · · 0 −a0

 1 0 ··· 0 −a1 


 1 −t · · · 0 −a1 

 0 1 ··· 0 −a2   0 1 ··· 0 −a2 
Ak =  ⇒ Ak −tIk = 
   
.. .. .. ..  .. .. .. .. 

 . . . . 


 . . . . 

 0 0 ··· 0 −ak−2   0 0 ··· −t −ak−2 
0 0 ··· 1 −ak−1 0 0 ··· 1 −ak−1 − t

2
Let P (n) be the statement that the characteristic polynomial of An is given by

(−1)n a0 + · · · + an−1 tn−1 + tn .





For n = 1, notice that A1 = −a0 − t = (−1)1 a0 + t1 . P (1) is true. Suppose P (k) is
true for some k ∈ N, i.e.
 
−t 0 · · · 0 −a0
 1 −t · · · 0 −a1 
 
 0 1 ··· 0 −a2 
 = (−1)k a0 + · · · + ak−1 tk−1 + tk

det (Ak − tIk ) = det  .
 
. .
. .
. .
.
 . . . . 
 
 0 0 · · · −t −ak−2 
0 0 · · · 1 −ak−1 − t

It follows that
 
−t 0 · · · 0 0 −a0

 1 −t · · · 0 0 −a1 


 0 1 ··· 0 0 −a2 

det (Ak+1 − tIk+1 ) = det 
 .. .. .. .. .. 
 . . . . . 


 0 0 ··· −t 0 −ak−2 

 0 0 ··· 1 −t −ak−1 
0 0 ··· 0 1 −ak − t
 ,
−t 0 · · · 0 0 −a0

 1 −t · · · 0 0 −a1


 0 1 ··· 0 0 −a2

= det 
 .. .. .. .. ..
 . . . . .


 0 0 ··· −t 0 −ak−2 

 0 0 ··· 1 −t −ak−1 − t 
0 0 ··· 0 1 −ak − t + 1

where the last equality follows from adding the second last column to the last column.
Consider expanding the above determinant along the last row, we obtained that
 
−t 0 · · · 0 0
 1 −t · · · 0 0 
 
 0 1 · · · 0 0 
det (Ak+1 − tIk+1 ) = − det (Ak − tIk ) + (−ak − t + 1) det  .
 
.. .. .. 
 .. . ··· . . 
 
 0 0 · · · −t 0 .
0 0 · · · 1 −t
k k−1
+ t + (−ak − t + 1) (−t)k
k

= −(−1) a0 + · · · + ak−1 t
= (−1)k+1 a0 + · · · + ak−1 tk−1 + tk + (−1)k+1 ak tk + tk+1 − tk
 

= (−1)k+1 a0 + · · · + ak−1 tk−1 + ak tk + tk+1




Therefore, P (k + 1) also holds. It follows by principle of mathematical induction


 that
the characteristic polynomial of A is (−1)k a0 + a1 t + · · · + ak−1 tk−1 + tk .

Common questions

Powered by AI

Polynomials help express vectors in T-invariant subspaces as linear combinations of vectors obtained by repeatedly applying the linear transformation T. For any vector w in a T-invariant subspace W, it can be represented as g(T)(v) for some polynomial g, where g(T) denotes the transformation formed by applying T in the polynomial form. This representation showcases how polynomials mediate between elements of the T-invariant set and the basis for space by con... Source 3 .

The eigenvalues of a matrix are the roots of its characteristic polynomial. The characteristic polynomial is formed by taking the determinant of the matrix A minus λ times the identity matrix, det(A - λI), where λ represents the eigenvalues. In Source 1, for matrix A, the characteristic polynomial is (1 - λ)^2(3 - λ), leading to eigenvalues λ = 1 and λ = 3 .

To diagonalize a matrix A, you need to find a matrix Q whose columns are the independent eigenvectors of A. The process involves forming a diagonal matrix D with eigenvalues on the diagonal and computing Q such that Q^{-1}AQ = D. In source 2, the matrix A is diagonalized using D = diag(5, -1) and Q formed from the eigenvectors. The transformation confirms that Q^{-1}AQ transforms A into its diagonal form, showing how A's linear transformation can be simplified when using a basis of its eigenvectors .

A matrix is diagonalizable if and only if the algebraic multiplicity of each eigenvalue equals the geometric multiplicity (or dimension of the eigenspace) associated with it. For example, in Source 2, the algebraic multiplicity of λ_1 = 1 is 2, and its eigenspace E_λ1 has dimension 2, thus satisfying the condition μ_T(1) = γ_T(1). Similarly, for λ_2 = -1, the algebraic multiplicity is 1, matching the dimension of eigenspace E_λ2, μ_T(-1) = γ_T(-1). Since all these conditions hold, the matrix is diagonalizable .

Two matrices are simultaneously diagonalizable if there exists a single invertible matrix Q that can diagonalize both matrices with the same transformation: Q^{-1}AQ and Q^{-1}BQ are both diagonal. This is possible if and only if A and B commute, meaning AB = BA. This commutation relationship is crucial because it ensures that A and B share the same eigenvectors, providing a common basis for diagonalization. Source 2 discusses finding a basis α such that [T]_α and [U]_α are diagonal, achieved by these conditions .

The characteristic polynomial splitting means it can be factored completely into linear factors over the field in consideration (typically real or complex numbers). This has significant implications for understanding the nature of a matrix, notably that if a polynomial splits, all its roots (eigenvalues) are present as real or complex numbers within the field, a prerequisite for diagonalizability. In Source 1, the splitting of f_T(t) = -(1-t)^2(t+1) ensures that the roots, eigenvalues λ_1 = 1 and λ_2 = -1, are readily accessible for the linear analysis of the transformation T .

T-invariant subspaces, which are subspaces preserved under a linear transformation T, provide fundamental insights into the transformation's structure. If W is T-invariant, applying T to any vector in W results in another vector in W, illustrating how parts of the space can be isolated and analyzed under T's influence. This concept is instrumental in examining how linear transformations decompartm... W is obtainable by these principles .

For an upper triangular matrix, the eigenvalues are given directly by its diagonal elements. Since an upper triangular matrix already partially simplifies to diagonal form, its characteristic polynomial is simply the product (δ_i - λ) for each diagonal entry δ_i. As shown in Source 2, [T]_β's eigenvalues match its diagonal elements, demonstrating this property .

Matrix A is not diagonalizable because the geometric multiplicity of the eigenvalue λ = 1 does not match its algebraic multiplicity. Specifically, the geometric multiplicity γ_A(1) is 1, whereas its algebraic multiplicity μ_A(1) is 2 (as seen from the power of (1 - λ) in the characteristic polynomial). This mismatch means that A lacks sufficient independent eigenvectors, a requirement for diagonalizability .

The Jordan canonical form provides a structure for non-diagonalizable matrices by arranging them into Jordan blocks. Each block corresponds to an eigenvalue and accounts for both its geometric and algebraic multiplicities by allowing off-diagonal entries of 1. This form highlights the defective nature of non-diagonalizable matrices, showing the linkage between eigenvalue multiplicities and revealing a near-diagonal structure even when actual diagonalization isn't possible [General knowledge].

You might also like