Scribd
Upload
46 views1 page

Gauge R&R Evaluation Sheet Guide

The document is a gauge repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) evaluation sheet. It evaluated 10 samples measured by 3 inspectors over 3 repetitions to measure the surface of a part. The analysis found the repeatability was 0.032, reproducibility was 0.007, and total variation was 0.037. The percentage of the total variation due to gage R&R was 87.9%, which did not pass the requirements.

Uploaded by

Fernando
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
46 views1 page

Gauge R&R Evaluation Sheet Guide

The document is a gauge repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) evaluation sheet. It evaluated 10 samples measured by 3 inspectors over 3 repetitions to measure the surface of a part. The analysis found the repeatability was 0.032, reproducibility was 0.007, and total variation was 0.037. The percentage of the total variation due to gage R&R was 87.9%, which did not pass the requirements.

Uploaded by

Fernando
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

(QRS2012 Section 2 "A-19 Gauge R&R Evaluation Sheet")

Gauge R&R Evaluation Sheet(Total Variation) Evaluation Date [Link].2017

Supplier Name For use of supplier's signature


Supplier Code

Part Name REINF HINGE LWR RH Gauge Name Taper gauge


Part Number DA6A-7003X Gauge No.
Mfg. Site

Quality Characteristic Surface 6.3W (CP) Number of Samples 10


Upper Limit(USL) 4.3 Number of Inspectors 3
Lower Limit(LSL) 2.3 Number of Repeat 3
Tolerance(Tol) 2
If Spec has only USL or LSL,the other cell should be blank.
Sample Average
Inspector 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1st 3.70 3.60 3.70 3.60 3.70 3.70 3.60 3.70 3.60 3.60 3.650
2nd 3.70 3.60 3.70 3.60 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.60 3.70 3.670
Inspector A
3rd 3.60 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.660
Average 3.67 3.63 3.70 3.63 3.70 3.70 3.67 3.67 3.60 3.63 a 3.660
a
Range 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.060
1st 3.70 3.70 3.60 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.60 3.60 3.70 3.70 3.670
2nd 3.70 3.60 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.60 3.70 3.680
Inspector B
3rd 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.60 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.60 3.70 3.70 3.680
Average 3.70 3.67 3.67 3.67 3.70 3.70 3.67 3.63 3.67 3.70 3.677
Range 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.060
1st 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.60 3.60 3.70 3.60 3.670
2nd 3.70 3.60 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.60 3.70 3.70 3.60 3.670
Inspector C
3rd 3.70 3.60 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.660
Average 3.70 3.63 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.63 3.63 3.67 3.60 3.667
Range 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.040
3.668
Average 3.69 3.64 3.69 3.67 3.70 3.70 3.66 3.64 3.64 3.64
𝑅! = 0.056
Aggregate Average 0.053
Aggregate Range ( Max ) - ( Min ) 0.017

Repeatability ＝ 0.053 x 0.5908 0.032


＝ 0.032

Reproducibility ＝ {(0.017 x 0.5231)^2 - (0.032 ^2/(10 x 3))}^1/2 0.007


＝ 0.007

Repeatability / Reproducibility ＝ {(0.032^2 + 0.007^2)}^1/2 0.032


＝ 0.032

Part Variation
＝ 0.056 x 0.3146 0.017
(PV)
＝ 0.017

Total Variation
＝ {(0.032^2 + 0.017^2)}^1/2 0.037
(TV)
＝ 0.037

% 87.9%
%GRR
＝ 100(0.032/0.037)
＝ 87.9% Result Not Passed
(Table1) (Table2)
*1: K1 is to be determined according to Table 1. Number of Repeat K1 Number of Inspectors K2
*2: K2 is to be determined according to Table 2. 2 0.8862 2 0.7071
*3: K3 is to be determined according to Table 3. 3 0.5908 3 0.5231
(Table3)
Number of Samples 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
K3 0.7071 0.5231 0.4467 0.403 0.3742 0.3534 0.3375 0.3249 0.3146

1/1

You might also like