CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHOD
This chapter discusses the research method applied in this research. It
consist of kind of the research, design of the research, subject of the research, area
of the research, procedure of the research, the criteria of success, research
instrument, and validity of the test.
3.1 Kind of the Research
According to Elliot (1991:69), Action Research might be defined as the
study of social situation with a view to improve the quality of action within it.
Arikunto (2010: 132) states that a classroom action research is an approach to
improve the quality of teaching learning process. Arikunto (2010: 128-129) also
states that the purpose of the classroom action research is to improve the quality
of teaching learning process and to solve the students’ problem.
3.2 Design of the Research
The classroom action research with cycle model is chosen as the research
design since this research is intended to improve the students’ pronunciation by
using tongue twister. This research is conducted collaboratively between the
researcher and the English teacher. Furthermore, Kemmis and Mc Taggart in
Arikunto (2013: 137) explain that there are four stages of activities in each cycle.
They are planning, implementing, observing and reflecting. If the results of the
18
19
first cycle does not achieve the target score, the action is continued to the second
cycle. The design of this action research is illustrated in the following diagram.
Figure 3.1 The Design of Classroom Action Research
Planning
Cycle 1
Reflecting Implementing
Observing
Planning
Reflecting Cycle 2 Implementing
Observing
?
(Adapted from Kemmis & Mc Taggart in Arikunto 2013: 137)
The diagram shows that there are four stages in each cycle. They are
planning, implementing, observing and reflecting. The planning is made by
considering the finding obtained from preliminary study. Then, teaching learning
process is conducted and the English teacher will observe it. Then, the result of
the observation is analyzed to evaluate wheter the action in the cycle is sucessful
or not. If the result of the cycle does not achieve the target score, the action is
continued to the next cycle until a success is reached.
20
3.3 Subject of the Research
The subjects of the research are taken from the eleventh grade students of
SMA Muhammadiah 3 Jember in 2015/2016 academic year. The researcher
chooses students of XI IPA 4 because they have problem in pronunciation. There
are thirty five students in the class.
3.4 Area of the Research
This research will be conducted at SMA Muhammadiyah 3 Jember. Some
reason are considered in choosing this school as the area of the research. First,
based on the English teacher information, the students of SMA Muhammadiyah 3
especially in XI IPA 4 had problems in pronunciation. Second, the school
principal gave permission to the researcher to conduct this classroom action
research at the school.
3.5 Procedure of the Research
Based on the research design, the actions of the research are implemented
in four stage, they are planning, implementing, observing and reflecting. Before
starting this research, the researcher must do of preliminary study. The step of the
research is formulated as follows:
3.5.1 Preliminary Study
This research was conducted at the eleventh grade students of SMA
Muhammadiyah 3 Jember in the 2015/2016 academic year on May 3rd– 30th, 2016.
To begin the research, the researcher held the preliminary study.
The methods of preliminary study used observation and interview the
English teacher to know students problem in pronunciation. In this preliminary
21
study, the researcher asks some questions about the activities in teaching and
learning process. Observation held in the class during the teaching and learning
process.
In the preliminary study, the English teacher asked the students to read a
text for the test. It was found the average of their pronunciation is 51 or 28.57%
students who got score ≥75. It means that students’ pronunciation was bad and
need to improve.
So, according the English teacher interview and the result of students’
score in preliminary study. It was found that some students cannot pronounce well
and cannot concentration to the teacher explanation. Based on those problems, the
researcher wants to conduct the research to improve students’ pronunciation by
using tongue twister.
3.5.2 Planning
Before the action implemented, some activities are done by researcher and
the English teacher as the preparation of the action in order to make the research
run effectively. These are activities consist of: designing the lesson plans, and
preparing the materials and media.
1. Designing the Lesson Plan
The lesson plan is intended to improve the students’ speaking especially
pronunciation ability. The researcher and the English teacher construct the lesson
plan for the action in the cycle 1 and cycle 2. There are 6 meetings, include the
test in the third meeting and sixth meeting. The activity in the lesson plan is
created to build an effective and enjoyable classroom situation, such as individual
tongue twister, pair tongue twister, etc. Those activities are expected to make the
22
students have motivation, interest and they will not shy in learning English,
especially pronunciation.
2. Preparing the Instructional Materials and Media
The materials that are used in this research are based on the materials that are
taught to the eleventh grade students. The researcher and the English teacher will
use students’ handbook and video as a media.
3.5.3 Implementing
Implementation is realization of some actions that has been planned
before. This classroom action research is possibly carried out in several cycles,
but the further cycle will be done if the previous cycle has not reached the target
average score of the students’ pronunciation. The actions of the cycles are
implemented during the school hours as it is written in the schedule of the English
subject. Each cycle is done in three meetings. In the implementation, the
researcher teaches pronunciation by using tongue twister as the action in order to
improve the students’ pronunciation.
In the first meeting, the researcher explains about tongue twister. Then, the
researcher show tongue twister phrases or sentences and ask students to read. The
researcher read tongue twisters and ask the students to follow. Then, the
researcher ask students to repeat and increase their speed. After that, the
researcher ask the students to make group in pair. The researcher give a tongue
twister card to each groups with different sounds and ask the students to practice
with their pair.
In the second meeting, the researcher continued the activities in the first
meeting and reviewed the material by asking some questions to the students about
23
tongue twister to know whether or not they still remembered about tongue twister.
If there were some students who still forgot and did not understand about it, the
researcher could remember the students again by re-explaining about tongue
twister briefly. And then, the researcher show of tongue twister phrases and
sentences. Then, ask the students to read and repeat it. After that, the researcher
show a video of tongue twister and the students watch and listen how to read
correct tongue twister. Then, the researcher give different tongue twister for each
students and ask to practice to read. After that, the researcher ask to students to
read their tongue twister and ask to increase their speed.
3.5.4 Observing
Observations means an activity to observe the result or the effect of the
actions that are done by the students. In this research, observation of the actions
are very important to control the students’ activities concerning with the
application of teaching word pronunciation using tongue twister.
Observation in this research is intended to evaluate the teaching and
learning process, the product and the evaluation of the teaching. In this research,
the researcher interview the English teacher about students’ pronunciation
problem and ask the score of the students. Then, the researcher collected the data
of the students. After that, the researcher and the English teacher will use checklist
in the cycle to note the students’ activities in teaching and learning process of
pronunciation. Observing is focused on the indicators of the participation of the
students’ active as passive involvement actively and passively in the teaching and
learning process of pronunciation.
24
The indicators here are the students’ participation in doing pronunciation
practice, the students’ participation in asking question, answering question, and
the students’ participation in reading tongue twister or text.
3.5.5 Reflecting
The reflection is conducted after doing observation. The aim of reflection
is to reflect descriptively the results of the action in the cycle. The data are
collected from testing pronunciation. The reflection is intended to know the
strength and weakness of the cycle. The reflection is done by the researcher and
the English teacher.
The collected data from the students’ pronunciation test in the cycle are
analyzed quantitatively. After that, the results of the data are analyzed to answer
the research problem. The formula is as follows:
n
E= x 100
N
Where:
E =The percentage of the students who scored ≥75
n = The number of the students who scored ≥75
N = The total number of students
(Adopted from Ali, 1998: 186)
3.6 The Criteria of Success
The criteria of success is used to know whether the implementation of the
action achieves the target or not. The criteria of success is designed to assess
25
students’ pronunciation by using tongue twister. It is designed to determine
whether the action throughout the cycle has already been successful or not. The
target score of pronunciation is 75. The actions will be successful if more than
75% of students achieve the target score. For active participation, the target active
participation is 75%. The action will be successful if more than 75% students
active during teaching and learning process by checklist number 3 of 4 aspects
fulfilled. Meanwhile, if the students cannot achieve the target score and active
participation in cycle, the action will be continued to the next cycle.
3.7 Research Instrument
3.7.1 Pronunciation Test
Test is used as the primary research instrument in this research. Test is a
set of question or exercise used to measure skill, knowledge, intelligence, and
aptitude of an individual or group (Arikunto 2006: 127). Test is used to measure
the students’ pronunciation achievement by reading a text. McMillan (1992: 114)
states a test is an instrument that present to each subject a standard set of questions
that require the completion of a cognitive task. Hughes (1996: 9) also states there
are four types of test, namely: proficiency test, diagnostic test, achievement test,
and placement test. In this action research, achievement test is used to know how
successful the individual students have achieved the goal of the teaching learning
process of pronunciation.
Achievement test is used in this research in order to know how successful
the individual students have achieved the goal of the teaching learning process in
achieving the subject. In this research, typical performance testis given in each
26
cycle after the actions given. The test item are construct based on indicator and all
words occurred in the test are taken from the compulsory book used by students.
In this research, the test is reading aloud. The students are asked to read
paragraph. The students pronounce the words individually. The students’
pronunciations are recorded. Then, the result of pronunciation is evaluated based
on indicators. The scoring of test is as follow:
Table 3.1 Scoring Rubric of Pronunciation Test
Points Criteria
1 ( Poor ) Frequent phonemic errors and foreign
stress and intonation pattern that
cause the speaker to be unintelligible.
2 ( Fair ) Frequent phonemic errors and foreign
stress and intonation pattern that
cause the speaker to be occasionally
unintelligible.
3 ( Good ) Frequent phonemic errors and foreign
stress and intonation patterns, but the
speaker is intelligible.
4 ( Excellent ) Occasional non-native pronunciation
errors, but the speaker is always
intelligible.
(Brown 2004: 148)
3.7.2 Observation Checklist
Observation that is done in this research is to measure the students’ active
participation in teaching and learning process. The researcher use checklist paper
as the instrument in the observation. The requirement of the students’ active to be
27
involved in the teaching and learning process is 75%. Doing pronunciation
practice, asking question, answering and reading tongue twister or text are the
indicators of active students. Meanwhile, never doing pronunciation practice,
asking question, answering and reading tongue twister or text are the indicators of
passive students. The students are considered as the active students when they
fulfill at least four indicators. The instrument used in this method is checklist
paper.
Table 3.2 Observation Checklist Paper
NO Name Indicators Active Passive
1 2 3 4
Notes:
1. Doing pronunciation practice
2. Asking question
3. Answering question
4. Reading the text
3.8 Validity of the Test
According to Arikunto (2010:11) an instrument will be valid if it measures
accurately what it is attended to measure. Validity is the degree to which a test
28
measures what it claims to be measured (Brown 2004: 22). In this research, the
researcher uses content validity because the test item is based on the curriculum.
This test is valid because the materials are constructed based on curriculum of
2013.
Table 3.3 The Syllabus of Curriculum of 2013
Competency Standard Test
4. Menganalisis fungsi Mengeksplorasi
social, struktur teks, dan
unsur kebahasaan dari siswa mencari beberapa text
teks biografi tentang biografi tokoh terkenal dari
tokoh terkenal, sesuai berbagai sumber.
dengan konteks Siswa berlatih menemukan
penggunaannya. gagasan utama, informasi
rinci dan informasi tertentu.
Siswa melengkapi rumpang
dari beberapa teks bigrafi
tokoh terkenal.
Siswa membaca teks
biografi tokoh terkenal
dengan menggunaka
unsur kebahasaan yang
tepat.
3.8.1 Reliability of the Test
According to Arikunto (2010: 221) reliability is how far the test or
instrument can be dependent upon. This means, when the researcher gives the test
to the students the result of the test must be the same or almost the same as the
result of another score. Arikunto (2010: 212) states that reliability is consistency
and dependability of the test. In other words, reliable is consistency or carefulness
of a certain instrument of evaluation. The test is reliable if it can be trusted,
consistent, stable and productive. To know whether the test item reliable or not,
the researcher use SPSS version 16.
29
The calculation of reliability is 0.709. It means that the reliability of the
test is “High Correlation”. So, the test is reliable.